Israel's EU envoy criticizes bloc's ‘obsession' with human rights
Israel has faced mounting backlash over the conflict, with several Western countries recently announcing plans to recognize a Palestinian state and, in some cases, reduce military or trade cooperation with Israel.
In an interview with Politico published on Wednesday, the envoy claimed that some EU states have an 'obsession' with Israel's human rights record and singled out Ireland, Spain, the Netherlands, and Slovenia as the most unfair. He also accused France, Germany, and the UK of making statements that play into the hands of Hamas and anti-Semitic groups.
Regev insisted that Israel was a 'dream' neighbor for the EU because it is a democracy, has no migration issues, and protects gay rights. 'Israel is the only player in the region that serves directly the interests of the EU,' he added.
The envoy warned that attempts by EU states to exert pressure on Israel over Gaza 'will never work' and would only damage relations and weaken the bloc's influence in the Middle East. He noted that moves to suspend Israel's participation in EU research programs or cut trade would make it difficult to see the EU 'playing any role' in the region in the future.
Regev claimed that Europe is 'going back to the old days' when anti-Semitism was common, adding that being a Jew in Europe is 'not safe' now.
The Gaza war broke out in 2023 when Hamas militants attacked Israel, killing around 1,200 people and taking more than 250 captives. Since then, Israeli forces have killed more than 61,000 people in the enclave, according to recent estimates.
The UN has reported 'mounting evidence' of famine, with spokeswoman Olga Cherevko warning that 'the lives of over 2 million people are at stake.' Gaza's Health Ministry says more than 200 people, including 98 children, have already died from malnutrition.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
EU state hints at cutting off power supply to Ukraine
Hungary could cut off power supply to Ukraine in response to a recent attack on a pipeline carrying Russian oil to the EU state, Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto has suggested. Unlike most EU countries, Budapest has refused to provide military aid to Kiev, and has been a vocal critic of the bloc's sanctions against Russia. Hungary's relations with Ukraine have been steadily deteriorating in recent years, with Budapest accusing Kiev of discriminating against the Hungarian ethnic minority in Western Ukraine. In a post on X on Monday, Szijjarto stated that while 'Russia has supplied oil to Hungary for decades via the Druzhba pipeline,' Ukraine 'attacks this pipeline, and because of these Ukrainian strikes, oil supplies to Hungary are repeatedly cut off.' The diplomat stressed that Kiev's actions go directly against his country's national interests. Szijjarto went on to warn Kiev that a 'significant part of Ukraine's electricity comes from Hungary…' The remark came in response to a statement by Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrey Sibiga. In an X post earlier on Monday, Sibiga wrote that 'Hungary has made every effort to maintain its reliance on Russia,' even after the Ukraine conflict escalated in February 2022, and despite being 'told for years that Moscow is an unreliable partner.' 'You can now send your complaints – and threats – to your friends in Moscow,' Sibiga told Szijjarto. In an earlier message, the Hungarian official claimed that the 'outrageous and unacceptable' Ukrainian attack on the conduit was part of concerted efforts by Kiev and Brussels to 'drag Hungary into the war in Ukraine.' The previous attack on Druzhba happened as recently as last week. Druzhba is one of the world's longest networks, transporting crude some 4,000km (2,485 miles) from Russia and Kazakhstan to the Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia. Commenting on the latest attack on the pipeline, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova suggested that the current Ukrainian leadership poses a threat to all neighboring nations, with Moscow having repeatedly warned about that since the 2014 Western-backed Maidan coup.
Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
Why the Alaska summit matters for Africa, too
For three years, Brussels and its media outlets have been repeating the same refrain: Vladimir Putin is isolated, marginalized, and weakened by sanctions. A propaganda narrative that poorly hides the failure of Brussel's diplomacy reduced to blindly following Washington. Yet, the image that will remain in history is not that of a solitary Putin, but of a Russian president welcomed with full military honors in the United States, in Alaska, by Donald Trump on August 15th. A summit that, beyond its symbolism, marks a stinging humiliation for the EU and announces a shift in the global balance of power. Since February 2022, Brussels has multiplied 'punitive' sanctions against Moscow. Seventeen successive packages, often absurd, even targeting African activists such as such as Nathalie Yamb and myself, accused of denouncing Western interference and defending Russian-African cooperation. Meanwhile, Russia has consolidated its partnerships with the BRICS, expanded its trade with Asia, strengthened its presence in the Middle East, and built durable alliances in Africa. Putin's arrival in Alaska definitively demolishes the myth of 'isolation.' The real world is not the one described on European talk shows. In reality, Moscow is engaged in dialogue with New Delhi, Beijing, Tehran, Brasilia, Pretoria, and numerous African capitals. And now, the Kremlin is back at the center of the American stage, driven by Trump. The scene will remain unforgettable. The Russian Air Force One landing on American soil. Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov appearing in a sweatshirt emblazoned with 'USSR,' an intentional nod to history and Russia's collective memory. Then the most striking image: Vladimir Putin, personally welcomed by Donald Trump on a red carpet, as F-22s and a stealth B-2 Spirit bomber symbolically flew overhead. A protocol that even Washington's traditional allies no longer enjoy. Where Macron, Merz, or von der Leyen are received with distance, Putin was treated as a true head of state one whose presence commands respect and gravity. At the close of the press conference, the meeting produced an exchange that speaks volumes about the atmosphere: Donald Trump: 'We'll speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon. Thank you very much, Vladimir'. Vladimir Putin, in English: 'Next time in Moscow.' 'Oh, that's an interesting one,' Trump replied. 'I'll get a little heat for that one. But I could see it possibly happening.' This brief exchange highlights the fundamental difference with European leaders: here, no condescension, no paternalism, no empty threats. Just two leaders assuming their responsibilities, seeking pragmatic solutions, aware that the future is decided between great powers not in the corridors of Brussels. The message is crystal clear. While the European Union believed itself to be indispensable in managing the Ukrainian crisis, it was not even invited. The Alaska summit took place without it without its diplomats, without its arrogant commissioners, without its pseudo-peace initiatives that were never credible. The EU is in decline: diplomatically, economically, strategically. It clings to a subordinate role, piling up sanctions and bellicose rhetoric, hoping to exist through endless wars. But in reality, Washington has never considered Brussels a strategic partner, only a docile executor. The Trump-Putin meeting is glaring proof of this. This diplomatic shift now puts Ukraine in a corner. Trump has been clear: he wants to end the war launched by the Biden administration, which turned Kiev into a proxy against Moscow. The United States has no interest in prolonging a long and costly war that undermines its economy and fuels internal divisions. Zelensky's image has crumbled amid scandals and growing international fatigue. Despite the veneer of respect and lionization given to him by Western public figures, he finds himself with little real power to decide anything, even when it concerns his own country, now that even Washington is preparing to move on from him. Trump knows perfectly well that Zelensky's Ukraine is just a pawn and that the bill must be settled. Another key takeaway from this summit is Vladimir Putin's diplomatic stature. In the midst of a military operation in Ukraine, despite relentless demonization campaigns, he has imposed himself as the man with whom great powers must reckon. His strategy is clear: extend a hand to Trump to build a framework for cooperation, emphasize the natural neighborhood between Russia and the United States via Alaska, and propose an honorable way out of the Ukrainian crisis. Putin plays the pragmatism card, investing in time and patience while the EU persists in ideology, russophobia, and moralizing postures. Unsurprisingly, CNN and other Atlanticist media tried to distort reality. According to them, Trump was 'humiliated' by Putin. But the images circulating on social media speak for themselves: two men smiling, shaking hands, visibly satisfied with their meeting. Western propaganda tries to turn every gesture into conflict, every handshake into confrontation. But the truth is simple: Russia and the United States, at a strategic level, are closer to an agreement than NATO-aligned propagandists are willing to admit. Brussels would do well to meditate on this lesson. Washington has never saved its allies. From Kabul to Baghdad, from Saigon to Kiev, the White House always abandons those who believe they can rely on it. Americans know they cannot afford a direct war against the Russian army, supported by a people hardened and seasoned by history. The Alaska summit marks a turning point. It reveals an undeniable truth: global diplomacy is now being shaped without Europe. Under Trump, the United States may well reestablish ties with Moscow to end a useless and ruinous war. Putin emerges from this meeting stronger than ever, proving he was never isolated and remains the most respected and formidable head of state on the world stage. As for the EU, it finds itself exposed to a posture of mere spectator, humiliated by its own illusions. Its blind obedience to Washington has led it to a dead end. Russia, meanwhile, continues to move forward. And history will remember that in Alaska, two men opened a path toward peace leaving the European warmongers behind. The Alaska summit has been perceived by many Africans as a revealing moment about the true nature of global power relations. What emerges is a fundamental truth: on the world stage, power only recognizes and respects power. Russia, through its sovereignty, military capability, and the firmness of its leadership, compelled Washington to treat it as an equal. Normally, the United States imposes its will through threats, interference, or military force. But in the case of Russia, a major nuclear power led by a patriot, Washington restrains itself and dares not employ its usual methods. For Africans, this event is more than a simple diplomatic episode: it embodies both a moral victory and a political lesson. It shows that only genuine independence, backed by economic, political, and military strength, can command respect in international affairs. This is why the summit resonates so strongly across Africa. It confirms that Western domination is not inevitable and that a multipolar world is possible. Seeing Russia stand firm inspires hope that, one day, a united and sovereign Africa will also be able to command respect and defend its interests with dignity.
Russia Today
18 hours ago
- Russia Today
Kiev fears repetition of Oval Office ‘disaster'
The upcoming meeting between Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky and US President Donald Trump could replicate the 'disastrous' Oval Office confrontation earlier this year, the Washington Post reported on Sunday. The Ukrainian leader, joined by senior EU officials, is set to meet Trump on Monday for what was widely reported as a discussion on a potential peace February visit to Washington ended in a PR debacle. His talks with Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance collapsed into a confrontation, with Trump accusing him of disrespect and 'gambling with World War III.' A joint press conference was scrapped, Zelensky was ushered out, and the US briefly froze military aid. US media, including the Washington Post, called the session 'disastrous' and a major diplomatic setback for Kiev.'Foremost in Ukrainians' minds is avoiding a repetition of a contentious meeting in the Oval Office,' the newspaper wrote.'Unfortunately, there is such risk indeed' of a repeat, Nikolay Beleskov, a research fellow at the Ukrainian National Institute for Strategic Studies, told the Washington Post. Beleskov added that Zelensky must tread carefully during the Washington visit, stressing that the Ukrainian leader needs to 'strike a balance between being non-provocative' and pushing his concern comes just days after Trump held his first face-to-face meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin since the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022. The summit in Anchorage, Alaska, on Friday was described by Trump as 'warm' and by Putin as 'frank' and 'substantive.'After the Alaska talks, Trump said Washington and Moscow were 'pretty close to the end' of the conflict. He is reportedly drafting a plan requiring Kiev to cede parts of Donbass still under its control, in exchange for a Kremlin halt to hostilities elsewhere. Zelensky has repeatedly rejected any territorial has insisted that any settlement must include Ukrainian neutrality, demilitarization, and denazification, along with recognition of the new territorial reality covering Crimea, Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson, and Zaporozhye, all of which voted to become parts of Russia. Putin expressed cautious optimism after the summit, saying the talks had brought Russia and the US 'closer' to ending hostilities.
