Care homes will close thanks to Starmer's immigration crackdown, providers warn
More social care services will be forced to close their doors as a result of Sir Keir Starmer's immigration crackdown, providers have warned as they hit out at the government's 'whack-a-mole' approach to the sector.
The plans, which include ending the recruitment of care workers from overseas, will leave older people and disabled patients will be left without access to safe care, care companies added.
The latest government data shows 26,100 people between April last year and April 2025 used the health and care worker visa route. This is down from 143,900 from March 2023 to March 2024.
The drop in applicants came following changes introduced in 2024 to the overseas visa for health and care workers, which restricted the ability of care workers to also bring over dependents.
Restrictions in care worker visas have, in part, come as a response to concerns over unethical practices and exploitation of the new visa route opened up by the Home Office in 2021. This new route allowed for the health and care visa to be used for care staff.
Dr Jane Townson OBE, chief executive of the Homecare Association, which represents home care providers, told The Independent: 'This policy signals, yet again, social care is not a priority for government, whatever ministers may say. The changes to immigration rules, layered on top of rising costs and chronic underfunding, will force more homecare providers to shut their doors. This is the brutal reality. When that happens, it is older and disabled people who can't get the help they need to live safely and with dignity at home.
'If the government genuinely cared about the people we support, it would not make policy decisions in isolation without listening to those delivering care on the ground.'
Nadra Ahmed, co-chair of the National Care Association, said in response to the changes, 'I think in reality if we can't get a workforce, we can't provide care services, and if we can't deliver care services, ultimately the results would be that services will close their doors. We saw this post-Brexit when the resilience in the sector was so low.
'This [new policy] has all elements of being a repeat of that [Brexit] unless the government has got a plan tucked away to replace the migrant workforce… There is 'almost a conspiracy theory' as to what the plan is for social care, is this a way of decimating the sector in a way that it becomes nationalised?
'There seems to be, very uncharacteristically of a Labour government, a complete and total misunderstanding of where social care fits into the economy'
Experts have criticised the government's approach to social care, warning that the latest changes come without any promise of further funding or investment to encourage more domestic staff.
Lucinda Allen, policy fellow for the Health Foundation, told The Independent: 'We need to remember that migrant workers have long played a really important role in sustaining the UK's health and care sector.
'The sector is already in a very fragile state, and that's partly due to the government's successive governments taking a whack-a-mole approach to social care. The back and forth over the care worker visa is in part a consequence of the central government's limited understanding, oversight and funding of the care system.'
'There are lots of issues at play here at the moment, with limited funding from central government, the increase to the national living wage and the increases to employer national insurance contributions.'
'So we've already heard providers saying that they may need to there will be an impact on their services, as a result of those decisions. and that obviously can impact people's care, can leave people without care.'
One owner of a home care provider in the North West, Stella Shaw, told The Independent that overseas workers have been 'absolutely vital to the success and the sustainability of my business.'
'Without them, I simply wouldn't be able to meet the growing demand for you know, quality home care…Their contribution has enabled us to maintain continuity of care, after Brexit and COVID, and those sorts of major events, and you know, reduce hospital admissions.
'I worry so much…With these changes. I can't honestly say that it isn't going to negatively impact our ability to continue to deliver care. Our elderly population are going to be left vulnerable, and if everybody feels the same as I do, it leaves the question, who is going to provide the care?'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
26 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
SNP calls on Labour to match Scottish Government action on poverty
Almost two million families would be lifted out of poverty if Labour matched Scottish Government action on the issue, the SNP has claimed. Ahead of the UK spending review, the SNP asked the House of Commons Library to produce an independent analysis on the number of British children in poverty and the impact that replicating Scottish Government policies across the UK would have. The research showed 1.83 million families would be lifted out of poverty if policies were matched, including abolishing the two-child benefit cap, scrapping the bedroom tax and raising the child element of Universal Credit to match the Scottish child payment, according to the SNP. Statistics showed a third of British children were anticipated to be living in poverty by 2029-30 unless action was taken. Sir Keir Starmer was urged to act on the figures ahead of the UK spending review on Wednesday amid warnings the number of British children living in poverty is expected to rise to a record 4.6 million by 2029-30. Over the past decade, the number of children living in poverty has risen from 3.7 million (27%) in 2013/14 to 4.5 million (31%) in 2023/24, the SNP said. The SNP said Scotland is the only part of the UK where child poverty is falling, due to 'bold' policies such as the Scottish child payment of £27.15 per child, per week, paid in addition to other benefits. Replicating it UK-wide, by raising the child element of Universal Credit by the same amount, would lift 732,000 families out of poverty, including a further 38,000 families in Scotland, analysis showed. The SNP said it has also mitigated the bedroom tax and is in the process of ending the two-child benefit cap in Scotland. It said replicating the policies would lift a further 609,000 British families out of poverty, with the combined impact of introducing all three policies lifting 1.83 million families out of poverty, including a further 75,000 in Scotland. The UK Government delayed its child poverty taskforce review to the autumn and last year Labour MPs voted against abolishing the two-child benefit cap, in a motion tabled by the SNP. The Chancellor has previously rejected proposals to abolish the bedroom tax. The SNP said the UK Government's own impact analysis showed planned cuts to disability benefits will push 250,000 more people into poverty, including 50,000 children, with families losing out on £4,500 a year on average as a result of the cuts, branding it 'shameful'. SNP work and pensions spokeswoman Kirsty Blackman MP said: 'The evidence shows Keir Starmer's Labour Government is keeping almost two million families in poverty by failing to match SNP action across the UK. 'It's shameful that UK child poverty is rising to record levels under the Labour Government, which has pushed thousands more children into deprivation by imposing punitive welfare cuts. 'It's vital that the Prime Minister finally listens to families struggling with the soaring cost of living – and takes the long-overdue action needed to end child poverty at the UK spending review this week. 'That means abandoning the devastating austerity cuts to disabled families, matching the Scottish child payment UK-wide, abolishing the bedroom tax and scrapping the two-child limit and benefit cap. 'With 4.5 million children living in poverty in the UK, only bold and immediate action will do. 'The two-child benefit cap and bedroom tax must be abolished immediately, but that alone isn't enough to end child poverty. It's vital the Labour Government matches the Scottish child payment by raising the child element of Universal Credit across the UK. 'Scotland is the only part of the UK where child poverty is falling – and families receive the best cost-of-living help of anywhere in the UK. 'Westminster must match this action – or it will leave millions more children languishing in poverty.' A UK Government spokesperson said: 'We are determined to bring down child poverty and we have already expanded free breakfast clubs, increased the national minimum wage for those on the lowest incomes, uprated benefits in April and supported 700,000 of the poorest families by introducing a fair repayment rate on universal credit deductions. 'We will also publish an ambitious child poverty strategy later this year to ensure we deliver fully funded measures that tackle the structural and root causes of child poverty across the country.'
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Scottish Labour 'naive' to expect widespread gains at 2026 Holyrood election after Hamilton victory
An ex-Labour MP urged Anas Sarwar to distance himself from unpopular policy decisions taken by Keir Starmer if he wants to become the next first minister. Scottish Labour would be "naive" to assume it can make widespread gains at the next Holyrood election on the back of its victory in Hamilton last week, a former MP has said. Anas Sarwar claimed last week it was "game on" for his party ahead of next year's poll after it pulled off a surprise by-election win in South Lanarkshire. The victory gives Labour some badly needed momentum in Scotland after its approval ratings slumped in the wake of Keir Starmer's first year in power at Westminster. But Dennis Canavan, who served as a Labour MP for 25 years, said the party needed to "beware" the rise of Reform UK after it came a close third in the by-election contest. He told the Record: "It was a surprise victory for Labour - but it would be naive to use this result to predict widespread Labour gains at next year's elections to the Scottish Parliament. "To put the result into perspective, Labour won with the support of only 14 per cent of the electorate. If Anas Sarwar really wants to improve his chances of becoming first minister, he should tell Keir Starmer to ditch his disastrous policies on things like the two child benefit cap, the WASPI women's pension rights and cuts to welfare. "Starmer is not an electoral asset, especially in Scotland, and his failure to make a personal appearance in the by-election campaign may have actually helped Davy Russell." Canavan, who quit Labour in 1999 and later served as an independent MSP, said the result was a "bitter disappointment" for the SNP. He added: "Both Labour and the SNP must beware of Reform, who came from nowhere to getting over a quarter of the vote. By next year they will probably be much more organised and may therefore present a bigger threat. "It is pointless pandering to the agenda of Reform. Starmer's recent claim that 'we risk becoming an island of strangers' sounded like the language of Nigel Farage. Responsible politicians must try to lead public opinion instead of apeing right wing extremists. "We need more emphasis on pointing out the evils of racism and positively campaigning for a fairer and more equal society. "The by-election result reveals that the majority of the electorate did not vote at all. That seems to indicate a serious disconnect between the political class and the rest of society and does not bode well for the future of democracy. "All politicians must work harder to enthuse the electorate with a positive vision of a better world." Sarwar said yesterday he had spoken to Keir Starmer following Labour's victory last week. He added that he wants to see the two-child benefit cap removed 'as fast as possible'. The Scottish Labour leader said the UK Government was already working to 'improve growth' and bring mortgage rates and energy bills down to alleviate the cost-of-living crisis. He added: 'There have been four interest rates cuts because of economic stability and those four interest rates cuts have meant that the average mortgage is down by over £1,000. 'We've started to see energy bills come down, but those need to come down much quicker, because people feel a real pressure in the cost-of-living crisis.'
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
How the UK spending reviews will shape Scotland's finances
The UK Government has already trailed plans to increase defence spending, boost spending in the NHS, and reform social security. But it has said much less, so far, about day-to-day spending on public services. With limited headroom for new funding, any shift in priorities is likely to mean savings elsewhere. Read more: Spending decisions on reserved areas such as the industrial strategy, research and development, and defence procurement will all have an impact here in Scotland. But the Scottish Government's budget will also be impacted too. Even with recent tax devolution, the Barnett Formula remains the most significant contributor to the Scottish Government's budget. The formula ensures that any increase or decrease in Whitehall spending in devolved areas – for example, health or education – triggers a population-based adjustment to Scotland's budget. That means that what is announced in the spending review will not just matter for Whitehall departments, it will directly shape the financial envelope available to Holyrood. The onus then falls on the Scottish Government to set out its own spending priorities. June's medium-term financial strategy will likely give a high-level overview, but for greater detail we will need to wait for our the spending review in Scotland. The Cabinet Secretary for Finance has indicated that a timeline for that review will be published in June. The interaction between UK and Scottish Government fiscal policies does not stop with the Barnett Formula. Just last month, we were reminded of further – often subtle – interactions between developments in the UK and the Scottish budget. Read more: In publishing our updated five-year outlook at the Scottish Fiscal Commission, we highlighted how further fiscal pressures had emerged since the turn of the year. One such factor was the latest information on the Scottish Government's devolved tax and social security data, relative to the rest of the UK. Under Scotland's fiscal framework, the Scottish budget does not always benefit when its tax revenues rise. What matters is whether those revenues are growing faster than their counterparts in the rest of the UK. This is due to a core principle in the fiscal framework that seeks to protect the Scottish budget from shared UK-wide economic risks. But, on the other hand, this means that any divergence in performance between Scotland and the rest of the UK – the so-called net tax position – has a direct consequence on the level of funding available. In recent times, we have seen an improving performance – and outlook – for revenues in the rest of the UK that is not being fully matched in the data for Scotland, leading to knock-on implications for Scotland's budget. This is one of the lesser-known intricacies of our devolved fiscal setup: stronger tax growth in England can mean less money for Holyrood than planned, even if Scotland's own outlook is unchanged. Read more: A similar issue arises in social security. As more benefits are devolved – including disability and carer payments – what matters is not just how much is spent, but how that compares to the funding received. Scottish Ministers have made deliberate policy choices to expand eligibility and increase support, particularly in areas linked to child poverty and disability. Those choices have widened the gap between spending and funding. But the latest forecasts show that planned UK Government reforms to reduce spending in England and Wales – especially through tighter eligibility for benefits related to disability and ill-health – might make that gap larger by lowering the equivalent funding to Scotland. By 2029–30, we project that annual spending on devolved social security will exceed funding by £2 billion. Holyrood may have greater control over tax and spend decisions than in the past, but the budget remains integrated with decisions made in Westminster. Any meaningful strategy for Scotland's public finances – including in future spending reviews – must start with a clear understanding of that interdependence. Graeme Roy is professor of economics at the University of Glasgow's Adam Smith Business School.
