Sir Keir Starmer and EU leaders will join Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy at White House peace talks
He will join European leaders including France's president Emmanuel Macron, Italy's PM Giorgia Meloni and Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz after the US president reportedly extended an invitation to them.
Also set to attend the talk at the White House are NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission.
This comes after Vladimir Putin reportedly made demands to take control of the key eastern Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine during his summit with Mr Trump as a condition for ending the war.
In exchange, Mr Putin would give up other Ukrainian territories held by his troops, according to several news reports citing sources close to the matter.
Mr Trump is said to be planning to urge Mr Zelenskyy to agree to the conditions as part of a peace deal to end the war, despite the Ukrainian president previously ruling out formally handing any territory to Moscow, as such a move would deprive Ukraine of defensive lines and open the way for Moscow to conduct further offensives.
Russia already controls a fifth of Ukraine, including about three-quarters of Donetsk province, which it first entered in 2014.
European leaders who make up the "coalition of the willing" are set to hold a conference call today ahead of the crunch talks between Mr Trump and Mr Zelenskyy, which some coalition members are set to attend.
They are expected to discuss how to bring Mr Zelenskyy into talks after Mr Trump and Mr Putin's meeting saw him left out in the cold.
In coordinated statements following the Alaska summit, European leaders said Mr Zelenskyy must play a greater role in future talks, and that peace cannot be achieved without him.
The US president said the Washington talk with Mr Zelenskyy could potentially pave the way for a three-way meeting with Mr Putin.
On Saturday, Downing Street insisted Sir Keir and other allies stand ready to support the next phase of talks to end the war.
"At the meeting that will take place at the White House tomorrow, the Prime Minister, with other European partners, stands ready to support this next phase of further talks and will reaffirm that his backing for Ukraine will continue as long as it takes," a statement from No 10 said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
a minute ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Timeline of territorial shifts in Russia's war on Ukraine
Russia's troops are continuing their slow war of attrition in eastern and northern Ukraine, even as the conflict enters a pivotal phase with a series of high-level meetings that are part of US President Donald Trump's push for peace. In the three-and-a-half years since Moscow launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the front line has continued to move slowly with some unexpected strikes also redrawing the map. Advertisement Here is a look at some of the main events in the conflict. An aerial view of Chasiv Yar shows the frontline city in ruins after heavy fighting between Russian and Ukrainian forces for over a year (AP) February 24 2022: Russian President Vladimir Putin launches an invasion of Ukraine from the north, east and south. Russian troops quickly reach Kyiv's outskirts, but their attempts to capture the capital and other cities in the north-east meet stiff resistance. March 5 2022: Russian advances toward Kyiv and Kherson reach their height. The port city of Mariupol is surrounded. April 2 2022: Ukraine defeats Russian forces in Kyiv after throwing them back in Chernihiv. Advertisement August 29 2022: Ukraine's first counter-offensive starts in the east and south. September 30 2022: Russia illegally annexes Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions of Ukraine, even though it does not fully control either of the four. September to November 2022: Ukrainian forces reclaim vast parts of the Kharkiv, Mykolaiv and Kherson regions in the first counter-offensive, including the city of Kherson itself. President Vladimir Putin and Russian officials during a ceremony to sign the treaties for four regions of Ukraine to join Russia at the Kremlin in 2022 (Kremlin Pool Photo via AP) May 22 2023: Russia claims control of Bakhmut after months of fighting. Advertisement June 6 2023: As Ukraine's long-anticipated second counter-offensive starts, the Russian-controlled Kakhovka Dam explodes, sending a wall of water into southern Ukraine and upending Ukrainian battle plans. Autumn 2023: The second Ukrainian counter-offensive ends, with little change to the front line. February 18 2024: Russian forces take complete control of the eastern city of Avdiivka after months of combat. April 19 2024: The US House of Representatives approves a 61 billion dollar package for Ukraine after months of delay. Advertisement May 10 2024: Russia launches a new offensive in the north-eastern region of Kharkiv, capturing a string of villages and opening a new front in the war. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky speaks during a media conference at EU headquarters in Brussels (AP) August 6 2024: Ukraine launches a lightning incursion into Russia's Kursk region, holding territory along the border in an unexpected and embarrassing episode for the Kremlin. January 20 2025: Mr Trump is inaugurated as the 47th president of the United States. His election raises uncertainty as to whether Washington will continue to support Ukraine. April 26 2025: Moscow says all Ukrainian troops have been forced out from Russia's Kursk region. Several weeks later, Mr Putin visits the area in a show of strength and is filmed speaking with local volunteers. Advertisement June 1 2025: Ukraine strikes airfields deep inside Russia by launching drones that have been secretly stored and transported across the country on the back of trucks. The attack is codenamed Operation Spider Web. Summer 2025: Russia and Ukraine both step up drone strikes with the ability to strike deep into each other's territory. June 30 2025: Russia says it has taken full control of Ukraine's Luhansk, one of four regions that Moscow illegally annexed in September 2022. July 31 2025: Russia says it has taken full control of the strategically important Ukrainian city of Chasiv Yar after a grinding, months-long assault. August 2025: Russian forces continue their push in the Donetsk region, where the Kremlin has focused the bulk of military efforts, capturing small villages and closing in on Pokrovsk, a strategically important city. August 15 2025: Mr Putin meets Mr Trump in Alaska for the first Russia-US summit in four years to discuss ending the war in Ukraine. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky and European officials say Mr Putin wants Ukraine to withdraw from the remaining 30% of the Donetsk region that it controls as part of a deal.
The Guardian
a minute ago
- The Guardian
‘Hallmarks of authoritarianism': Trump banks on loyalists as he wages war on truth
Donald Trump is waging a war on truth by firing top officials who present facts he finds unpalatable, while he banks on key loyalists at executive agencies to bolster his policies and powers by 'rewriting history's narrative' and squelching dissent, say scholars and former officials. Trump's penchant for rejecting facts in an authoritarian style was especially revealed in August by his sudden firing of the Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner, charging without evidence that her latest report was 'totally rigged', just hours after she released data undercutting his rosy economic boasts, say critics. The firing was emblematic of Trump's expanding battle against people and policies that challenge the US president's often conspiratorial views about truth such as his 2020 election loss to Joe Biden, which Trump last fall falsely blamed again on 'fraud'. From the justice department to the Environmental Protection Agency to other key agencies, Trump loyalists have pushed falsehoods and taken radical steps to promote Trump's policies and what a Trump adviser in 2017 dubbed 'alternative facts'. In doing so, Trump and his top allies are acting in an authoritarian style by revising history, rejecting facts and widely accepted science, critics add. 'The irony in firing the widely respected economist and BLS commissioner Erika McEntarfer is that the commissioner has very little to do with the actual production of the figures Trump says were 'rigged',' said Peter Shane, who teaches constitutional law at New York University. ''Rigged', in Trump-speak, just means 'unfavorable to Trump'. To the extent the firing had an actual purpose, it was not to reform [the] BLS, but to send a message to all agency heads that the release of unflattering information, no matter how routine or how objective, would put their jobs in jeopardy,' Shane added. Little wonder that Trump on 11 August announced he was nominating EJ Antoni, an economist at the rightwing Heritage Foundation who has been a vocal critic of the BLS, to replace her, and boasted that he 'will ensure that the Numbers released are HONEST AND ACCURATE'. Scholars, ex-justice department officials and even some conservatives say Trump's and his loyalists attacks on truth have increased in his second term in dangerous ways, since he has avoided choosing the kinds of aides who before served as guardrails against some of his instincts to revise history and promote radical policies. 'The difference between Trump 1 and Trump 2 is that he now has no guardrails … Now Trump is surrounded by people who want to be like him. He learned his lesson of not having people around him who would say no to him,' said George Conway, a lawyer and board president of the Society for the Rule of Law, a group that includes several ex-justice department officials with Republican pedigrees who have been critical of Trump's authoritarian-style moves. Conway added: 'He's always tried to create his own set of facts. None of this is new. It's part of Trump's conspiratorial mindset.' Shane stressed: 'Sabotaging independent sources of knowledge, flooding communications media with disinformation, and rewriting history's narrative to conform to ideology rather than fact are hallmarks of authoritarianism.' Shane's points are underscored by multiple Trump and administration actions, including Trump's counter-factual charges that crime in Washington was 'out of control' despite data released early this year that showed violent crime in DC was at a 30-year low. Still, flanked by several cabinet members, Trump held a press conference to declare a 'public safety emergency' and put DC police under temporary federal control, while deploying 800 national guard troops to America's capital. Elsewhere, Trump loyalists at the EPA moved this month to rescind its key 2009 endangerment finding, which has underpinned regulatory efforts to fight climate change since the Barack Obama administration as the agency increasingly rejects widely accepted scientific facts. Likewise, the justice department impaneled a grand jury in August to investigate a conspiratorial charge by Trump's director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, that Obama and some of his aides engaged in a 'treasonous conspiracy' by launching inquiries in 2016 into Russian efforts to influence that election to help Trump win. In another battle royale against facts, the health secretary and vaccine sceptic, Robert F Kennedy Jr, has stepped up efforts to block some vaccines that scientists regard as crucial weapons in fighting Covid and other diseases. Critics say Trump's moves to undermine facts have been escalating in dangerous ways. 'From government agencies to universities, the president is wielding the cudgel of federal money and the threat of presidential power to intimidate people whose data and ideas don't support him,' said the Princeton political historian Julian Zelizer. Zelizer said: 'While many presidents have been critical of economic data [such as Herbert Hoover], this is a new level of hostility. Someone says something he does not like, that person is removed. The point is to create fear so that others think twice before saying something that is harmful to the administration.' Shane of NYU warned that Trump's administration allies have mimicked his actions. 'Trump's top officials, many of whom lack the experience, judgment, intellect and temperament to do their jobs properly, know Trump's playbook and are determined to remain where they are … Everyone around Trump sees he has paid very little cost for his perfidy. They're following the boss.' Leaders at key agencies have followed Trump's playbook of attacking facts and widely accepted science with regulatory moves to undermine climate change science and alternative fuels. The EPA, as well as the interior and energy departments, has stepped up efforts to throttle spending and regulations to expand wind and solar energy; Trump has attacked green energy as part of his conspiratorial view that climate change is a 'hoax', while aggressively promoting his fossil fuel agenda of 'drill, baby, drill'. 'The Trump team has launched an all-of-government assault on wind and solar,' said Michael Gerrard, who runs the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia University. Gerrard said: 'When Obama's EPA issued the endangerment finding in 2009 there was a ton of scientific evidence supporting it. There are now 10 tons. There are a few ounces on the other side, but Trump's EPA is seizing on the ounces as an excuse to wipe out our strongest legal tool to fight climate change. 'The EPA, the energy and interior departments, and even the Federal Aviation Administration, are using all available tools, and making up some new ones, to suppress these sources of clean power.' Other experts and scientists are alarmed too that Kennedy has stepped up efforts to block vaccines he has long castigated without real evidence as dangerous. Earlier this month, Kennedy announced in a statement the ending of 22 projects worth $500m to develop mRNA technologies that have been used in vaccines to combat respiratory viruses such as Covid and the flu. In response to Kennedy's move, Trump told reporters that 'we're on to other things' and said the administration was focused now on 'looking for other answers to other problems, to other sicknesses and diseases'. Trump, a former champion of the Covid vaccines, seems to have ignored several recent moves by Kennedy which health experts have sharply criticized. In July, Kennedy abruptly fired a 17-member CDC panel that recommends vaccines, and replaced it with a smaller committee that boasts some known vaccine sceptics. Further, Kennedy has balked at offering strong support for vaccinations even as the CDC reported 1,356 measles cases as of this month, the highest total of annual cases since 2000, when the United States declared measles eliminated. On a legal battlefront, former prosecutors say truth and facts are under assault at the justice department, which increasingly has acted without solid evidence of misconduct to investigate Trump's declared foes, such as the former FBI director James Comey and ex-CIA director John Brennan. Trump in July baselessly accused Obama of 'treason' for his administration's inquiry into Russian influence efforts to help Trump win in 2016. The move came despite multiple reports, including one from the bipartisan Senate intelligence panel, concluding that Moscow mounted a drive to boost Trump. Trump's comments followed Gabbard's release of classified materials that did not support his allegations, say critics. Yet the attorney general, Pam Bondi, then impaneled a grand jury to investigate the charges as Gabbard requested. Some legal scholars see a pattern with earlier Trump tactics to fudge facts and revise history and warn of the justice department's marked politicization under Trump and Bondi. The Columbia law professor and ex-federal prosecutor Daniel Richman said: 'The announcement of a grand jury investigation into Obama and Biden officials [is] just the latest effort to support a false narrative with the presence of official action.' From a historical perspective, critics say the Trump administration's assaults on truth and facts will do long-term damage. 'The United States did not put a man on the moon or invent the transistor, the internet, the polio vaccine, or [on the negative side] the atomic bomb by ignoring or making up facts,' said Gerrard. 'All these achievements resulted from scientists doing the very hard work of discovering truths about the physical world and using them in brilliant ways. 'A country that instead ignores facts it doesn't like and invents falsities can achieve very little beyond satisfying those who share the leaders' ideology. We are on a dangerous path to mediocrity, or worse.'
Telegraph
a minute ago
- Telegraph
First trans judge appeals to ECHR over Supreme Court ruling
Britain's first transgender judge has lodged an appeal with the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) against the Supreme Court ruling on gender. In April, Supreme Court judges ruled the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act referred to biological sex and not to acquired gender in a legal action brought against the Scottish Government by For Women Scotland, a campaign group. Lawyers for Victoria McCloud told The Telegraph that she was seeking a re-hearing of the case, arguing the Supreme Court undermined her Article 6 rights to a fair trial after refusing to hear representation from her and evidence from any other transgender individuals or groups. But women's rights campaigners dismissed the case as 'fantasy' and say McCloud should exhaust 'all domestic legal remedies' before going to Strasbourg. In a statement on Monday morning, Ms McCloud said: 'There is no space for decision-making about us, without us. 'I intend to ensure that there will be no peace for the gender-critical ideological movement, the Labour Government appeasing it, or space in our schools, homes and workplaces for an ideology which causes harm, misery and oppression of a small and law-abiding minority in our formerly tolerant country.' Ms McCloud is being represented by Oscar Davies, the UK's first openly non-binary barrister, and Olivia Campbell-Cavendish, the founder and executive director of the Trans Legal Clinic and the first black trans lawyer in the UK. The Trans Legal Clinic has launched a legal fundraiser for £150,000 to raise funds to support the case, and it is the first one in British history to be brought by a trans-led legal team. But the challenge has provoked a backlash from women's rights groups. Maya Forstater, the chief executive of the women's human rights charity Sex Matters, told The Telegraph: 'What we are being told about this proposed case is incomprehensible. 'The European Court of Human Rights only hears cases that have exhausted all domestic legal remedies, and since McCloud wasn't a party to For Women Scotland in the Supreme Court, that's not the case here. 'It's a fantasy that someone can go straight to Strasbourg to complain that the Supreme Court in their own country didn't listen to them.' Ms Forstater said Ms McCloud's team should go to the UK High Court to 'seek a declaration of incompatibility with domestic human rights law'. Susan Smith, from For Women Scotland, said: 'As far as we understand it is the SC's prerogative whether to accept interventions or not. It obviously carefully considered McCloud's application and made a decision based on the value of its content. 'The court is solely concerned with statutory interpretation and does not hear personal testimony or take evidence, and rarely takes interventions from individuals. 'We will watch with interest whether McCloud's application is accepted by the ECHR or even if it comes within the deadline to proceed.' 'Public figure and a target' Ms McCloud quit the profession last year after claiming she could no longer do the job without politicising the judiciary. She transitioned in the 1990s, becoming the first transgender barrister and judge in the UK. She was the youngest person to become a King's Bench Master of the High Court at the age of 40 in 2010. In her resignation letter last year, she said the leaking of her formerly private transgender identity eight years ago 'came at a cost because I became a public figure and a target'. At the time of the case, the Supreme Court heard interventions from a number of gender-critical groups including Sex Matters, the LGB Alliance and The Lesbian Project. Earlier this month, The Times reported that Labour MPs were also pushing back against the Supreme Court ruling. Andrew Western, a work and pensions minister, told one of his constituents that he felt the case was 'completely unnecessary' and he appreciated 'the fear and distress that has resulted' from it. Josh Newbury, the MP for Cannock Chase, said that it was 'clear' to him 'that trans women are women and that trans men are men'.
