Nintendo unveils Splatoon game for Switch 2 with major Splatoon 3 update incoming
'Splatoon Raiders' will take players to the Spirhalite Islands, where they will join forces with a fictional pop group called Deep Cut to solve a mystery. The game appears to focus on a single-player experience, branching off from the main ink-based shooting gameplay of the franchise. Nintendo has not yet confirmed when the game will be available to the public.
Also read: Nintendo sells record 3.5 million Switch 2 consoles in four days
This announcement follows closely after the launch of the Switch 2 on June 5, which debuted alongside 'Mario Kart World', a new open-world racing game. In addition, Nintendo used its app to inform fans about a delay in the live-action 'Legend of Zelda' movie, pushing its release date back by a few weeks.
Meanwhile, the existing title 'Splatoon 3' will receive a significant update on June 12. The update, version 10.0, will introduce 30 remixed weapons and bring back the Urchin Underpass map from the original 'Splatoon' on the Wii U. The update also includes technical improvements tailored for the Switch 2, offering enhanced visuals and smoother gameplay in certain areas. Players on both the original Switch and the Switch 2 will be able to compete together without restrictions. Nintendo will provide this update free of charge.
Also read: Microsoft launches Xbox Copilot beta on Android app to assist gamers with real-time support
Among the new features in the 'Splatoon 3' update, the weapon Freshness caps will increase, and players will gain access to new in-game badges. A 'Series Weapon Power' stat will also be added to help match players based on weapon performance, allowing gamers to try out different weapons without risking unfair matchups.
For Switch 2 owners, improvements will include upgraded visuals in locations such as Splatsville. Cross-platform play between the Switch and Switch 2 will remain a key feature, maintaining the community's ability to connect regardless of hardware.
Also read: Mafia: The Old Country releasing on 8 August, 2025: Here's everything you need to know
In other news, Nintendo reported that it sold 3.5 million Switch 2 consoles worldwide during the opening weekend, exceeding the sales of the original Switch over the same time period. The company attributes this strong performance to high demand for its new generation console, released eight years after the original model. Nintendo's figures highlight the Switch 2 as the fastest-selling Nintendo hardware in its first four days on the market.
The Switch 2 launched in major markets, including the United States, where fans queued at midnight to purchase the device. Unlike previous Nintendo launches that introduced major innovations, such as the Wii's motion controls or the DS's touch screen, the Switch 2 focuses on refining and expanding the original Switch's features.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Elon Musk's stern warning to short sellers after Tesla Senior VP dumps 82% of shares: Here's what he said
Tesla's Senior Vice President, Xiaotong Zhu (also known as Tom Zhu), has sold more than 82% of his Tesla holdings. The stock sales occurred between 2023 and 2024 at prices ranging from $174 to $323 per share, according to securities filings. This major sale by a top executive has raised questions about insider confidence in the company. Amidst the news of the stock sale, Tesla CEO Elon Musk has issued a strong warning to short sellers. In a post on X (formerly twitter), he stated that short sellers would be 'obliterated' if they do not exit their short positions before Tesla reaches 'autonomy at scale.' Musk's comment was a direct response to a list of current net short sellers of the Electric Vehicle (EV) manufacturer. Short selling isa trading strategy where an investor profits from a decline in a stock's price. The process involves: Borrowing: An investor borrows shares of a company from a broker Selling: The borrowed shares immediately sold at the current market price. Buying back: Later, if the stock price drops, the investor buys back the same number of shares at a lower price. Profit: The shares are then returned to the broker and the difference between selling price and buy-back price is the investor's profit. Short selling is considered a high-risk strategy because potential losses are unlimited if the stock price rises instead of falls, as the investor must still buy back the shares at a higher price to return them to the broker. Elon Musk has a history of clashing with short sellers, including Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates. Their feud stems from Gates' reported short positions against Tesla stock. According to Walter Isaacson's 2023 biography of Musk, this short position has allegedly resulted in a $1.5 billion loss for Bill Gates. In an earlier post on X, Musk had warned that 'If Tesla does become the world's most valuable company by far, that short position will bankrupt even Bill Gates.'
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
OpenAI staff looking to sell $6 billion in stock to SoftBank, others
Current and former employees of OpenAI are looking to sell nearly $6 billion worth of the ChatGPT maker's shares to investors including SoftBank Group and Thrive Capital, a source familiar with the matter told Reuters on Friday. The potential deal would value the company at $500 billion, up from $300 billion currently, underscoring both OpenAI's rapid gains in users and revenue, as well as the intense competition among artificial intelligence firms for talent. SoftBank, Thrive and Dragoneer Investment Group did not immediately respond to requests for comment. All three investment firms are existing OpenAI investors. Bloomberg News, which had earlier reported the development, said discussions are in early stages and the size of the sale could change. The secondary share sale investment adds to SoftBank's role in leading OpenAI's $40 billion primary funding round. Bolstered by its flagship product ChatGPT, OpenAI doubled its revenue in the first seven months of the year, reaching an annualized run rate of $12 billion, and is on track to reach $20 billion by the end of the year, Reuters reported earlier in August. Microsoft-backed OpenAI has about 700 million weekly active users for its ChatGPT products, a surge from about 400 million in February.
Mint
4 hours ago
- Mint
Big Tech is eating itself in talent war
Big Tech's insatiable thirst for AI talent is threatening to kill its golden goose. Tech companies are paying AI researchers billions of dollars and using unorthodox tactics to grab the brightest minds. Their moves might help them near-term in the battle for AI supremacy, but they could also stifle a Silicon Valley innovation engine they badly need. Alongside job offers worth as much as $1 billion, Microsoft, Meta Platforms, and Google-parent Alphabet have all indulged in some version of what has come to be called the 'reverse acquihire": Instead of acquiring startups, they have hired away founders and top AI researchers—or licensed startups' technology—and left the husk of the businesses to either find new missions or be acquired by someone else. Microsoft did it with Inflection AI last year, bringing in its chief executive Mustafa Suleyman to manage its Copilot AI business, and paid a $650 million licensing fee to the company. Meta did it in June with AI data-labeling specialist Scale AI, proffering a $14.8 billion investment in the company in exchange for CEO Alexandr Wang and a team of Scale employees. Such moves suit the needs of the top tech companies in the current moment. The hires are pulled off quickly during an AI race that the companies see as a once-in-a-generation opportunity. They are relatively uncomplicated, with companies getting the talent and technology they want without the hassle of a post-acquisition integration effort. Perhaps most important, they don't need regulatory approval in an era when all of the companies are under some form of antitrust scrutiny. There are incentives on the startup side, too. Poached researchers are in some cases getting pro-athlete-level salaries. Venture-capital funders largely aren't getting big returns in these deals, industry executives say, but they aren't totally losing their shirts. The problem is that the moves challenge Silicon Valley's cultural foundations. Silicon Valley's basic bargain has always been rooted in taking enormous risk in the hope for an equally enormous reward. Most startups fail, but those that succeed can be wildly successful, generating hundredfold or higher returns for their venture-capital backers and making employees—many lured with the promise of equity—rich. It is an especially risky business for rank-and-file employees of venture-backed startups who are tied to the success of one company at a time, not a diversified portfolio of them. But for many employees of startups hollowed out in reverse acquihires or passed over in Big Tech hiring sprees, the rewards haven't been very handsome. When Google gutted a startup called Windsurf in a $2.4 billion deal in July, some of the remaining staff cried in the startup's office. The remainder of the company was quickly snapped up by another AI startup, but those employees almost certainly didn't get the kind of payday they were expecting. Before the Google deal, OpenAI had been in talks to buy Windsurf for $3 billion in what would have been a standard-issue Silicon Valley acquisition. A bunch of tech employees losing out on a payday might not seem all that significant. But Silicon Valley's innovation machine only works if it has an army of people who aren't founders or leading researchers moving its gears, the employees who handle sales, marketing, human resources or are part of large engineering teams. That's who's getting the short end of the stick. 'There are a ton of employees who are bought into this system, and the history and the tradition is you come out here, you try to make something of value and if it works out, everybody wins," said Jon Sakoda, the founding partner of Decibel, a venture-capital firm. 'If you thought you had a share of a company and you actually didn't have a share of a company, there's a loss of trust." If the reverse acquihire trend persists, there is a reasonable chance many people who would have been bold enough to join a risky startup will give more weight to their other options. They might instead go directly to big tech companies, in what might be a safer route for themselves but one that makes the pool of available startup talent shallower. Big tech's hiring tactics could ultimately prove problematic not only for venture capitalists and startups but for the titans themselves. Microsoft, Alphabet, Meta and Amazon collectively have acquired more than 100 companies outright since 2020, and have invested in hundreds more, according to Dealogic figures. Android was hardly a household name when Google paid $50 million for it back in 2005, but it has become the centerpiece of the company's mobile-phone strategy. Amazon's acquisition of Annapurna Labs for $350 million in 2015 laid the foundation for its wide-ranging custom-chip effort. It is clear enough why Big Tech is using its current playbook in the AI craze. But every time it does so, it erodes the very startup culture that has made Silicon Valley an unparalleled source of tech innovation. Write to Asa Fitch at
