Canada's mens soccer coach blasts Trump's 'ridiculous' comments on nation becoming 51st state
Since winning the presidential election in November, Trump has repeatedly stated that Canada should become America's 51st state, a thought that doesn't sit well with Canada's Wisconsin-born soccer coach Jesse Marsch.
'I'd like to address the 51st state discourse, which I find unsettling and frankly insulting,' said Marsch while speaking to the press in Los Angeles earlier this week. 'If I have one message to our president, it's lay off the ridiculous rhetoric about Canada being the 51st state.'
'As an American, I'm ashamed of the arrogance and disregard that we've shown one of our historically oldest, strongest, and most loyal allies,' said Marsch.
The Racine, WI, native and former U.S. Men's National team player compared the politics of his home nation to that of the country he's now coaching.
'Canada is a strong, independent nation that's deep-rooted in decency,' said Marsch, who at one time was touted to take over the U.S. Men's Soccer team. 'It's a place that values high ethics and respect, unlike the polarized, disrespectful, and often now, hate-fueled climate that's in the US,' he said, comparing Canada and the United States.
Trump reiterated his desire for the United States to absorb Canada during Wednesday's inaugural cabinet meeting of his second term.
'I say Canada should be our 51st state. It's not fair for us to be supporting Canada, and if we don't support them, they don't subsist as a nation,' Trump said, flanked by his cabinet appointees and special government employee Elon Musk.
On Thursday morning, Trump took to his social media platform, Truth Social, to blast both Canada and Mexico. 'Drugs are still pouring into our Country from Mexico and Canada at very high and unacceptable levels,' he wrote.
While U.S. Customs officials intercepted 20,000 pounds of fentanyl at the Mexican border in 2024, only 43 pounds of fentanyl were intercepted at the Canadian border last year, according to an NBC News analysis of U.S. Customs and Border Protection data.
Also included in Trump's social media post was a deadline for his looming tariffs on Canada and Mexico. 'The proposed TARIFFS scheduled to go into effect on MARCH FOURTH will, indeed, go into effect, as scheduled,' wrote Trump.
During his cabinet meeting earlier this week, Trump outlined the crippling effects his tariffs will have on Canada. 'The tariffs will make it impossible for them to sell cars into the United States. The tariffs will make it impossible for them to sell lumber or anything else into the United States,' said Trump of how tariffs will affect Canada.
Since Trump's pugilistic tone toward Canada has taken shape, the tension between the longtime allies has boiled over into the world of sports. Canadian fans have repeatedly booed the American national anthem at NBA and NHL games. That trend continued on February 15th when the U.S. and Canada's hockey teams faced off in an international hockey tournament in Montreal, where three fights broke out in the first nine seconds of the game between the players on the ice.
'These international tournaments for Canada means something different now,' acknowledged Marsch.
The most highly watched international tournament in all of sports is just over a year and a half away. The World Cup, which will be hosted between the United States, Canada, and Mexico, could see the host nations play each other in the knockout rounds amid the backdrop of unprecedented geopolitical dynamics.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Statesman
8 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Trump vs Murdoch: lawsuit of the century
Photo by AP Photo/Evan Vucci Donald Trump has asked a federal court to speed up the deposition of Rupert Murdoch in the president's $10bn defamation lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal 's parent company Dow Jones – in case the 94-year-old dies before the case reaches court. In a motion, Trump's lawyers claim that Murdoch 'has suffered from multiple health issues throughout his life' and has 'suffered recent significant health scares'. But Murdoch is not taking it lying down in his bath chair. 'I'm 94 years old and I will not be intimidated,' he told friends. The WSJ stories alleged Trump sent a 'bawdy' drawing to Jeffrey Epstein for his birthday in 2003, and that the US president was told in May that he features in the Epstein files. The White House denies both claims. Insiders at Murdoch's News UK say there is zero chance of Murdoch backing down. 'He may have his faults, but Murdoch always backs his editors and he has huge admiration for [WSJ editor] Emma Tucker – that's why she was hand-picked from the Sunday Times and sent to the US.' At least Trump was able to get away from the furore at his Aberdeen golf course, where he could enjoy stunning views up the coast a mere 15 miles to Cruden Bay, the ancestral home of one Rupert Murdoch. On the subject of News UK, Keir Starmer is bringing in the company's chief operating officer, David Dinsmore, as his 'very own Malcolm Tucker'. Dinsmore, who was the Sun's editor from 2013 to 2015, has been hired into a new role as 'permanent secretary for communications', in which his first task will be to create a strategy for communicating in a digital age, using his contacts at the likes of Meta and Google. His second task will be to get to grips with the government's eye-watering 7,000 comms staff. Dinsmore's appointment has gone down like a lump of lead on Merseyside, where the Sun's coverage of the Hillsborough disaster remains an open wound. Mayor Steve Rotheram called it a 'deeply insensitive choice'. This comes amid fury that the Hillsborough Law to prevent future state cover-ups is being 'watered down to nothing' by Attorney General Richard Hermer. The Liverpool-born Greater Manchester Mayor, Andy Burnham, who has campaigned tirelessly for the law, is oddly silent about Starmer's new appointment. In the 2015 leadership election Burnham refused to be interviewed by the Sun, then edited by Dinsmore, which led to the retaliatory headline: 'Is two-faced Burnham the most hypocritical politician in Britain?' Still, it's a topic unlikely to come up at Labour's party conference… in Liverpool. Sacked sleazeball Gregg Wallace sat down for an interview with the Sun, in which he bemoaned being bracketed with the likes of Jimmy Savile and Huw Edwards. 'I'm not a groper,' he wailed, while also lending support to his former MasterChef colleague John Torode, saying: 'He's not a racist.' Wallace's loyalty is not being reciprocated by at least one source close to Torode; they grumbled: 'Why doesn't he just shut his mouth? This isn't helping anyone.' Spare a thought for editors of the Daily Mail Weekend magazine, who were so chuffed at landing an exclusive interview with Jack Osbourne that they blasted it across the cover. Inside, Jack revealed: 'Dad's great and his mood's really high.' Unfortunately by the time of publication, the hellraising, bat-eating Ozzy had passed away. Panicked meetings were held to see if the mag could be pulled but alas, as with Ozzy, it was all too late. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Snout line: Got a story? Write to tips@ Related
New Statesman
35 minutes ago
- New Statesman
How do we keep the lid on race-related violence?
A police car set on fire by far-right activists in Sunderland last August. Photo by Ian Forsyth / Getty Images 'Shower upon us abundant rain,' goes a Muslim prayer one learns in childhood, 'swiftly and not delayed.' A prayer for rain that makes sense in the desert. Imagine my surprise on learning the Church of England has one too. Whose idea was it to institute such a prayer in this soggy, inclement land? Its diverse uses have, however, recently become apparent: in the middle of an inconvenient hosepipe ban, to foil defeat in the cricket, or – more seriously – to maintain public order in times so tense that the country is being called a 'tinderbox' at risk of exploding again into nationwide rioting. Last summer, a far-right frenzy gripped towns across Britain. Hotels housing asylum seekers were almost burned down. Now, another such hotel in Epping is subject to anti-migrant demonstrations; these are spreading. Fearing another summer of discord, officials have been appealing to the deus ex machina of the weather. It's well known that hot summers provide the perfect conditions for public unrest to germinate. The London riots in 2011 were a summer affair, as were the 1981 England riots, the worst race-related violence the UK has seen. Tempers flare with temperatures. And rain souses the appetite to indulge in outdoor clashes. A historic heatwave also provides the metaphor for simmering conflict in Do the Right Thing (1989), Spike Lee's classic film about racial tension in a predominantly black Brooklyn neighbourhood. Lee saturates the frame – Gauguin-like – with volcanic hues of red and orange. Our eyes are primed – lava will surely fly – and after a youngster is choked to death by a cop, as George Floyd would be, the community at last erupts into violence. What would be the right thing to do in these circumstances? Lee is a dialectical filmmaker. He ends by quoting from two opposing – though equally compelling – schools of thought about political protest: Martin Luther King Jr's contention that violence is 'both impractical and immoral', and Malcolm X's rejoinder, that when violence is 'in self-defence, I call it intelligence'. The film doesn't say which of these courses of action is, in the end, right. I admire Malcolm X's courage. His insinuation that the bullet may ultimately be more effective than the ballot was born of the chronic failure of American democracy. But rewatching Lee's film, I found myself leaning more towards King. I recoiled during the climactic scene, when the amiable protagonist, Mookie, smashes up the Italian-American pizzeria that provides him with employment, a father-figure and a lively communal space (last year's rioters similarly ransacked their own community centres and amenities). Finally, the rioters threaten the local Asian-run grocery. At this moment, seeing such a familiar character threatened, I fully realised where it was that I stand in this debate. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe For all my sympathy with this community ravaged by the violence of an unjust state, I could not accept this rage against blameless bystanders. I recalled the real-life Bangladeshi family in Minneapolis, whose livelihood – a restaurant – was destroyed in Black Lives Matter protests five years ago. 'Let my building burn,' its immigrant owner, Ruhel Islam, proclaimed, 'justice needs to be served.' The restaurant's name still sticks in the mind: Gandhi Mahal, in homage to the man whose still revolutionary doctrine of non-violence King was an adherent of. By overcoming self-interest and standing with a just cause at personal cost, so clearly was Ruhel Islam. The rioters from Do the Right Thing and from last summer have divergent motives: Mookie and his friends in 1980s New York are crying out for racial justice, while last year's rioters were motivated, I do believe, by racial animus. Nevertheless, in distinct ways, they exemplify anxieties and resentments around race that can stew in any 'melting pot' society. Incidents of police brutality or, as has recently been the trigger in UK unrest, sexual assault, can blow the lid off. When that happens, since time immemorial, immigrant communities like mine are the ones consumed in the fury. How, then, to keep the lid on? This, now, is our challenge. Personally, I'd like to spread the Mahatma's teachings in Epping, but alas, that may fall on deaf ears. Severe sentencing was what the courts opted for – on violent demonstrators, deservedly, but also on inciteful or hateful speech. This, on reflection, seems appropriate. Terror was unleashed by the now jailed Lucy Connolly's call to burn down asylum hotels. But such authoritarianism betrays a political establishment increasingly of the view that the country's diverse ethnic and religious make-up can no longer sustain open discussion of topics sensitive to its respective communities. Note the state's recent activity: a superinjunction to prevent media reporting on Afghan refugee resettlement; an Online Safety Act that is concealing from the public controversial footage; making it a crime even to voice support for Palestine Action; penalising the burning of a Koran. Here, then, is a government that thinks segments of the population are so vexed by migration, or so offended by criticism of Israel, or Islam, that these conversations must be suppressed to keep the peace: ignorance coerced for the sake of bliss. If this is the cost of being tolerated, I don't really feel like paying it. I refuse to believe the country is such a tinderbox. Social cohesion will come, but only by having and withstanding difficult conversations, not by avoiding them. That's how to do the right thing. Failing that, I have my prayer for rain. [See also: One year on, tensions still circle Britain's asylum-seeker hotels] Related
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Trump announces 25% tariff on India plus penalties for buying Russian energy
The US president said on Wednesday that India 'is our friend' but its tariffs 'are far too high' on US goods. He added that India buys military equipment and oil from Russia, which Mr Trump said has enabled the war in Ukraine. As a result, he intends to charge an additional 'penalty' starting on Friday as part of revised tariffs on multiple countries. The new tariffs could put India at a disadvantage in the US market relative to Vietnam, Bangladesh and, possibly, China, said Ajay Sahai, director general of the Federation of Indian Export Organisations. 'We are back to square one as Trump hasn't spelled out what the penalties would be in addition to the tariff,' he added. 'The demand for Indian goods is bound to be hit.' The announcement came after a series of negotiated trade frameworks with the European Union, Japan, the Philippines and Indonesia — all of which Mr Trump said would open markets for American goods while enabling the US to raise tax rates on imports. The president views tariff revenues as a way to help offset the budget deficit increases tied to his recent income tax cuts and generate more domestic factory jobs. While he has effectively wielded tariffs as a cudgel to reset the terms of trade, the economic impact is uncertain as most economists expect a slowdown in US growth and greater inflationary pressures as the costs of the taxes are passed along to domestic businesses and consumers. His approach of putting a 15% tariff on America's longstanding allies in the EU is also generating pushback — possibly causing European partners as well as Canada to seek alternatives to US leadership on the world stage. Washington has long sought to develop a deeper partnership with New Delhi. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has established a good working relationship with Mr Trump, and the two leaders are likely to further boost co-operation between their countries. At a population exceeding 1.4 billion people, India is the world's largest country and a possible geopolitical counterbalance to China. India and Russia have close relations, and New Delhi has not supported western sanctions on Moscow over its war in Ukraine. When Mr Trump met Mr Modi in February, the US president said India would start buying American oil and natural gas. He discussed his policies on trade and tariffs with reporters accompanying him on Tuesday on the flight home after a five-day visit to Scotland. He declined to comment then about reports that India was bracing for a US tariff rate of at least 25%, saying: 'We're going to see.' Mr Trump also said the outlines of a trade agreement with India had not yet been finalised.
