‘Over my dead body': Fight to keep Healthscope's hospitals alive just getting started
Canadian investment firm Brookfield is a global financial giant with a trillion dollars under management, yet it could not save Healthscope and decided to walk away with a $2 billion loss.
In simple terms, it paid too much using too much debt, and sold off the land for many of these hospitals to landlords under deals that allowed them to charge too much for rent.
As an interesting contrast, unlike Healthscope, Ramsay owns most of its hospitals and the land they sit on.
It means Healthscope lenders who are owed $1.6 billion, including Australia's Big Four banks, will also wear massive losses once the proceeds of the sale are divvied up between them. The good news is that this will ensure the business is transferred with zero debt in any sale.
Landlords will also be wearing a lot of the pain to help many of these hospitals become financially viable for a new private owner. The alternative is closure if state governments don't step into the breach.
Healthscope's hospitals would be empty if doctors lost faith and moved their elective surgeries to private hospitals nearby.
This explains why Healthscope reached its own abyss well ahead of its rivals, and faces a much larger challenge just to get back to the abysmal state the sector as a whole faces.
Separate to this is the immediate challenge that La Spina faces in running the day-to-day operations at the hospitals, and it explains why his fireside chat came with so much heat: Healthscope desperately needs to keep faith with the many specialist doctors and surgeons who actually generate its revenue.
Around 70 per cent of elective surgeries in Australia take place in a private hospital.
La Spina knows that the last thing they want is Healthscope in the hands of a private health insurer, who could dictate how much a hip replacement should cost.
Loading
Healthscope's hospitals would be empty if these doctors lost faith and moved their elective surgeries to other private hospitals. If this business flows out the door, it doesn't matter what happens to its rent bill and debt levels.
La Spina may not like it, but the truth is BUPA is almost certainly among the parties interested in buying either all of Healthscope's operations or parts thereof, and there is nothing he can do about it.
His immediate priority is to keep the day-to-day business running while the lender-appointed receivers from McGrathNicol kick off the sales process next month, with as many as 30 parties interested in Healthscope as of this week.
The receivers have one job, maximise the sale price and return as much money as possible to the lenders.
Loading
To this end, they are expected to focus on a single transaction involving all of Healthscope's assets - if possible. The price will be determined by the receiver's delicate dance with landlords over how much financial pain they are willing to endure to give potential suitors confidence they are buying a viable business.
If the rent concessions are too low, the hospitals won't find a buyer and their staff could be out of a job.
The success of any sale is also heavily dependent on whether all potential white knights are allowed to come to Healthscope's rescue.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
9 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Biosecurity not competition a meaty issue in beef talks
Even if the federal government lowers barriers blocking imports of US beef, it would be no match for higher quality and cheaper to produce Australian cattle. Australia is considering granting more American beef producers access to the local market as a potential bargaining chip to strike a deal on tariffs, as the two nations' leaders prepare to potentially meet face-to-face for the first time. For biosecurity reasons, Australia imposes a soft ban on US beef. Cattle that can be proven to have been raised and slaughtered in the US are allowed into the Australian market, but large amounts of beef sent to American abattoirs come from Mexico or Canada, which are barred from importation. Challenges in tracing the origin of cattle means in practice beef imports are not allowed, until the US can show the same traceability systems Australia has in place. Australian beef producers urged the government not to loosen biosecurity protections. "Australia's biosecurity status is integral to the success and sustainability of our agricultural industries," National Farmers Federation president David Jochinke said. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese assured farmers the government would make no compromises on biosecurity. But as long as biosecurity was protected, Mr Albanese said he would be open to discussions about easing restrictions. David Humphreys, vice chair of industry body Western Beef Association, was open to the idea as well. As long as Australia's biosecurity standards were protected, it would be a beneficial outcome for all Australian farmers if it could be used as leverage to lower US tariffs, he said. Assuming US beef imports posed no disease risk, the impacts for Australian farmers from extra competition would be limited. "Australia has very competitive and relatively cheap beef production in comparison," Mr Humphreys told AAP. "Any beef that's coming in from the US is probably going to be targeting quite select segments of beef consumption, probably the cheaper cuts, produced beef products. "So it's not really competing with the premium Australian beef products that our beef farms produce." The low exchange rate of the Australian dollar as well as the high cost of transporting US beef also reduced the likelihood of it outcompeting homegrown products, he said. Local consumers are accustomed to leaner, higher-quality Australian beef and unlikely to be won over by fatty, hormone-injected American competitors. "I think there's not a lot of risk to Australian producers of beef, with this possibility of some limited US beef being imported into Australia," Mr Humphreys said. Australia's Department of Agriculture is reviewing its ban on Mexican and Canadian beef slaughtered in the US. Agriculture Minister Julie Collins said any decision to allow greater access for US beef would be based on science and evidence. Even if the federal government lowers barriers blocking imports of US beef, it would be no match for higher quality and cheaper to produce Australian cattle. Australia is considering granting more American beef producers access to the local market as a potential bargaining chip to strike a deal on tariffs, as the two nations' leaders prepare to potentially meet face-to-face for the first time. For biosecurity reasons, Australia imposes a soft ban on US beef. Cattle that can be proven to have been raised and slaughtered in the US are allowed into the Australian market, but large amounts of beef sent to American abattoirs come from Mexico or Canada, which are barred from importation. Challenges in tracing the origin of cattle means in practice beef imports are not allowed, until the US can show the same traceability systems Australia has in place. Australian beef producers urged the government not to loosen biosecurity protections. "Australia's biosecurity status is integral to the success and sustainability of our agricultural industries," National Farmers Federation president David Jochinke said. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese assured farmers the government would make no compromises on biosecurity. But as long as biosecurity was protected, Mr Albanese said he would be open to discussions about easing restrictions. David Humphreys, vice chair of industry body Western Beef Association, was open to the idea as well. As long as Australia's biosecurity standards were protected, it would be a beneficial outcome for all Australian farmers if it could be used as leverage to lower US tariffs, he said. Assuming US beef imports posed no disease risk, the impacts for Australian farmers from extra competition would be limited. "Australia has very competitive and relatively cheap beef production in comparison," Mr Humphreys told AAP. "Any beef that's coming in from the US is probably going to be targeting quite select segments of beef consumption, probably the cheaper cuts, produced beef products. "So it's not really competing with the premium Australian beef products that our beef farms produce." The low exchange rate of the Australian dollar as well as the high cost of transporting US beef also reduced the likelihood of it outcompeting homegrown products, he said. Local consumers are accustomed to leaner, higher-quality Australian beef and unlikely to be won over by fatty, hormone-injected American competitors. "I think there's not a lot of risk to Australian producers of beef, with this possibility of some limited US beef being imported into Australia," Mr Humphreys said. Australia's Department of Agriculture is reviewing its ban on Mexican and Canadian beef slaughtered in the US. Agriculture Minister Julie Collins said any decision to allow greater access for US beef would be based on science and evidence. Even if the federal government lowers barriers blocking imports of US beef, it would be no match for higher quality and cheaper to produce Australian cattle. Australia is considering granting more American beef producers access to the local market as a potential bargaining chip to strike a deal on tariffs, as the two nations' leaders prepare to potentially meet face-to-face for the first time. For biosecurity reasons, Australia imposes a soft ban on US beef. Cattle that can be proven to have been raised and slaughtered in the US are allowed into the Australian market, but large amounts of beef sent to American abattoirs come from Mexico or Canada, which are barred from importation. Challenges in tracing the origin of cattle means in practice beef imports are not allowed, until the US can show the same traceability systems Australia has in place. Australian beef producers urged the government not to loosen biosecurity protections. "Australia's biosecurity status is integral to the success and sustainability of our agricultural industries," National Farmers Federation president David Jochinke said. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese assured farmers the government would make no compromises on biosecurity. But as long as biosecurity was protected, Mr Albanese said he would be open to discussions about easing restrictions. David Humphreys, vice chair of industry body Western Beef Association, was open to the idea as well. As long as Australia's biosecurity standards were protected, it would be a beneficial outcome for all Australian farmers if it could be used as leverage to lower US tariffs, he said. Assuming US beef imports posed no disease risk, the impacts for Australian farmers from extra competition would be limited. "Australia has very competitive and relatively cheap beef production in comparison," Mr Humphreys told AAP. "Any beef that's coming in from the US is probably going to be targeting quite select segments of beef consumption, probably the cheaper cuts, produced beef products. "So it's not really competing with the premium Australian beef products that our beef farms produce." The low exchange rate of the Australian dollar as well as the high cost of transporting US beef also reduced the likelihood of it outcompeting homegrown products, he said. Local consumers are accustomed to leaner, higher-quality Australian beef and unlikely to be won over by fatty, hormone-injected American competitors. "I think there's not a lot of risk to Australian producers of beef, with this possibility of some limited US beef being imported into Australia," Mr Humphreys said. Australia's Department of Agriculture is reviewing its ban on Mexican and Canadian beef slaughtered in the US. Agriculture Minister Julie Collins said any decision to allow greater access for US beef would be based on science and evidence. Even if the federal government lowers barriers blocking imports of US beef, it would be no match for higher quality and cheaper to produce Australian cattle. Australia is considering granting more American beef producers access to the local market as a potential bargaining chip to strike a deal on tariffs, as the two nations' leaders prepare to potentially meet face-to-face for the first time. For biosecurity reasons, Australia imposes a soft ban on US beef. Cattle that can be proven to have been raised and slaughtered in the US are allowed into the Australian market, but large amounts of beef sent to American abattoirs come from Mexico or Canada, which are barred from importation. Challenges in tracing the origin of cattle means in practice beef imports are not allowed, until the US can show the same traceability systems Australia has in place. Australian beef producers urged the government not to loosen biosecurity protections. "Australia's biosecurity status is integral to the success and sustainability of our agricultural industries," National Farmers Federation president David Jochinke said. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese assured farmers the government would make no compromises on biosecurity. But as long as biosecurity was protected, Mr Albanese said he would be open to discussions about easing restrictions. David Humphreys, vice chair of industry body Western Beef Association, was open to the idea as well. As long as Australia's biosecurity standards were protected, it would be a beneficial outcome for all Australian farmers if it could be used as leverage to lower US tariffs, he said. Assuming US beef imports posed no disease risk, the impacts for Australian farmers from extra competition would be limited. "Australia has very competitive and relatively cheap beef production in comparison," Mr Humphreys told AAP. "Any beef that's coming in from the US is probably going to be targeting quite select segments of beef consumption, probably the cheaper cuts, produced beef products. "So it's not really competing with the premium Australian beef products that our beef farms produce." The low exchange rate of the Australian dollar as well as the high cost of transporting US beef also reduced the likelihood of it outcompeting homegrown products, he said. Local consumers are accustomed to leaner, higher-quality Australian beef and unlikely to be won over by fatty, hormone-injected American competitors. "I think there's not a lot of risk to Australian producers of beef, with this possibility of some limited US beef being imported into Australia," Mr Humphreys said. Australia's Department of Agriculture is reviewing its ban on Mexican and Canadian beef slaughtered in the US. Agriculture Minister Julie Collins said any decision to allow greater access for US beef would be based on science and evidence.
AU Financial Review
11 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
Mongolia forces Rio Tinto into major engineering change at copper mine
Copper production from Rio Tinto's most important growth project will not increase as rapidly nor efficiently as expected, after tensions with the Mongolian government forced Rio to make a major engineering change at the Oyu Tolgoi mine. Rio has been forced to halt eight months of tunnelling work to move the giant underground mine in a northerly direction because the Mongolian government has delayed approval for the mine to enter tenements that are partly owned by Canadian company Entree Resources.
The Age
a day ago
- The Age
‘Over my dead body': Fight to keep Healthscope's hospitals alive just getting started
Canadian investment firm Brookfield is a global financial giant with a trillion dollars under management, yet it could not save Healthscope and decided to walk away with a $2 billion loss. In simple terms, it paid too much using too much debt, and sold off the land for many of these hospitals to landlords under deals that allowed them to charge too much for rent. As an interesting contrast, unlike Healthscope, Ramsay owns most of its hospitals and the land they sit on. It means Healthscope lenders who are owed $1.6 billion, including Australia's Big Four banks, will also wear massive losses once the proceeds of the sale are divvied up between them. The good news is that this will ensure the business is transferred with zero debt in any sale. Landlords will also be wearing a lot of the pain to help many of these hospitals become financially viable for a new private owner. The alternative is closure if state governments don't step into the breach. Healthscope's hospitals would be empty if doctors lost faith and moved their elective surgeries to private hospitals nearby. This explains why Healthscope reached its own abyss well ahead of its rivals, and faces a much larger challenge just to get back to the abysmal state the sector as a whole faces. Separate to this is the immediate challenge that La Spina faces in running the day-to-day operations at the hospitals, and it explains why his fireside chat came with so much heat: Healthscope desperately needs to keep faith with the many specialist doctors and surgeons who actually generate its revenue. Around 70 per cent of elective surgeries in Australia take place in a private hospital. La Spina knows that the last thing they want is Healthscope in the hands of a private health insurer, who could dictate how much a hip replacement should cost. Loading Healthscope's hospitals would be empty if these doctors lost faith and moved their elective surgeries to other private hospitals. If this business flows out the door, it doesn't matter what happens to its rent bill and debt levels. La Spina may not like it, but the truth is BUPA is almost certainly among the parties interested in buying either all of Healthscope's operations or parts thereof, and there is nothing he can do about it. His immediate priority is to keep the day-to-day business running while the lender-appointed receivers from McGrathNicol kick off the sales process next month, with as many as 30 parties interested in Healthscope as of this week. The receivers have one job, maximise the sale price and return as much money as possible to the lenders. Loading To this end, they are expected to focus on a single transaction involving all of Healthscope's assets - if possible. The price will be determined by the receiver's delicate dance with landlords over how much financial pain they are willing to endure to give potential suitors confidence they are buying a viable business. If the rent concessions are too low, the hospitals won't find a buyer and their staff could be out of a job. The success of any sale is also heavily dependent on whether all potential white knights are allowed to come to Healthscope's rescue.
