
Cleverly has delivered a direct challenge to Badenoch on net zero
The former home secretary will drive a wedge between himself and the Conservative Party leader on Wednesday night by directly challenging her approach to net zero, which will be met with jubilation by Labour, the SNP, and especially Reform UK.
Conservatives who have not already switched their allegiance to Nigel Farage's party might be tempted to do so through sheer exasperation with the latest evidence of infighting.
Sir James, who was convinced he was on course to become Tory leader last year, before an apparent tactical voting mishap by his supporters ended his chances, has chosen to speak out hours before the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election, a poll that will provide a snapshot of just how much the Tories are struggling.
Mr Farage has said he is 'confident' his candidate will finish third or higher, which would mean the Tories - who have finished third in the last three elections for the seat - being relegated to fourth place or even lower.
That would put even more pressure on Mrs Badenoch, who is already struggling to convince some of her MPs that she should stay in the job after a terrible set of local election results last month and a series of defections by local councillors since then.
As the Conservatives scrap for every vote on Thursday, Sir James's disloyalty - for that is how it will be seen in Mrs Badenoch's office - can only harm the cause.
Sir James, who returned to the backbenches when Mrs Badenoch became leader and has never ruled out another leadership bid, has chosen to present an alternative vision for the Conservatives' green agenda in an apparent attempt to appeal to the moderate wing of the party.
Rather than backing his leader's decision to drop support for the UK reaching net zero carbon emissions by 2050, he will say that: 'Conservative environmentalism doesn't mean a choice between growth and sustainability.'
Contrast that with Mrs Badenoch's view that: 'Anyone who has done any serious analysis knows [net zero] can't be achieved without a serious drop in our living standards or by bankrupting us.'
Although Sir James will not mention Mrs Badenoch by name, or refer directly to her net-zero policy, his message - that she has got it wrong - could not be clearer.
In case anyone doubted his motives, he will make the speech at the Conservative Environment Network, which has described Mrs Badenoch's net-zero policy as a 'mistake'.
On one level, Sir James has drawn attention to the deep divide between Mrs Badenoch and environmental hand-wringers in her party, who include Boris Johnson, former COP26 president Lord Sharma and Baroness May, who as prime minister adopted the net zero 2050 target.
More broadly, Sir James is presenting an alternative strategy for beating Reform UK: moving to the centre rather than trying to outflank Mr Farage.
Moderates believe Mrs Badenoch has been forced to drop support for the net-zero target in order to keep up with Mr Farage, who has called net zero 'lunacy'. There is plenty of evidence that she is being dragged further to the Right on other matters to see off the threat of Reform.
Critics believe the Tories can't out-Farage Mr Farage and that the only way to differentiate the Conservatives from Reform is to occupy the centre ground from which elections have traditionally been won in the past.
In highlighting a difference over policy, Sir James has presented a separate view on the future direction of the Conservative Party and who should lead it.
The odds on Mrs Badenoch uniting her party before the next general election may just have lengthened a little more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
JD Vance greeted by angry Palestine protesters as he arrives in Scotland for holiday
As US Vice President JD Vance arrived in Scotland for a family holiday to the UK, he was greeted at the resort by dozens of pro-Palestine protesters, who accused him of supporting a 'genocide' by Israel in Gaza on Wednesday, 13 August. It comes after demonstrators descended on a quiet hamlet in the Cotswolds to protest against the Republican's presence there. Dozens of people gathered in the usually quiet Oxfordshire countryside to tell Mr Vance he was 'not welcome' in the area as he stayed in a Grade II listed country manor in the hamlet of Dean. Local media described a crowd of between 50 to 100 people gathering in the nearby village of Charlbury.

Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Chinese wind farm owner to build 900ft turbines off coast of Scotland
A Chinese state-owned company is to install Britain's largest wind turbines after plans were revealed for dozens of 900ft structures off the Scottish coast. SDIC Power, which is based in Beijing, is planning to install the machines through its European subsidiary Red Rock Renewables at the proposed Inch Cape Wind Farm. It has joined with the Irish electricity company ESB Engery to pursue the venture. Once complete, the site will be one of the UK's largest and most visible, lying just 11 miles off the coast of Angus, where it will be clearly visible from tourist towns like Arbroath and St Andrews. It will also be among the most controversial – the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) has warned that it will threaten UK populations of puffins, northern gannets, black-legged kittiwakes, guillemots and razorbills. Details of the scheme, which was originally planned with smaller machines, emerged with the latest financial results from Danish turbine manufacturer Vestas, which is building the giant new turbines. The turbines will measure 919ft from base to blade tip – five to six times taller than Nelson's Column. It means they will be visible across a radius of more than 35 miles, including from St Andrews, whose 'Old Course' is renowned as the home of golf. Donald Trump, who has named the Old Course as amongst his five favourite courses in the world, has long protested at the expansion of wind farms along Scotland's east coast, including one built just offshore from his Aberdeen links. John Constable, director of the UK charity Renewable Energy Foundation, said: 'The sheer gargantuan scale of offshore wind projects such as Inch Cape is a good index of their underlying risk, which is very large indeed. 'However, that risk is not being taken by the overseas investors, but has been loaded onto UK electricity consumers. A future administration will have to unwind these contracts, however embarrassing and painful that might be.' Much of the UK profits will come from the Government's lucrative Contracts for Difference, which was awarded to Inchcape Offshore Power, the subsidiary set up by Red Rock and ESB. These will guarantee its investors, including the Chinese government-owned SDIC, a minimum price of up to £78 per megawatt hour for the power generated Red Rock Renewables is based in Edinburgh, but its website says that it is a subsidiary of SDIC Power Holdings, which is owned by China's State Development and Investment Corporation, which is, in turn, owned by the Chinese government. Inchcape Power – the Red Rock and ESB venture – confirmed it had just installed the offshore substation and foundations for the 72 turbines it will install over the coming months. Xiaomeng Chen, the chief executive of Red Rock, said that the wind farm would generate almost five terawatt hours of energy each year or enough to power half the homes in Scotland. He said: 'It's fantastic to see the project making such strong progress.' However, a spokesman for the National Trust for Scotland said it had already raised concerns about the Inch Cape, saying it could kill 'thousands of seabirds every year'. 'The Trust's St Abb's Head National Nature Reserve was predicted to be affected by these windfarms, with already vulnerable populations of kittiwakes and razorbills at risk of additional mortality,' the Trust said. The Scottish Fishermen's Federation also objects to the windfarm, partly because fishing boats will be effectively excluded from a prime fishing ground, but also over fears that the damage done to the seabed would impact fish stocks. Elspeth Macdonald, the chief executive of the federation, said: 'Our concern is about their impact on fishermen's livelihoods, which we think count for more than someone feeling upset about their view.' An RSPB Scotland spokesperson said: 'RSPB Scotland considered that the Inch Cape project, in combination with other offshore wind farms, is predicted to have substantial negative impacts on protected seabird populations, in particular Gannets and Kittiwakes.'


Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Net zero target blowing in the wind
The SNP is sticking to its target of 2045 to reduce carbon emissions to net zero (Picture:) Six years ago, the SNP set a target of 2045 to reduce carbon emissions to net zero, accompanied with rhetoric of achieving a 'just transition' to renewable energy. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... It was an unachievable goal, set only to undercut the UK target of 2050 so the Nationalists could talk up their claims to be more ambitious and more concerned about the planet than the evil Conservative government. They bowed to the inevitable only last year when Energy Secretary Mairi McAllan admitted the interim target of a 75 per cent reduction by 2030 would be missed. But she stuck with 2024, so the plan now appears to be to find someone who can do the actual work, when it might have been presumed that the thousands of civil servants her department employs would already have been hard at work. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Yet the Scottish Government has just started to advertise for a £140,000-a-year 'Director-General Net Zero' who will be expected to 'forge and deliver a coherent, joined-up strategy and subsequent outcomes which bring a just transition of the economy whilst delivering transformational change across the whole of government.' That sounds like a very big job, but isn't that what they've supposed to have been doing for the last six years? Transformational change across the whole government? Phew! Has anyone told the rest of the government? Transforming the economy for £140,000 a year sounds like a bargain, except the SNP has been blowing billions for years and the only thing that's been transformed is thousands of lives for the worse. Sue Webber is a Scottish Conservative MSP for Lothian