logo
Arab World Reacts to Netanyahu's New Gaza Plan

Arab World Reacts to Netanyahu's New Gaza Plan

Newsweek2 days ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Israel's security cabinet has approved a sweeping plan to take full military control of Gaza City and the wider Gaza Strip, a move Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced amid an intensifying conflict that has devastated the besieged territory.
The decision has drawn sharp rebukes across the Arab world, with regional leaders warning the operation will deepen the humanitarian crisis, risk mass displacement and undermine any prospects for peace.
Newsweek has reach out to the Israeli Foreign Ministry for comment.
Why It Matters
Gaza, weakened by years of blockade and assaults, now faces a deepening crisis. The planned occupation could worsen shortages of food, water and medical care amid collapsing infrastructure.
Israel says the operation aims to dismantle Hamas's militant network and end rocket attacks and hostage-taking. But Arab nations see it as a continuation of policies that are eroding Palestinian rights, warning it could fuel regional instability.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks during a press conference at the Prime minister's office in Jerusalem, Sunday, Aug. 10, 2025.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks during a press conference at the Prime minister's office in Jerusalem, Sunday, Aug. 10, 2025.
Abir Sultan/AP Photo
A Region Reacts
Hamas
Since the October 7, 2023, attacks—when Hamas launched a deadly assault on Israeli communities—the conflict has spiraled into a devastating war.
In response to the Israeli plan, Hamas said the seizure of Gaza City would be a dangerous escalation that deliberately risks the lives of hostages held there. The group accused Netanyahu's government of showing blatant disregard for the captives, warning that the decision to occupy Gaza is essentially a death sentence for those being held.
Hamas portrays the move as part of a wider campaign of Israeli aggression aimed at crushing Palestinian resistance and erasing their sovereignty.
Palestinian Authority
The Palestinian leadership in the West Bank condemned Israel's plan as "a complete crime," calling it part of an ongoing campaign of "genocide, systematic killing, starvation and siege," according to the Palestinian news agency Wafa.
President Mahmoud Abbas warned that the operation would cause an "unprecedented humanitarian catastrophe." He repeated pleas for urgent international intervention.
Egypt
Egypt issued a sharp rebuke, denouncing the plan as "inadmissible." Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty rejected Israel's decision to expand military operations and seize control of Gaza, calling it "extremely dangerous" and warning it would intensify the enclave's already catastrophic humanitarian crisis.
Displaced Palestinians walk through a makeshift camp along the beach in Gaza City, Sunday, Aug. 10, 2025.
Displaced Palestinians walk through a makeshift camp along the beach in Gaza City, Sunday, Aug. 10, 2025.
Jehad Alshrafi/AP Photo
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia strongly denounced the Israeli strategy, accusing the occupying authorities of persistent "crimes of starvation, brutal practices, and ethnic cleansing" against Palestinians. Riyadh reaffirmed its support for Palestinian rights and condemned Israel's conduct as a violation of human rights.
Iran
Iran condemned the plan as a sign of Israel's intent to ethnically cleanse Gaza and commit "genocide."
"This decision constitutes a grave violation of international law and a deliberate attempt to expand occupation and impose new realities across the occupied Palestinian territories by force and military aggression," the Iranian Foreign Ministry said a statement released on Saturday.
"Undoubtedly, the renewed displacement of Palestinians is categorically condemned," Tehran said.
Destroyed buildings in the Gaza Strip are seen from a Jordanian Air Force C-130 plane during an airdrop of humanitarian aid for Palestinians, Thursday, Aug. 7, 2025.
Destroyed buildings in the Gaza Strip are seen from a Jordanian Air Force C-130 plane during an airdrop of humanitarian aid for Palestinians, Thursday, Aug. 7, 2025.
Raad Adayleh/AP Photo
Qatar
Qatar warned that Israel's decision risks escalating violence and worsening the humanitarian disaster in Gaza. It urged swift international action to prevent the plan's implementation and to revive ceasefire efforts.
Jordan
Jordan's Foreign Ministry condemned the plan as a serious breach of international law that undermines the two-state solution and the Palestinian right to an independent state with East Jerusalem as its capital, according to a statement.
United Arab Emirates
The UAE cautioned that the Israeli move will cause "catastrophic consequences," worsening civilian suffering. It called on the United Nations and global powers to intervene, framing Palestinian rights as a moral and legal imperative.
What Happens Next
With Israel advancing plans to occupy Gaza City, diplomatic tensions across the Middle East are set to rise. Arab governments are expected to escalate calls for urgent humanitarian aid and political intervention.
The worsening humanitarian conditions, combined with escalating violence, increase the risk of prolonged conflict and regional destabilization. The international community now faces intense pressure to respond as the situation on the ground grows ever more precarious.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's Pick To Oversee Social Security COLA Says 'Need To Sunset' Program
Trump's Pick To Oversee Social Security COLA Says 'Need To Sunset' Program

Newsweek

time27 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Trump's Pick To Oversee Social Security COLA Says 'Need To Sunset' Program

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's pick for commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics has argued for "sunsetting" Social Security, calling it a "Ponzi scheme." Trump nominated Heritage Foundation economist E.J. Antoni to lead the BLS less than two weeks after firing the agency's former commissioner, Erika McEntarfer, in response to weaker-than-expected job numbers. The dismissal has fueled concerns that upcoming BLS reports could be altered to advance Trump's political agenda. Newsweek has contacted Antoni for comment via his profile on the Heritage Foundation's website. Why It Matters Social Security provides benefits to more than 70 million Americans every month, paying out retirement, survivor and disability benefits. Often referred to as the "third rail" of American politics for its enduring popularity, advocating against the program is considered politically perilous to members of either party. The BLS is the federal agency responsible for producing essential inflation data, including the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers—the official index used to calculate Social Security Cost of Living Adjustments. As commissioner, Antoni would oversee how that data is produced and published. President Donald Trump listens to questions from reporters after speaking on economic data in the Oval Office in Washington, D.C., on August 7. President Donald Trump listens to questions from reporters after speaking on economic data in the Oval Office in Washington, D.C., on August 7. Win McNamee/GETTY What To Know Speaking on KTRH's Houston's Morning News in December, Antoni said Social Security was set up as a "Ponzi scheme" where "today's investors are—their funds are being used to pay yesterday's investors." A Ponzi scheme is a fraudulent investment setup where money from new investors is used to pay existing ones. Social Security payments are financed from a dedicated payroll tax collected from current workers. Any excess that is not used is kept in dedicated trust funds: the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance trust fund and the Disability Insurance trust fund. These trust funds are scheduled to reach depletion in 2034 unless Congress acts, according to the 2025 Social Security Trustees report. "And unless you are going to grow the number of investors at an exponential rate, that system is eventually going to collapse. Well, since we can't grow the workforce at an exponential rate, especially today when our population is actually in a state of decline, you're not going to be able to sustain a Ponzi scheme like Social Security," Antoni continued. "Eventually you need to sunset the program." Antoni said current benefits need not be touched, but future retirees should not rely on the program. He advocated for transitioning to a system that uses private accounts "for just them." "There's plenty of money available to pay for folks who are already retired," he said. "But the people who are going to retire 10, 20, even 30, or certainly 40 years from now—I'm sorry, but the program is not going to be viable at that time." Antoni argued for "some kind of transition program where, unfortunately, you'll need a generation of people who pay Social Security taxes but never actually receive any of those benefits," he continued. "And that sounds harsh, but unfortunately that's the price to pay for unwinding a Ponzi scheme that was foisted on the American people by the Democrats in the 1930s." Who Is E.J. Antoni? Antoni is the chief economist for the conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation, which published Project 2025. According to his bio on its website, he was previously "an economist at Texas Public Policy Foundation and has taught courses ranging from labor economics to money and banking." He also holds master's and doctoral degrees in economics. Writing on Truth Social regarding Antoni's appointment to the BLS, Trump said, "E.J. will ensure that the Numbers released are HONEST and ACCURATE." In a statement on X, Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer said Antoni would "provide the American people with fair and accurate economic data they can rely on." What People Are Saying White House assistant press secretary Taylor Rogers told Newsweek: "President Trump selected Dr. E.J. Antoni III to restore America's trust in the jobs data that has had major issues, without any real attempt at resolution, for years. Antoni's education and vast experience as an economist has prepared him to produce accurate public data for businesses, households, and policymakers to inform their decision-making." Democratic Representative John B. Larson of Connecticut said in a news release on August 11: "It should alarm everyone when a yes-man determined to end Social Security is installed in this position. I call on every Senate Republican to stand with Democrats and reject this extreme nominee—before our seniors are denied the benefits they earned through a lifetime of hard work." Jason Furman, a Harvard economist and former chair of Barack Obama's Council of Economic Advisers, posted on X: "I don't think I have ever publicly criticized any Presidential nominee before. But E.J. Antoni is completely unqualified to be BLS Commissioner. He is an extreme partisan and does not have any relevant expertise. He would be a break from decades of nonpartisan technocrats." What Happens Next It remains to be seen whether the Senate will confirm Antoni's nomination to lead the BLS, which is an independent agency under the Labor Department.

Donald Trump's Honesty Rating Hits New Low
Donald Trump's Honesty Rating Hits New Low

Newsweek

time29 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump's Honesty Rating Hits New Low

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's honesty rating has fallen to its lowest point since he re-entered the White House, according to newly released polling. Just 31 percent of Americans view Trump, according to the latest YouGov/Economist poll, conducted between August 9-11. And that trend is also present among Republicans. In January, 77 percent of Republicans said the president was trustworthy. By August, that had dropped to 71 percent, while those finding him untrustworthy doubled from 7 percent to 14 percent. Why It Matters A president's perceived honesty is a key driver of public trust, shaping both voter enthusiasm and their willingness to believe campaign promises. For Trump, whose political brand has long relied on projecting authenticity to his base, a sustained decline in honesty ratings could weaken his ability to roll out his agenda. President Donald Trump speaks with reporters in the James Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House, Monday, Aug. 11, 2025, in Washington. President Donald Trump speaks with reporters in the James Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House, Monday, Aug. 11, 2025, in Washington. Alex Brandon/AP What To Know Mounting Pressure Over Epstein Files The latest polling comes as Trump is facing mounting criticism for his handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. The Department of Justice (DOJ) and FBI recently released a memo and video stating that Epstein died by suicide in 2019 and that no secret "client list" exists, directly countering years of speculation and conspiracy theories. This disclosure has sparked further anger from Trump supporters and victims' advocates, who believe the administration is withholding key details. In a significant legal setback for transparency efforts, a federal judge in Manhattan denied the Trump administration's request to unseal grand jury transcripts from Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell's prosecution, calling the move more of a diversion than a genuine attempt to release new information. A similar request in Florida was also rejected, with the court citing legal precedent. These rulings leave many of the case's most sensitive records under seal. Meanwhile, Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence, has held multiple meetings with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to discuss the case. Her legal team has reportedly floated the idea of a presidential pardon and is appealing her conviction, arguing that Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement should have applied to her as well. Maxwell's recent transfer to a minimum-security prison has intensified outrage from survivors, who see it as further evidence of leniency toward those linked to Epstein. And public frustration has only grown. Billionaire Elon Musk has urged Trump to "just release the files as promised," while author Michael Wolff has speculated that Trump may be seeking major distractions to shift attention away from the Epstein fallout. Victims and advocacy groups remain adamant that all records be made public, arguing that the current handling of the case "smacks of a cover-up." Public discontent is also reflected in the polls. Only 20 percent of Americans said they approve of Trump's handling of the Epstein case in the most recent YouGov/Economist poll. And 71 percent say they think Trump knew a lot or something about Epstein's crimes. Just 8 percent said they believe he did not know anything. Trump has maintained that he had no knowledge of or involvement in Epstein's crimes. Economic Confidence Slips Meanwhile, the economy is also causing a headache for Trump. Inflation rose to 2.7 percent in June. That is despite Trump's previous promise to end inflation on day one of his second term. "Starting on day one, we will end inflation and make America affordable again, to bring down the prices of all goods," he said during a rally in Bozeman, Montana, in August 2024. And job growth slowed sharply in July, with just 73,000 new jobs added—down from 147,000 the previous month, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The unemployment rate edged up to 4.2 percent, though it remains near historic lows. After last month's jobs report was published, Trump fired BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer. In a post, Trump accused McEntarfer—without offering evidence—of rigging the numbers to harm his administration. Now, only 22 percent say the government's unemployment rates are accurate. There are also concerns about Trump's tariff program. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick predicted $50 billion in monthly revenue from the new import taxes, which came into effect this month. But JPMorgan warned that 60 percent of the increased costs are expected to be passed on to American consumers through higher prices. Amid those concerns, approval of Trump's handling of the economy has fallen sharply this year. In January, 49 percent approved and 37 percent disapproved. By August, approval had dropped to 41 percent, while disapproval had risen to 52 percent. His ratings on inflation show a similar slide. In January, 45 percent approved and 39 percent disapproved. By August, only 35 percent approved, compared with 58 percent who disapproved. What Happens Next The Republican-led House Oversight Committee subpoenaed the DOJ for its files on Epstein, with a deadline of August 19 to hand them over, suggesting the issue isn't going away for the president anytime soon. Meanwhile, Trump's new nominee to run the BLS hinted at suspending the monthly release of jobs data. August's numbers are due to be published in the first week of September.

Veteran Separated from Family as USCIS Delays Green Card for Wife
Veteran Separated from Family as USCIS Delays Green Card for Wife

Newsweek

time29 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Veteran Separated from Family as USCIS Delays Green Card for Wife

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A U.S. veteran who now works for Intel has told Newsweek of his agonizing wait to bring home his wife and their 7-year-old daughter due to prolonged delays in processing his spouse's green card application. Russell John Campbell, 57, a Navy veteran and longtime Intel Corp. communications professional, is living alone in Oregon while his wife, Wasithee Campbell, and daughter remain in Thailand, unable to join him amid a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) backlog. He has been waiting for nearly five months to hear anything, but could be holding out for 12 more months. "It is just unconscionable for the U.S. government to treat a citizen and veteran this way," Campbell told Newsweek in an exclusive interview. "They just don't care, and they are quite clear in saying so. It is disgusting and vile. This is not what I swore an oath to defend. This is just evil to keep a family apart like this for no reason," he added. The Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status, Department of Homeland Security, U.S, Citizenship and Immigration Services Form I-485. The Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status, Department of Homeland Security, U.S, Citizenship and Immigration Services Form I-485. Jon Elswick/AP Newsweek has contacted USCIS for comment via email. Why It Matters The case comes as USCIS faces a significant backlog of immigration cases, hitting a record 11.3 million pending applications. Immigration courts are overwhelmed, with a backlog exceeding 3.7 million cases, according to Syracuse University's Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse. Asylum-seekers often wait years for decisions on their cases. What To Know Campbell, who served from 1985 to 1989 as an Aviation Electronics Technician at NAS North Island in San Diego, moved to Thailand in 2010 for an Intel role managing corporate and government affairs across the Asia-Pacific region. Campbell married his wife on April 12, 2012, on the island of Koh Chang, Thailand. Their daughter was born on February 19, 2018, and is a U.S. citizen with a passport and Social Security number. His wife first received a U.S. tourist visa in 2015, visiting the United States two to three times for business and family visits. Wasithee was granted a green card in 2019; however, it was canceled by USCIS after the family relocated to Thailand due to employment opportunities for Campbell. In March 2025, Campbell accepted a position back at Intel as Global Content Strategy Manager, moving to Hillsboro within weeks. On April 3, he filed a new I-130 petition for his wife's green card. USCIS has told him that processing could take up to 17 months. Two humanitarian expedite requests—citing financial hardship, medical issues, and the impact on their U.S. citizen child—have been denied or ignored. He says he is still waiting to hear from the offices of Rep. Suzanne Bonamici and Sen. Jeff Merkley after writing to them. Campbell's wife suffers from abdominal ulcers and kidney stones, requiring treatment that would be covered under his U.S. health insurance. In Thailand, the cost is prohibitive, and she has no family nearby to help care for their daughter during recovery. Meanwhile, their daughter faces both delayed school enrollment in Oregon and nightly emotional strain from being apart from her father. "My daughter is my life," Campbell said. "I have an empty home, next to a park, waiting for my daughter to come play and make friends," he added. USCIS has provided no timeline beyond "up to 17 months," which Campbell says makes it impossible to plan for housing, school, and medical care. "Time passes, and we don't get it back. Being apart from her is the greatest pain I've ever known, because it is just so senseless," he said. Campbell and his family have complied with all legal requirements throughout the immigration process. The delays in reuniting the family illustrate the challenges faced by American citizens and veterans whose families are subject to protracted immigration backlogs.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store