As Texas weighs banning consumable hemp containing THC, Austin shop sees 'stock buying'
Senate Bill 3, authored by state Sen. Charles Perry, R-Lubbock, would ban Texas businesses from selling or manufacturing 'a consumable hemp product that contains any amount of a cannabinoid other than cannabidiol (CBD) or cannabigerol (CBG),' both of which are non-psychoactive compounds, meaning they don't produce the "high" feeling. The Senate last month passed SB 3, which is priority legislation for Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who presides over the upper chamber. The House State Affairs Committee heard testimony on the bill April 7 and left the proposal pending.
Estella Castro, who owns Austinite Cannabis Co. on East Cesar Chavez Street, has seen many senior citizens and veterans 'stock buying' consumable hemp products since SB 3 and House Bill 28, which also seeks to restrict the products, move through the Legislature. The House State Affairs Committee also heard testimony on HB 28 on April 7.
'It's terrible to have somebody thinking that (these products) are going to go away and they're on a fixed income, and they have to budget that gummy or that tincture in there,' Castro said. 'So we've been giving some veterans ... discounts because we've had such a huge amount of people coming out and stock buying because they're scared.'
In 2019, a law sponsored by Perry legalized the production, manufacturing and sale of hemp in Texas, and inadvertently approved consumable products with up to 0.3% THC, the primary psychoactive component in the cannabis plant. In just six years, the Texas hemp industry created over 53,000 jobs and represents an estimated economic impact of $10 billion, according to Austin Monthly.
More than 8,000 businesses, including everything from gas stations, convenience stores, vape shops, dispensaries and apothecaries, sell a similarly wide range of THC products in the state. SB 3, however, would ban all consumable hemp products, including gummies, pre-rolls, smokable flower and infused drinks. HB 28, authored by Rep. Ken King, R-Canadian, would ban all smokable and edible consumable hemp products except for infused drinks. The bill would bring the regulation of those drinks under the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission.
The Senate and House proposals come amid concerns from doctors and parents that many potent THC products are too accessible to minors and those whose brains are still developing, which the National Institutes of Health suggests may take until one reaches their mid-to-late 20s.
The consumption of high-dose cannabinoids by adolescents leads to an increased risk of addiction and psychosis, which can lead to severe mental health disorders, according to a spokesperson for the Texas Medical Association, who is also a pediatrician.
'About 50% of them (adolescents who experience psychosis because of cannabinoid consumption) develop a formal diagnosis of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder," the spokesperson said.
Patrick, who is an ardent supporter of banning all consumable hemp products, calling it a 'life and death issue,' has threatened to hold parts of Gov. Greg Abbott's agenda hostage to get him to call a special session if consumable hemp isn't prohibited by the end of the legislative session in early June.
Patrick points to myriad of cannabinoid compounds such as THCa (tetrahydrocannabinolic acid), CBN (cannabinol), Delta-8 and others found in many products being legally sold across the state as being impossible for the state to keep up with effectively.
'You just can't regulate it. You've gotta take it out,' Patrick told the Texas Tribune. 'You're never going to be able to regulate it.'
Patrick, who alleges many businesses are selling THC products to minors, investigated the issue himself and visited the Happy Cactus Apothecary in South Austin last month. In security camera footage of the encounter, Patrick seemed to expect not to have to show identification, but the business refused despite the 75-year-old clearly being of legal age.
'I'm Dan Patrick,' he reportedly replied, but the employee stuck to the store's policy of requiring identification.
Brothers Mickey and Todd Harris, who own Happy Cactus, believe Patrick targeted their business due to its proximity to Crockett Early College High School and because it sold two joints to a Texas Monthly reporter last year that were above the 0.3% THC limit, according to lab testing.
'We showed him all of our testing,' said Todd Harris of the encounter with Patrick. 'We showed him that our limits are low. He even mentioned that he supports shops doing it like us, which is very different from his attitude in the media.'
Patrick didn't purchase anything at the shop, but according to the Harris brothers, customers in his age group represent a significant portion of their business.
'Our clientele is pretty expansive, but I'd say most of them are looking for help with sleep, chronic pain or PTSD,' Mickey Harris said. 'We have a pretty large 55 (years old) and up clientele base.'
'Twenty-one to 100" years old, Todd chimed in. 'We do get a pretty big range. We have 80-year-olds coming in.'
As the House State Affairs Committee heard testimony on the bills this month, Castro, the owner of Austinite Cannabis Co., her entire staff and hundreds of others flocked to the Capitol to lay out their case. Although Castro and her staff left after waiting more than 14 hours to testify, the Harris brothers were able to plead their case.
'For anybody that thinks that they can't get involved, they can,' Castro said. 'Everybody has a voice. We're not out of time yet. Challenge your lawmakers and ask questions. There's always room for help in this fight.'
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Austin shop sees panic buying as Texas weighs banning consumable hemp
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘I'm all in': Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick announces 2026 reelection campaign
AUSTIN (KXAN) — Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said he has heard of people speculating that he would not run for reelection. On Tuesday afternoon, he made it clear that he will run again, making an official announcement to launch his 2026 campaign. 'I'm all in. I've always been all in,' Patrick said. He made the announcement surrounded by several Republican state senators. In a news release sent shortly after the announcement, Patrick said, 'I'm ready to hit the ground running for my re-election. With the help of my Texas Senate, we've accomplished so much, but there is more work to be done.' 'This Session, we have virtually eliminated school property taxes for the average senior for the rest of their life and cut school property taxes nearly in half for those under 65. I'm committed to continuing to lower property taxes in the Sessions ahead. We must continue to build a stronger, safer, and more prosperous Texas for generations to come,' Patrick said. Before Tuesday, it was not immediately clear if Patrick would seek reelection, after he was tapped to chair President Donald Trump's new commission on religious liberty back in May, according to The Texas Tribune. This was part of the Trump administration's push to 'bring back religion,' to the U.S. It was also Patrick who 'approached Trump with the idea for the commission,' which President Trump noted during his speech in May. Patrick also touted 'a major media buy covering all 20 media markets across Texas through broadcast, cable, and streaming services' as part of his campaign kick-off, the release said. During the news conference, Patrick said his campaign bank account will have $40 to $45 million available. 'I've never seen a more ambitious campaign kickoff in Texas,' Allen Blakemore, Texans for Dan Patrick senior strategist, said in the release. 'Launching a statewide media buy in all 20 markets, with broadcast, cable, and streaming media, certainly is laying a marker down. Lt. Governor Patrick and the Senate candidates are running to continue to deliver a bold conservative vision for Texas. It's an exciting milestone that shows the strength and momentum behind our campaign.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Is this legal? A look at why North Texas Democratic Rep. Nicole Collier remains in state Capitol
A Texas House member from Fort Worth prepares to spend another night inside the Capitol in a political showdown over the rules established by the state legislature. Representative Nicole Collier, who represents District 95 in East Fort Worth, objects to the House speaker's demand that Democrats, who had fled the state to prevent a quorum, sign permission slips to leave and promise to be inside the Capitol on Wednesday morning. SMU political science professor Matthew Wilson explains the rarely enforced rules being applied during this second special session of the legislature. He said once enough Democratic lawmakers returned to the Capitol to meet the quorum for the second special session, the speaker needed only 15 other members, according to the House Rules Manual. "I think both sides in this are playing hardball. Everybody's using all the tools that are at their disposal to achieve the political outcome that they want. I mean, it's worth noting she's the only Democratic legislator who is being subject to this, and it's because of her own decision not to sign the agreement," said Wilson. Collier told CBS News Texas' Jack Fink that she's taking a stand against what she believes are improper efforts by Republicans to control her and other Democrats. "I have a right to resist, I have a right to oppose, just like my voters do, just like Texans have a right to challenge government, and that's what I'm doing," said Collier. Spending a few nights inside the state Capitol may not stop the redistricting plan from passing, but political observers say it will help raise Collier's profile within the Texas Democratic Party.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Legislative committees advance CA redistricting legislation
(The Center Square) — Legislators, taxpayers and others debated passionately Tuesday for several hours as Democratic-led election committees in the California Assembly and Senate advanced congressional redistricting legislation. The bills making up the Election Rigging Response Act received support from the Democratic majorities in the Senate Elections and Constitutional Amendments Committee and the Assembly Elections Committee. Ultimately they're expected to land on the floors of the Assembly and Senate on Thursday. They're backed by the Democratic supermajorities in both houses, as well as by Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom. With their passage certain, the legislation will mean voters on a Nov. 4 special election will decide whether to revise boundaries for congressional districts in response to redistricting in Republican-led states such as Texas. But the Republican minority in the Legislature scored what they called an early victory Monday night by delaying Thursday's floor votes. "The bill was stalled until after 7 p.m., meaning the earliest it can be legally voted on is Thursday evening. That leaves only hours before the special election deadline for passage and Newsom's signature," Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones, R-San Diego, posted on X. Democrats and Republicans agree democracy is at stake and that California has a gold standard with its independent, nonpartisan Citizens Redistricting Commission. Republican lawmakers argued the will of voters, who approved a constitutional amendment creating the commission, was being disregarded. But Democratic legislators stressed voters can see the proposed map, which is posted at They also noted that unlike people in Texas, Californian voters will have the final say on whether congressional districts are changed and that the independent commission can resume its work after the 2030 census. "We are not asking California to rubber stamp maps behind closed doors," Assembly Elections Committee Chair Gail Pellerin, a Democrat, told the committee. "As a former election official, I would never stand for that. This is about defending democracy itself, making sure checks and balances our kids learned in government class are alive and well after the 2026 election." Other Democrats on the committee voiced their support. 'Who should have the control of the vast power of the federal government?' asked Assemblymember Steve Bennett, D-Ventura. 'Our founding fathers agreed hundreds of years ago on a special form of democracy, designed to protect our democracy from power grabs.' If people in power try to change the rules to seize power undemocratically, then democracy advocates must also change their rules in response, Bennett argued. But Assemblymember David J. Tangipa, R-Clovis, who sits on the committee with Bennett, told the committee that Republicans weren't given enough time to review the legislation in advance of Tuesday's hearing. He also noted the proposed congressional map changed at 8 p.m. Monday. Pellerin countered that she understood the map was posted at 8 a.m. Monday. Pellerin and Tangipa clashed during the hearing as the latter asked extensive questions of Assemblymember Marc Berman, D-Palo Alto, who spoke on behalf of one of the three bills making up the Election Rigging Response Act. Pellerin said she was trying to keep the meeting moving, and Tangipa stressed the importance of his questions on topics such as funding. A large number of residents throughout California, union representatives and representatives of organizations such as Planned Parenthood and the California Teachers Association, spoke in favor of redistricting at the Assembly committee meeting. But what appeared to be an even bigger number of taxpayers from throughout the state, as well as representatives of Republican organizations, spoke against the legislation. Comments on the two sides echoed those made by the Democratic and Republican legislators. The Assembly committee rejected a motion by its ranking Republican, Vice Chair Alexandra Macedo of Tulare, that the committee recess until its members could read all 16,000 comments that voters have made in a portal on the Assembly website. "Democratic power bosses want to take the power away from the people," Macedo said. She called the Election Rigging Response Act a coordinated effort to tear down the independent commission and gerrymander districts for political gain at a time California faces severe budget shortfalls. The Assembly Republican Caucus has said the Nov. 4 election will cost voters more than $235 million. Democrats have countered the Trump administration has cost the state much more than that by cutting or withholding funding.
