Minutes before gunfire erupted at Fort Stewart, the shooting suspect texted his family saying ‘I love y'all,' uncle says
'My time is slowly coming to an end. I choose my destiny and my faith. I might not be with my mama, but I'm gonna be in a better place,' the enigmatic group text message read, his uncle, Joe Mitchell, told CNN affiliate WTLV.
Radford, 28, wounded five of his peers at Fort Stewart Army base with a personal handgun before he was subdued by other soldiers nearby, authorities have said. All five soldiers are in stable condition, Brig. Gen. John Lubas, the commanding general of the 3rd Infantry Division, said at a news conference Wednesday.
'Please don't talk like that,' one message in response to Radford said. 'Call me, don't talk like this bro,' another said. 'Don't do whatever going on, you gonna be okay,' a different family member wrote.
But despite desperate pleas from family members, what unfolded after Radford's messages has left many loved ones with looming questions over what led up to the shooting, his motive, and how someone they know to be a kind and loving family guy could commit such violence.
Radford joined the Army in 2018 as an automated logistical specialist and was assigned to the 2nd Brigade Combat Team, the US Army said. His role involved handling supplies and warehouse operations and he had not deployed to a combat zone, Lubas, the general said.
The native Floridian had been arrested for driving under the influence in May – an arrest his chain of command didn't know about before the incident, Lubas said.
Radford had no known behavioral incidents in his military record, according to the general.
A day before the shooting, Radford had a disagreement with one of the shooting victims, according to a law enforcement official briefed on the case. It's unclear what the disagreement was about.
He followed that coworker to a maintenance area on Wednesday and shot him in the chest before shooting four others.
While Radford's motive remains unknown, details about his character and issues he faced in and out of the workplace have emerged from loved ones and former coworkers.
His father, Eddie Radford, told The New York Times that he hadn't noticed any unusual behavior from his son recently and didn't know what might have motivated the shooting.
He did, however, say his son had complained to the family about racism at Fort Stewart and had been seeking a transfer, according to the Times, which did not publish any specifics. CNN has reached out to Eddie Radford for more information.
Fort Stewart declined to comment on the racism allegation and whether Radford had requested a transfer. 'The circumstances that led to the events (on Wednesday) are currently under investigation,' a spokesperson for the 3rd Infantry Division told CNN.
As Radford's military career began in 2018, so did relentless bullying over his stutter, two former coworkers told NBC. Sneh Patel, an attorney that represented Radford during his DUI case, also confirmed to CNN that 'he has a stuttering condition,' although he wouldn't disclose much more due to client-attorney privilege, he said.
'He got bullied a lot,' Sgt. Cameron Barrett, who became friends with Radford during an Army training program, told NBC. 'It was very bad to the point where he could barely talk.'
People would mock Radford by also pretending to have a stutter, Barrett said, adding the apparent speech impediment was a 'trigger' for Radford, but he endured the treatment by being silent, showing no signs of anger or resentment, Barrett and other soldiers told the network.
CNN has reached out to those soldiers for more information.
Since the shooting, Radford has been interviewed by the Army Criminal Investigation Division and is now sitting in pretrial confinement as he waits for a charging decision by the Office of the Special Trial Counsel, Lubas said Wednesday afternoon.
As for his family, Mitchell told WTLV he's still asking himself questions, even days after the shooting.
'I was just one phone call away,' Mitchell said. 'I wish we could have talked about it, and it would have never happened. But we just leave it in God's hands.'
CNN's Danya Gainor and Mark Morales contributed to this report.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
25 minutes ago
- Axios
Deepfaked after death: Some don't want it
Former CNN anchor Jim Acosta's interview with an AI-generated avatar of a Parkland shooting victim has reignited debate on the ethics of creating deepfakes of the dead. Why it matters: As cheap and free generative AI tools become capable of replicating voices, faces and personalities, some people are adding clauses to their wills to prevent the creation of their digital likeness after they die. Catch up quick: Acosta, who's now an independent journalist, aired an interview last week with an AI-generated avatar of Joaquin Oliver, one of the teenagers who was killed at age 17 in the 2018 mass shooting in Parkland, Florida. Viewers found the video disturbing, exploitative and bad journalism in need of an editor. What it wasn't? Illegal. Oliver's father, Manuel Oliver, is the executor of his son's estate, so he can use his son's name, image and likeness (NIL) — including creating an AI version of him. This is known as a post-mortem right of publicity, which is recognized in the state of Florida. How it works: Digital twins are created by uploading photos, videos and writings of a person into a large language model. The models then spit out "twins," which can range from video avatars with audio to text chatbots. Generative AI can roughly simulate tone and personality and predict how a person might respond. The big picture: Celebrities have been planning for what happens to their digital NIL after death at least since rapper Tupac Shakur's hologram posthumously "performed" at Coachella in 2012. But in a world where everyone has an online footprint, it's no longer just a celebrity problem. Case in point: The viral video of two concertgoers from last month's Coldplay concert was quickly fed into AI tools that used the couple's likeness to create deepfakes. State of play: It's easy enough to put a clause in your will stating you don't want to be reanimated by AI. "It would let families know the decedent's wishes and obligate the executor to carry them out as best they can," said Denise Howell, a technology lawyer and host of the podcast Uneven Distribution on the Hearsay Culture network. But enforcing that wish could mean expensive lawsuits, especially in states without clear laws on posthumous AI rights. "Our right of publicity laws weren't written with this situation in mind or designed to deal with it. They vary from state to state and many states don't have them at all," Howell said. The other side: Not everyone wants to opt out. Chatbots based on a person's likeness are a way that some loved ones grieve. Joaquin's father says he created the AI version of his son both to deal with his loss and also to bring more attention to gun control. "If the problem that you have is with the AI, then you have the wrong problem. The real problem is that my son was shot eight years ago." Oliver said in an Instagram video. Follow the money: While few people are planning for posthumous AI rights, many are already building digital versions of themselves to monetize and control now and after death. AI rights management platform Vermillio now offers this service to everyone for free. 2wai allows celebrities (and soon everyone else) to create their digital avatars on their phones. But even if you train an AI avatar yourself, it may say things you never would. "For me, it's a consent issue," Johnni Medina, manager of content and digital engagement at Pace University, told Axios. "I know how I feel about things. I don't know that my loved ones know exactly how I feel about things." "If I were tragically murdered, I would hate to think that my likeness could be used to advocate for the death penalty for my aggressor," they said. In May, the sister of a man who was killed in a road rage incident used AI to generate a video of her brother giving a victim impact statement.
CNN
4 hours ago
- CNN
US military bases are fortresses that guard against external threats. But what happens when the threat comes from within?
Federal agencies US militaryFacebookTweetLink Follow Fort Stewart in Georgia houses the US Army's vaunted 3rd Infantry Division, a premier fighting force roughly 20,000 soldiers strong. It was at the headquarters of the division's 2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team, described by the Army as its 'most lethal and fit' armored brigade combat unit — formidably equipped with tanks and modern artillery systems — where five soldiers were wounded Wednesday when authorities said a 28-year-old active-duty sergeant pulled out a personal weapon and opened fire. The latest shooting at a US military fortress long accustomed to guarding against external threats demonstrates that no amount of physical security can totally protect soldiers when the threat comes from within, according to experts. 'I just don't think there's any way to ever prepare for every single possible insider threat,' said Robert Capovilla, a former military prosecutor and partner in a law firm representing current and former service members. Still, the violence has renewed concerns about the safety of American service members at facilities where they live, train and work. And, when coupled with other high-profile shootings at military bases in recent years, the rarity of such incidents offers little solace to the victims and families of soldiers hurt or killed by other service members. For Nichole Hillman — whose husband Nathan, an Army sergeant with the 2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team, was shot and killed by another soldier at Fort Stewart in 2022 — the latest shooting was 'terrifying and completely heartbreaking.' Nathan Hillman and the alleged gunman both served in the 2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team, nicknamed the Spartan Brigade. 'I was sick over it, as it brought back so much pain and fear, and had me reliving one of the absolute worst days of my life,' she told CNN via Facebook Messenger. 'Our soldiers shouldn't have to fear going to work. They should be able to know 100% for a fact they are safe.' The military has mandated active shooter and 'insider threat' training following a series of deadly mass shootings at American bases, including one in 2009 at the Fort Hood Army post in Texas, in which 13 people and an unborn child were killed and more than 30 others wounded. At Fort Stewart on Wednesday, authorities said, unarmed soldiers ran toward the sound of gunshots and tackled the suspect, subduing him and halting a shooting Army Secretary Dan Driscoll said could have been much more severe were it not for their bravery. 'Under duress and fire, they ran into battle to the sound of the gunfire, took down the assailant, and then took care of their comrades. And that made all the difference,' Driscoll said Thursday at Fort Stewart, where he awarded six soldiers the Meritorious Service Medal for their actions. 'We commit to you that anything we discover during the investigation that can make this base and other bases like it safer, we will act on as quickly as possible,' Driscoll added. 'We are constantly looking at our security protocols at all of our bases … We absolutely will want to learn from this investigation. We do not want something like this to ever happen again at an Army base.' Last year, Fort Stewart's military police simulated an active shooter and hostage rescue exercise. The drills have been routine at US military bases for years and include topics such as what to do before, during and after an active shooter incident. On Wednesday, Fort Stewart was briefly put on lockdown. 'The fact that the base was put on lockdown so quickly shows that the installation had practiced this kind of an event, and they knew what procedures they needed to implement in order to minimize the impact of this active shooter incident,' said Cedric Leighton, a retired Air Force colonel and CNN military analyst. 'The response clearly had been practiced.' The motive for the shooting was not known. A law enforcement official briefed on the case told CNN the shooter, identified as Quornelius Samentrio Radford, had a disagreement with one of the victims on Tuesday. He followed that coworker to a maintenance area and shot him in the chest before shooting four others on Wednesday. It's unclear what the disagreement was about. Law enforcement responded at 10:56 a.m. ET, according to a Facebook post from Fort Stewart Hunter Army Airfield. Less than 10 minutes later, the base was locked down. Emergency personnel were sent to treat the victims at 11:09 a.m., the post said. The unarmed soldiers who intervened 'prevented further casualties' by tackling Radford, allowing police to arrest him, said Brig. Gen. John Lubas, Fort Stewart's senior commander. The soldiers handled the scene like a 'battle drill,' according to Lt. Col. Mike Sanford, the commander of the 703rd Brigade Support Battalion. Active shooter training instructs soldiers on what to do before, during, and after shootings — including helping others evacuate, not moving the wounded, creating barricades and, as a last resort, using 'whatever means possible to overpower the subject to save further lives.' Military bases have strict regulations on the possession and storage of personal weapons. 'I'm not sure by allowing soldiers to carry their personal firearms with them in a professional capacity while they're doing their jobs prevents what happened at Fort Stewart,' Capovilla said. 'Our military personnel that live and work on military installations, by and large, I would consider them to be in highly secure and safe facilities.' The November 5, 2009, shooting at Fort Hood by an Army psychiatrist with radical Islamist beliefs forced the military to evaluate 'not just the tactical-level response that happened at Fort Hood specifically, but also the processes and systems and policies that were in place for the Department of Defense as a whole that could have led to what happened,' Mary 'Chris' Frels, deputy provost marshal for US Army North said one year after the shooting. After Fort Hood, Frels said, the military reevaluated its risk assessment process to consider both internal and external threats. A huge part of the training involves teaching service members to identify behaviors in colleagues who may be spiraling — which could be early warning signs of a potential 'insider threat.' The risk indicators range from declining performance rating to demotions, from threats of violence to suicidal ideation to criminal behavior. Authorities this week would not speculate about Radford's motives. He had not deployed to a combat zone and had no known behavioral incidents on his military record, Lubas said. The general acknowledged Radford was arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence in May. Radford's chain of command was unaware of the arrest prior to Wednesday's shooting, Lubas said. The suspect's father, Eddie Radford, told The New York Times he had not noticed unusual behavior by his son recently. He did not know what might have motivated the shooting, but said his son had complained about racism at Fort Stewart and had been seeking a transfer, according to the Times, which did not cite any specifics. CNN has reached out to Eddie Radford for more information. Fort Stewart declined to comment on the racism allegation and whether Radford had requested a transfer. 'The circumstances that led to the events today are currently under investigation,' a spokesperson for the 3rd Infantry Division told CNN. Authorities are unsure how Radford got his personal firearm through the base's high security before carrying out the shooting, although personnel with authorized access are typically not searched en masse unless an installation has increased its security posture in response to potential threats. Carrying personal firearms on base is typically prohibited. 'From a company, battalion, or brigade commander's perspective, I think it would be very hard to enforce good order and discipline if the soldiers were allowed to carry their personal weapons with them at all times,' Capovilla said. Radford had texted his relatives at least 20 minutes before he began shooting, his uncle, Joe Mitchell, told CNN affiliate WTLV: 'I just want y'all to know that I love y'all, and I tried my hardest to be the best I could be.' Radford's military career began in 2018. Around the same time, he started being bullied over his stutter, two former coworkers told NBC. Sneh Patel, an attorney who represented Radford during his DUI case, also confirmed to CNN that Radford 'has a stuttering condition,' although he wouldn't disclose much more due to client-attorney privilege, he said. 'He got bullied a lot,' Sgt. Cameron Barrett, who became friends with Radford during an Army training program, told NBC. 'It was very bad to the point where he could barely talk.' In a video training course by the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency, which handles security and risk management across the Defense Department workforce, the narrator warns: 'It is up to all of us to be aware of potential signs and report what we see. You are your organization's first line of defense against someone who could do harm.' CNN's Amanda Musa, Dakin Andone, Alisha Ebrahimji and Danya Gainor contributed to this report.
CNN
4 hours ago
- CNN
US military bases are fortresses that guard against external threats. But what happens when the threat comes from within?
Federal agencies US military FacebookTweetLink Fort Stewart in Georgia houses the US Army's vaunted 3rd Infantry Division, a premier fighting force roughly 20,000 soldiers strong. It was at the headquarters of the division's 2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team, described by the Army as its 'most lethal and fit' armored brigade combat unit — formidably equipped with tanks and modern artillery systems — where five soldiers were wounded Wednesday when authorities said a 28-year-old active-duty sergeant pulled out a personal weapon and opened fire. The latest shooting at a US military fortress long accustomed to guarding against external threats demonstrates that no amount of physical security can totally protect soldiers when the threat comes from within, according to experts. 'I just don't think there's any way to ever prepare for every single possible insider threat,' said Robert Capovilla, a former military prosecutor and partner in a law firm representing current and former service members. Still, the violence has renewed concerns about the safety of American service members at facilities where they live, train and work. And, when coupled with other high-profile shootings at military bases in recent years, the rarity of such incidents offers little solace to the victims and families of soldiers hurt or killed by other service members. For Nichole Hillman — whose husband Nathan, an Army sergeant with the 2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team, was shot and killed by another soldier at Fort Stewart in 2022 — the latest shooting was 'terrifying and completely heartbreaking.' Nathan Hillman and the alleged gunman both served in the 2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team, nicknamed the Spartan Brigade. 'I was sick over it, as it brought back so much pain and fear, and had me reliving one of the absolute worst days of my life,' she told CNN via Facebook Messenger. 'Our soldiers shouldn't have to fear going to work. They should be able to know 100% for a fact they are safe.' The military has mandated active shooter and 'insider threat' training following a series of deadly mass shootings at American bases, including one in 2009 at the Fort Hood Army post in Texas, in which 13 people and an unborn child were killed and more than 30 others wounded. At Fort Stewart on Wednesday, authorities said, unarmed soldiers ran toward the sound of gunshots and tackled the suspect, subduing him and halting a shooting Army Secretary Dan Driscoll said could have been much more severe were it not for their bravery. 'Under duress and fire, they ran into battle to the sound of the gunfire, took down the assailant, and then took care of their comrades. And that made all the difference,' Driscoll said Thursday at Fort Stewart, where he awarded six soldiers the Meritorious Service Medal for their actions. 'We commit to you that anything we discover during the investigation that can make this base and other bases like it safer, we will act on as quickly as possible,' Driscoll added. 'We are constantly looking at our security protocols at all of our bases … We absolutely will want to learn from this investigation. We do not want something like this to ever happen again at an Army base.' Last year, Fort Stewart's military police simulated an active shooter and hostage rescue exercise. The drills have been routine at US military bases for years and include topics such as what to do before, during and after an active shooter incident. On Wednesday, Fort Stewart was briefly put on lockdown. 'The fact that the base was put on lockdown so quickly shows that the installation had practiced this kind of an event, and they knew what procedures they needed to implement in order to minimize the impact of this active shooter incident,' said Cedric Leighton, a retired Air Force colonel and CNN military analyst. 'The response clearly had been practiced.' The motive for the shooting was not known. A law enforcement official briefed on the case told CNN the shooter, identified as Quornelius Samentrio Radford, had a disagreement with one of the victims on Tuesday. He followed that coworker to a maintenance area and shot him in the chest before shooting four others on Wednesday. It's unclear what the disagreement was about. Law enforcement responded at 10:56 a.m. ET, according to a Facebook post from Fort Stewart Hunter Army Airfield. Less than 10 minutes later, the base was locked down. Emergency personnel were sent to treat the victims at 11:09 a.m., the post said. The unarmed soldiers who intervened 'prevented further casualties' by tackling Radford, allowing police to arrest him, said Brig. Gen. John Lubas, Fort Stewart's senior commander. The soldiers handled the scene like a 'battle drill,' according to Lt. Col. Mike Sanford, the commander of the 703rd Brigade Support Battalion. Active shooter training instructs soldiers on what to do before, during, and after shootings — including helping others evacuate, not moving the wounded, creating barricades and, as a last resort, using 'whatever means possible to overpower the subject to save further lives.' Military bases have strict regulations on the possession and storage of personal weapons. 'I'm not sure by allowing soldiers to carry their personal firearms with them in a professional capacity while they're doing their jobs prevents what happened at Fort Stewart,' Capovilla said. 'Our military personnel that live and work on military installations, by and large, I would consider them to be in highly secure and safe facilities.' The November 5, 2009, shooting at Fort Hood by an Army psychiatrist with radical Islamist beliefs forced the military to evaluate 'not just the tactical-level response that happened at Fort Hood specifically, but also the processes and systems and policies that were in place for the Department of Defense as a whole that could have led to what happened,' Mary 'Chris' Frels, deputy provost marshal for US Army North said one year after the shooting. After Fort Hood, Frels said, the military reevaluated its risk assessment process to consider both internal and external threats. A huge part of the training involves teaching service members to identify behaviors in colleagues who may be spiraling — which could be early warning signs of a potential 'insider threat.' The risk indicators range from declining performance rating to demotions, from threats of violence to suicidal ideation to criminal behavior. Authorities this week would not speculate about Radford's motives. He had not deployed to a combat zone and had no known behavioral incidents on his military record, Lubas said. The general acknowledged Radford was arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence in May. Radford's chain of command was unaware of the arrest prior to Wednesday's shooting, Lubas said. The suspect's father, Eddie Radford, told The New York Times he had not noticed unusual behavior by his son recently. He did not know what might have motivated the shooting, but said his son had complained about racism at Fort Stewart and had been seeking a transfer, according to the Times, which did not cite any specifics. CNN has reached out to Eddie Radford for more information. Fort Stewart declined to comment on the racism allegation and whether Radford had requested a transfer. 'The circumstances that led to the events today are currently under investigation,' a spokesperson for the 3rd Infantry Division told CNN. Authorities are unsure how Radford got his personal firearm through the base's high security before carrying out the shooting, although personnel with authorized access are typically not searched en masse unless an installation has increased its security posture in response to potential threats. Carrying personal firearms on base is typically prohibited. 'From a company, battalion, or brigade commander's perspective, I think it would be very hard to enforce good order and discipline if the soldiers were allowed to carry their personal weapons with them at all times,' Capovilla said. Radford had texted his relatives at least 20 minutes before he began shooting, his uncle, Joe Mitchell, told CNN affiliate WTLV: 'I just want y'all to know that I love y'all, and I tried my hardest to be the best I could be.' Radford's military career began in 2018. Around the same time, he started being bullied over his stutter, two former coworkers told NBC. Sneh Patel, an attorney who represented Radford during his DUI case, also confirmed to CNN that Radford 'has a stuttering condition,' although he wouldn't disclose much more due to client-attorney privilege, he said. 'He got bullied a lot,' Sgt. Cameron Barrett, who became friends with Radford during an Army training program, told NBC. 'It was very bad to the point where he could barely talk.' In a video training course by the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency, which handles security and risk management across the Defense Department workforce, the narrator warns: 'It is up to all of us to be aware of potential signs and report what we see. You are your organization's first line of defense against someone who could do harm.' CNN's Amanda Musa, Dakin Andone, Alisha Ebrahimji and Danya Gainor contributed to this report.
