Europe must shoulder ‘lion's share' of Ukraine's security, Vance says
In an interview with Fox News on Wednesday, Vance said the US should not have to 'carry the burden' of underpinning Kyiv's post-war security.
'I think that we should be helpful if it's necessary to stop the war and to stop the killing. But I think that we should expect, and the president certainly expects, Europe to play the leading role here,' Vance said in an interview with Fox News host Laura Ingraham.
'What he said very clearly is: Look, the United States is open to have the conversation, but we're not going to make commitments until we figure out what is going to be necessary to stop the war in the first place.'
Vance's comments came a day after US President Donald Trump ruled out the possibility of US troops in Ukraine, while suggesting that Washington could provide support 'by air'.
The issue of post-war security guarantees for Ukraine has been a major question mark over Trump's push to end the three-and-a-half-year-long conflict.
After hosting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and top European leaders at the White House for talks on the war on Monday, Trump said that European countries would be the 'first line of defence', but that Washington would provide 'a lot of help'.
While Trump has ruled out NATO membership for Ukraine, his special envoy, Steve Witkoff, and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte have raised the possibility of offering Kyiv a security guarantee resembling the 32-member alliance's collective defence mandate.
Under Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, an armed attack against one NATO member nation is considered an attack on all members of the alliance.
While Trump has said that Russian President Vladimir Putin is open to European peacekeepers being stationed in Ukraine, Moscow has repeatedly dismissed the possibility of the presence of troops from NATO countries.
On Wednesday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said that his country would need to be included in negotiations on security guarantees, warning that excluding Moscow would be a 'road to nowhere'.
'We cannot agree with the fact that now it is proposed to resolve questions of security, collective security, without the Russian Federation. This will not work,' Lavrov said.
Despite the sticking points between the sides, Vance said on Wednesday that the Trump administration had made 'great progress' in its efforts to end the war.
'You can never say with certainty what the outcome in this situation is going to be,' Vance said.
'But we now have the Russians talking to the Ukrainians; they're talking details about what would be necessary on each side to stop the fighting, to stop the killing.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
9 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
Ex-adviser to King Charles: UK incontrovertibly complicit in Gaza genocide
London, United Kingdom – Jonathon Porritt, a 75-year-old Oxford-educated environmentalist, is among the hundreds of people that the UK has cracked down on over their support of Palestine Action. He was arrested and charged earlier this month, under Section 13 of the Terrorism Act, for holding up a sign at a rally decrying the government's decision to outlaw the protest group. 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action,' read the cardboard placard that he, and many of the 520 others arrested, raised. His bail hearing is scheduled for late October. But Porritt is not a criminal. He spent 30 years advising the king on environmental issues when the monarch held the Prince of Wales title. He has also chaired a sustainable development commission set up by former Prime Minister Tony Blair, and throughout his career has worked in politics, academia and directed Friends of the Earth. In 2000, he was awarded a CBE, a high-ranking order, for services to environmental protection. Al Jazeera spoke to Porritt about his activism, Palestine, the role of business and the effect of weapons manufacturing and climate change. Al Jazeera: As the crisis in Gaza worsens, you have urged the UK to take action to stop Israel's onslaught. With more than 700 other business leaders, you recently called for targeted sanctions against those accused of violating international law, including war crimes. Does that include Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, since he is wanted for arrest by the International Criminal Court? Jonathan Porritt: It would certainly include members of his cabinet who have been very forthright in the comments that they've made, which clearly breach any understanding of the rights of people to exist … and indicate a readiness to ethnically cleanse Gaza and indeed to prepare to do the same in the West Bank. It's very clear that those sanctions do now need to be brought forward, and I think it is important that it's business leaders that are suggesting that you just can't allow those kinds of blatant attacks on the Palestinian people to continue. Al Jazeera: On an individual level, many people appalled at Israel's conduct in Gaza have joined a campaign to boycott Israeli goods, in an attempt at hitting the economy that fuels the war. Is this an effective way to stem the violence? Porritt: It is something I do on an individual level. And this is purely personal, but I would be deeply unhappy buying anything exported into the UK from Israel. I feel that the government of Israel at the moment and its track record in terms of the way it's dealt with the situation in Gaza and the West Bank is so repugnant to me personally that I feel uncomfortable supporting the economic standing of that country, so that's my own personal choice. I don't go out of my way to suggest that everybody needs to do that. I think lifestyle decisions are really important, ethical decisions are really important, but do they actually change very much? Probably not, is the reality, and an awful lot of people simply don't know the issues behind these choices. Al Jazeera: Your arrest earlier this month made headlines. What do you think figures such as King Charles and Tony Blair, who you've worked with, would make of your radical activism? Porritt: I was comfortable taking on establishment roles as chair of the commission [launched by Blair], for instance, [and] helping to set up the Prince of Wales's business and sustainability programme, all that kind of stuff. But my life started as an activist in the Green Party and in Friends of the Earth, so they probably always knew that I was more predisposed to that tactical route than to the inside track that I nonetheless spent 30 years pursuing. Al Jazeera: With several wars raging, is the link between militaries and weapons companies, which are major carbon polluters, and climate change being talked about enough? Porritt: No, and this really bugs me a lot. The investment in nuclear weapons of one kind or another, upgrades going on all over the world, and increasing the number of warheads again – this is just crazy, and on the 80th anniversary of Hiroshima you think, how can that possibly be? And then, then you look at the environmental impacts of all of that, of course, including the CO2 footprint of vast increases in expenditure on arms, and it's just the worst possible way of trying to increase security for people in their own country – to make these hugely carbon-intensive and destructive investments and yet more weapons of mass destruction. Al Jazeera: The UK has proscribed Palestine Action as a terror organisation, but its backers say outlawing the group is a way to silence dissent as Israel wages war in Gaza. It is now legally challenging the proscription. What does Palestine Action stand for, in your view? Porritt: What Palestine Action actually stands for is a readiness to use violence against property as part of its campaigning tactics against, in particular, those arms companies [that are] deeply complicit in the continuing genocide in Gaza. They see as being proportionate when set against the devastation going on in Gaza. That choice about tactics is morally based, wholly defensible … and in no way indicative of a formally designated terrorist organisation. In the last few years, there's been an astonishing legal crackdown on basic rights in this country, particularly the right to the freedom of speech and the right to freedom to protest The designation as a terrorist organisation … is to try and silence Palestine Action. That's where I come back to the now incontrovertible proof of the UK government's complicity in this genocide, and because of that complicity – its continuation of licences for arms quite clearly being used to massacre innocent people across Gaza – if you look at that complicity, they needed something extra. They needed an even bigger stick to shut Palestine Action up so that the citizens of the UK were not permitted to recognise just how abhorrent this government's behaviour is.
Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
At least one killed, 18 wounded in wave of Russian strikes on Ukraine
At least one person has been killed and 18 others wounded in a Russian drone and missile attack on Ukraine, officials said, as Moscow launched its largest attack on its neighbour in weeks amid an ongoing diplomatic push for a ceasefire. Russian forces launched 574 drones and 40 missiles overnight, Ukraine's Air Force said on Thursday, adding that its air defence units had downed most of the attacks. But a number of the attacks struck targets in several locations across Ukraine, resulting in casualties and damage to buildings. In the western city of Lviv, about 70km (43 miles) from the border with Poland, a drone and missile attack killed one person, injured three and damaged 26 residential buildings, Governor Maksym Kozytskyi said. In Mukachevo, near the border with Hungary and Slovakia, 15 people were wounded in Russian attacks, local authorities said. The strike also destroyed storage facilities at a US electronics manufacturer in the town, the Reuters news agency reported. Television footage showed the building at the plant, which regional Governor Myroslav Biletskyi said produced consumer electronics, engulfed in smoke, the agency reported. In a post on X, Ukrainian Minister of Foreign Affairs Andrii Sybiha said the plant was a 'fully civilian facility that has nothing to do with defense or the military'. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy condemned the attack, saying it was carried out 'as if nothing were changing at all'. Moscow has shown no signs of pursuing meaningful negotiations to end the war, he said, urging the international community to respond with stronger pressure on Russia, including tougher sanctions and tariffs. Russia 'wasted several cruise missiles against an American business,' he said, noting that it was a regular civilian enterprise producing domestic utilities, such as coffee machines. 'And that too became a target for Russia. Very telling.' Russian drones and missiles also hit the northwestern city of Lutsk, Mayor Ihor Polishchuk said, but there were no reported casualties, according to the AFP news agency. Meanwhile, Russia's Ministry of Defence said that it had destroyed 49 Ukrainian drones at various locations. It did not say whether the attacks had caused any casualties or damage. Poland's military said on Thursday that it had scrambled aircraft to protect its airspace in response to the Russian assault on its neighbour. Reporting from Kyiv, Al Jazeera's Charles Stratford said the deluge of drones and missiles was 'a sign that Russia is not interested … in this effort to at least begin meaningful talks towards ending the war'. Push for ceasefire The latest exchange of fire between Moscow and Kyiv follows a renewed diplomatic push to end the war. On Friday, United States President Donald Trump hosted his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, at a summit in Alaska in a bid to strike a ceasefire deal, but no agreement was reached. He then held a meeting on Monday at the White House with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and key European leaders on the situation, assuring Ukraine that Washington would provide it with 'very good protection' if a deal is reached to end the war. But the meeting left many issues unresolved, with a Ukrainian military analyst saying he was sceptical about the outcome. 'No decision has been made from the viewpoint of security guarantees [for Ukraine], the supply of arms and [the deployment of Western] troops,' Ihor Romanenko, the former deputy head of Ukraine's army, told Al Jazeera. Earlier, Zelenskyy said Ukraine would hold intensive meetings to understand the kind of security guarantees its allies are willing to provide. The details are being hammered out among national security advisers and military officials in the coming days. Zelenskyy then expects to be ready to hold direct talks with Putin for the first time since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The talks could also be conducted in a trilateral format alongside Trump, Zelenskyy said. 'We want to have an understanding of the security guarantees architecture within seven to 10 days. And based on that understanding, we aim to hold a trilateral meeting. That was my logic,' Zelenskyy told reporters on Wednesday after his trip to Washington, DC. 'President Trump suggested a slightly different logic: a trilateral meeting through a bilateral one,' Zelenskyy said. 'But then we all agreed that, in any case, we continue working on the security guarantees, establishing this approximate framework, similar to Article 5. And what we have today is political support for this.' Article 5 is NATO's common defence guarantee under which an attack on one member is considered an attack on them all. Al Jazeera's Stratford said that since Trump's meetings, there had been no visible progress on arranging a bilateral meeting between the Ukrainian and Russian leaders, and 'certainly not in relation to the kind of time frame that … Trump set during that meeting in Washington'. '[Trump] was talking about wanting a meeting in a couple of weeks,' said Stratford, adding that the US leader had said he had spoken to Putin about meeting with Zelenskyy and that he 'was potentially open to it'. A venue for the meeting between the Ukrainian and Russian leaders is being discussed, with Switzerland, Austria and Turkiye as possibilities, Zelenskyy added. He said that Hungary, which has offered to host talks, would be a 'challenging' location. On Thursday, Hungary reiterated an offer to host peace talks between Moscow and Kyiv. 'If we are needed, we are ready to provide appropriately fair and safe conditions for such peace negotiations,' Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto said in a podcast broadcast on Facebook. In an interview with Fox News on Wednesday, US Vice President JD Vance said that European countries would have to shoulder the 'lion's share' of guaranteeing Ukraine's security in the event of a deal to end the war, and that the US should not have to 'carry the burden'. Meanwhile, Russia warned that efforts to resolve Ukraine's security issues without Russian involvement were a 'road to nowhere'.
Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Tracking US and NATO support for Ukraine: A full breakdown
After a week of high-stakes diplomacy aimed at halting the war in Ukraine, United States President Donald Trump says he is set on arranging a summit between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Following separate meetings with both leaders, Trump has ruled out sending US troops to Ukraine, but pledged security guarantees to Kyiv and indicated that Washington could provide air support to reinforce a potential deal. Ukraine, in turn, told reporters at the White House it would obtain US-made weapons purchased by Europeans for an estimated $90bn as part of the effort to bolster its defences. Which countries are aiding Ukraine? At least 41 countries have contributed to Ukraine's war efforts monetarily, either through military, humanitarian or financial assistance, according to the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, a German think tank. Military assistance includes weapons, equipment and financial aid for the Ukrainian military. Humanitarian relief covers medical, food and other items for civilians, while financial assistance comes in the form of grants, loans and guarantees. Most contributions to Ukraine have come from NATO, with 29 of its 32 members providing monetary aid, according to the Kiel Institute. Additionally, 12 non-NATO countries and territories have sent monetary aid to Ukraine. These include Australia, Austria, Cyprus, the Republic of Ireland, Japan, Malta, New Zealand, South Korea, Switzerland, China, Taiwan, and India. The European Union, through the Commission and Council, has also delivered substantial aid to Ukraine. How much aid has Ukraine received so far? So far, Ukraine has received more than 309 billion euros ($360bn) in military, financial, and humanitarian aid, according to the Kiel Institute: Military aid – 149.26 billion euros ($174bn – using today's exchange rate of €1 = $1.17) Financial aid – 139.34 billion euros ($163bn) Humanitarian aid – 21.04 billion euros ($24bn) Who are Ukraine's largest donors? The US has committed the largest amount of aid to Ukraine, providing 114.64 billion euros ($134bn) between January 24, 2022 and June 30, 2025, of which: Military aid – 64.6 billion euros ($75bn) Financial aid – 46.6 billion euros ($54bn) Humanitarian aid – 3.4 billion euros ($4bn) The EU (Commission and Council) is the second biggest donor at 63.19 billion euros ($74bn), followed by Germany (21.29 billion euros or $25bn), the UK (18.6 billion euros or $21bn) and Japan (13.57 billion euros or $15bn). How much aid has been pledged v allocated? According to the Kiel Institute, European countries have collectively allocated 167.4 billion euros ($195bn) to the war in Ukraine, more than the 114.6 billion euros ($134bn) allocated by the US. Allocated aid refers to funds or resources that have actually been set aside, delivered, or officially committed for use by Ukraine. It is different from pledged aid, which is money or equipment promised by a country but not yet delivered or officially set aside. In total, Europe as a whole has committed 257.4 billion euros ($300bn) and the US 119 billion euros ($139bn). US aid to Ukraine plummets under Trump Days before Trump took office, the Biden administration gave one final injection of military support to Ukraine with a weapons package of $500m on January 9. Following the start of the Trump administration's second term in office, aid to Ukraine has plummeted, with Washington suspending all support, including weapons, in March after a tense meeting with Zelenskyy at the White House. Trump made claims that the US has given Ukraine more than $300bn in wartime aid. That number has been contested by Ukraine and its supporters, despite the US being the single largest donor country. What weapons has Ukraine received? Ukraine has received various weapons systems from its allies, including armoured vehicles, artillery, aircraft, air defence systems, drones, missiles, and a wide range of support equipment. According to the Kiel Institute, Poland has supplied its neighbour with the largest number of tanks, totaling 354, while the US leads in providing infantry fighting vehicles (305), howitzers (201), air defence systems (18), and HIMARS rocket launchers (41). The HIMARS, capable of striking targets just a few metres (feet) wide from nearly 80km (50 miles) away, gave Ukraine a vital long-range precision strike capability that slowed Russian advances early in the war. NATO defence spending In a news briefing, the White House said the US could help coordinate a security guarantee for Ukraine. However, Russia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs has ruled out the deployment of troops from NATO countries to help secure a peace deal. In June, NATO leaders signed a deal to increase defence spending, which is to be achieved over the next 10 years, and is a jump worth hundreds of billions of dollars a year from the current goal of 2 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) to 5 percent. Currently, 23 of the 32 member countries have met this target, with the alliance as a whole spending 2.61 percent of its combined GDP on defence last year. NATO countries bordering Russia, such as Estonia and Lithuania, have significantly increased their defence spending – from less than 1 percent of their GDP just 10 years ago.
