logo
Why Las Vegas Casinos Won't Gamble On Cannabis

Why Las Vegas Casinos Won't Gamble On Cannabis

Forbes10 hours ago

In June 2023, real estate entrepreneur Alexandre Rizk opened The Lexi on West Sahara Avenue, just off The Las Vegas Strip as Sin City's first cannabis-friendly hotel. The 46-year-old Rizik thought he had a 'genius, million-dollar idea.'
Smoking weed is only allowed on The Lexi's fourth floor, where every room is outfitted with air filters and every suite is numbered 420. The Lexi was the second cannabis-friendly hotel Rizk had opened after the Clarendon in Phoenix, Arizona, and he had ambitious plans to expand his weed-hotel concept under his Elevations brand across the West, from California to Oregon and become the 'Kimpton of cannabis.'
Rizk soon realized that being cannabis-friendly was not really an edge in Las Vegas: While cannabis consumption is officially banned in casinos and on The Strip, enforcement is very lax. Rizk says many well-known properties turn a blind eye to their patrons' vaping and other pot use.
Within five months of launching The Lexi, Rizk knew he had made a mistake as occupancy topped out at 30% and he started losing bids to host weddings and other group events to competitors who don't cater to cannabis consumers. Rizk sold the Clarendon and is in the process of rebranding The Lexi. After he stopped advertising the property as cannabis-friendly, occupancy jumped 15%.
'Unfortunately, this venture could cost me my entire career,' says Rizk, who personally invested $5 million into the 64-room, adults-only hotel, which he bought with other investors for $12 million in 2022. 'It brings a stigma to the property that it is a pothead gathering and most people don't want to be associated with it.'
Despite Rizik's cautionary tale, Las Vegas is perpetually wrestling with how to integrate cannabis and casinos, particularly now that gaming revenue has declined this year. Visitor volume in Las Vegas is also down 6.5% from January 2025 through April 2025, according to the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority. Even visitor satisfaction has declined. Eighty-seven percent of visitors in 2024 said they were 'very satisfied' with their visit, down from 94% of visitors in 2019, according to the 2024 Las Vegas Visitor Profile Study.
Meanwhile, gaming revenue from casinos on the Strip is down 3.3% during the last nine months compared to the same period last year, according to the Nevada Gaming Control Board. In 2024, casinos on the Las Vegas Strip collected $8.8 billion from games alone, a 1% decrease from $8.9 billion in 2023. While total revenue from gambling, hotels, food and drink and attractions along the Las Vegas Strip hit a record of $22 billion, up 6.8% over 2023, profits tanked 40% compared to 2023.
But cannabis is not the answer.
The city, where 42 million tourists flock every year to indulge in legal vices, already hosts several major cannabis conferences every year, including MJBizCon, Women in Cannabis Expo and the Nevada Cannabis Awards Music Festival. The state legalized medical marijuana in 2001 and recreational marijuana in 2020, but thanks to federal law and Nevada gaming rules, casinos cannot invest in or be a part of the state-regulated marijuana trade without risking losing their gaming license. Nevada's legislators have gone further and instituted rules that ban dispensaries within 1,500 feet from a licensed casino and forbids them from delivering legal orders on The Strip.
More than anything, gaming operators have a lot to lose by sanctioning cannabis use. In 2024, Wynn Resorts generated $2.6 billion in revenue from its two Vegas properties, Caesars Entertainment's eight properties in Vegas posted $4.3 billion in revenue and MGM Resorts' eight properties brought in $8.8 billion in revenue. These three companies combined make nearly half as much as the entire $32 billion in sales the U.S. cannabis industry posted in 2024. All casinos on The Strip generated $22 billion last year.
In other words, doing business with the cannabis industry would be a death sentence for casino operators. Soo Kim, the chairman of Bally's Corporation, which is building The New Las Vegas Stadium on the former site of the recently demolished Tropicana to be the home of the Athletics baseball team once they relocate from Oakland, says incorporating cannabis into any casino is a nonstarter.
'Gaming is part of the federal banking system, so the problem with cannabis is that [gaming operators] cannot be in it because it is federally prohibited,' he says.
And even if federal law does change and casinos can legally open a cannabis consumption lounge within the property, Kim says he is still not high on the idea.
'I'm not sure it would be a big draw to the business,' says Kim. 'I don't see it right now.'
Seth Schorr, CEO of Fifth Street Gaming, which operates the Downtown Grand Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas, does not share Kim's skepticism. Schorr says casinos should find a way to capitalize on cannabis, but admits that it is 'no silver bullet.' Still, Schorr believes 'you need all the tools in the toolbox, even if it helps with just a few points. It's important in Vegas to think about the next ten years and cannabis has become an acceptable form of entertainment.'
Despite The Lexi's troubles, a plurality of gamblers who participated in a poll published by the Cannabis Policy Institute at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas in May said they want to enjoy cannabis and gambling at the same time. The poll found that about 40% of respondents would gamble at a casino that allowed cannabis consumption, while 29% would not want to and 30% said a pro-cannabis policy would not tip the scales either way. Fifty-nine percent of respondents said their gambling habits would not change if allowed to gamble and ingest cannabis, while 24% said they would gamble more and 19% said they would gamble less. And 70% said they would be in favor of a hotel and casino having a designated cannabis consumption area.
Riana Durrett, a gaming attorney and the director of the University of Las Vegas' Cannabis Policy Institute who helped conduct the survey, says she understands why the two 'sins' of cannabis and gambling are siloed to prevent gaming operators from running afoul of federal law, but she says Nevada's strict rules go beyond protecting the city's multibillion-dollar gaming industry from violating the Controlled Substances Act. Durrett says gaming regulators and operators who are not willing to at least ask questions about how the two industries can be more symbiotic are pushing aside the fact that in America today more people consume cannabis daily than alcohol.
'We do a good job at regulating vice: you can gamble, you can visit a sex worker, you can consume cannabis, but we have these overly broad artificial barriers between cannabis and gaming that are not even effective,' she says, explaining outright banning legal marijuana gives the black market a good hand at casinos. 'We need to have a realistic discussion and approach to how to license the activities that are already happening and obtain the revenue that's being lost to the illegal market.'
Brendan Bussmann, the managing partner of B Global, a consulting firm focused on gaming and hospitality, says Las Vegas' greatest skill is its ability to offer entertainment to the masses, but that the anything-goes debauchery Sin City is famous for is like a David Copperfield show—largely an illusion.
'Yes, you can have gaming here, and yes, you can have fun in a host of different ways,' says Bussmann, 'but we're not here to say there are no rules.'
Bussmann compares the cannabis conversation to prostitution, which many mistakenly believe is legal in Las Vegas. In fact, it is illegal in Clark County, but legal in about 20 licensed brothels across six of Nevada's 17 counties.
'You can easily 'go over the hump to Pahrump', the closet place to Las Vegas where prostitution is legal,' says Bussmann, 'but that was designed on purpose to [clean up] the act of gaming' from its start as a Mafia-controlled enterprise to one now owned by corporate giants.
When it comes to risk, it would be foolish for any one casino to delve into the federally illegal world of weed, even though 39 states have some kind of regulated sales.
'[Cannabis] is in direct violation of federal law, so gaming cannot take the same liberties that other businesses may,' says Bussmann. 'And while the voters of Nevada have approved this, no conversation should even consider it.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Estee Lauder Chairman Emeritus Leonard Lauder dies at 92
Estee Lauder Chairman Emeritus Leonard Lauder dies at 92

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Estee Lauder Chairman Emeritus Leonard Lauder dies at 92

(Reuters) -Estee Lauder said on Sunday that its chairman emeritus, Leonard Lauder, died on Satuday at the age of 92. Lauder joined the company in 1958 and played a key role in transforming the business from a handful of products sold under a single brand in U.S. stores to a multi-brand cosmetics giant. He was the son of company founders Estee Lauder and Joseph Lauder. He served many roles at Estee Lauder over six decades and led the launch of many brands including Aramis, Clinique and Lab Series, the company said. Sign in to access your portfolio

Billionaire Bill Ackman Has Nearly 20% of His Hedge Fund in 1 Growth Stock That's Up 44% in 2025
Billionaire Bill Ackman Has Nearly 20% of His Hedge Fund in 1 Growth Stock That's Up 44% in 2025

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Billionaire Bill Ackman Has Nearly 20% of His Hedge Fund in 1 Growth Stock That's Up 44% in 2025

This dominant platform-enabled business is Pershing Square's largest holding, demonstrating Bill Ackman's strong conviction. Running a scaled mobility service, powered by a network effect, makes this company a partner of choice for firms working on autonomous vehicle technology. Even after the stock's huge rise in 2025, the valuation is compelling. 10 stocks we like better than Uber Technologies › The average investor can find lucrative investment ideas by following the experts. Bill Ackman, the billionaire hedge fund manager who runs Pershing Square Capital Management, is one such professional. His firm's strategy involves making bold bets on a select few businesses, a focus that rhymes with Warren Buffett's philosophy. That's why it's noteworthy when one position commands 18.5% of the fund at a market value of $2.2 billion (as of March 31). This company is the single largest holding for Ackman. As of June 12, this growth stock has soared 44% in 2025. That impressive performance beats the major indexes by a wide margin. Maybe it's time for investors to take a closer look at this business. The stock that Pershing Square made a big investment in is Uber (NYSE: UBER). When the hedge fund first bought shares in January, the stock had just come off a disappointing 2024 that saw the share price dip 2%. After that kind of upsetting performance, Ackman still was impressed with Uber's strong fundamentals. Those fundamentals are worth highlighting. Growth is a key part of the Uber story, even though it's a global scale platform. Revenue was up 14% in Q1 (ended March 31), driven by double-digit gross booking gains in both the mobility and delivery segments. It's encouraging to see both parts of Uber's business registering meaningful growth, particularly in the uncertain economic environment. Another positive development deals with Uber's profitability. The company generated over $1.2 billion in operating income just in the last three months, highlighting how financially sound it has become. For an indication of just how much Uber has evolved, understand that in Q1 2019, the business posted a massive $1 billion operating loss. The management team is optimistic. They expect adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) to increase at a "high 30s% to 40%" compound annual rate between 2024 and 2027. Uber's most defining characteristic is probably that it benefits from a powerful network effect. As more riders come to the app to book a trip, drivers who are looking to boost their income will follow because there is more of an opportunity to make money. With this added capacity, Uber becomes more valuable to riders. It's a positive feedback loop. That network effect underscores Uber's remarkable competitive position. This is becoming more evident with the rise of autonomous vehicle (AV) technology. Uber's direct relationship with riders, in particular, makes it a very valuable partner for AV firms looking to achieve faster adoption. Of course, it benefits Uber by giving it a low-risk, capital-light avenue to get into this space that just might be the future of transportation. Uber is one of the rare businesses whose name is used also as a verb. This highlights how well the service resonates with people. Alphabet's Google, Airbnb, and Netflix are other prominent examples. These are all dominant enterprises in their own right. The path of least resistance is to immediately follow in Bill Ackman's footsteps and buy Uber shares. But investors must take the time to understand the investment case with this opportunity. Once that hurdle checkpoint is cleared, the next step is to take the valuation into account. Uber's stock has been on quite the run, accelerating 109% higher since June 2023. Strong financial performance in recent years is doing a great job of winning over the investment community. But the valuation is still very reasonable. The stock trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 23.5. Maybe now is a good time to consider initiating a position in the company. Before you buy stock in Uber Technologies, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Uber Technologies wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,702!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $870,207!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 988% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Neil Patel has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Airbnb, Alphabet, Netflix, and Uber Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Billionaire Bill Ackman Has Nearly 20% of His Hedge Fund in 1 Growth Stock That's Up 44% in 2025 was originally published by The Motley Fool

Former NCAA athletes to be paid $2.8 billion for lost NIL earnings
Former NCAA athletes to be paid $2.8 billion for lost NIL earnings

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Former NCAA athletes to be paid $2.8 billion for lost NIL earnings

The post Former NCAA athletes to be paid $2.8 billion for lost NIL earnings appeared first on ClutchPoints. The House Settlement is approved by a judge, and that is good news for thousands of former NCAA athletes. The NCAA is agreeing to pay $2.8 billion in lost NIL earnings to athletes, per Yahoo Sports. Schools are also chipping in to help cover all the costs, per college sports reporter Ross Dellenger. Advertisement NIL stands for name, image and likeness, which allows athletes to make profits while they play for colleges. As a result of the settlement, athletes who played in the last decade will be eligible for the funds. These back payments are expected to start going out soon. The distribution is determined using a formula to calculate each player's value, per Dellenger. Most of that $2.8 billion is going to athletes who played football or men's basketball for a power 4 conference school. Those conferences are the Big Ten, SEC, Big 12 and ACC. The House Settlement was reached as a result of litigation brought by former NCAA players against the agency, who had not been able to profit in the past from NIL. NIL has completely changed NCAA college athletics In the past, schools could face severe penalties for paying players. Penalties included loss of scholarships, and even the stripping of national championships from a program. That is essentially no more, as players can now make millions from NIL deals. Advertisement The NCAA has been under fire by many politicians, fans and others who want to see more guardrails for NIL. NCAA President Charlie Baker has proposed several changes, including giving more structure to how NIL deals can be reached with players. There has been no official changes yet due to those proposals. The federal government is also looking into NIL. Legislation in Congress would regulate NIL protocols, but no bill has been officially passed in Washington D.C. President Donald Trump has established an NIL and college athletics commission, but no movement has come about yet from that. It seems that NCAA sports will truly never be the same. Related: NCAA conference commissioners applaud House settlement that 'prioritizes fairness' Related: Former MLB exec to be new head of College Sports Commission

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store