logo
Issue 155: Singapore's natural gas challenge; Temasek keeps bets on renewables

Issue 155: Singapore's natural gas challenge; Temasek keeps bets on renewables

Business Times18-07-2025
This week in ESG: Singapore approves carbon capture and storage studies; Temasek explains 'geopolitically resilient' thesis
Energy transition
Singapore's tough choices on natural gas
As Singapore looks more seriously into carbon capture and storage (CCS), it needs to begin making some tough decisions about its power sector's heavy reliance on natural gas.
Singapore's Energy Market Authority (EMA) is advancing CCS feasibility studies in the power sector, with co-funding approvals for five site-specific projects that will be undertaken by Keppel's infrastructure division, PacificLight Power and YTL PowerSeraya. All the plants involved in the studies use natural gas, which is primarily methane.
CCS refers to solutions that extract carbon dioxide from emissions sources such as power plants or industrial facilities, then permanently store the captured carbon. Carbon capture is distinct from carbon removal, which refers to solutions that extract carbon that is already in the atmosphere.
The feasibility studies will explore two different CCS approaches. The first is pre-combustion CCS, which extracts carbon from natural gas before combustion; the process leaves behind hydrogen, which is used to generate power. The second solution is post-combustion CCS, where an on-site unit captures carbon emissions after the natural gas is burned for power.
A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU
Friday, 12.30 pm ESG Insights
An exclusive weekly report on the latest environmental, social and governance issues.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The studies will help EMA to assess the feasibility of using CCS to decarbonise Singapore's power sector, and to identify infrastructure and site-specific requirements, the agency said.
The need
Singapore relies on natural gas for more than 90 per cent of its electricity generation.
If Singapore is to meet its climate targets, it will need to address the emissions from its power sector. The most effective way to decarbonise the sector would be to replace natural gas with lower-carbon alternatives, but the fossil fuel is proving difficult to replace.
The country's decarbonisation strategy for the power sector rests on four pillars: solar, regional power grids, emerging low-carbon alternatives and natural gas.
While solar power is the most mature and economically feasible solution, it also requires a lot of land, which Singapore does not have. The country's 2030 target for 2 Gigawatt-peak (GW-peak) of solar capacity will be enough to meet only 3 per cent of total projected electricity demand that year.
Electricity imports via regional power grids have seen considerable progress with conditional approvals for 10 projects granted so far. Six of those have progressed to conditional licences, but are still far from actual operations – the projects must still obtain relevant regulatory approvals in all relevant jurisdictions, achieve financial close, build, test and commission before commercial operations can begin. Singapore is aiming to secure 6 GW of electricity imports by 2035.
The emerging low-carbon alternatives are, as the term suggests, still nascent, with considerable uncertainties about feasibility and long timelines if viable. These alternatives include CCS, as well as low-carbon hydrogen, nuclear and hydrothermal power.
The reality is that many questions remain about how Singapore will be able to wean itself off natural gas. As EMA says on its website, 'natural gas remains a key fuel source' while Singapore scales up renewable energy deployment.
An important natural gas strategy for Singapore is therefore improving the efficiency and reducing the emissions of natural gas electricity production. If CCS works well enough, it could extend the window for natural gas in Singapore's power supply mix.
The risk
CCS is no silver bullet.
The technology faces considerable feasibility challenges. In terms of emissions reduction, CCS faces some inefficiencies that can be quite considerable. This is especially so for Singapore, which does not have any suitable domestic storage capacity and must therefore transport the captured carbon to wells in neighbouring countries. These circumstances raise the risk of leakage during transportation and storage.
CCS solutions also require energy input. A grid that is predominantly reliant on natural gas reduces the net reduction of CCS.
CCS is also costly. A study commissioned by the Singapore government and published in 2021 estimated that CCS for Singapore's energy and chemicals sectors would face a weighted average cost of US$85 per tonne of carbon dioxide. For natural gas power, the estimated CCS cost is US$100 per tonne.
At that price, it's debatable whether power producers will voluntarily adopt CCS. For instance, Singapore's carbon tax is only S$25 per tonne of carbon dioxide at the moment. The rate will increase to S$45 per tonne in 2026 and 2027, with a policy target to reach S$50 to S$80 per tonne by 2030. From a business standpoint, a power plant operator would be better off paying the tax than investing in CCS.
The decisions
CCS can only be a stopgap for Singapore's power sector. It's expensive, and eventually there won't be enough room to store all of that carbon. There's no escaping the eventual need to shift away from natural gas towards lower-carbon alternatives if Singapore intends to hit its climate targets. The country has committed to achieving peak emissions and then reducing emissions to about 60 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (MtCO2e) by 2030. By 2035, Singapore aims to reduce emissions to between 45 and 50 MtCO2e. The goal for 2050 is net-zero emissions.
However, while Singapore has articulated plans for increasing capacity for solar and electricity imports, it's less clear how the country plans to reduce its use of natural gas. If natural gas is intended to be a transition fuel for Singapore, that intention should ideally be supported by a transition plan.
It's understandably challenging for the country to commit to winding down natural gas when it's still unclear which of the emerging low-carbon alternatives can replace it. Nevertheless, it's worth taking a harder look at the extent to which better guidance can be given about the transition strategy. For example, could Singapore commit to some limits on new natural gas power infrastructure?
That visibility is important because the returns from infrastructure and research can take a long time to manifest. Is it worth building pipelines to transport captured carbon to sequestration wells in Malaysia? Should Singapore build new natural gas power plants? What's the best way to allocate Singapore's budget for decarbonising the power sector? Would Singapore have to revise its climate goals?
There are no easy answers for Singapore on the natural gas problem. But it's also a good idea not to leave too many unanswered questions.
Sustainable investing
Temasek still hot on renewables
Good news for renewable energy companies: Singapore government investment firm Temasek thinks renewable energy technologies remain good investments.
Temasek's thesis is that there are compelling opportunities within the sector that are geopolitically resilient, at scale and with more predictable outcomes.
For example, solar energy projects with energy storage are cheap, quickly deployable, inflation-protected and cashflow-generating, says Temasek chief sustainability officer Park Kyung-Ah.
Furthermore, concerns about policy headwinds may have negatively affected valuations for some companies in the space. But where the concerns are short-term, a long-term investor like Temasek could see a buying opportunity.
Temasek's rationale seems sound. Perhaps some solar panel makers may not be great investments amid a supply glut and rock-bottom prices, but they don't form the entire renewables supply chain. Cheap solar panels can be a boon for installers and project developers.
Cheap solar cells are also fuelling a significant rise in solar power capacity, which leads to increased demand for firming infrastructure such as energy storage and smarter grids. The International Energy Agency estimates that between 2024 and 2030, solar power will account for 80 per cent of growth in global renewables capacity. As Park says, the economics behind these trends are compelling enough to provide some insulation from political volatility.
But there are long-term risks in the sector as well. For instance, the solar supply chain has yet to fully confront end-of-life issues, especially with most installed capacity still relatively young. Without good solutions, demand for solar electricity could cool in the future when old, unusable panels pile up.
That said, the wind sector has not fared as well as solar. Because of high upfront investment costs and long build times, the technology is more exposed to inflation and interest rates, both of which have not been favourable in recent years. Wind projects are also more susceptible to politics, as changes of control in government can lead to cancellations. Wind, which has dominated the renewables sector over the past two decades, is expected to cede the leading spot to solar before 2030.
The lesson here is that the recent changes in policies and macroeconomic conditions have not hit the renewables sector uniformly. There are winners and losers, and taking the time to figure out who they are could be a profitable exercise.
Other ESG reads
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Singapore eyes breakthrough in landmark regional clean-power deal by October: EMA chief
Singapore eyes breakthrough in landmark regional clean-power deal by October: EMA chief

Business Times

time10 hours ago

  • Business Times

Singapore eyes breakthrough in landmark regional clean-power deal by October: EMA chief

[SINGAPORE] The Republic hopes that talks on how to charge for clean electricity flowing across four South-east Asian nations could be finalised by October, paving the way for it to expand imports under a landmark regional grid deal that could deliver up to 200 megawatts (MW) of renewable power, said a top executive of the city-state's energy authority. The parties in the four-way agreement involving Laos, Thailand, Malaysia and Singapore are 'looking through what are the transmission charges – or sometimes they call it wheeling charges – the different grid operators will impose', Puah Kok Keong, chief executive of the Energy Market Authority (EMA), told The Business Times in an interview. Wheeling charges refer to the cost of using power infrastructure to transfer electricity from one point to another. 'We are hoping that by the coming Asean energy ministers' meeting in October, that that should be finalised,' said Puah, who has led EMA since July last year. The first phase of the Laos-Thailand-Malaysia-Singapore power integration project (LTMS-PIP) was launched in 2022. It involves the export of up to 100 MW of hydropower from Laos to Singapore, via the other two countries. The second phase doubles the capacity, with additional supply also coming from Malaysia, as announced by EMA last September. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 12.30 pm ESG Insights An exclusive weekly report on the latest environmental, social and governance issues. Sign Up Sign Up The LTMS-PIP is one of several efforts to build an Asean power grid – an idea that was conceptualised decades ago but picked up steam only recently. Puah believes that the development of a regional grid is 'riding on good momentum' – with Malaysia pushing for greater interconnectivity as this year's Asean chair, while Indonesia in June signed an agreement with Singapore on cross-border electricity trade. Electricity imports are a key strategy for Singapore in its goal to hit net-zero emissions by 2050. While the city-state is also studying alternative energy sources and technologies – such as geothermal power and carbon capture – these will need time to mature, Puah noted. 'Therefore, electricity imports – quite clearly already really feasible, as shown in Europe and many other regions around the world – is something that will be a key strategy for us in the short to medium term to decarbonise,' he said. Revenue support for imports Singapore aims to import 6 gigawatts (GW) of low-carbon electricity by 2035, accounting for about a third of its power demand then. EMA has thus far granted conditional licences to six projects importing clean energy from Indonesia – amounting to a total capacity of 3 GW. Another four projects, with a total capacity of 4.35 GW, have been granted conditional approvals. One of the biggest challenges for a project is in moving from a conditional approval to a conditional licence. 'This is where, I will say, the rubber really hits the road,' Puah said. 'From the developer point of view, they will really have to finalise their numbers. They will have to call for contracts… so that they can nail down exactly how much it will cost. This is also the time that they will try to nail down their customers in Singapore, talking to various potential offtakers.' Securing customers is crucial, as project developers face high upfront costs for infrastructure such as hydropower dams and solar farms. Projects located further away also have to procure high-voltage direct current cables, for which demand is surging globally. Acknowledging these challenges, Puah noted that since the launch of the first request for proposals in 2021, EMA has allowed participants to request 'revenue support' if needed. This would mean that EMA steps in as an offtaker, giving developers more certainty on their long-term revenue profile and lowering risk and financing costs. 'The project may last 20 to 30 years, and therefore, over this period they (need to) make sufficient returns to justify why shareholders are parting with their money. We understand that,' Puah said. He declined to disclose whether the import projects thus far have requested such revenue support, citing commercial confidentiality. He also noted that EMA will consider such support carefully. 'First, we have to think about the national interest. If we are entering into various support (agreements) with the importers… we are doing it on behalf of the overall energy sector. Therefore, we will make sure that we get a decent deal,' he said. 'Resilient' LNG market While Singapore is pushing for more renewable energy, the city-state is still reliant on liquefied natural gas (LNG) for 95 per cent of its power generation. Puah is sanguine about the stability of Singapore's LNG supply and prices, even amid geopolitical tensions. In March, China halted its purchase of US LNG as the tariff war escalated. But more recently, Asian economies such as Vietnam have been looking to increase US LNG imports to negotiate with the Trump administration. Despite the uncertainty over how these developments will play out, Puah believes that the LNG market is 'quite resilient' to disruptions. 'The US today is a major exporter of LNG, but the LNG market is also a global one that is very fluid… If you don't buy from country A, you can buy from country B,' he said, adding that while there could be some impact from disruptions, the market is 'well-honed to manage it'. Market experts are also anticipating a 'very healthy stream' of investments globally into new LNG capacity, Puah noted, with increases in LNG terminal operations and shipping to meet rising demand for the fuel. 'So we think that the supply of LNG will increase, and that is good for an LNG buyer like Singapore,' he said. Puah also highlighted that Singapore has introduced safeguards since the 2021 energy crisis, when several electricity retailers went bust. These measures include a temporary price cap to mitigate volatility in the wholesale electricity market, as well as more stringent requirements for electricity retailers in terms of paid-up capital and hedging. Another safeguard is the formation of a new centralised gas buyer, Gasco, which can buy fuel contracts of varying durations and contracts, as well as those tied to various price indices. This is so that 'if a particular price index were to shoot up, then maybe only some of my gas supplies are affected', Puah said. 'This diversification across geographies, markets (and) tenures will help to prevent (or) reduce the shock that we have in future if there's a spike in oil and gas prices,' he added. No 'big impact' from tariffs He is likewise optimistic that the US' tariffs on clean-energy components – such as solar panels – are unlikely to have a big impact on projects to import renewable power into Singapore. In April, the US imposed tariffs as high as 3,500 per cent on solar exports from four South-east Asian countries: Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam. This month, US solar manufacturers petitioned for such tariffs to be extended to Indonesia, Laos and India. While the tariffs will certainly affect regional solar panel makers, they are 'not really having a big impact' on project developers sourcing the panels. '(If) exports to the US are going to be less competitive, maybe the manufacturers will look into the domestic market to offload their capacity,' Puah said. Regional geopolitics is another issue Singapore will have to navigate as it imports clean energy. Last year, a senior minister in Indonesia said that the country may review plans to export clean electricity as the government prioritises national interests. Asked about this, Puah noted that the Riau Islands and Sumatra – where several projects are based – are close to Singapore and far from the 'major energy demand centres' in Indonesia, such as Java. Therefore, the projects 'do not in any way compete with the supply of renewable energy to other demand centres in Indonesia', he said, adding that there are also economic benefits for Indonesia. 'Apart from attracting investments to Indonesia and creating jobs, (they) would also help to allow supplies of panels and batteries for Indonesia's own domestic demand,' he said. 'As costs continue to come down, they will come to a price point that many more locations in Indonesia will want to deploy solar energy. We do think, quite clearly, it will be mutually beneficial.' Another positive trend is that the solar and battery industry has also expanded, with manufacturers seeing higher demand. 'As they gain scale, as they gain more manufacturing know-how, costs have continued to come down. So that bodes well for the developers and bodes well, eventually, for the consumers in Singapore,' Puah said.

Formula 1 to achieve net zero carbon by 2030
Formula 1 to achieve net zero carbon by 2030

Independent Singapore

time4 days ago

  • Independent Singapore

Formula 1 to achieve net zero carbon by 2030

According to Formula 1's Sustainability Update 2025, the organisation is still on track to meet its goal of net zero carbon emissions by 2030. The president and CEO of Formula 1, Stefano Domenicali, said in the report: 'We are strongly committed to achieving net zero by 2030. It is a concrete goal, already visible in the significant reduction of our sport's carbon footprint.' He added: 'Formula 1 has always been synonymous with innovation and the desire to improve. Once again, this mentality has allowed us to make important progress, not only for those who work in this world, but also for society as a whole.' At the end of 2024, F1 had already cut its carbon emissions by 26% compared to 2018. Furthermore, during this period, more fans were watching races, increasing from 4 million to 6.5 million. With this, F1 now has over 826 million fans worldwide. F1 sustainability updates Ellen Jones, in charge of ESG at Formula 1, directs the company's sustainability efforts. 'What we have tried to do as a sport,' she said, 'is ask how we can take climate action now and explore how we can do so much more together, whether that's through partnerships or through shared solutions… It's a real balance of individual activity within the organisations that make up our sport, as well as shared activity across the stakeholders who all love the races.' F1 plans to achieve net zero carbon emissions compared to 2018 levels, with at least a 50% reduction in emissions by 2030. 'Being Formula 1, we want to beat that number… When we do exhaust the reductions phase, we will look at what (credible offsets are) at that time.. 'In our sustainability strategy, you have things that are different from normal bricks and mortar because it's about the relationships that we have across the sport. We also look to make a unique contribution as Formula 1 by developing road-relevant solutions. You see that in our cars with hybrid engines, and you'll see that in our cars in 2026 with advanced sustainable fuel. 'How those two cross-pollinate is what I find fascinating. How we innovate on track and how that culture, mindset and knowledge of the technical innovation space helps us innovate off track,' Jones stated. Current F1 cars run on E10 fuel, which contains 10% eco-friendly ethanol. However, starting in 2026, the cars will switch to using fuel that is 100% sustainable. This new fuel has a carbon-neutral footprint because the amount of carbon released when it's used is balanced by the amount absorbed to produce it. Cutting emissions by 26% gets F1 over halfway to its 50% reduction target, but the organisation admits there is still more work to do. Regardless of the challenges, Jones said: 'Sustainability and performance are better delivered together, and we have those examples within F1 every day showing that when you build sustainability from the front into your strategy, you're not making compromises on what is delivered.'

Temasek proposes 5-year, 10-year and 30-year tranches of offshore Chinese yuan bonds
Temasek proposes 5-year, 10-year and 30-year tranches of offshore Chinese yuan bonds

Business Times

time6 days ago

  • Business Times

Temasek proposes 5-year, 10-year and 30-year tranches of offshore Chinese yuan bonds

[SINGAPORE] Temasek announced on Tuesday (Jul 22) a proposed notes issuance in a five-year tranche, in addition to 10-year and 30-years tranches. These will be issued under its US$25 billion guaranteed global medium-term note programme. Temasek has mandated Credit Agricole CIB, DBS, HSBC and Standard Chartered as joint lead managers and joint book runners for the venture. The notes are unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed by Temasek. If issued, they are expected to be rated 'Aaa' by Moody's and 'AAA' by Standard and Poor's. The bonds have yet to be priced. Earlier on Aug 21, 2024, Temasek Financial (I) – a wholly owned subsidiary – announced that it will launch a dual tranche offer of 10-year and 30-year offshore Chinese yuan bonds. It said at the time that net proceeds from the issuance will be given to Temasek and its investment holding companies to fund their businesses.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store