Indiana toll road bill amended in committee, but toll road language remains
House Bill 1461, authored by state Rep. Jim Pressel, R-Rolling Prairie, would allow the state to charge tolls on all Indiana interstate highways, including I-80/94 and I-65.
Specifically, the bill would allow the Indiana Department of Transportation to submit a request to the Federal Highway Administration for a waiver to toll lanes on interstate highways. If the waiver is granted, the legislature would not have to enact a statute for the Indiana finance authority to take action on tolling.
As he presented the amendment to his bill to the Senate Appropriations Committee, Pressel said the bill includes 'a check and balance' on potential tolling.
'We put a check and balance in there to report back to the state budget committee that if any tolling is going to be done or considered that they would have to go through the state budget committee at least to make them aware of that,' Pressel said.
Sen. Lonnie Randolph, D-East Chicago, asked Pressel if his amendment would remove the tollway provision. Randolph said he's concerned about the impacts of toll roads in Northwest Indiana.
Pressel asked where in the bill it states that toll roads will be established.
'Nowhere in this bill does it say, 'you shall toll',' Pressel said. 'Tolling is an option, currently today. The administration could do that today without us by creating a toll lane.'
Sen. Aaron Freeman, R-Indianapolis, offered an amendment that, in part, removed provisions regarding tolling.
'The bill as it currently is, in my view, would make it a lot easier to toll in Indiana,' Freeman said.
Sen. Michael Crider, R-Greenfield, said the gas tax, which state officials use to fund roads, won't be a sustainable option to continue road projects in the future.
'The gas tax is not a viable method anymore, and so we have to leave all options on the table, which includes giving the government the option of tolling, if that's what we decide,' Crider said.
Freeman's amendment failed 4-9.
Along with tollways, House Bill 1461 allows for wheel tax, addresses bridge construction funding, allows excess distributions from the state's Community Crossings matching grant program to be distributed to all communities based on lane miles instead of road miles, along with other elements.
Pressel previously testified in committee that the state has seen a decrease in road funding dollars, which comes from gas tax, BMV registration and excise tax, as cars become more fuel efficient and people purchase less gas.
'When your road funding revenue is based on gallons sold … we are having the conversation: How do we fund roads into the future? Should it come out of the general fund? I don't believe that to be true. I think we should have user fees. You pay for what you use,' Pressel previously said.
By 2030, the state will have to fund $1.2 billion and local governments will have to fund between $900 million to $2.5 billion in road projects because of inflation costs and the reduction in drivers purchasing gas, Pressel said.
The amendment to the bill increased the electric vehicle registration fees from $221 to $340 in 2026 and increased the hybrid registration fee from $74 to $170 in 2026, Pressel said. By 2027, under the amendment, the tax credit for the Shore Line Rail will expire, he said.
Further, the amendment creates a $100 million fund for communities without a wheel tax, Pressel said.
The amendment increases the speed limit on I-465 from 55 miles per hour to 65 miles per hour, Pressel said. The amendment also contains 'clean up language' on the township portion of the bill, he said.
Pressel's amendment passed in a voice vote. The bill passed in a 9-4 vote, and it will move forward to the Senate for consideration.
Sen. Rodney Pol, D-Chesterton, said he voted in favor of Freeman's amendment but against the bill because of the tolling language.
'I've gotten more calls from folks in my community about the concerns about this,' Pol said. 'I just have a lot of folks that get to and from work on the roads that could potentially be tolled, and these are folks that are struggling.'
akukulka@post-trib.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Legislative committees advance CA redistricting legislation
(The Center Square) — Legislators, taxpayers and others debated passionately Tuesday for several hours as Democratic-led election committees in the California Assembly and Senate advanced congressional redistricting legislation. The bills making up the Election Rigging Response Act received support from the Democratic majorities in the Senate Elections and Constitutional Amendments Committee and the Assembly Elections Committee. Ultimately they're expected to land on the floors of the Assembly and Senate on Thursday. They're backed by the Democratic supermajorities in both houses, as well as by Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom. With their passage certain, the legislation will mean voters on a Nov. 4 special election will decide whether to revise boundaries for congressional districts in response to redistricting in Republican-led states such as Texas. But the Republican minority in the Legislature scored what they called an early victory Monday night by delaying Thursday's floor votes. "The bill was stalled until after 7 p.m., meaning the earliest it can be legally voted on is Thursday evening. That leaves only hours before the special election deadline for passage and Newsom's signature," Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones, R-San Diego, posted on X. Democrats and Republicans agree democracy is at stake and that California has a gold standard with its independent, nonpartisan Citizens Redistricting Commission. Republican lawmakers argued the will of voters, who approved a constitutional amendment creating the commission, was being disregarded. But Democratic legislators stressed voters can see the proposed map, which is posted at They also noted that unlike people in Texas, Californian voters will have the final say on whether congressional districts are changed and that the independent commission can resume its work after the 2030 census. "We are not asking California to rubber stamp maps behind closed doors," Assembly Elections Committee Chair Gail Pellerin, a Democrat, told the committee. "As a former election official, I would never stand for that. This is about defending democracy itself, making sure checks and balances our kids learned in government class are alive and well after the 2026 election." Other Democrats on the committee voiced their support. 'Who should have the control of the vast power of the federal government?' asked Assemblymember Steve Bennett, D-Ventura. 'Our founding fathers agreed hundreds of years ago on a special form of democracy, designed to protect our democracy from power grabs.' If people in power try to change the rules to seize power undemocratically, then democracy advocates must also change their rules in response, Bennett argued. But Assemblymember David J. Tangipa, R-Clovis, who sits on the committee with Bennett, told the committee that Republicans weren't given enough time to review the legislation in advance of Tuesday's hearing. He also noted the proposed congressional map changed at 8 p.m. Monday. Pellerin countered that she understood the map was posted at 8 a.m. Monday. Pellerin and Tangipa clashed during the hearing as the latter asked extensive questions of Assemblymember Marc Berman, D-Palo Alto, who spoke on behalf of one of the three bills making up the Election Rigging Response Act. Pellerin said she was trying to keep the meeting moving, and Tangipa stressed the importance of his questions on topics such as funding. A large number of residents throughout California, union representatives and representatives of organizations such as Planned Parenthood and the California Teachers Association, spoke in favor of redistricting at the Assembly committee meeting. But what appeared to be an even bigger number of taxpayers from throughout the state, as well as representatives of Republican organizations, spoke against the legislation. Comments on the two sides echoed those made by the Democratic and Republican legislators. The Assembly committee rejected a motion by its ranking Republican, Vice Chair Alexandra Macedo of Tulare, that the committee recess until its members could read all 16,000 comments that voters have made in a portal on the Assembly website. "Democratic power bosses want to take the power away from the people," Macedo said. She called the Election Rigging Response Act a coordinated effort to tear down the independent commission and gerrymander districts for political gain at a time California faces severe budget shortfalls. The Assembly Republican Caucus has said the Nov. 4 election will cost voters more than $235 million. Democrats have countered the Trump administration has cost the state much more than that by cutting or withholding funding.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sen. Lindsey Graham says Trump ready to ‘crush' Russian economy if Putin avoids talks with Zelenskyy
WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham said Tuesday that he believes President Donald Trump is prepared to 'crush' Russia's economy with a new wave of sanctions if Russian President Vladimir Putin refuses to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the coming weeks. Graham, who spoke with Trump on Tuesday morning, has pushed the president for months to support his sweeping bipartisan sanctions bill that would impose steep tariffs on countries that are fueling Russia's invasion of Ukraine by buying its oil, gas, uranium, and other exports. The legislation has the backing of 85 senators, but Trump has yet to endorse it. Republican leaders have said they won't move without him. 'If we don't have this thing moving in the right direction by the time we get back, then I think that plan B needs to kick in,' Graham said in a phone interview with The Associated Press on Tuesday. The Senate, now away from Washington for the August recess, is scheduled to return in September. Graham's call with Trump came less than 24 hours after high-stakes meetings at the White House with Zelenskyy and several European leaders. Trump and the leaders emerged from those talks sounding optimistic, with the expectation being that a Putin and Zelenskyy sit-down will happen soon. Still, Trump's comments to Graham, one of his top congressional allies, mark the latest sign that pressure is building — not just on Putin, but on Trump as well. 'Trump believes that if Putin doesn't do his part, that he's going to have to crush his economy. Because you've got to mean what you say,' Graham told reporters in South Carolina on Tuesday. As Congress prepares to return to session in early September, the next few weeks could become a defining test of whether lawmakers and international allies are prepared to act on their own if Trump doesn't follow through. Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal, the lead Democrat pushing the bill with Graham, says there is a 'lot of reason for skepticism and doubt' after the meetings with Trump, especially because Putin has not made any direct promises. He said the Russian leader has an incentive to play 'rope-a-dope' with Trump. 'The only way to bring Putin to the table is to show strength,' Blumenthal told the AP this week. 'What Putin understands is force and pressure.' Still, Republicans have shown little willingness to override Trump in his second term. They abruptly halted work on the sanctions bill before the August recess after Trump said the legislation may not be needed. Asked Tuesday in a phone interview whether the sanctions bill should be brought up even without Trump's support, Graham said, 'the best way to do it is with him.' 'There will come a point where if it's clear that Putin is not going to entertain peace, that President Trump will have to back up what he said he would do,' Graham said. 'And the best way to do it is have congressional blessing.' The legislation would impose tariffs of up to 500% on countries such as China and India, which together account for roughly 70% of Russia's energy trade. The framework has the support of many European leaders. Many of those same European leaders left the White House on Monday with a more hopeful tone. Zelenskyy called the meeting with Trump 'an important step toward ending this war.' German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said that his expectations 'were not just met, they were exceeded.' Still, little concrete progress was visible on the main obstacles to peace. That deadlock likely favors Putin, whose forces continue to make steady, if slow, progress on the ground in Ukraine. French President Emmanuel Macron told reporters after talks at the White House that Trump believes a deal with Putin is possible. But he said sanctions remain on the table if the process fails. ___ Associated Press reporter Meg Kinnard contributed to this report from Florence, South Carolina.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ferguson rejects U.S. attorney general's threat over Washington immigration law
Governor Bob Ferguson said Tuesday that Washington state will not be intimidated by threats of criminal prosecution from U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi over the state's immigration policies. Speaking at the Capitol alongside lawmakers, cabinet officials and community leaders, Ferguson said Washington will not divert state resources from public safety to enforce federal immigration directives. Ferguson received Bondi's letter late last week. It cited unspecified 'sanctuary policies and practices' in Washington and claimed they violate federal law. Bondi also warned that state officials who 'obstruct federal immigration enforcement efforts … may be subject to criminal charges.' Washington GOP responded Tuesday, saying Ferguson should 'follow the Constitution.' 'The current governor's response to Attorney General Pam Bondi's letter of August 13 demanding that he end his unlawful 'sanctuary state' policies is disappointing but entirely predictable,' WAGOP Chairman and State Rep. Jim Walsh said. 'Bob Ferguson puts essential functions of state government at risk in order to perpetuate a foolish political fight with the federal government.' In his response, Ferguson denounced the threat as inappropriate and politically motivated. 'You seem to believe that cavalierly citing criminal statutes and personally threatening me, a democratically elected governor, will result in compromising the values of my state. Never,' Ferguson wrote. Lawmakers at the Capitol rallied behind Ferguson and the state's 2019 Keep Washington Working Act, which limits state and local law enforcement from assisting federal immigration authorities in most situations. Sen. Lisa Wellman, D-Mercer Island, who sponsored the law, said it ensures law enforcement focuses on crime rather than immigration. 'This administration's total disregard of due process shows us all they care about is instilling fear and hurting law-abiding Washingtonians,' Wellman said. Rep. Lillian Ortiz-Self, D-Mukilteo, who sponsored the companion bill, argued that the act makes Washington safer by strengthening trust between immigrant communities and local police. She noted that immigrants make significant contributions to the state's economy across industries such as agriculture, healthcare, technology and hospitality. 'Pam Bondi wants fear. Washington state wants fairness,' Ortiz-Self said. Senate Majority Leader Jamie Pedersen, D-Seattle, said Washington's stance is longstanding. 'Washingtonians have a long history of welcoming ALL people to our state,' Pedersen said. 'That will not change.' Other lawmakers echoed that message. Rep. Julio Cortes, D-Everett, said the law reflects the values of fairness and dignity. 'We will continue protecting all our residents because we value fairness, hard work, and the dignity of every person who calls Washington home,' he said. Support also came from advocacy groups. Malou Chávez, executive director of the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, called the law 'an important protection for our communities.' She urged Washington leaders to continue defending immigrant residents against federal overreach. Ferguson has frequently clashed with the Trump administration over immigration enforcement, including legal challenges during Trump's first term. Solve the daily Crossword
