More Australian retailers axe free returns after ‘reckoning' of costs
But McClelland, whose videos on TikTok have gained popularity for promoting more sustainable consumption habits, said businesses could do more to mitigate the problem.
'I do think there needs to be a deterrent for those customers who are 'repeat purchase and return' customers … However, I do think as well that there should be some investment on the retail side into making sure that the product they're selling is a product that customers actually want to keep,' she said.
More retailers could, for example, photograph clothes on models in a range of sizes.
'So consumers could then see, 'OK, this is what it looks like on someone my size', and then they can make a more informed decision about whether the product will look good on them.'
Loading
Other Australian brands try to incentivise shoppers to cover the costs of returns: Byron Bay-based sustainable clothing store Afends provides free returns when customers choose store credit instead of a refund. Others offer free returns for online purchases if the goods are dropped off at a physical store.
However, competition from Australian fashion retail giants The Iconic, David Jones and Myer, which offer free returns on all purchases, puts significant pressure on other retailers.
Australia Post e-commerce reports indicate that, overall, 65 per cent of shoppers value 'friction-free' returns, with this figure rising to 72 per cent for Gen Z and Millennial customers.
Ben Wapling, the head of marketing for sporting goods retailer Intersport, said the company was constantly trying to strike the right balance between costs and customer experience: 'We want to reduce as many barriers as possible.'
He said the costs of returning products ranged between $7 and $11 an order.
'You've got to weigh that up, but you also weigh up the potential of the customer saying 'oh look, it's all a bit too hard, I'm not going to make a purchase',' he said.
While Intersport manages to integrate all their stock back into inventories to be sold again, unless items have been damaged, some companies that offer free returns send brand-new goods to landfills because it's cheaper.
A report published by charity Good360 last month found that 30 per cent of clothing bought online and returned in 2024 was sent to landfills instead of being resold.
Melbourne-based small business owner Imara Seneviratne said her passion for sustainability as a consumer bled into her business practices.
Seneviratne runs Adamo, which sells sustainably sourced tote bags. Adamo does require customers to cover the cost of returns if they've changed their mind, but not if the item is damaged.
'As both a consumer and a business owner, I'm just trying to find a balance, like making the experience fair and flexible but also encouraging people to buy less and choose better,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AU Financial Review
an hour ago
- AU Financial Review
Inside the airport-linked project shifting Sydney's centre of gravity
The new airport being built in Sydney's west boasts it will be able to send Australian travellers to all points of the globe 24/7 and bring cherries from a farm in Young to a table in Singapore in record time. But the success of the Western Sydney International Airport project will not just be measured in flights and freight, but by the quality of the jobs and innovation it can engineer in one of the nation's fastest growing regions.
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Abuse of power': Chalmers seeking to bypass parliament and impose little-known clause to ‘unilaterally' expand super, unrealised gains tax
Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has said the Albanese government cannot be trusted after it was discovered Treasurer Jim Chalmers had embedded an arcane provision within the super, unrealised gains tax legislation that would allow the government to expand the policy after it passes parliament. Labor's plan to hike the tax rate from 15 to 30 per cent on super accounts with over $3 million has caused widespread uproar, with fund managers, economists and union bosses joining forces to fiercely denounce the policy. Industry magnates have argued the policy would alter the behaviour of the entire superannuation industry and spark frantic mass sell offs despite the government claiming it would only impact a small portion of Australians. The government's plan to target unrealised capital gains, which are profits made before the asset is sold and its refusal to index the threshold has also sparked alarm, with critics stating the policy is both reckless and unprecedented in nature. However, in a major development in The Australian that the Treasurer has embedded a clause deep within the legislation which would allow him to make modifications to the policy after it passes parliament. Section 296-60, dubbed a Henry VIII clause would give Mr Chalmers special powers to alter the bill as he sees fit without parliamentary oversight, with some political theorists labelling the move unconstitutional. The potential modifications could include the Treasurer increasing the number of individuals impacted by the tax, whether a superannuants interest is in retirement phase, if the interest of an individuals superannuation is a defined benefit interest and removing exemptions for certain superannuation funds. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley labelled clause as 'ridiculous' and said the government was saying one thing but doing another. 'Revelations today that sneaky Jim Chalmers is adding extra measures to this taxation proposal that will allow Labour to raise the rate in the future, is ridiculous and it offends every principle of our taxation system,' Ms Ley told reporters in Sydney on Thursday. 'How can you actually trust this government with a measure which allows them to raise the rate if and when they choose without consultation from the Australian parliament and the Australian people.' Ms Ley said the policy and the imposition of the provision 'should offend every single Australian.' Meanwhile, Director of Research at the Institute of Public Affairs Morgan Begg denounced the implementation of an executive clause within the policy and said the move was 'an extraordinary abuse of power.' 'It is an extraordinary abuse of power for the Treasurer to be given the power to change laws as he sees fits without the consent of parliament,' Mr Begg said. 'If the Treasurer supposedly needs this extraordinary power to change the law to smooth over unintended consequences, this itself confirms the proposed law is fundamentally flawed.' Mr Begg also drew attention to a section of the legislation that would enforce different laws for different people and reiterated that this undermined fundamental democratic practices. 'What's worse is that the proposed bill explicitly allows the Treasurer to make changes to the law 'in relation to an individual in different ways' meaning different people could be subject to different laws, violating the most basic principles of the rule of law,' Mr Begg said. 'Unilaterally granting powers to amend this law, according to the tax revenue being brought in, shows this as nothing but a brazen tax grab by the federal government.' The clause will also severely limit the influence of the Greens who the government needs to work with to pass the legislation in the Senate, with Mr Chalmers now able to freely amend or redact negotiated amendments. The policies threshold, which is currently set at $3 million could also be amended after the fact by the Treasurer. Mr Chalmers has not directly provided a justification for imposing the contentious clause, but it is understood his office views the provision as routine procedure to ensure that necessary changes can be swiftly made to legislation if need be. Treasury predicts the tax will generate $2.3 billion in its first year and over $40 billion over the next decade.
Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
Big bank's warning on rate hold shock
This week's shock decision from the Reserve Bank of Australia to keep interest rates on hold could dampen the country's recovery in spending, the Commonwealth Bank has warned. The $300bn bank said the hold, which has kept the cash rate at 3.85 per cent, could soften an already limp recovery in household spending throughout 2025. 'The RBA's decision to hold rates at 3.85 per cent in July was unexpected but we anticipate the RBA to cut the cash rate in August by 25 basis points, with November the most likely option for a follow-up rate cut,' CBA senior economist Belinda Allen said. 'While we still anticipate a pick-up in household spending in 2025, a slower rate-cutting cycle could soften this recovery over the remainder of the year.' Consumer spending lifted 0.3 per cent in June, the bank's closely watched household spending index revealed, for a third month of gains following rises of 0.4 per cent in both April and May. But Ms Allen said a full recovery 'was not yet assured'. Commonwealth Bank's household spending index is a closely watched economic indicator. NewsWire/ Gaye Gerard Credit: News Corp Australia 'Household spending is starting to show signs of consistency month-on-month and should continue to pick up this year as consumers begin to loosen their purse strings,' she said. 'This recovery is taking longer than expected to occur, but there are green shoots emerging. 'The annual growth rate has picked up, but the recovery is not yet assured. 'Spending around sales events and new items show consumers are still deliberate on their spending decisions.' She also said households continued to preference saving and paying down debt over spending. 'Recent data from CBA showed that just 10 per cent of eligible home loan customers chose to reduce their mortgage direct debit payments following the May interest rate cut,' she said. Growth in spending on utilities, education and communications propelled June's uplift, the index shows, while spending fell across hospitality, motor vehicle and recreation. Consumer spending makes up about 50 per cent of the Australian economy and CBA's index is a closely watched economic indicator. The data is drawn from de-identified payments from the bank's seven-million customer base, accounting for about 30 per cent of Australian consumer transactions. Reserve Bank governor Michele Bullock wants to see the June inflation numbers before moving on rates. Christian Gilles / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia On Tuesday, the RBA voted 6-3 for the hold, which shocked expert commentators and predictions from the money markets. RBA governor Michele Bullock wanted to wait for the June quarter inflation numbers – scheduled for release on July 20 – before moving on rates. 'We just want to confirm with a full quarterly CPI that we're still on track to deliver inflation continuing down to the middle of the band over time,' she said in response to a question from NewsWire. 'That's the reason we're waiting. We decided to hold and we'll reconsider again in August with this extra information and new forecasts.' bRight Agent co-founder Aaron Scott called the hold a 'cruel blow' for millions of Australian homeowners. 'Despite the fact that a July cut would not have been enough to give most mortgage holders a meaningful reprieve, it would have been welcome by the millions of Aussies who are holding out for more cost-of-living relief,' he said on Tuesday. 'Nobody will be breaking out the Wagyu beef or shiraz.'
