
Musk's X sues to block New York social media transparency law
The complaint, filed in a federal court in Manhattan, seeks to halt the law, which X argues violates the First Amendment by forcing platforms to disclose sensitive information about their content moderation practices.
"Today, @X filed a First Amendment lawsuit against a New York law, NY S895B," X's Global Government Affairs team posted Tuesday, adding that it had successfully challenged a similar law in California.
"X is the only platform fighting for its users by challenging the law, and we are confident we will prevail in this case as well," the company said.
The New York law requires social media companies with over $100 million in annual revenue to submit semiannual reports detailing how they define and moderate hate speech, racism, extremism, disinformation and harassment.
Companies face fines of $15,000 per day for violations, which can be sought by the attorney general's office.
X says the law is "an impermissible attempt by the State to inject itself into the content-moderation editorial process" and seeks to pressure platforms into restricting constitutionally protected speech.
'Stop Hiding Hate'
Reporters Without Borders said in a statement that asking X "account for their actions against misinformation is by no means an infringement of freedom of expression, but the bare minimum to clean up the digital space."
"Freedom of expression does not come without responsibilities," it added.
The lawsuit comes after X successfully challenged a nearly identical California law last year, according to the filing. New York's law is "a carbon copy" of the California provisions that were struck down, the filing adds.
X claims New York lawmakers refused to discuss changes to the bill after the California ruling, with sponsors saying they declined to meet because of content on X promoted by owner Musk that "threatens the foundations of our democracy."
The company argues this indicated "viewpoint discriminatory motives" behind the law's passage.
Senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal and Assembly member Grace Lee -- who introduced the law -- said in a statement that their act "does not infringe upon the First Amendment rights of social media companies, nor does it conflict with federal law."
"Instead, the Stop Hiding Hate Act requires narrowly tailored disclosures by social media companies to allow consumers to better decide which social media platforms they utilize," they added.
"The fact that Elon Musk would go to these lengths to avoid disclosing straightforward information to New Yorkers as required by our statute illustrates exactly why we need the Stop Hiding Hate Act."
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


France 24
14 hours ago
- France 24
Musk's X sues to block New York social media transparency law
The complaint, filed in a federal court in Manhattan, seeks to halt the law, which X argues violates the First Amendment by forcing platforms to disclose sensitive information about their content moderation practices. "Today, @X filed a First Amendment lawsuit against a New York law, NY S895B," X's Global Government Affairs team posted Tuesday, adding that it had successfully challenged a similar law in California. "X is the only platform fighting for its users by challenging the law, and we are confident we will prevail in this case as well," the company said. The New York law requires social media companies with over $100 million in annual revenue to submit semiannual reports detailing how they define and moderate hate speech, racism, extremism, disinformation and harassment. Companies face fines of $15,000 per day for violations, which can be sought by the attorney general's office. X says the law is "an impermissible attempt by the State to inject itself into the content-moderation editorial process" and seeks to pressure platforms into restricting constitutionally protected speech. 'Stop Hiding Hate' Reporters Without Borders said in a statement that asking X "account for their actions against misinformation is by no means an infringement of freedom of expression, but the bare minimum to clean up the digital space." "Freedom of expression does not come without responsibilities," it added. The lawsuit comes after X successfully challenged a nearly identical California law last year, according to the filing. New York's law is "a carbon copy" of the California provisions that were struck down, the filing adds. X claims New York lawmakers refused to discuss changes to the bill after the California ruling, with sponsors saying they declined to meet because of content on X promoted by owner Musk that "threatens the foundations of our democracy." The company argues this indicated "viewpoint discriminatory motives" behind the law's passage. Senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal and Assembly member Grace Lee -- who introduced the law -- said in a statement that their act "does not infringe upon the First Amendment rights of social media companies, nor does it conflict with federal law." "Instead, the Stop Hiding Hate Act requires narrowly tailored disclosures by social media companies to allow consumers to better decide which social media platforms they utilize," they added. "The fact that Elon Musk would go to these lengths to avoid disclosing straightforward information to New Yorkers as required by our statute illustrates exactly why we need the Stop Hiding Hate Act." © 2025 AFP


AFP
21 hours ago
- AFP
Video of Trump announcing ban on US Tesla production is manipulated
"Trump bans Tesla production in the USA," reads an Instagram post shared June 9, 2025. It includes a video that appears to show Trump saying: "Today I am here to announce that I will be banning the production of all Teslas in the United States of America, effective immediately. As everyone knows, Elon stabbed me in the back a couple of days ago and went crazy on his platform, X." Image Screenshot of the false post taken June 18, 2025 The false clip surfaced after the pair's public falling-out, in which the tech billionaire criticised Trump's so-called "big, beautiful" spending bill on his X account and linked the president with disgraced financier and sex Jeffrey Epstein (archived link). Trump fired back with threats to cancel federal contracts with Musk's companies and warned of "serious consequences" if he sought to punish Republicans who voted for the spending bill. Musk later said he regretted some of his posts, saying they "went too far". The video of Trump's supposed announcement of a Tesla production ban spread alongside similar claims on Facebook, X and Instagram. A reverse image search on Google using keyframes from the false video shows a longer version was published June 8, 2025 on an Instagram called DangerousAi (archived link). The caption says: "Donald Trump BANS Production of Tesla in USA after feud with Elon Musk." Image Screenshot comparison of the clip seen in the false post (L) and on the DangerousAi Instagram page The creator regularly shares clips made with AI on Instagram, Facebook and YouTube (archived here, here and here). His YouTube profile says they are "AI Parody Content", and that he creates the videos using "AI for the voiceover". AFP found no credible reports that Trump has banned Tesla vehicle production in the United States. false video appears to be based on footage from a May 30 press conference at the White House during which Trump thanked Musk for his work as outgoing head of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (archived here and here). AFP has debunked other AI-generated and manipulated content here.


Local France
a day ago
- Local France
France urged to apologise over Polynesia nuclear tests
France conducted 193 nuclear tests in French Polynesia from 1966, especially at the Pacific archipelago's Moruroa and Fangataufa atolls, as it built up its atomic weapon arsenal. These included atmospheric and underground tests, which had severe health impacts. Tens of thousands of people in the French overseas territory are estimated to have been exposed to harmful levels of radiation, leading to a significant public health crisis that has been largely ignored. The tests remain a source of deep resentment in French Polynesia, where they are seen as evidence of racist colonial attitudes that disregarded the lives of islanders. 'The inquiry has strengthened the committee's conviction that a request for forgiveness from France to French Polynesia is necessary,' the report said. 'This request is not merely a symbol, nor a request for repentance. It must be a... fundamental step in the process of reconciliation between French Polynesia and the State,' the authors said. The report said the apology must be added to a 2004 law on French Polynesia's semi-autonomous status. Advertisement Residents in the south Pacific Ocean islands are hoping for compensation for radiation victims. Investigative website Disclose, citing declassified French military documents on the nearly 200 tests, reported in March that the impact from the fallout was far more extensive than authorities had admitted. Only a few dozen civilians have been compensated for radiation exposure since the tests ended in 1996, Disclose said.