Traditional owners call for diaries of WA settler who killed Aboriginal people to be released in full
The Naaguja Yamatji elder Derek Councillor has heard accounts of Major Logue passed down for generations.
He would ride up on his horse shooting Aboriginal people on sight.
'He wouldn't ask questions – he'd just shoot and kill,' Councillor tells Guardian Australia.
'When people used to see him riding up to wherever they were, a lot of people were scared and would run away, they wouldn't [want] to be where he was.'
The stories of a feared man once whispered about in communities around Geraldton, 400km north of Perth, have been confirmed by the man's own hand, 123 years after his death.
Logue – Major is his given name, not a military rank – went on to become one of Western Australia's earliest parliamentarians. He kept a diary from 1850 to his death in 1900, a version of which is being prepared for publication. But those behind the forthcoming book have decided to omit information relating to the killings.
Councillor and other traditional owners are demanding that the diary be published in full.
Amid handwritten diary entries that document 50 years of daily life are chilling accounts of the killing of local Yamatji people.
Writing in a code called pigpen, also known as Freemason's cipher, Logue described the murders of at least 19 Yamatji people between 1851 and 1853.
The coded entries, critically by Guardian Australia as part of the Descendants series, record a number of attacks on Yamatji by Logue and others – some where he was directly responsible, others recording attacks made by his neighbours. Some of the dead, who appear in earlier pages of the diary as helping the settlers, are listed by name.
A version of his diaries is being prepared for publication by a small press publisher in WA which focuses on colonial diaries and historical texts and includes books about Aboriginal Australians. The publisher's latest booklist, published in July 2025, includes descriptions of historical works using outdated and racist terms, including one use of 'nigger', titles that repeatedly refer to Aboriginal people as 'savages' and in one title 'clapped out gins'.
A local historian, Nan Broad, who has worked on the diaries for six years and prepared them for publication, tells Guardian Australia that she had translated the coded sections and knows that they describe the murders of Aboriginal people.
'It's a bit hard to single that poor fellow out just because he wrote a diary – that's a bit underhanded,' she says.
'To protect the person who holds the diaries we felt it was … expedient, perhaps, to not have that in writing. Everyone knows they did it.'
Broad says Logue's actions on the frontier were well known locally but the nation is not yet ready to understand its often bloody and brutal past.
'I am very distressed by that situation,' she says. 'But we are too close to it at the moment.
'In Australia we are too close to the colonisation, confrontation and the history that went on. It's not old history yet to be looked at dispassionately.'
Frontier killings and massacres were widespread from the arrival of the first white settlers to Australia in 1788. An eight-year project by the University of Newcastle documented hundreds of massacres and frontier killings. That project, published in conjunction with Guardian Australia, found that 10,657 people were killed in at least 438 colonial frontier massacres.
Councillor says the full extent of the Logue diaries, including the coded sections of past deeds, must be published to heal and acknowledge the truth.
'They should be published in full,' he says. 'We Yamatji people, we don't half-tell a story. We tell the story fully. If he did do all these killings and it's in his diaries, it should be published that he did do it.'
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
There are 11 coded diary entries between 1851 and 1853 that describe shooting and killing Aboriginal people; witnessing others doing the shooting; going on a 'campaign' to kill natives; and later riding over the 'battlefield' and seeing the bodies of those he killed lying dead or 'hastily buried'.
The diaries do not contain mention of the 1954 Bootenal massacre, in which 30 Naaguja men, women and children were recorded as killed by a group of settlers led by the local police deputy superintendent, John Nicol Drummond, Logue's brother-in-law. The Naaguja say the actual number killed was in the hundreds.
Scans of the diaries have been available on microfilm at the Battye library in Perth since the 1950s.
But publisher Hesperian Press and a descendant of Logue who holds the original diaries have declined to publish the coded sections in the version being prepared for sale. Broad says she supports their decision.
Hesperian Press's owner, Peter Bridge, did not respond to questions about Yamatji concerns, but in an earlier statement to Guardian Australia said the coded sections of Logue's diaries were 'in unique characters' and 'are not omitted – they are simply unprintable'.
He added that the location of the omitted passages would be indicated in the published book; that the printed edition of the Logue diaries would make 'no attempt to deceive, suppress or editorialise' and that Hesperian Press was publishing a primary document 'faithfully and unflinchingly, as is our usual method'.
'If your concern is that the code may conceal politically potent material – I suggest that you take that up with Logue himself, who is, unfortunately, unavailable for an interview,' he said.
'We publish the diaries because they are historical documents, not a moral confession.'
Councillor says the diary 'just confirms what we as Yamatji people have said'.
'We weren't lying when we told these stories,' he said 'This actually proves it.
'The stories of those people that were involved in those massacres and the people that died, they can rest easy now because their story's been told.
'They'll be able to finally settle, instead of being tormented and their soul not resting. They will finally rest in peace.'
Indigenous Australians can call 13YARN on 13 92 76 for information and crisis support; or call Lifeline on 13 11 14, Mensline on 1300 789 978 or Beyond Blue on 1300 22 4636
Lorena Allam is a professor at the Jumbunna Institute for Indigenous research at the University of Technology Sydney
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
17 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Aussie cop exposes the red flag behaviours paedophiles use to groom kids - and the two things every parent needs to know
A former child abuse detective has exposed two subtle but sinister tactics predators use to get close to children, warning that it's not just the kids being groomed - it's the adults too. Kristi McVee, who spent a decade as a senior detective with the Western Australia Police Force specialising in child abuse, says parents are often unknowingly the first target in a predator's plan. Now the founder of Child Abuse Prevention and Education Australia (CAPE), Ms McVee is on a mission to educate parents on the real-world grooming tactics she witnessed during years of harrowing frontline work. 'There are two things child sex offenders do to groom adults so they can get close to kids,' she told viewers in a video last month. 'Number one, they want you to like them. Number two, they need you to trust them.' She explained that offenders often embed themselves into a family's life, posing as friends, mentors or even community helpers, to gain the trust they need to be left alone with a child. 'If they're not someone who is in your family already, like a parent or a grandparent, they're going to be someone introduced to your family. 'They're going to need you to trust them.' Ms McVee warned that there's no single blueprint for how predators earn trust, but there are common threads. 'How this looks depends on the person, but they're very friendly, very helpful, offering opinions, offering advice, wanting to help coach or wanting to help support, it's dependent on the child and the relationship,' she said. 'If it's a coach, for instance: 'Your child's very special, they need extra support.' 'If it's a friend who wants to get closer to your children: 'Let me take them for the weekend so that you can have a night off.' It really depends. 'They want you to like them and they want you to trust them so they can get your children alone with them.' Ms McVee also shared some of the common red flags that parents often miss. She said predators may try to normalise inappropriate physical contact, such as giving excessive hugs, kisses, or insisting on children sitting on their lap. They may touch the child in ways that aren't necessary, including around areas close to their private parts, she said. They often seek out alone time with children and go out of their way to arrange situations where other adults aren't present, such as sleepovers, private tutoring, or 'special' playdates. In many cases, the adult will keep secrets with the child and ask them not to tell their parents, using phrases like 'this is our little secret' or 'I'll get in trouble if you tell.' They may also shower the child with special treats, extravagant gifts, or foods their parents have said no to, as a way of building loyalty and complicity. Another tactic involves treating the child as if they're more mature than they are, including exposing them to adult content. Predators may create opportunities for nudity or semi-nudity, for instance by offering to bathe or change the child, and showing little regard for their privacy. In some cases, they'll deliberately undermine the parents, dismissing their rules, going behind their back, or brushing off the importance of teaching body safety and abuse prevention. Ms McVee said the risk is greater than many parents realise, warning that one in three girls and one in five boys will be sexually abused before the age of 18. Disturbingly, more than 90 per cent of the time, the offender is someone the child knows. Her own awareness of the scale of the problem began in her first week as a police officer. She said she was shocked by how widespread abuse was, and how little understanding the public had of how it really happens. Through her organisation, CAPE, she now works to bridge that gap by sharing her insights through blogs, educational resources and social media. She explained that grooming is rarely a random act, instead, it follows a pattern. Most predators go through five stages: identifying a victim, building a connection, isolating the child, initiating abuse, and then maintaining control. Her key advice to parents is to teach their children the difference between feeling safe and unsafe, because children, especially very young ones, don't always recognise when something is wrong. 'Sometimes children don't understand what it means to feel unsafe, so they don't understand when something inappropriate is happening,' she said. 'When I talk with kids as young as two or three, I'll say, 'When I feel unsafe I get butterflies in my tummy, my hands feel sweaty and my voice is shaky.' That helps kids to identify if they're feeling unsafe.' She also urged parents to be wary of adults who appear too eager to spend time with their children. 'Look out for those people who are paying way too much attention to kids,' she said. 'No one should want to spend more time with your child than you want to spend with your child. Even as parents, we don't always want to be around our kids, they're annoying at times. There is not one adult that should want to be around your child more than you.' For more information and access to free resources, parents can visit Ms McVee's website, Child Abuse Prevention and Education Australia.
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
‘No clear explanation': businesses reliant on Meta struggle in the wake of wrongful suspensions
This time of the year is typically the busy booking season for Sam Enticknap, a makeup artist based in Margaret River, Western Australia. But the phone has stopped ringing since her Instagram account, which had 48,000 followers, was suspended without notice by Meta three weeks ago. 'I received a horrible email saying a reference to child sexual exploitation content, which obviously was quite traumatic to see,' she said. 'Saying my Instagram accounts have been disabled with just no clear explanation.' Enticknap estimates that, as a result of her account being wrongly suspended, she has lost 80% of the bookings she otherwise would have leading into the busy wedding season in Margaret River. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'A lot of people come through Instagram, they find hashtags and they find word of mouth, and obviously through other businesses that always tag us,' she said. Enticknap said it made her realise how reliant she was on Meta for business. She said she lost two Instagram accounts and a Facebook account as a result of the permanent suspension, and said attempts to contact the company to have the ban appealed had resulted in a 'dead end'. She said she was not alone, citing another Western Australian business – which sells artificial flowers – which had been suspended from Meta platforms and received the same reference to child sexual exploitation. 'My friend who has another successful makeup business, she went down the week after me, but she's managed to get her account back,' Enticknap said. Incorrect account suspensions on social media platforms are not a new phenomenon. Often when Meta is asked by media about an account, it is later restored. However, something changed in July. A flood of emails were sent to journalists from people all over the world saying that, without warning, their Facebook and Instagram accounts had been suspended. Many were told – erroneously – by Meta that their accounts had been suspended for breaching community standards on child sexual exploitation, abuse and nudity. Users report Meta has typically been unresponsive to their pleas for assistance, often with standardised responses to requests for review, almost all of which have been rejected. There are petitions with tens of thousands of signatures, a subreddit devoted to people who have had their accounts disabled and talk of a class action against Meta over the bans. From around a dozen emails received in the past two weeks, Guardian Australia has reported five accounts – including Enticknap's to Meta, which said it had internally escalated the investigation of those accounts. Media reporting of the plight of businesses struggling as a result of their Instagram ban has led to many of those accounts being restored. But the company claims there has not been an increase in incorrect account suspension, and the volume of users complaining was not indicative of new targeting or over-enforcement. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'We take action on accounts that violate our policies, and people can appeal if they think we've made a mistake,' a spokesperson for Meta said. Meta is reliant on a mix of human reports and automation to find and remove accounts in breach of its rules. The company publishes data on how many accounts it removes – and data on how many it subsequently restores – in its quarterly community standards enforcement report. However, the latest report only covers to the end of March, so it can't yet be judged whether the company has had a significant uptick in removed accounts or appeals. For Enticknap, the suspension carries an emotional weight. Her father died this year, and the photos and messages her father uploaded to Facebook cannot be accessed. 'I've tried to message and just say: 'Can I just get my data? Can I just get that? Shut me down, but let me get those pictures back',' she said. 'But nothing. I've not had any reply.'
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
Arsenic in the damper, campers driven off a cliff: the murky historical links of AACo, Australia's largest beef producer
Warning: This article contains historical records that use racist and offensive language, and descriptions of events that will be distressing to some readers. It also contains references to Indigenous Australians who have died In a bustling Newcastle suburb there is a large park where families gather under giant fig trees. Few know it is named after a man who killed Aboriginal people. Gregson park was given to the local council in 1889 by Jesse Gregson, then the head of one of the nation's most important enterprises, the Australian Agricultural Company. AACo, today worth about $830m, is still Australia's largest beef producer, with stations covering almost 1% of the nation's land mass. Its majority shareholder is the UK billionaire Joe Lewis, whose family own Tottenham Hotspur, followed by the Australian mining magnate Andrew Forrest and his ex-wife, Nicola Forrest. An investigation as part of Guardian Australia's the Descendants series has revealed the company's historical links with the dispossession, shooting and poisoning of Aboriginal people – through the exploits of Gregson before he joined the company, and others who helped establish its farming operations in the 19th century. The discoveries raise complex questions about how longstanding Australian companies can reckon with past harms. Before Gregson joined AACo in the 1870s, he managed a sheep station in central Queensland where he perpetrated a series of massacres that unleashed a bloody war. Gregson arrived at Rainworth station, 300km inland from Rockhampton, in June 1861. Queensland had become a self-governing colony two years earlier and the frontier was moving north, assisted by the notorious native police – contingents of Aboriginal troopers led by white officers tasked with protecting the livelihoods of settlers and punishing Aboriginal resistance. As Gregson and his workers approached the station, they were greeted by Aboriginal people. 'We had been met by blacks who made overtures of peace by attaching white feathers to our horses' bridles or anywhere they could stick them,' the pastoralist wrote in his memoirs. 'As soon as the drays reached the camp I gave the blacks to understand that they must keep clear which they did good humouredly enough.' The next month he and the native police went looking for some missing sheep, finding them on the side of a ridge with a Gayiri tribe. They opened fire. Gregson describes the encounter as a 'brush' but native police records show at least four Gayiri people were shot. Months later, on the property next to Gregson's, the Gayiri responded by killing 19 men, women and children – including the Victorian sheep farmer Horatio Wills, the father of Australian rules football co-founder Tom Wills. It was Queensland's largest massacre of white settlers by Aboriginal people. Gregson assembled a group of settlers to track those he believed to be responsible. Finding them within days, they shot the sleeping tribe, killing at least 30. More reprisals would follow, led by native police and vigilantes, wiping out about 300 Aboriginal people. There are various theories about what provoked the Wills massacre but the commonly held view among historians, Indigenous knowledge holders and Wills' descendants is that the encounter with Gregson and the native police was a tipping point. It is believed that the Gayiri thought Horatio Wills was Gregson's brother, and therefore an appropriate target for retribution. About a decade later Gregson moved to Newcastle in New South Wales to take up the position of superintendent of AACo. He remains the company's longest-serving superintendent, holding the position for 30 years and wrote one of the first histories of the company. Darryl Black, a Bidjara and Ghungalu man from central Queensland who learnt of the massacres from his father, said Gregson 'wasn't a very good person at all'. He described Gregson's appointment to the prestigious company as his 'reward' for opening up the region to farming and grazing. Founded in 1824, AACo is the oldest continuously operating company in Australia. It was established by an act of British parliament when a handful of UK politicians, banking directors and business leaders were granted 1m acres of land around Port Stephens to raise sheep for fleece to be sold on the London market. The Worimi historian John Maynard wrote that the company's arrival on his ancestors' country at a time when his people were being ravaged by violence and disease was both a lifeline and 'another means of enforced organised brutality'. The company employed Aboriginal people as stockmen, sailors, constables and domestic workers. When AACo experienced convict labour shortages, the company's records show that Aboriginal workers helped fill the gap and were an essential part of its success. Historical reports link the company to at least two shooting attacks on Aboriginal people near Newcastle in the Hunter Valley region, in 1830 and 1835, in retaliation for the spearing of shepherds and livestock. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion In the later encounter, according to a 1922 newspaper article, soldiers retained by AACo joined local vigilantes in tracking an Aboriginal group who had speared five shepherds. The soldiers, fearing ambush, stopped before the rest of the group fired on the sleeping camp at a cliff's edge – but according to the report later re-engaged to hunt down survivors. 'Maddened with fear under the gunfire they broke hither and thither in vain attempts to escape,' the article says of the clifftop encounter. 'Panic stricken they turned to the cliff edge and sprang into space.' About the same time, the same article claims that a group of convicts employed on an AACo station poisoned a group of Aboriginal people in retaliation for raids on cattle, by giving them damper laced with arsenic. It says they 'lay down and died all around'. The modern-day suburb of Belbora (from the Worimi Baal Bora) is said to be named after the tragedy, meaning 'a place to be shunned'. AACo eventually sold its NSW properties and moved into cattle production. Today it holds 7m hectares across the Northern Territory and Queensland, including two properties within an hour of Gregson's former station. An AACo spokesperson told Guardian Australia: 'We won't and can't comment on historical matters, especially given we don't have access to records from the time.' Most of the company's records, dating back to 1824, are held at the Australian National University. Last year, to mark its 200th anniversary, the company held an exhibition showcasing its history through archival photos, maps, drawings and papers held at the university. The exhibition's section on Aboriginal history said the Worimi people had been largely displaced by cedar getters (convicts who harvested timber) before AACo was established, but said the company 'would also have displaced some of the local Worimi'. James Fitzgerald, a legal consultant for the Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility, said companies had an obligation to confront the 'evils of the past'. 'Just creeping along as though nothing happened is moral cowardice, particularly when it's an enterprise that's making money off dispossession,' he said. 'The more a company's wealth is built on that sort of dispossession, I would have thought, the greater its obligation to take account of that as a decent corporate citizen in 2025.' Fitzgerald said there were comparable cases where mining companies had made reparations through apologies, working with traditional owners to improve cultural heritage management, setting Indigenous employment targets or negotiating financial compensation. The AACo spokesperson said the company had built 'trusted relationships' with many traditional custodians across the properties managed. 'We recognise their culture and deep connection to Country and work with them to ensure we engage respectfully,' they said. Joe Lewis, through a spokesperson, declined to comment to Guardian Australia. Andrew and Nicola Forrest did not respond to questions. Fitzgerald said the 1992 Mabo verdict, which recognised Indigenous peoples' rights to their land, raised complex questions for Australian companies that had built their wealth on land taken from and cleared of Aboriginal people. 'If you keep pulling at the thread long enough, it implicates the entire basis of our sovereign state economy,' he said. 'We are all the beneficiaries of these actions in one way or another, whether as real property owners, shareholders or super fund members.' Indigenous Australians can call 13YARN on 13 92 76 for information and crisis support; or call Lifeline on 13 11 14, Mensline on 1300 789 978 or Beyond Blue on 1300 22 4636 Lorena Allam is a professor at the Jumbunna Institute for Indigenous research at the University of Technology Sydney
