
How GDS Commission Shares Impact Global Hotel and Agency Revenue
Part one of this two-part series explores the global landscape for GDS commission shares, which represent tens of millions of dollars in revenue for travel management companies and agencies. A better understanding of gaps by region, country, and hotel class can lead to competitive advantages in global distribution.
This sponsored content was created in collaboration with a Skift partner.
It's 5:59 a.m. on a rainy Monday in Chicago. A corporate traveler scans her company's booking tool, hits 'book,' and locks in a room at an upscale hotel in Auckland. That single click unleashes the Global Distribution System (GDS): reservation messages, credit‑card authorizations, and once the guest checks out, a commission to the travel management company (TMC) that facilitated the sale.
Multiply that chain by hundreds of millions of transactions, and you begin to see why the GDS agency model remains one of hospitality's most durable revenue engines.
Roughly 200 million hotel bookings flow through the three big GDS networks (Amadeus, Sabre, Travelport) every year, primarily from corporate travel. Corporate travel, and by extension, GDS channels, continue to be critical in the hotel booking ecosystem at a time when hotel companies are clinging to stable, predictable revenue streams.
GDS Commissions in the Booking Universe: A One‑Slide Crash Course
Hotel demand splits into two macro buckets. Direct bookings flow through brand.com, voice/central‑reservation lines, and walk‑ins. Indirect bookings spread across online travel agencies (OTAs), wholesale, group blocks, and the GDS. Within GDS, two commercial models dominate:
Agency / Post‑Pay : The hotel gets paid after the stay and owes a commission to the TMC.
: The hotel gets paid after the stay and owes a commission to the TMC. Merchant / Net: The hotel is paid a wholesale rate, and the TMC then upsells the room to travelers to earn a margin on the markup.
According to Skift Research data, global hotel bookings from these two models represented about 25% of global gross hotel bookings revenue in 2024. This article zeros in on the Agency/Post-Pay model because it generates commissionable revenue, or GDS Commission Share.
GDS Commission Share: A Global Perspective
According to OnyxInsights data, hotels paid an estimated $2.1 billion in commissions to TMCs through the GDS networks in 2024. However, GDS commission share, which represents the share of total hotel commissions incurred by GDS bookings, is unevenly distributed. Understanding gaps can lead to competitive advantages for players in the hotel bookings game.
Region by Region: How GDS Commissions Differ
North America (5% GDS commission share) has spent decades wiring corporate travel programs into back‑office systems. Deep links between TMCs, payment providers, and hotel CRS platforms keep agency bookings fast and relatively cheap.
Europe (4.3%) enjoys dense cross‑border business and stringent duty‑of‑care rules, pushing travelers into managed channels. Yet, powerful direct booking campaigns from hotel companies limit GDS growth.
Asia‑Pacific (4% and climbing) currently lags but has significant momentum. Multinational companies are scaling hubs in Singapore, Sydney, and Bangalore; local TMCs are modernizing; and card adoption is broadening, together fueling the steepest year‑over‑year gains globally.
Country by Country: Where GDS Commissions Carry Higher Shares
New Zealand (11% GDS commission share) and Australia (10.5%) top the league table, powered by resource‑sector compliance, lengthy domestic flight sectors, and dominant regional TMCs.
The United States (5.1%) tracks just above the global mean of 4.8%, representing the tug‑of‑war between enormous corporate demand and loyalty‑fueled direct‑booking campaigns.
Belgium (4.4%) shows how mid‑size economies can under‑index when large corporations negotiate static, direct deals with preferred chains, sidestepping the GDS entirely.
How Room Class Drives GDS Commission Share
Luxury and upper‑upscale hotels capture 6% to 7% of stays via GDS because they sit at the epicenter of managed‑travel itineraries: meeting space, negotiated last‑room‑available clauses, and premium loyalty tiers.
Midscale and economy properties earn less than 3% GDS commission share. Their price‑sensitive guests flock to OTAs, metasearch sites, and air‑hotel bundles. Chain scale magnifies the gap: mega‑brands amortize connectivity costs and lock in global preferred suppliers, while independents shoulder higher fees or skip the channel altogether.
Why GDS Commission Share Matters
Why do these slight differences matter, if agency/post-pay GDS commissions comprise only about 5% of global hotel commissions?
Indeed, hotels more broadly have been making efforts to migrate to direct-heavy distribution strategies since the dawn of the internet age, and Skift Research expects those efforts to intensify in the next several years, according to the 'Hotel Distribution Outlook 2024.'
However, Skift Research also estimated in the report that agency bookings are expected to grow 125% by 2030. With every percentage point in GDS commission share representing millions of dollars, there's a significant amount of money on the table for hotels and agencies.
Part 2: GDS Commission Implications at the Property Level
Region, country, and hotel class explain only part of the variance in GDS commission share. The next Data Snap, coming out in July, will zoom into the property level — branded vs. independents, location, hotel persona — and show how hotels are turning hidden white space into high‑margin bookings. Stay tuned.
'The Data Snap' is a recurring article series that paints a clearer picture of the dynamic hotel booking landscape, empowering hotels and agencies to make data-driven decisions that help them build productive partner relationships and drive more revenue.
OnyxInsights offers a comprehensive view of the industry landscape, enabling hotels and TMCs to make well-informed decisions and better serve their clients and partners. Onyx CenterSource processes over 100 million transactions annually on behalf of 200,000 agencies and 150,000 hotels globally, representing nearly $2.1 billion in hotel commission payments. Visit onyxcentersource.com to learn more.
This content was created collaboratively by Onyx CenterSource and Skift's branded content studio, SkiftX.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dollar General Stock Just Popped, but Is the Worst Really Behind It?
Dollar General is starting to benefit from more affluent customers trading down on their shopping choices. However, its core customer base remains under pressure. The stock, meanwhile, is no longer in the bargain bin after a strong rally. 10 stocks we like better than Dollar General › Dollar General (NYSE: DG) has struggled in recent years, as inflationary pressures hurt its lower-income consumer base. However, the stock staged a strong rally following its fiscal first-quarter earnings report. As of this writing, it is up 50% in 2025. Let's take a closer look at its most recent earnings report and commentary to see whether this rally is sustainable or if the worst is not really behind it just yet. On the surface, tariffs would seem to be a big negative for a company like Dollar General. After all, the retailer's core customer base was already feeling pressure from higher prices due to inflation, and it looked like it was losing share to big-box price leader Walmart (NYSE: WMT). However, the company has begun to see more higher-income consumers frequent its stores in search of value. The retailer said it plans to minimize the impact of tariffs on its gross margins as much as possible without raising prices, although it could increase prices as a last resort. It plans to do this by working with vendors to cut costs, moving some manufacturing to other countries, and tweaking its product lineup by making changes or swapping out certain items. It noted that a mid- to high-single-digit percentage of its overall purchases are directly imported from China, but about double that percentage comes indirectly from the country. The inroads with higher-income consumers contributed to a 2.4% increase in same-store sales in the quarter. While traffic fell by 0.3%, its average checkout ticket rose by 2.7%. Growth came from gains in the food, seasonal, and home & apparel categories. Same-store sales is a very important metric for Dollar General, as it has said in the past that it needs to grow its comparable-store sales by around 3% for it to leverage its expenses and grow its earnings. However, the composition matters, and growth from high-margin areas, such as seasonal items, helped power its earnings higher. This appears to be largely a reflection of higher-income consumers shopping at its locations, as well as its efforts to improve the customer experience and offer better merchandising in categories such as seasonal decor and home items. The company also said that its newer pOpshelf store concept -- which is meant to provide a fun and affordable shopping experience with a focus on home goods, seasonal decor, and party supplies -- performed well, exceeding expectations. Overall, Dollar General's revenue rose 5% year over year to $10.4 billion, while its earnings per share (EPS) jumped 8% to $1.78. That was well ahead of the analyst consensus of $10.3 billion in revenue and adjusted EPS of $1.48. Gross margin increased 78 basis points to 31%, helped by lower shrink and higher inventory markups. Shrink is the amount of merchandise that gets lost, damaged, spoiled, stolen, or just generally can't be sold, and the company has been working hard to improve this metric. Looking ahead, Dollar General raised its full-year guidance. It now expects revenue to grow between 3.7% and 4.7%, with same-store sales increasing between 1.5% and 2.5%. That's up from a prior outlook of revenue growth of 3.4% to 4.4% on comparable-store growth of 1.2% to 2.2%. Meanwhile, it raised the low end of its full-year EPS guidance to a range of $5.20 to $5.80, up from a previous forecast of between $5.10 and $5.80. It said that the guidance assumes that current tariff rates remain in place. Metric Prior Guidance Current Guidance Revenue growth 3.4% to 4.4% 3.7% and 4.7% Same-store sales growth 1.2% to 2.2% 1.5% and 2.5% Earnings per share $5.10 to $5.80 $5.20 to $5.80 Source: Dollar General. The company is also looking to add 575 new store openings in the U.S. this year and up to 15 in Mexico. Dollar General appears to be benefiting from the trade-down effect this year. This is something Walmart has been experiencing for a while, but something dollar stores like Dollar General had previously been missing out on. It was only last year that these companies were talking about how the current environment was one of the most difficult periods in their histories. And for dollar stores' core customer bases, things may actually be worse now with tariffs than they were last year. As such, whether Dollar General can continue to turn the corner likely depends largely on whether it can keep the higher-income customers that have begun to visit its stores and continue to attract new ones. Right now, the company is seeing these new customers visit more often and spend more money per visit. Its remodeling efforts, along with initiatives like its mobile app and own same-day delivery service and partnership with DoorDash, are also likely helping attract more affluent consumers. From a valuation perspective, the retailer now trades at a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 20 based on analyst estimates for fiscal year 2025 (ending January 2026). That valuation shows the stock is no longer in the bargain bin. While Dollar General has made a lot of progress -- with its core consumer still very stressed -- I don't want to chase this rally at its current valuation. Before you buy stock in Dollar General, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Dollar General wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $674,395!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $858,011!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 997% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Geoffrey Seiler has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends DoorDash and Walmart. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Dollar General Stock Just Popped, but Is the Worst Really Behind It? was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio

Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Homes in Franklin County sold for higher prices recently: See how much here
Newly released data from for March shows that potential buyers and sellers in Franklin County saw higher home sale prices than the previous month's median of $259,000. The median home sold for $265,000, an analysis of data from shows. That means March, the most recent month for which figures are available, was up 2.3% from February. Compared to March 2024, the median home sales price was up 4.4% compared to $253,750. sources sales data from real estate deeds, resulting in a few months' delay in the data. The statistics don't include homes currently listed for sale and aren't directly comparable to listings data. Information on your local housing market, along with other useful community data, is available at Here is a breakdown on median sale prices: Looking only at single-family homes, the $263,000 median selling price in Franklin County was down 3.7% in March from $273,000 the month prior. Since March 2024, the sales price of single-family homes was up 2% from a median of $257, single family homes sold for $1 million or more during the month, compared to zero recorded transactions of at least $1 million in March 2024. Condominiums and townhomes increased by 26.8% in sales price during March to a median of $265,000 from $209,000 in February. Compared to March 2024, the sales price of condominiums and townhomes was up 28.5% from $206,300. No condominiums or townhomes sold for $1 million or more during March. In March, the number of recorded sales in Franklin County rose by 25.8% since March 2024 — from 128 to 161. All residential home sales totaled $61 million. Across Pennsylvania, homes sold at a median of $265,000 during March, up 1.9% from $259,998 in February. There were 9,945 recorded sales across the state during March, down 3.3% from 10,287 recorded sales in March 2024. Here's a breakdown for the full state: The total value of recorded residential home sales in Pennsylvania increased by 18.7% from $2.7 billion in February to $3.2 billion this March. Out of all residential home sales in Pennsylvania, 2.33% of homes sold for at least $1 million in March, up from 2.29% in March 2024. Sales prices of single-family homes across Pennsylvania increased by 1.9% from a median of $260,000 in February to $265,000 in March. Since March 2024, the sales price of single-family homes across the state was up 6% from $250,000. Across the state, the sales price of condominiums and townhomes rose 2% from a median of $255,916 in February to $261,000 during March. The median sales price of condominiums and townhomes is up 6.1% from the median of $245,892 in March 2024. The median home sales price used in this report represents the midway point of all the houses or units listed over the given period of time. The median offers a more accurate view of what's happening in a market than the average sales price, which would mean taking the sum of all sales prices then dividing by the number of homes sold. The average can be skewed by one particularly low or high sale. The USA TODAY Network is publishing localized versions of this story on its news sites across the country, generated with data from Please leave any feedback or corrections for this story here. This story was written by Ozge Terzioglu. Our News Automation and AI team would like to hear from you. Take this survey and share your thoughts with us. This article originally appeared on Waynesboro Record Herald: Homes in Franklin County sold for higher prices recently: See how much here

Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Homes in Washington County sold for higher prices recently: See how much here
Newly released data from for March shows that potential buyers and sellers in Washington County saw higher home sale prices than the previous month's median of $299,500. The median home sold for $324,900, an analysis of data from shows. That means March, the most recent month for which figures are available, was up 8.5% from February. Compared to March 2024, the median home sales price was up 8.5% compared to $299,500. sources sales data from real estate deeds, resulting in a few months' delay in the data. The statistics don't include homes currently listed for sale and aren't directly comparable to listings data. Information on your local housing market, along with other useful community data, is available at Here is a breakdown on median sale prices: Looking only at single-family homes, the $342,500 median selling price in Washington County was up 12.3% in March from $305,000 the month prior. Since March 2024, the sales price of single-family homes was up 2.2% from a median of $335, single-family homes sold for $1 million or more during the month. Condominiums and townhomes decreased by 10.2% in sales price during March to a median of $247,000 from $274,999 in February. Compared to March 2024, the sales price of condominiums and townhomes was down 2.8% from $254,000. No condominiums or townhomes sold for $1 million or more during March. In March, the number of recorded sales in Washington County rose by 26.1% since March 2024 — from 142 to 179. All residential home sales totaled $59.9 million. Across Maryland, homes sold at a median of $398,894 during March, up 2.4% from $389,423 in February. There were 6,417 recorded sales across the state during March, down 1.8% from 6,534 recorded sales in March 2024. Here's a breakdown for the full state: The total value of recorded residential home sales in Maryland increased by 22.8% from $2.9 billion in February to $3.6 billion this March. Out of all residential home sales in Maryland, 7.14% of homes sold for at least $1 million in March, down from 7.73% in March 2024. Sales prices of single-family homes across Maryland increased by 4.5% from a median of $440,000 in February to $460,000 in March. Since March 2024, the sales price of single-family homes across the state was slightly up from $457,600. Across the state, the sales price of condominiums and townhomes is at a median of $325,000, the same as February. The median sales price of condominiums and townhomes is down 1.6% from the median of $330,333 in March 2024. The median home sales price used in this report represents the midway point of all the houses or units listed over the given period of time. The median offers a more accurate view of what's happening in a market than the average sales price, which would mean taking the sum of all sales prices then dividing by the number of homes sold. The average can be skewed by one particularly low or high sale. The USA TODAY Network is publishing localized versions of this story on its news sites across the country, generated with data from Please leave any feedback or corrections for this story here. This story was written by Ozge Terzioglu. Our News Automation and AI team would like to hear from you. Take this survey and share your thoughts with us. This article originally appeared on The Herald-Mail: Homes in Washington County sold for higher prices recently: See how much here