The Tecno Spark 40 series has a $214 model that puts some iPhone 16 specs to shame
Pixel 9
Samsung
Galaxy S25
Tecno Spark 40
Tecno Spark 40 Pro
Tecno Spark 40 Pro+
The debut of the MediaTek Helio 200 chipset
Is there a spec that would make you choose a budget phone over a flagship?
No, I love my flagship phone
A faster charging battery
The refresh rate of the display
An in-display fingerprint sensor
No, I love my flagship phone
0%
A faster charging battery
100%
The refresh rate of the display
0%
An in-display fingerprint sensor
0%
Receive the latest Android news
By subscribing you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy
50 MP main camera on the back
13 MP selfie camera
Android 15 with HiOS 15.1 interface
IP64 water and dust resistance rating
Tecno doesn't share any details about the second sensor on the main camera or how many Android updates you could expect. However, phones in this price range usually come with 2-3 years of software support and an extra year of security updates. The IP64 water and dust protection rating means the device is fully protected from dust and will survive splashes and spills of clean water or rain.
The rest of the specs are:Tecno doesn't share any details about the second sensor on the main camera or how many Android updates you could expect. However, phones in this price range usually come with 2-3 years of software support and an extra year of security updates. The IP64 water and dust protection rating means the device is fully protected from dust and will survive splashes and spills of clean water or rain.
Tecno Spark 40 Pro
The middle child in the series is the Tecno Spark 40 Pro. It has a flat 6.78-inch display, which shares the AMOLED panel, 1220p+ resolution and 144Hz refresh rate with the Pro+ model. Its chipset is the Helio G100, again with 8GB and 128GB or 256GB storage.
The Spark 40 Pro+ comes in Aurora White, Nebula Black, Moon Titanium, and Tundra Green colors. All that is offered on pre-order in Uganda for UGX 769,000, which would be about $214 when directly converted.
50MP main camera
13MP selfie camera
5,200 mAh battery
45W wired charging, 30W wireless charging
5W reverse wireless charging
IP64 water and dust resistance
Offered in Ink Black, Lake Blue, Moon Titanium, and Bamboo Green, the Spark 40 Pro starts selling July 7 for UGX 679,000 in Uganda, which is about $189 when directly converted.
Tecno Spark 40 The base
Under the hood, you get a Helio G81 chipset with up to 8GB RAM and 128/256GB storage. The battery is 5,200 mAh and supports 45W wired charging. It comes in four colors: Ink Black, Titanium Gray, Mirage Blue, and Vail White. All that comes at UGX 479,000, which would be about $133 when directly converted.
What's up with the premium phones?
iPhone 16 ,
iPhone 16 , I also wonder why a $799 flagship device has a lower refresh rate display than a $214 budget phone.
I am the first to confess that I wouldn't buy a Tecno phone just for the faster charging, but I am still looking at the Galaxy S25 , and Pixel 9 and wonder why they don't charge faster. In the case of the, I also wonder why a $799 flagship device has a lower refresh rate display than a $214 budget phone.
None of the Tecno Spark 40 models is meant for the US market, and comparing them to some of the best smartphones in the world would be unfair. However, I'd like to see Apple, Google, and Samsung more worried about specs. They don't make a phone good, but they make me feel better about spending hundreds of dollars on those phones.
None of the Tecno Spark 40 models is meant for the US market, and comparing them to some of the best smartphones in the world would be unfair. However, I'd like to see Apple, Google, and Samsung more worried about specs. They don't make a phone good, but they make me feel better about spending hundreds of dollars on those phones.
The rest fo the spec list is basically the same as the Spark 40 Pro+:Offered in Ink Black, Lake Blue, Moon Titanium, and Bamboo Green, the Spark 40 Pro starts selling July 7 for UGX 679,000 in Uganda, which is about $189 when directly converted.The base Spark 40 model is also the most basic. It has a 6.67-inch IPS LCD display with HD+ resolution and a 120Hz refresh rate. Its cameras are an 8MP selfie shooter and a 50MP rear camera.Under the hood, you get a Helio G81 chipset with up to 8GB RAM and 128/256GB storage. The battery is 5,200 mAh and supports 45W wired charging. It comes in four colors: Ink Black, Titanium Gray, Mirage Blue, and Vail White. All that comes at UGX 479,000, which would be about $133 when directly converted.
As you can imagine, the Spark 40 is the base model, while the Spark 40 Pro and Spark 40 Pro+ introduce improvements to the chipsets, displays, and durability.The Spark 40 Pro+ is the first smartphone with a MediaTek Helio 200 chipset. Paired with 8GB RAM and 128/256GB storage, the 6nm chipset has slightly improved graphics over its predecessor.What should make Apple reconsider some decisions about the iPhone 16 are the Spark 40 Pro+ display and battery. The 6.78-inch curved AMOLED display has a 1220p+ resolution, 144Hz refresh rate, and under-display fingerprint sensor. The 5,200 mAh battery supports up to 45W wired charging, 30W wireless charging, and 5W reverse wireless charging.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GSM Arena
4 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Our Motorola Razr+ 2025 video review is out
In our Motorola Razr 2025 video review, we concluded that the phone holds promise, but chipset performance, battery life and camera image quality left something to be desired. Maybe the Motorola Razr+ 2025 is the better option? The truth is that the Razr+ 2025 is essentially a re-release of last year's Razr+, except with upgraded ingress protection (IP48 instead of IPX8) and a newer Android version out of the box. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is no match for modern flagship chips like in the Razr Ultra 2025, but it trounces the Dimensity 7400X inside the vanilla Razr 2025. So that's one problem solved. Motorola Razr+ 2025 The battery life situation is not as big of a win. The phone doesn't last as long as its predecessor (despite having the same relevant hardware) and it only beats the vanilla Razr 2025 by a small margin. As for the camera, the plus model is the only one with a telephoto lens (50MP 2x), while the other two offer an ultra-wide instead. It's a mixed bag with some good results and some issues that need fixing. Watch the video for more details: You should also read our Motorola Razr+ 2025 review if you are considering it as your next phone. Motorola Razr+ 2025
Phone Arena
7 hours ago
- Phone Arena
Apple's perfectionism is setting up the long-awaited first foldable iPhone for failure
While perfectionism is definitely a good quality to have in an artistic field like painting, sculpture, or even creative writing, trying too hard to get a product just right before releasing it to the masses can be a fatal mistake in the overcrowded and ultra-competitive tech industry. Is there such a thing as a flawless smartphone? Not that I know of, and I'm sure both the most hardcore iPhone fans and the most devoted Android enthusiasts around will be quick to agree with me and point to the "obvious" weaknesses of the best devices from the other camp as proof. But if Apple hasn't been able to design the perfect iPhone after 18 years of uninterrupted refinement work, why does the Cupertino-based tech giant insist on endlessly polishing its rookie foldable effort behind closed doors? Okay, I admit I might be exaggerating there just a teensy bit, although it's hard to deny that foldable phones are in trouble around the world after an explosive start only a few years ago. Back in 2022, for instance, global shipments jumped from 9 million units the year before to a 16 million talfly, with the number then expected to rise to 26 million the following year. But instead of that big increase, the thriving market segment only ended up posting an uptick to around 18 million unit sales in 2023. Weirdly enough, I can't find a reliable global figure for 2024, which makes me fairly certain that those 25 million analyst predictions at the beginning of the year haven't panned out. This is just one of many iPhone Fold concepts floating around the interwebs these last couple of years. | Image Credit -- Apple Insider What I can find are a few different reports anticipating a 2025 decline in foldable smartphone demand, which is clearly not what companies like Samsung, Huawei, Motorola, Honor, Oppo, Vivo, and Google had expected to happen at this stage in the market's evolution. I'm willing to bet that this trend isn't making Apple happy either, as it could put a lot of pressure on the first-gen " iPhone Fold " to save the foldable landscape from ruin. We all know that's not going to happen at the flick of a switch, but at the same time, Cupertino simply cannot afford to waste much more time and risk entering the market when no one cares about or believes in foldables anymore. In an ideal world, Apple would swoop in, blow all our minds with the invisible crease, stunning overall design, and cutting-edge specifications of its first-ever foldable iPhone, thus forcing Samsung to instantly up its game too and roll out a massively upgraded Galaxy Z Fold 8. Everyone from Huawei to Google would then follow suit with incredible advancements of their own, making us all buy a high-end foldable by 2027. Unfortunately, that's where you need to stop dreaming with your eyes open and envision such utopian scenes because the truth is the iPhone Fold will probably not blow many minds no matter how much time Apple spends preparing the device for its already long overdue launch. The flawed but undeniably great Galaxy Z Fold 6 is proof that Samsung has come a long way since 2019. | Image Credit -- PhoneArena And that's perfectly fine by me because I understand how first-gen products work. Remember 2019's disastrous original Galaxy Fold? Granted, times are different now, and the level of expectations is much higher, but... Apple only has itself to blame for that. Even in 2025, the company could have released a foldable iPhone that would have probably been relatively well-received as long as it didn't break after the first few days of use. I honestly hope that will remain the case next year, and for the sake of the entire foldable market, I really hope Apple won't delay this launch beyond 2026. I know that this is not the "Apple way" or whatever, but the company has to throw its hat in the ring ASAP regardless of production challenges or quality issues. Obviously, I'm not saying that the iPhone Fold should be released without due diligence, but as long as it turns on, doesn't break very easily, and it does all the things a "conventional" iPhone can do in a sleek new package, Apple should probably pull the trigger before it's too late... and start working on a refined sequel. Otherwise, this project could end up suffering the same fate as the AirPods Max or, even worse, the Vision Pro, neither of which have received a sequel or blown many minds after spending years and years in development hell. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase This offer is not available in your area.
GSM Arena
9 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Google loses $314 million lawsuit over data transfers when Android phones are idle
Google just lost the class action suit against it in California – the suit was filed on behalf of an estimated 14 million Californians in 2019 and alleged $800 million in damages over Android phones collecting and transmitting data to Google while idle. The jury sided with the plaintiffs and awarded them $314.6 million (that's almost pi!). More specifically, Android phones collected data that would be used for targeted advertising and transmitted it to Google's servers over cellular data – at the phone owner's expense. Google will appeal this verdict as it claims that users were not harmed by these data transfers and that users consented to this when they agreed to Google's terms of service and privacy policies. A spokesperson for the company stated that the verdict 'misunderstands services that are critical to the security, performance, and reliability of Android devices'. Another group has filed a separate lawsuit, this time on behalf of Android users in the other 49 US states – this trial will begin in April. Source
