UK manufacturing stabilises, but demand & costs remain challenging
Manufacturing output was broadly flat in the three months to July (weighted balance of -2 per cent), following a sharp decline in the previous quarter (-23 per cent). Although 12 out of 17 sub-sectors recorded lower output, gains in motor vehicles, transport equipment, and food, drink and tobacco helped offset the overall fall. Firms expect output to decline slightly over the next quarter (-6 per cent).
The UK manufacturing sector showed signs of stabilisation in July, but demand remained weak and cost pressures rose sharply, according to the CBI. Output was flat, new orders declined, and business sentiment fell further. Investment intentions stayed subdued due to demand uncertainty, low returns, and labour shortages. Rising input costs and limited export competitiveness continue to weigh on margins.
Demand conditions continued to weaken. Total new orders dropped 17 per cent, driven by a 16 per cent fall in domestic demand, while export orders remained flat. A further drop in total orders is expected by October (-18 per cent). Exporters face growing headwinds, with 56 per cent of firms citing pricing as a key constraint—up from 38 per cent in April—likely due to higher US tariffs and a stronger Sterling. Additionally, 20 per cent of firms pointed to quotas and licensing barriers, a level not seen since the 1980s.
Business sentiment continued to deteriorate in July, with optimism down 27 per cent (from -33 per cent in April) and export sentiment falling 26 per cent (from -35 per cent). Firms expect competitiveness to decline further in both EU (-10 per cent) and non-EU (-13 per cent) markets, after recording declines of -13 per cent and -23 per cent respectively—the latter marking the sharpest fall since 2005.
Investment intentions remain weak. Firms plan to cut spending on buildings (-28 per cent), plant and machinery (-15 per cent), training and retraining (-13 per cent), and product and process innovation (-6 per cent). The main constraints cited were demand uncertainty (50 per cent), inadequate returns (27 per cent), and labour shortages (21 per cent).
Cost pressures intensified, with average costs rising 63 per cent—the fastest pace since January 2023. Growth is expected to moderate by October (41 per cent). Domestic prices rose 33 per cent, while export prices increased 19 per cent; both are forecast to rise more slowly in the next quarter (+21 per cent and +1 per cent, respectively).
Stocks of work in progress declined sharply (-12 per cent), raw material inventories were stable (-1 per cent), and finished goods rose slightly (+3 per cent). All categories are expected to fall by October, with work in progress at its weakest forecast since January 2021 (-21 per cent), raw materials (-19 per cent), and finished goods (-6 per cent).
Employment in manufacturing fell for the third consecutive quarter (-11 per cent), with a marginal decline expected by October (-5 per cent). Skilled labour shortages continue to constrain output, cited by over one-quarter of firms.
'Conditions in UK manufacturing remain challenging, with many firms reporting subdued and unpredictable demand. High input costs, labour shortages and global supply chain disruptions are continuing to put pressure on margins and capacity,' said Ben Jones, lead economist at CBI. 'Rising labour costs have undermined manufacturers' external competitiveness. While some exporters are finding opportunities overseas, overall sentiment is cautious, with economic and policy uncertainty weighing heavily on investment decisions.'
'What manufacturers really need now is stability—starting with predictability in the tax environment, alongside delivery at pace on the government's industrial strategy, skills reforms and steps to bring down energy costs. As we look ahead to the Autumn Budget, government must work to reassure businesses to avoid additional uncertainty that could further weaken investment prospects.'
Fibre2Fashion News Desk (SG)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
11 minutes ago
- The Hindu
On SC directive, CBI registers 22 cases to probe alleged builders-banks nexus; conducts searches at 47 locations in NCR
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Wednesday (July 30, 2025) conducted searches at 47 locations in the national capital region (NCR) after registering 22 cases, on the Supreme Court directive, to probe the alleged nexus between builders and financial institutions for cheating homebuyers. Names of the companies and their top functionaries mentioned in these First Information Reports include Supertech Limited, AVJ Developers (India), Earthcon Universal Infratech, Rudra Buildwell Projects, Geotech Promoters, Shubhkamna Buildtech, Bulland Buildtech, Decent Buildwell, Rudra Buildwell Construction, Saha Infratech, and Dream Procon. Logix City Developers, Shubhkamna Buildtech, Jaypee Infratech, Sequel Buildcon, Ajnara India, Vatika Limited, CHD Developers Limited, Ninex Developers, Jaypee Sports International Limited/Jaiprakash Associates Limited, Idea Builders, and Manju J Homes India Limited have also been named, according to the agency. Hundreds of homebuyers in the NCR, being cheated by builders/developers and further aggrieved by the coercive action of financial institutions against them, had approached the Supreme Court seeking relief. Noting that they were cheated by innovating and introducing a 'subvention scheme' of home loans, the Court had in April directed the CBI to institute seven preliminary enquiries. Accordingly, the agency completed its inquiry in six matters within three months and submitted a status report before the Court. 'Upon perusal of the status report submitted by the CBI, the Hon'ble SC directed the CBI to register 22 regular cases, against different builders in the NCR area and unknown officials of financial institutions,' the agency said, adding that the searches were conducted in Delhi, Gurugram, Noida, Greater Noida, and Ghaziabad. In the FIR against Supertech, the agency alleged the builders — in connivance with banks/financial institutions, —innovated the subvention scheme for sale of its nine residential projects stating 'No Pre-EMI till delivery of possession of residential unit', thereby lured homebuyers for booking/purchasing residential units. While the projects were launched from 2010 to 2017, Supertech started defaulting on payment of EMIs in 2018-2019 and neither constructed/completed the project nor continued to pay pre-EMI/EMI as promised till handing over the possession of flats to homebuyers. Their deposits were also not refunded, as alleged. The agency found that the banks started deducting EMI from homebuyers and in the event of default reported their accounts as non-performing asset and therefore, their CIBIL score were adversely impacted. Among the accused persons in the case are unknown officials of erstwhile Indian Bank, ICICI Bank, Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited, HDFC Housing Finance Limited, PNB Housing Finance, India Infoline Housing Finance, L&T Housing Finance, and Aditya Birla Housing Finance. Similar instances were found in other projects in question. In the various FIRs, the role of unknown officials of banks and financial institutions such as the State Bank of India, formerly State Bank of Travancore, UCO Bank, Reliance Housing Finance Limited, Axis Bank, Tata Capital Housing Finance, Diwan Housing Finance Limited, Central Bank of India, Samman Capital Limited, and Punjab National Bank will also be investigated by the agency.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Trumpland: What if the world turned US trade war back on America?
AI image Tariff' Trump has announced a 25% levy on Indian goods entering US starting tomorrow, coupled with a penalty for India's continued oil and defence purchases from Russia. Prefixing his announcement on Truth Social with 'while India is a friend', the US president has sought to punish India for asserting sovereign choices in trade and foreign policy. With friends like this, who needs friends? The irony is poetic: the self-declared custodian of free trade is now its most protectionist offender. Economics is built around the principle of movement: of goods, capital, labour and data. This isn't just ideology, it's the physics of prosperity. Yet, the US, once the world's most vocal advocate for free markets, is, in the form of Trumpland, its most disruptive force. From semiconductor export bans and weaponised sanctions to unilateral tariffs and extraterritorial dictates, Trumpland has turned the global economy into a minefield of exceptions, exclusions and coercion. So, here's the question that can now be asked aloud: what if the rest of the world sanctioned the US? What if countries collectively paused the flow of rare earths, APIs, industrial machinery, telecom infrastructure, even data? Could the US survive the very conditions it imposes on others? In 2024, US goods imports hit a record $3.3 tn, while exports reached $2.1 tn, pushing goods trade deficit to $1.2 tn, a 14% increase from the previous year. Even after including services like finance and travel, total trade deficit stood at $918 bn, up 17%, the second highest on record. Trade gap with China grew to $295 bn, a clear sign of ongoing reliance. Beyond China, the US remains critically dependent on imports for over 221 essential goods, including microchips and battery components, with foreign sourcing levels between 90% and 100%. China supplies 70% of rare earths, and dominates the global graphite supply chain. Other key materials like lithium and cobalt are also heavily imported from countries like Chile, Canada and Argentina. In total, just four trading partners — China, the EU, Mexico and Canada — each account for more than 10% of US import value. These are not discretionary purchases, but foundational components of American industry. The US is not merely part of global supply chains, but also structurally dependent on them, never mind all that talk of decoupling and University's Budget Lab assessed that the US' 2025 tariff surge has raised its average effective tariff rate to 22.5%, the highest since 1909. This policy shift has led to a 2.3% rise in consumer prices, costing the average household $3,800 annually. Lower-income families are hit hardest, with those in the second income decile losing $1,700 a GDP growth is expected to drop by 0.9 percentage points in 2025. Long-term output is projected to remain 0.6% smaller, a permanent loss of around $180 bn a year. Exports have declined by 18.1%. Prices for essentials have spiked, with apparel up 17%, food nearly 3% higher, and new cars costing an extra $4,000 on from protecting the economy, Trump tariffs are eroding household income, slowing growth and adversely affecting America's economic Walter Scheidel explains in his 2017 book, The Great Leveler, entrenched systems rarely reform themselves through negotiation alone. Meaningful redistribution often follows rupture rather than consensus. So, what might rupture look like today? Imagine the world's major exporters including Europe, China, India, Asean and Latin America agreeing to a coordinated pause in shipments to the US. No semiconductors, no APIs, no telecom equipment. In a matter of weeks, American production lines would slow, inflation would surge, and financial markets would be rattled. It would serve as a powerful reminder that the US economy is not insulated by exceptionalism. It operates on the consent and cooperation of the rest of the world. This isn't about restoring balance. It's a call to deliberately hit the US economy where it hurts, to expose the double standards that define today's global order. In any functioning market, domestic or global, rules matter not only because they enable exchange but also because they constrain abuse. Participation in global trade is characterised by the principle of mutualism and benefits will flow only as long as responsibilities are this fundamental point, the US' economic bullying undermines not just the trust but the very ethos of the current global economic system. The world, India included, now faces a pivotal question. Should it continue to accommodate this exception, or begin to act as a collective? A coordinated stand by global exporters, in defence of systemic integrity, would affirm that globalisation is not the privilege of a single actor but the shared project of many. If the international order is to survive, it must demonstrate that no participant is above its rules. Trumpland may yet learn that the system the US helped create can continue to evolve without its dominance. And that the invisible hand, if constrained long enough, may simply withdraw its reach from the United States. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Regulators promote exchanges; can they stifle one? Watch IEX Jane St: How an options trader smelt a rat when others raised a toast TCS job cuts may not stop at 12,000; its bench policy threatens more From near bankruptcy to blockbuster drug: How Khorakiwala turned around Wockhardt Stock Radar: SBI Life rebounds after testing 50-DEMA; could hit fresh record highs above Rs 2,000 – check target & stop loss These 10 banking stocks can give more than 25% returns in 1 year, according to analysts Two Trades for Today: A metals stock for an over 6% gain, a large-cap chemicals maker for about 7% upmove F&O Radar| Deploy Broken Wing in LIC Housing Finance to benefit from bearish outlook
India Today
3 hours ago
- India Today
CBI crackdown on NCR builders cheating homebuyers, 22 cases after 47 raids
In a major crackdown on builders accused of cheating and defrauding thousands of homebuyers in the National Capital Region (NCR), and to investigate the nexus between builders and officials of financial institutions, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has registered 22 cases against various NCR builders and unidentified officials of financial were conducted at 47 locations, including Delhi, Gurugram, Noida, Greater Noida, and Ghaziabad. The CBI seized various incriminating documents and digital evidence during these operations, shedding light on the complexity of the builder-financial institution Supreme Court had earlier directed the CBI to probe the allegations after homebuyers filed special leave petitions (SLPs), citing coercive actions from financial institutions. The court's instructions led to the CBI registering seven preliminary enquiries in April 2025. Following a comprehensive investigation, the CBI completed six out of the seven preliminary enquiries within three months and submitted a status report to the Supreme Court. The investigation revealed a problematic 'Subvention Scheme' for home loans, which allegedly facilitated the Supreme Court, upon reviewing the CBI's report, instructed the agency to register 22 regular cases against various builders and unknown financial institution officials in the NCR. This directive is part of broader efforts to address the grievances of crackdown is expected to have significant implications for the real estate and financial sectors, potentially leading to stricter regulatory measures. The investigation is still ongoing as authorities attempt to trace the extent of the financial irregularities involved.- EndsMust Watch
