India "carefully monitoring" China's mega hydropower project on River Brahmaputra: Indian Minister Kirti Vardhan Singh
The Ministry of External Affairs said in a statement that they were carefully monitoring China's hydropower project on the lower reaches of the Yarlung Tsangpo (upper reaches of the Brahmaputra) River in Tibet.
This project, first made public in 1986, has been a subject of concern for India due to its potential impact on the country's interests and the livelihoods of local tribes.
Minister of State for External Affairs, Kirti Vardhan Singh, said that the government carefully monitors all developments related to the Brahmaputra River and takes necessary measures to protect its interests. The government has consistently conveyed its views and concerns to the Chinese authorities, emphasising the need for transparency and consultation with downstream countries.
"The Government of India has taken note of reports about the commencement of construction of the mega dam project by China on the lower reaches of the Yarlung Tsangpo (upper reaches of the Brahmaputra) River in Tibet. This project was first made public as far back as 1986 and since then, preparations have been underway in China," the MEA stated in response to an unstarred question in the Rajya Sabha.
The MEA said that the government remained committed to safeguarding Indian interests in the region.
"Government carefully monitors all developments relating to the Brahmaputra river, including plans by China to develop hydropower projects, and takes necessary measures to protect our interests, including preventive and corrective measures to safeguard life and livelihood of Indian citizens residing in downstream areas," the statement said.
India has discussed various issues related to transboundary rivers with China under an institutionalised Expert Level Mechanism established in 2006. The government has also urged China to ensure that any activities in upstream areas do not harm the interests of downstream states.
"Various issues relating to trans-border rivers are discussed with China under the ambit of an institutionalised Expert Level Mechanism which was established in 2006, as well as through diplomatic channels. As a lower riparian state with considerable established user rights to the waters of the trans-border rivers, Government has consistently conveyed its views and concerns to the Chinese authorities, including on the need for transparency and consultation with downstream countries and has urged them to ensure that the interests of downstream states are not harmed by any activities in upstream areas," he said.
Singh said that the government noted the need for cooperation on the trans-border issue and has conveyed it to China.
"The need for cooperation on trans-border rivers, including resumption of provision of hydrological data by the Chinese side has been highlighted by the Government in several bilateral interactions with China including during the recent visit of EAM to China from 14-16 July 2025 for the SCO Foreign Ministers' Meeting," he said.
During the recent visit of External Affairs Minister to China for the SCO Foreign Ministers' Meeting, the need for cooperation on trans-border rivers, including the resumption of hydrological data provision by the Chinese side, was highlighted. The Indian government remains vigilant and proactive in protecting its interests and ensuring the well-being of its citizens.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times of Oman
4 hours ago
- Times of Oman
More tariffs on the way – Learn to become self-sufficient
Every day, we hear news of fresh and increased tariffs on US imports. Last Wednesday, Donald Trump imposed an additional 25 percent tariff on Indian imports, bringing the total to 50 percent. Speaking to The Times of Oman, R. Madhusoodanan, a financial expert based in Muscat, said, 'This is nothing but a retaliatory action' by the US, citing that India continued to purchase of Russian crude. This is quite discriminatory as China is importing more crude from Russia than India, and still, their tariff is much lower than that of India. No doubt, if implemented, India's exports to the US, particularly textiles, pharma, vehicle parts, leather, and marine products, are expected to be impacted at least in the short term. For example, the current tariff on steel, copper, and aluminium is 1.7 percent, while the revised rate will be 51.7 percent, whereas the tariff applicable to Mexico , China, and Canada is 25 percent, 30 percent, and 35 percent, respectively. This makes the Indian products costly for the US customers. 'Unfair, unjustified, and unreasonable' The Indian government has said the move is 'unfair, unjustified, and unreasonable. The government has been taking steps to diversify the export markets to other regions, including South American countries, to mitigate the potential risks. More credit flow is expected to happen to sectors like agriculture, manufacturing, pharma, housing, and textiles. New markets, infrastructure, tariffs on imports, export incentives, and tax sops are also very important, besides making available cheap, timely, and adequate finance to these sectors. Currently, India has around 18 percent of its exports to the US, and India has a trade surplus with US. New developments may impact the trade deficit of India. The shocks in the Indian equities, weaker INR, and high volatility in the forex markets are indicators., he further said. It is high time that India became self-sufficient in many areas and to have checks on the import of electronic goods, gold, and other precious metals to preserve forex earnings. Efforts also needed to produce goods and services that are globally competitive. Outlook The new tariffs on more than 90 countries around the world have come into effect. But the fact is that the US is also not insulated from the aftermath of the tariff decisions. The latest payroll data released is not good. The dollar index (DIX), which indicates the strength of the dollar against a basket of currencies, is in the range of 98-99. Inflation and growth concerns are also factors facing the US economy. The US is well aware of the consequences of its exports and the higher inflation, etc, due to the increased tariffs. US kept the windows open for discussion with many countries, including that of India, and the new rates are unlikely to be the final ones, R. Madhusoodanan said.
Times of Oman
15 hours ago
- Times of Oman
China opposes "abuse of tariffs" by US against India
Beijing: China voiced its opposition to the US announcement of tariffs against India. The Spokesperson of China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Guo Jiakun, in his press briefing while responding to media queries called the act an 'abuse of tariffs'. When asked on comments on Trump's executive order to place an additional 25 percent tariff on India for its purchases of Russian oil, he said, "China's opposition to the abuse of tariffs is consistent and clear." "China opposes the US politicizing tech and trade issues and using them as weapons to maliciously blockade and go after China. The US should earnestly protect the legitimate and lawful rights and interests of Chinese nationals," he added. Trump's order drew criticism from within the country as House Foreign Affairs Committee Dems warned that Trump's actions risk the carefully developed US-India relationship. In a post on X, House Foreign Affairs Committee Dems said, "RM Gregory Meeks: Trump's latest tariff tantrum risks years of careful work to build a stronger US-India partnership. We have deep strategic, economic, and people-to-people ties. Concerns should be addressed in a mutually respectful way consistent with our democratic values." Earlier in the day, Trump said there will be no trade negotiations with India until a dispute over tariffs is resolved, following his administration's decision to double tariffs on Indian imports. When pressed by ANI at the Oval Office, whether he expected talks to resume in light of the new 50% tariff. "No, not until we get it resolved," he replied. The White House on Wednesday issued an Executive Order imposing an additional 25 percentage points in tariffs on Indian goods, raising the total levy to 50%. The administration cited national security and foreign policy concerns, pointing specifically to India's ongoing imports of Russian oil. The order claims that these imports, whether direct or via intermediaries, present an "unusual and extraordinary threat" to the United States and justify emergency economic measures. According to US officials, the initial 25% tariff came into effect on 7 August. The additional levy will take effect in 21 days and apply to all Indian goods entering US ports -- with exceptions for items already in transit and certain exempt categories.
Times of Oman
15 hours ago
- Times of Oman
"We are close to reaching a deal," Danish Ambassador to India on EU-India trade negotiation
New Delhi: Denmark's ambassador to India, Rasmus Christensen, said that the European Union and India are close to making a trade deal, which is a testament to the fact that India is not a "dead economy," as touted by US President Donald Trump. In an interview with Christensen the diplomat said that Denmark sees India as a promising place to invest. "I certainly do not see India as a dead economy. On the contrary, it's world's fastest growing economy. And I think a testament to that fact is that the EU and India is negotiating a free trade agreement. I think that will be mutually beneficial," Christensen said. He said that Denmark views India as a promising place to conduct business, which contradicts Trump's claims. "So certainly from a Danish European perspective, we see India as a very promising place to invest and do business with. And that would not be the case if it was a dead economy," the Danish envoy said. He further said that though Denmark holds the rotating presidency of the European Union, all trade policies are thoroughly discussed among all member states and the EU is currently interested in exploring options to invest in India. "Indeed, Denmark currently holds the rotating presidency of the European Union. Although when it comes to trade policy, as we discussed, it's a responsibility of the EU Commission. But I think we do see a very significant momentum now in the negotiations between the EU and India, probably for all kinds of reasons. Certainly, the EU is also very interested in diversifying its trade relationships," he said. The Ambassador further said that India is an important player in trade with the EU and that now there is an urgency now to conclude the trade agreement. "India is an important player. And I think the same goes for India. So maybe the reason why we have been negotiating for so long was a certain lack of urgency. But I think the urgency is there now. And whether we can conclude it during our presidency in November or December, or whether it comes slightly later, nobody knows," Christensen said. "But I think we are close to reaching a deal. And I remain confident that we will reach a deal," he added. When asked if Europe saw India as a counterbalance to China, Christensen said that Europe is farther away from Asia, and now Europe is realising the downside of having to depend on one country for certain goods. "Of course, Europe is, in that sense, we are kind of a little bit far away from the Indo-Pacific. But I think if you look at it from a geoeconomic perspective, certainly in Europe, there is a growing realisation that, again, we need to diversify our economic partnerships. I think in Europe, in the past couple of years, I think we have also come to realise the reliance we have on one country in particular when it comes to imports of certain goods," he said. Christensen said that the EU is looking to diversify their trade ambit, noting that very few countries could contribute what China did through exports. "And we would like to diversify that. We will, the Europe will keep trading with China, but we would like to increase our trade with others and make sure that our supply chains are more diversified, that we can get access to goods, manufactured goods, whatever from different places. And I think, to be very honest, there are very few countries that could deliver what, for example, China has delivered to the global economy," he said. He futher noted that India is seen as the best alternative to China. "And India is probably the best example of that. So that's why, if you're sitting back in Brussels or Copenhagen or the European capitals and look out into the world, India is probably the upcoming alternative to what we've seen. So therefore, we will invest here," he said. (ANI)
