Conservative law to ban phones in schools is ‘gimmick', Education Secretary says
The Education Secretary has rejected calls to bring in a new law to ban phones in classrooms, as she branded the Conservative Party's proposal a 'headline-grabbing gimmick'.
Bridget Phillipson said she agreed that mobile phones should not be in lessons, but added the opposition were wrong to say it could only be done by introducing legislation.
She also told MPs the academies movement will 'continue to flourish' despite a letter from the Children's Commissioner Dame Rachel de Souza which said it would lead to children being in failing schools for longer.
The Conservative party said last week that it would table an amendment to the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill that would require the Government to ban phones in classrooms.
Shadow education secretary Laura Trott asked Ms Phillipson whether she would support her party's plans.
To fix the problem, guidance needs to be put on a statutory footing
Laura Trott
She said: 'We know that smartphones in the classroom have a negative impact on reading and educational attainment of children in general.
'When in government, we issued guidance to try to ban smartphones in the classroom, but the latest evidence is clear that they are still far too prevalent in schools.
'So to fix the problem, guidance needs to be put on a statutory footing.
'Does the Education Secretary agree that children's education outcomes are negatively affected by smartphones, and if she does, will she back our amendment to ban them from the classroom?'
Under former prime minister Rishi Sunak, the then-Conservative government issued non-statutory guidance to schools in England intended to stop the use of mobile phones during break and lunch periods in schools, as well as in lessons.
Ms Phillipson referenced the previous Government's approach to phones inside schools and said nothing had changed.
The Conservative Party tried to block the schools Bill earlier this month amid calls for a new public inquiry into grooming gangs.
Replying during Education Questions in the House of Commons on Monday, Ms Phillipson said: 'I agree that phones have no place in the classroom. It is entirely right that schools take firm action to stop their use, and I know that that is what the vast majority of schools already do.
'As (Ms Trott) just said, last July, they said that they didn't need to legislate in this area. Nothing has changed in this time. I back the approach that they took in July in this area.
'Yet again, another headline-grabbing gimmick. No plans to drive up standards in our schools.
Yet again, another headline-grabbing gimmick. No plans to drive up standards in our schools
Bridget Phillipson
It came as the Conservatives urged the Government to listen to concerns raised by the Children's Commissioner about Labour's schools reforms.
Ms Trott and Tory whip Nick Timothy referenced the letter sent by Dame Rachel to MPs, which said she could not support the plans as they stood. The Bill includes the removal of the requirement for failing schools to be automatically converted into academies.
Before taking on her position, Dame Rachel was co-founder and chief executive of the Inspiration Trust – a multi-academy trust with 17 primary and secondary schools in Norfolk and north Suffolk. It also has five sixth forms.
In written evidence for the Bill, she said: 'I am deeply concerned that we are legislating against the things we know work in schools, and that we risk children spending longer in failing schools by slowing down the pace of school improvement.'
Ms Trott told MPs: 'Just today, we had another voice come out against the disastrous academy proposals in the Government's Bill. The Children's Commissioner in a scathing letter said that ending the academy order to turn around failing schools will mean, and I quote, 'that children will spend longer in failing schools'.
'Her own backbenchers have said that ending the academy order would be a huge mistake and will weaken standards.
'Instead of running all her policy past unions, who are more interested in their own power than teachers' pay, will the Education Secretary listen to the Children's Commissioner, her own backbenchers and headteachers up and down the country?'
Mr Timothy said: 'The Children's Commissioner says the Government is legislating against things we know work in schools. Katharine Birbalsingh says the Schools Bill is 'catastrophic'. Sir Dan Moynihan asks why are we doing this.
'So why does the Education Secretary think she knows more about education than the Children's Commissioner, the head of the best school in the country and the head of the best academy trust?'
Replying to Ms Trott, Ms Phillipson said: 'It was a Labour government that created the academies movement, and a Labour government will ensure they continue to flourish. But the party opposite left 1,000 failing schools which continued to let down more than 400,000 children year after year.
'We will intervene more rapidly and more effectively to turn it around. The party opposite have nothing to say on school standards, more interested in their own record than best outcomes for children.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Is this the worst Labour MP in parliament?
The publication of Louise Casey's report into rape gangs was a sobering affair. But not, apparently, for Shaun Davies, Labour MP for Telford since July 2024. He previously served as the Shropshire town's council leader from 2016 to 2024. More than 1,000 children in Telford were sexually exploited over decades, according to the Independent Inquiry for Child Sexual Abuse in 2022. Davies decided that yesterday was the perfect time to stand up in the House of Commons and criticise the Conservative government for not themselves investigating grooming gangs. He told the House that: 'We did a local-based review because the then Home Secretary, Amber Rudd, and the then local government Minister, Rishi Sunak, refused to provide a statutory inquiry into Telford.' Yet, as council leader, Davies signed a letter to Rudd in September 2016, asking her not to investigate Telford. The crucial paragraph of the two page-letter is the following: 'Given the recent findings of Ofsted and the fact that the Government's own independent inquiry, chaired by Alexis Jay, is already committed to looking at what happened here in Telford, we do not feel at this time that a further inquiry is necessary.' As Kemi Badenoch wrote on X after yesterday's debate: This Labour MP will be exposed soon enough. He sat in the chamber trembling, made this outrageous statement and ran off. He was of course the council leader in Telford who actively requested no national investigation and has the cheek to smear Amber Rudd and Rishi Sunak. You can read the full incriminating letter here. Over to you Davies…
Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
Calls to change free bus travel scheme for people over 60 nears important UK Government milestone
The national entitlement scheme operates UK-wide but there are different eligibility age rules under devolved governments. Pension Credit – Could you or someone you know be eligible? Nearly 80,000 people have signed an online petition supporting calls for changes to be made to the English National Concessionary Travel Scheme (ENCTS) and bring it into line with the same service provided by the Scottish Government for people over 60 living north of the border. People can sign the e-petition until Friday, June 27 and if it reaches 100,000 signatures of support, it will be considered by the Petitions Committee for debate in Parliament. Petition creator Karen Hickman argues the current scheme is 'unjust' and calls for 'equality for everyone over 60'. The campaigner explained people in England, living outside London, are not entitled to free bus travel until they reach State Pension age - 66 for both men and women - which she believes has 'changed dramatically.' The 'extend free bus travel for people over 60 in England' petition states: 'We call on the Government to extend free bus travel to all people over 60 years old in England outside London. We believe the current situation is unjust and we want equality for everyone over 60. 'Currently, people in England who do not live in London are not entitled to free bus travel until they reach the state pension age, which we believe has changed dramatically. As people get older some over 60s drive less and less, therefore we believe we need equality on public transport. 'It would mean England had the same provision as Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.' Earlier this month, Labour MP Markus Campbell-Savours has urged the UK Government to consider the 'potential impact of introducing free bus passes for people aged 60 and over on social inclusion, the economy and the environment. The written question from the Penrith and Solway MP is similar to the proposal put forward in the petition by Ms Hickman. In a written response, Transport Minister Simon Lightwood, explained how the ENCTS costs around £700 million annually and 'any changes to the statutory obligations would therefore need to be carefully considered for its impact on the scheme's financial sustainability'. He continued: ' No assessment has been made of the potential impact of lowering the age on social inclusion, the economy or the environment.' However, he added that local authorities in England have the power to offer concessions in addition to their statutory obligations, which includes lowering the age of eligibility. He explained that 'additional local concessions are provided and funded by local authorities from local resources'. Mr Lightwood added: 'Funding allocated to local authorities to improve services for passengers can be used in whichever way they wish. This could include extending the discretionary concessions available in local areas to support the local economy and environment.' There are two broad categories of people eligible for the English National Concessionary Travel Scheme - older people and eligible disabled people. Both men and women are eligible for concessionary travel in England when they reach state pension age, 60 in Scotland. Eligibility for concessionary travel may vary depending on local authorities and the specific terms of the concessionary travel scheme in place. National Entitlement Card in Scotland In Scotland, people over 60 are eligible to apply for the National Entitlement Card (NEC), which is administered by the Scottish Government. It is Scotland's National Smartcard, offering access to many public services across the country. The card gives elderly and disabled people free bus travel across Scotland and, through the Strathclyde Concessionary Travel Scheme, also provides reductions on train, Subway and ferry fares. The NEC is valid for up to three years, but in a change to the renewal process, SPT no longer sends out renewal forms to disabled card holders. This means everyone with a card - sometimes referred to as a 'Saltire card' - should check the expiry date to make sure they will be able to enjoy uninterrupted entitlement to travel concessions. SPT recommends applying for a renewal card at least five weeks before the expiry date. It's also important to be aware guidance on the SPT website states the Concessionary Travel Card Unit at Buchanan Bus Station will be closed for in person applications until further notice.
Glasgow Times
2 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Report criticises ‘major failing' to gather ethnicity data on grooming gangs
Officials have dodged the issue of ethnicity among the groups of sex offenders for fear of being called racist, even though available data showed suspects were disproportionately likely to be Asian men, the Home Secretary told the House of Commons. Speaking as a review of grooming gangs by Baroness Casey was published on Monday, Yvette Cooper told MPs: 'While much more robust national data is needed, we cannot and must not shy away from these findings, because, as Baroness Casey says, ignoring the issues, not examining and exposing them to the light, allows the criminality and depravity of a minority of men to be used to marginalise whole communities.' She said Baroness Casey found examples of organisations 'avoiding the topic altogether for fear of appearing racist or raising community tensions'. Yvette Cooper makes a statement in the House of Commons on grooming gangs (House of Commons/UK Parliament/PA) Ms Cooper said: 'These findings are deeply disturbing, but most disturbing of all, as Baroness Casey makes clear, is the fact that too many of these findings are not new.' Currently ethnicity is only recorded for around 37% of suspects. The report found that: 'The appalling lack of data on ethnicity in crime recording alone is a major failing over the last decade or more. Questions about ethnicity have been asked but dodged for years. 'Child sexual exploitation is horrendous whoever commits it, but there have been enough convictions across the country of groups of men from Asian ethnic backgrounds to have warranted closer examination. 'Instead of examination, we have seen obfuscation. In a vacuum, incomplete and unreliable data is used to suit the ends of those presenting it. The system claims there is an overwhelming problem with white perpetrators when that can't be proved. 'This does no-one any favours at all, and least of all those in the Asian, Pakistani or Muslim communities who needlessly suffer as those with malicious intent use this obfuscation to sow and spread hatred.' Baroness Casey called the crimes of grooming gangs 'one of the most heinous' in society (James Manning/PA) Ms Cooper unveiled the findings from the rapid national audit to MPs, after the Prime Minister committed to launching a national inquiry into the abuse. She gave 'an unequivocal apology for the unimaginable pain and suffering' that victims had faced, and 'the failure of our country's institutions through decades.' Children's Commissioner Dame Rachel de Souza said: 'The girls at the heart of this scandal have been failed by every professional in their lives. 'They, and the institutions that were intended to protect them, ignored their voices and sidelined their experiences. 'They must be held accountable for turning a blind eye to a sustained campaign of violence against young girls by predatory men. This is a source of national shame.' The National Crime Agency (NCA) will carry out a nationwide operation targeting people who have sexually exploited children, and follow up on an estimated more than 1,000 cold cases where no one was convicted. The gangs' harrowing crimes have typically targeted children, mainly girls, as young as 10, some of whom were in care, had physical or mental disabilities, or who had already suffered neglect or abuse. Baroness Casey's review looked at around a dozen live investigations into grooming gangs, and found 'a significant proportion of these cases appear to involve suspects who are non-UK nationals and/or who are claiming asylum in the UK.' The Home Secretary has pledged to exclude convicted sex offenders from the asylum system. In her report, Lady Casey said it is time to draw a line in the sand and take action over the issue, which she called 'one of the most heinous crimes in our society'. Her report concluded: 'Unless government and all the organisations involved are able to stand up and acknowledge the failures of the past, to apologise for them unreservedly, and to act now to put things right, including current cases, we will not move on as a society.' Speaking in Westminster, Lady Casey called for an end to 'political football' over the scandal, adding: 'I think it would be a real shame if politicians from the opposition parties and people in wider society didn't see that this is a chance to create a national reset, that the only thing that really matters is the protection of children.' The Government has accepted her recommendation that any adult man who has penetrative sexual activity with a child under 16 will face a mandatory rape charge. Police forces will be made to gather data on the ethnicity and nationality of child abusers, and rules for the licensing of taxi drivers will also be tightened to stop drivers operating outside the area where they are licensed.
