More Australian retailers axe free returns after ‘reckoning' of costs
But McClelland, whose videos on TikTok have gained popularity for promoting more sustainable consumption habits, said businesses could do more to mitigate the problem.
'I do think there needs to be a deterrent for those customers who are 'repeat purchase and return' customers … However, I do think as well that there should be some investment on the retail side into making sure that the product they're selling is a product that customers actually want to keep,' she said.
More retailers could, for example, photograph clothes on models in a range of sizes.
'So consumers could then see, 'OK, this is what it looks like on someone my size', and then they can make a more informed decision about whether the product will look good on them.'
Loading
Other Australian brands try to incentivise shoppers to cover the costs of returns: Byron Bay-based sustainable clothing store Afends provides free returns when customers choose store credit instead of a refund. Others offer free returns for online purchases if the goods are dropped off at a physical store.
However, competition from Australian fashion retail giants The Iconic, David Jones and Myer, which offer free returns on all purchases, puts significant pressure on other retailers.
Australia Post e-commerce reports indicate that, overall, 65 per cent of shoppers value 'friction-free' returns, with this figure rising to 72 per cent for Gen Z and Millennial customers.
Ben Wapling, the head of marketing for sporting goods retailer Intersport, said the company was constantly trying to strike the right balance between costs and customer experience: 'We want to reduce as many barriers as possible.'
He said the costs of returning products ranged between $7 and $11 an order.
'You've got to weigh that up, but you also weigh up the potential of the customer saying 'oh look, it's all a bit too hard, I'm not going to make a purchase',' he said.
While Intersport manages to integrate all their stock back into inventories to be sold again, unless items have been damaged, some companies that offer free returns send brand-new goods to landfills because it's cheaper.
A report published by charity Good360 last month found that 30 per cent of clothing bought online and returned in 2024 was sent to landfills instead of being resold.
Melbourne-based small business owner Imara Seneviratne said her passion for sustainability as a consumer bled into her business practices.
Seneviratne runs Adamo, which sells sustainably sourced tote bags. Adamo does require customers to cover the cost of returns if they've changed their mind, but not if the item is damaged.
'As both a consumer and a business owner, I'm just trying to find a balance, like making the experience fair and flexible but also encouraging people to buy less and choose better,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Arts Centre builder's family home sold in Burwood
A Burwood home built by the man who helped supervise works on Melbourne landmarks including the Arts Centre and RMIT has sold to a local family who plan to preserve its character. The four-bedroom house at 30 Leopold St changed hands for $1.775m, with buyers drawn to its spacious floorplan, 836sq m block, and original features, including a spa, sauna and swimming pool, which were ahead of their time when built in the early 1970s. Buxton Mount Waverley's Peter Serafino said the home attracted strong local interest and was never seriously considered for demolition. Melb property market tipped to hit new record 'The buyers are a family from the area who fell in love with it,' Mr Serafino said. 'They're planning to renovate rather than rebuild, which is the perfect outcome. It's rare to find a home like this in such great condition.' Seller Leonie Vella, who grew up in the home with her sister Kim, said their late father John Vella was a construction supervisor who worked on the Arts Centre and the RMIT building. 'Dad was a builder through and through, but he also had heart,' Ms Vella said. 'He built this house for us. Every brick was perfectly placed, and Mum made sure it was always immaculate. 'It still has her curtains hanging from the '70s.' Ms Vella's late mother June played a major role in the home's interior and garden design. 'Mum had so much flair. She planted flowers along the brick walls and kept the formal lounge for Christmas only,' she said. 'It was pristine, but always warm. 'She took pride in every detail, right up to the end.' The property features two large living areas, a bar, terraced gardens, and an undercover alfresco area that once hosted pool parties, family milestones and holiday celebrations. 'We had every kind of event here, engagements, Christmases, sleepovers,' Ms Vella said. 'It was the kind of house that was always full of life and joy.' Ms Vella said knowing the home would be loved again gave the family comfort. 'That's what Dad would've wanted,' she said. 'There is this warmth that never left, like the love stayed in the walls.'
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘So deceptive': Melbourne fashion brand called out over AI-generated models
Shoppers have voiced outrage after a popular e-commerce retailer advertised AI-generated models and product images on its platform, labelling the move 'deceptive'. An Australian woman called out Atoir, a Melbourne-based label, for using AI-generated images of a model and clothing, available for purchase on The Iconic. 'Saw this on The Iconic,' she wrote on Reddit. 'The brand ATOIR is using AI models for their clothing. Feels so deceptive.' The website features two images of a brunette woman wearing a white dress, taken from the front and back. At the very bottom of the item's product description, the brand said the model's measurements 'represents a size S/8 and is standing at 5'10' but disclosed neither the clothing, nor the model, were real. 'Please note that this eCommerce imagery has been crated (sic) using artificial intelligence technology and does not feature a real model,' the product description read. 'These AI generated visuals are designed to represent our products accurately and creatively.' The same AI model displays other Atoir items on the website without any mention of AI-generated imagery. Online, Australian customers voiced their frustration with the AI-generated models, arguing it did not accurately represent the item they wanted to buy. '(A) $400 dress and you can only see an image generated version of it before you buy it,' a comment read. Others argued the AI-generated image failed to represent the fit of the clothing on a human body and other angles of the clothing. 'AI cannot replicate the way a garment sits on the body, or the way different types of fabric drape,' a person wrote. 'They might as well just take a flat lay photo of the garment, that would actually be more useful.' Another said the move was 'so wildly unappealing' and discouraged them from making a purchase. 'It's just a realistic looking line drawing at this point,' they wrote. 'I can't say I'm prepared to shell out hundreds of dollars online when I don't even get to see an actual garment.' Interlunar Media director Krishna Chandak said AI visuals could 'often miss the mark' if used for advertising retail, skincare and fitness products compared with 'commoditised sectors' and could 'definitely affect consumer trust and brand credibility'. 'In categories like skincare, fashion, or wellness, where authenticity and emotional connection matter, AI visuals often miss the mark,' he told NewsWire. He said 'real content consistently outperforms' AI-generated content, which may '(raise) questions around transparency and ethics'. 'Whether it's user-generated content, branded shoots, or genuine storytelling, the return on investment is almost always stronger with authentic visuals,' he said. The Ad Firm chief executive Kevin Heimlich said retailers using AI were walking on an 'ethical tightrope' that could discourage shoppers from trusting a brand. He said while AI may 'create a technically perfect image', it may also 'lack the soul and relatability that genuinely resonate with a target audience and encourage them to convert'. 'AI can whip up these incredibly slick, almost perfect images. They look amazing, truly aspirational,' he told NewsWire. 'If that image does not exactly match the real item a customer receives, you have a problem.' Mr Heimlich said shoppers may be disappointed when the item arrived at their doorstep. 'When a customer opens their package and sees something that does not quite align with what they saw online, it is a direct path to disappointment, frustration, and often, a return,' he said. Mr Heimlich said there was a risk of 'breeding distrust' if retailers relied on AI-generated product images, leading customers to wonder if the brand is 'intentionally trying to mislead them'. 'Such damage to a brand's reputation and consumer trust can take a considerable amount of time to repair, and it undoubtedly impacts future sales,' he said. Mr Heimlich urged retailers to consider relying on traditional photography and models to negate the lack of 'emotional connection and storytelling' that came with AJ-generated imagery. 'A skilled photographer, or a model who embodies the essence of your brand, does so much more than show the product,' he told NewsWire. 'AI, in its current form, often struggles to replicate that nuanced human artistry and emotional depth.' The Iconic and Atoir did not immediately respond to NewsWire's questions.
7NEWS
2 hours ago
- 7NEWS
The Issue with Tim Lester: Diplomat Geoff Raby on Anthony Albanese's all-important meeting with Xi Jinping in China
Geoff Raby has no doubt how he would advise Anthony Albanese if he were briefing the Prime Minister in the minutes before this coming week's planned talks with China's President Xi Jinping. 'I'd be telling him that this is a very important moment in Australia-China relations,' Raby said. As Australia's Ambassador in Beijing, Raby counselled prime ministers John Howard, Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard on the critical relationship with China. In the decade-and-a-half since, China has surged as a military superpower, while two-way trade has all but trebled — built on $100 billion a year of Australian iron ore exports. Before leaving Sydney, the Prime Minister acknowledged that — on the list of our trading partners — China is bigger than the next three combined. 'The relationship in China means jobs in Australia. It's as simple as that,' Albanese said. China is the export market we can't live without, at the same time as our longtime security guarantor, the United States, regards China as its greatest military rival. After decades of experience in China diplomacy — stretching back to a stint in Australia's Beijing Embassy in the 1980s — Geoff Raby acknowledges China 'needs to be watched' but says the common assumption that it's now the world's great military threat, is wrong. 'My own view is that China is not a threat to Australia's security as such. China is much more interested in its own stability (and) economic performance,' Raby said. More important to Raby is the fact China has land borders with 14 countries and territorial issues with Xinjiang, Tibet, Taiwan and Hong Kong that loom large in Beijing's calculations. Add in a dependence on foreign energy and natural resources, and China is a 'constrained superpower'. 'This is all part of us having to recognise an emerging new power and be smart in how we deal with it,' Raby said. But one feature of Australia's recent security policy has been anything but 'smart', according to Raby. AUKUS, the giant nuclear submarine pact with the United States and the United Kingdom is set to cost hundreds of billions of dollars over coming decades. Raby called it 'a foreign policy failure for Australia'. 'We have had decades of trying to integrate ourselves into Asia … That has been the cornerstone of our foreign policy for 40-odd years. AUKUS really tears that up,' he said. As Prime Minister Albanese visits China, AUKUS approaches a crossroad in Washington. The Pentagon is reassessing the security pact to see if it fits with President Donald Trump's 'America First' agenda. As well, the Trump Administration's demand that the Albanese government sharply increase military spending has stoked doubts in Australia about the commitment of the United States to our defence. Raby shares that concern. 'Having put this big bet on the US, can we rely on them to be there whenever we need them? Serious defence analysts question that these days,' he said. Raby argued more of Australia's security ought to rest on regional relationships and less on our AUKUS partners. 'Independent foreign policy is essential. We have to be able to make these decisions for ourselves,' he said. So where does that leave Anthony Albanese in his Beijing meeting with Xi Jinping? Raby said the Prime Minister must raise human rights issues and consular cases involving imprisoned Australians. As well he needs from President Xi 'a very clear understanding that China sees a future in a close economic relationship with Australia'. The veteran diplomat also cautioned that the 'personal dynamic is extremely important'. It may be even more so at this, the fourth leaders' meeting between Xi and Albanese. Our Prime Minister has yet to clinch his first Trump meeting. Relations with the U.S. President appear cool. Any sign of warmth in the talks with Xi is sure to stand out. For more from Tim Lester and his interview with Geoff Raby, you can listen to The Issue in the player below or watch their full conversation in the video above.
