Major win for abortion access in Aussie state
The Bill, introduced by upper house Greens MP Dr Amanda Cohn in February, would expand access to abortions by allowing nurse practitioners to supply medication to terminate pregnancies of up to nine weeks in gestation.
Since being introduced, the Bill has been significantly watered down with amendments specifying the endorsed nurse practitioners and midwives must have the needed skills and training to administer the drug, known as MS-2 Step.
Opponents of the Bill – including former prime minister Tony Abbott – have argued against forcing conscientious objectors to actively refer abortion services. That component was removed as the Bill made its way through parliament.
NSW Opposition Leader Mark Speakman on Wednesday said he would support the current, amended Bill, as did Labor Premier Chris Minns.
The lead-up to Wednesday's vote was marred by allegations of misinformation, but ultimately passed without significant discourse in the lower house after two proposed amendments were shot down by a majority of MPs.
A third reading of the bill was passed 65 to 20. The bill was initially introduced by Greens MP Amanda Cohn. NewsWire / Gaye Gerard Credit: News Corp Australia
It will now return to the Legislative Council.
Greens Newtown MP Jenny Leong thanked MPs for the vote.
'It's wonderful to think that very, very soon, there will be better access to abortion care for people across the state of NSW as a result of the decision we are making today,' she said.
'Sometimes it feels like when you're in this place that we will never get good outcomes for people in their communities, and sometimes we do really good work together.
'I feel like this debate has shown what we can do when we work together in the actually genuine interests of the community that we serve.'
In introducing the first reading of the Bill, Ms Leong said it was about 'equity in access to reproductive healthcare – access to abortion services – and increased that access to women and people across the state of NSW'.
She urged MPs in the room to, despite their personal opinions, 'actually consider whether or not you're okay with the idea of people in the city having access to better services and more services … than those in regional and rural' Greens Newtown MP Jenny Leong thanked MPs for the vote. NewsWire / Jeremy Piper Credit: News Corp Australia
An amendment put forward by independent Wagga Wagga MP Joe McGirr requiring nurse practitioners or endorsed midwives have at least two years of experience was not supported by Health Minister Ryan Park or Liberal health spokeswoman Kellie Sloane.
The MPs raised the extensive training received by both nurses and midwives, including 5000 hours of clinical practise for nurse practitioners, with Ms Sloane saying the amendment 'makes it even harder for access and equity in regional areas'.
'This amendment is unnecessary. It's inconsistent with health data, ignores the expertise of nurse practitioners and endorsed midwives and it makes harder for our regional, remote communities to access this important healthcare,' she said.
They also noted the Bill as tabled was supported by peak medical bodies, including the NSW Nurses and Midwives Association, the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and Family Planning Australia
Ultimately, the amendment was voted down by MPs.
As was a second amendment also put forward by Mr McGirr seeking a 'certain requirement for training' prior to commencing of practise for endorsed midwives and qualified nurses undertaking terminations, facing similar opposition. Premier Chris Minns said he would support the Bill. NewsWire / Nikki Short Credit: News Corp Australia
Mr Park said stipulating specific training requirements was not done with any other health service and would 'mean NSW is inconsistent with the rest of our country and with national guidelines', including the TGA guidelines.
Mr McGirr on both counts said he was not seeking to undermine the bill.
The Bill initially sought to ensure abortion services be provided across the state within a reasonable distance from residents' homes, and would remove unnecessary reporting to health authorities about the termination.
It would also have empowered the Health Minister to compel public health services to comply with directions to offer abortion services and would require practitioners who object to abortion to refer a patient to someone who will.
Abortion was decriminalised in NSW only in 2019.
Nonetheless, hospitals in the regional centres of Queanbeyan, outside Canberra, and Orange were found to have banned abortions, prompting an apology during budget estimates from NSW Health secretary Susan Pearce.
Dr Cohn has previously said the intention of the Bill was to expand who could perform medical terminations which she said was necessary to bring legislation in-line with changes in 2023 to the national medicine regulator.
Its introduction has stirred fiery debate since it was tabled. Opposition Leader Mark Speakman backed the amended Bill. Christian Gilles / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia
In a parliamentary debate last week, upper house Liberal MP Chris Rath compared abortion to the Nazi genocide of Jews, stating 'it is bizarre that abortion is increasingly being categorised as a human right to health care'.
Mr Rath later that week apologised for the statement.
The Bill has also stirred protest on the steps outside parliament by anti-abortion campaigner Joanna Howe's coalition, with a Wednesday night protest attended by Tony Abbott and the Catholic archbishop of Sydney, Anthony Fisher.
Opposition Leader Mark Speakman accused Dr Howe of 'brazen bullying', stating on Wednesday that he would 'vote according to my conscience and balance difficult and sensitive ethical, social, moral and medical concerns'.
'I will not cave to brazen bullying like this nor to the Americanisation of NSW … I thank all constituents who have contacted me. I have carefully considered their sincere and varying views. I will therefore vote for the Bill,' he said.
'I think that, on balance, the Bill will make no material difference to the rate of abortion in NSW.
'It will not interfere with freedom of conscience and will probably lead to better, not worse, health outcomes for many pregnant women seeking abortions.'
Mr Speakman noted some objections were 'based on misinformation' and that, despite stating he would not have supported the original bill, believed 'The attacks on freedom of conscience and freedom of religion in the original bill have now been removed by successful amendments.'
Premier Minns earlier on Wednesday stated 'enormous amounts of misinformation and lies that have been spread' on social media had 'whipped up a lot of good people in the community believing that the reform changes, the legislative changes, are far more extensive than they are'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
Shock sector driving the Aussie economy
Australia's economy is getting a surprising boost from the wellness sector, which has quietly grown to one of the nation's leading sectors. According to a new report by Global Wellness Institute, Australia ranks seventh in the world when it comes to spending on their healthcare. In total this added $194.4bn in 2023, up 10.9 per cent year on year or around $7,402 per person. Wellness now makes up seven per cent of Australia's GDP, placing it behind the construction sector. Currently the construction industry accounts for around 9 per cent of GDP and employs more than 1.3 million people. Australians are spending billions to stay fit. NewsWire/Sarah Matray Credit: News Corp Australia Anytime Fitness managing director Simon Thompson says the results show the wellness economy is doing its share of the heavy lifting when it comes to Australia's economy. 'When you consider our population, Australia is punching above its weight and has pioneered many wellness communities that support healthy lifestyles, vibrant social connections, and sustainable living in its growing housing markets,' Mr Thompson said. Mr Thompson said the push was coming from younger Aussies. 'Gyms, instead of pubs and clubs, are now often the number one choice for weekend outings, and even dates,' he said. 'Gen Z now spends seven times the amount of money on getting fit than Gen X.' According to the report, Australia's overall wellness growth is coming across a number of sub-sectors. Wellness tourism has swelled by 32.9 per cent between 2019 to 2023 while thermal/mineral springs are up 21.5 per cent. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese (left) and federal Climate Change and Energy Minister Chris Bowen talk about the benefits of building things in Australia Dan Peled / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia Wellness real estate, mental wellness and physical activity round out the top five sectors. The report comes as prime minister Anthony Albanese separately spruiks the benefit to Australia reviving its building and manufacturing sectors. During a doorstop in the electorate of Bonner in Brisbane the prime minster and Energy Minister Chris Bowen talked up the home battery incentive and solar panel uptake. 'It's good for everyone because what it does is take pressure off the grid during peak times, and that's why this is such good public policy, good for households … of course, good right throughout Australia,' Mr Albanese says. According to the ministers, 28,000 Australian homes have installed a home battery under the government's policy. But Mr Albanese wants more Australians to take up the scheme and for the panels to be built in Australia. 'Chris (Bowen) was at the South Australian factory producing solar panels earlier this week, or at the end of last week, that's expanding by nine times,' Mr Albanese said. 'We also want to produce more things here. We have everything that goes into a battery. One of the progress we have is for battery manufacturing.' Mr Albanese went further calling for more large infrastructure projects such as trains and boats to be built in Australia. 'We want things made here and here in Queensland. I want more manufacturing, more jobs to be created here.'
Perth Now
5 hours ago
- Perth Now
State's childcare centres ‘on notice'
Childcare and early learning centres in NSW have been put on notice that the 'days of pretending to improve while nothing is done are over', with centres failing children to face a crackdown. Acting Education and Early Learning Minister Courtney Houssos has announced a list of changes coming for the sector, including the launch of an independent regulator agency and providing parents with 'increased information' and 'transparency for the community'. Former deputy NSW Ombudsman Chris Wheeler was commissioned to conduct an independent review into the sector in February after a rise in safety breaches in the sector last year. A list of proposed reforms was released in June. Speaking to media on Wednesday, Ms Houssos welcomed feedback for its reforms into the childhood sector. The NSW government will introduce a trial of CCTV cameras inside childcare centres. NewsWire / David Crosling Credit: News Corp Australia 'We will be increasing the fines on individual centres,' she said. 'And we will be, as the Wheeler Review recommended, establishing a trial of CCTV cameras.' Ms Houssos said while there were many early 'fantastic' learning centres across the state, the underperforming centres had been put on notice. 'The time for the days are pretending to improve while nothing is done are over,' she said. 'We are really clear that we will be cracking down on those centres who are not delivering for those safe and quality environments for parents and for children. 'We take this responsibility incredibly seriously, that's why we have such a comprehensive program of reform.' Acting Minister for Education and Early Learning Courtney Houssos said poorly performing early childcare centres were 'on notice'. Photo: NewsWire/ Gaye Gerard Credit: News Corp Australia However, in response to the reforms, early educator Rebecca Saville argued the changes were a 'Band-Aid fix', In a letter penned to the federal Early Childhood Education Minister Jess Walsh, Ms Saville said the sector didn't need announcements, but rather an 'overhaul' of 'how the sector is funded, staffed, regulated, and respected'. 'I was prompted to write the letter because I was hearing of other educators' concerns within the sector and how the new safety measures don't address the issues at heart and are a Band-Aid fix,' she said per The Daily Telegraph. Ms Houssos said the government was 'hamstrung' getting the reforms through. NewsWire / David Crosling Credit: News Corp Australia Ms Houssos told media on Wednesday the government was working with ministers from across the country on the reforms, which she hopes would be 'pursued at a national level'. 'We have a sense of urgency for the reforms that we're pursuing,' she said. 'And we are going to get these changes under way.' 'We are hamstrung by the national law, but this is law that does pass through each of the individual parliaments,' she added. 'I want to be clear under performing centres that the time of pretending to improve while nothing is done are over.'
SBS Australia
7 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Some people with disability feel 'silenced' by this law. Now there's a fresh push for change
Members of Victoria's parliament are being urged to support proposed changes to a law that prevents some people with disability from speaking freely and publicly about their experiences. The Greens are set to introduce a bill to parliament today, alongside disability advocate Uli Cartwright, seeking to amend the 'gag law' — known as clause 37 — affecting those under guardianship or administration orders. Cartwright has long advocated for reform of this law based on his lived experience of such orders. "It's just outdated. It needs to be changed," he told SBS News. In Australia, guardianship laws vary state to state but gag laws, which restrict public comment on such arrangements, are enforced across most jurisdictions. For many Australians currently or formerly subject to guardianship, including Cartwright, this limits their ability to speak openly about their experiences. The move by the Greens seeks to change that in Victoria. The proposed amendment adds to calls of support from disability sector organisations, along with the Victorian Office of the Public Advocate — the state body responsible for advocating for the rights of people living with disability — which backed amending the legislation in 2023. "Not only are we listening to advocates in the sector, but the Office of Public Advocate has also made their position pretty clear on this exact reform," Greens MP Anasina Gray-Barberio said. "We need to be ensuring that legislation as it stands does not constrain the rights of people with a disability." What is clause 37? In Australia, a person may be placed under guardianship or administration orders if they require help with decision-making. An appointed guardian then has legal authority to make decisions or support decision-making on behalf of an individual about personal and lifestyle matters specified in an order. An administrator is someone granted authority over financial and property matters. In Victoria, the so-called gag law refers to clause 37 in schedule 1 of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) Act 1998, which states that, "unless the Tribunal orders otherwise", a person must not publish or broadcast information that could identify parties involved in guardianship and administration proceedings. The tribunal may make an order, "only if it considers it would be in the public interest to do so". The Greens' proposed amendment is set to be introduced to parliament in Victoria on Wednesday. Source: AAP / Con Chronis This provision can effectively stop people from talking publicly about any of their experiences of guardianship or administration orders. This can also extend to VCAT proceedings, according to a spotlight paper published by the Victorian Law Reform Commission (VLRC) in February. In a letter to Victorian MPs, the state's peak advocacy organisation for adults with intellectual disability, VALID, said the "unnecessary restriction" is applied automatically and "assumes the need to protect people with disabilities". "Their will and preference is not taken into account," the letter reads. "It contradicts human rights principles, undermines transparency and public trust and curtails free speech." Gray-Barberio said the current legislation has a "silencing impact" on those under guardianship or administration orders. "It is so important for them to be able to have choice and control when it comes to their decision-making, to publicly share their lived experience and stories related to their guardianship. I think that is within public interest," she said. "People living with disability or with chronic health [conditions] shouldn't have to ask for permission to tell their own story and lived experience." Telling Uli Cartwright's story Cartwright, 30, is an advocate who lives with disability. He came up against the gag law several years ago when a documentary about his life became subject to it. Life is a Battlefield was acquired by SBS and broadcast in December 2021 as part of the International Day of People with Disability, after which it was available online via SBS' streaming service On Demand. Two weeks after it screened, VCAT raised concerns relating to Cartwright having identified himself as someone previously under the control of the State Trustees. SBS decided to take the program down to allow legal concerns to be addressed. Uli Cartwright has been a long-standing advocate for reform. Credit: Otis Filley Cartwright applied to VCAT for a declaration that clause 37 did not apply in his case, with a tribunal deputy president making an order allowing the material to be published. This meant the documentary could go back online, and Cartwright could be legally identified. Cartwright has been advocating for reform in Victoria ever since. Most states and territories in Australia, except the ACT, ban the publication of information about guardianship proceedings in some way, according to the VLRC paper. This varies state by state, with Tasmania introducing changes last September. The Victorian private member's bill, backed by Cartwright, proposes an amendment to clause 37 of the Act, which allows a represented person, or someone authorised by them, to disclose information about their proceedings without requiring tribunal approval. "I think there is a place for it [the gag provision]," Cartwright said. "I do believe that there needs to be some protections in place to stop abuse and weaponisation of people's stories, whether that's with the media or with family members. "But the bill says the silence mechanism is not the default. It's an extra step." The Greens' Gray-Barberio said the change would ensure a "human rights approach" to legislation in the state. 'Simply the right thing to do' In a letter to Victoria's parliament on 6 August, VALID's chief executive Fionn Skiotis called on all members to support the upcoming bill. "Provisions to protect privacy and limit the disclosure of sensitive and personal information, for example by parties other than the person subject to an order, will continue to exist," Skiotis said. "In our view, supporting this change is simply the right thing to do, for any elected representative in Victoria, so that all citizens in the state can enjoy the same freedoms and rights, whether they are a person with disability or not." LISTEN TO It follows disability service providers Yooralla and Life Without Barriers supporting gag law reform in Victoria in late 2023. "Freedom for people with disability to speak with the media and share their experiences under guardianship is an important step in transparency and accountability and can contribute to safeguarding by individuals and organisations responsible for providing safe and quality support," Life Without Barriers said in a statement. Yooralla said current legislation is at odds with decision principles in the Guardianship and Administration Act 2019, which state that a person's will and preference should only be overridden to prevent serious harm. "While safety and privacy are a factor, the Act conflicts with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of People with Disability, which provides the rights of people with disability to freedom of expression and opinion and the participation in political and public life," its statement said. In April 2023, the Office of the Public Advocate (OPA) also voiced support for reform. The OPA recognised there are "valid reasons" to limit the disclosure of sensitive and personal information discussed in guardianship and administration proceedings to protect the privacy of those under orders. But it said these should ensure the person's right to tell their own story is not inadvertently limited. It called on the government to amend the legislation, saying: "Ensuring people can freely tell their own stories will increase transparency and promote public trust in this essential safeguarding system." Gray-Barberio said there has been "no progress" in reform since 2023. This is one small section which we feel is really important, that we feel the government should recognise. "The evidence is there, the calls are there from the community, from advocates, campaigners, as well as the Office of the Public Advocate. So really, it makes sense for them [the government] to come on board and support this reform," she said. The Victorian government has been contacted for comment.
