
Sir Keir Starmer can sell us out all he likes but EU wants us to beg – but history shows we NEVER will
SIR KEIR STARMER, and every British Prime Minister who ever follows him, can have 'resets' with the European Union until the mad cows come home.
They can sell out our fishermen. Tear down our borders. They can sign up for 'dynamic alignment' — meaning meekly accepting rules we take no part in making.
But no matter how hard Keir and the PMs of the future strive to build bridges, I can see no way that this country will ever go back into the European Union.
Because the EU wants the UK to come back on our knees.
I am all for having the best possible relationship with our EU neighbours.
And I wish that they felt the same way. But clearly, they don't. Because what really prevents the UK and the EU from ever having a mutually beneficial reset is that some of our neighbours still want to punish us for Brexit.
You see it as soon as you land in an EU country, where your toxic British passport gets you herded into the dreaded All Other Passports line.
And that would be fair enough if this happened when EU citizens arrive in the UK. But it doesn't. EU citizens are welcomed into the UK like old friends and pass through immigration in the same line as the locals.
After Keir's reset with the EU, long-suffering, long-queueing British tourists have been promised faster passport queues in Europe. But, in-credibly, only if individual EU countries agree. So don't hold your breath.
Starmer's reset with the EU is as thin as an After Eight mint.
It says it all that even after Keir Starmer's new deal with the EU, you can still be treated like an undesirable alien when your family arrives for a holiday in France or Spain or Italy.
Ever feel like you're not wanted?
Keir Starmer makes HUGE concession as Brexit 'surrender' deal 'agreed' – with UK dragged back into shackles of Europe
But then there has been an hysterically vindictive spirit abroad in Brussels ever since we voted to leave the European Union.
It would be wrong to think that this is just pure spite.
The routine punishment beatings are also to décourager les autres — to discourage the others, meaning any member state that contemplates bailing out of the European project.
Most of the anti-British spite comes from France — or specifically from this French President, Emmanuel Macron.
Bitterly estranged
In this week's reset, it was Monsieur Macron who at the last moment demanded 'a hard link' between separate deals on fishing rights and defence, winning the right for French fishermen to fish in British waters for the next 12 years.
What we get in return is, er, the right to protect the EU from Russia.
Starmer leads a UK that is bitterly estranged from the EU but just another bunch of free-loading foreigners to the isolationist USA.
If Keir, the arch Remainer, is naive to believe there is a way back into the European Union, then the Brexiteers were naive to think the UK could ever remain on good terms with the EU.
10
Did we think we could still be friends? Yes, we did.
And today we find ourselves in a worst-of-both-worlds twilight zone.
Neither really in the EU nor genuinely out. But there will always be an impenetrable barrier preventing any genuine reset between the UK and EU, a barricade built by the bile of Brussels.
To paraphrase Taylor Swift, the UK and the EU are never ever, ever getting back together.
Because the EU wants us to crawl.
And the history of our nation suggests that the British just don't crawl.
MORE good news for Reform voters. A study by Harvard and Southamp-ton universities suggests that the friends of Farage have more success on dating apps than Tory voters.
'While Reform voters had a below- average favourability on dating apps, they are four points more likely to enjoy success on the dating market than Conservative voters,' says Dr Alberto Lopez Ortega.
It seems everybody loves a hard Brexit.
How Cannes they forget Brigitte?
THE Cannes Film Festival is tightening its red-carpet dress code because in recent years some stars have left little – and sometimes nothing – to the imagination.
Bella Hadid, Kendall Jenner, Irina Shayk, Leila Depina, Winnie Harlow, Nadia Lee Cohen, Cindy Kimberly, Julia Fox – the nipple-count has been higher at the festival than at the average nudist beach.
10
10
But now Cannes has decided it is reclaiming the red carpet for higher things.
'For decency reasons, nudity is prohibited on the red carpet, as well as in other areas of the festival,' sniff the organisers.
And what makes Cannes' prim new dress code comically ironic is that the most famous film festival in the world was put first on the map by a young French actress wearing not much.
The trend to flaunt the flesh in the south of France began a lifetime ago with the 19-year-old Brigitte Bardot. BB arrived at the 6th Cannes Film Festival in April 1953 in a shocking new invention called a 'bikini', right. The world went wild.
The organisers of Cannes seem to have forgotten their own history.
Bardot's bikini-clad photo shoots in 1953 earned instant global fame for the festival. Back then, Bardot was years away from her breakout role in And God Created Woman.
And this would also become a grand Cannes tradition. The young actress grabbing all the headlines at Cannes in 1953 did not even have a film out.
Voters Trump Bruce
BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN starts each show on his Land Of Hope And Dreams tour with a prepared statement about the President of the United States.
'The America I love, the America I've written about, that has been a beacon of hope and liberty for 250 years, is currently in the hands of a corrupt, incompetent and treasonous administration.'
Sincere, passionate, heartfelt stuff.
Springsteen's subject matter has always been the blue-collar America he comes from. People who saw their jobs disappear, their communities decline, their hope of a better tomorrow evaporate.
Folk who felt ignored by the elite, despised by the establishment, discarded by their nation.
Nobody has recorded the scars, traumas and travails of working-class Americans like Bruce.
And ironically the majority of the 77.3million who voted for Trump were the same blue-collar Americans who fill Springsteen's songs.
GREGGS is removing its self-service fridges to combat the shoplifting epidemic.
In future, tasty favourites will be kept behind the counter.
What a wretched sign of the times – lock up your sausage rolls!
Miss is no hit
DO you ever record something on TV that you never actually get around to watching?
I missed the all-English Europa Cup Final between Spurs and Manchester United in Bilbao because I was watching Eric Clapton at the Royal Albert Hall (great – but no Layla).
SunSport's Dave Kidd told me what I had missed.
'A terrible match, between two terrible teams, settled by a terrible goal,' Dave reckoned.
Insult to war heroes
10
A FLOTILLA of little ships marking the 85th anniversary of Dunkirk had to change course mid-English Channel to avoid a boat of illegal immigrants heading in the opposite direction.
The little ships were remembering the decisive moment in this country's history when 338,000 Allied soldiers were rescued from the beaches of Dunkirk by some 850 privately owned small boats.
After a marine alert, the flotilla was 'shoved out of the way' to create an exclusion zone of one nautical mile around the migrant boat. Luckily, no one was hurt.
Perhaps even luckier is that this is not May 1940.
MONDAY was the seventh anniversary of Harry and Meghan's wedding.
I recall the joy among those crowds in Windsor. How happy the world was for this couple.
How glad we were to have this beautiful bride joining our Royal Family.
What a waste.
AT 50, TV presenter Ben Shephard is on the cover of Men's Health – stripped, ripped, proudly displaying a body like a pro athlete half his age.
Meanwhile, David Beckham poses in white Boss pants, at 50. And Pedro Pascal is the sex symbol of the small screen – at 50.
Why are we seeing all these fiftysomething hunks? The male midlife crisis was traditionally marked by blokes pining for firm young flesh to stave off feelings of mortality.
These days the desirable body they crave turns out to be their own.
10
ONCE in a generation, a TV presenter comes along who is a perfect fit for their show.
The late, great Paul O'Grady was a perfect fit on For The Love Of Dogs.
And Gary Lineker was a perfect fit for Match Of The Day.
This Sunday, as the Premier League season reaches its conclusion, Lineker says goodbye after 26 years fronting MOTD.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
20 minutes ago
- Reuters
Kremlin says NATO air defence plan is confrontational and will cost European taxpayers
MOSCOW, June 9 (Reuters) - The Kremlin said on Monday that NATO's plan for a huge boost to its air and missile defence capabilities was confrontational and would come at the expense of European taxpayers who were being asked to pay to defuse a threat that did not exist. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, who is pushing for members to boost defence spending to 3.5% of GDP and commit a further 1.5% to broader security-related spending, was due to use a speech in London on Monday to say that the alliance needed a 400% increase in air and missile defence. Asked about Rutte's planned remarks on air and missile defence, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters: "(NATO) is not an instrument for maintaining stability and security on the continent. It is an instrument created for confrontation and has so far kept its true nature disguised. Now it is showing its real nature." Peskov said European taxpayers were the ones who would suffer. "European taxpayers will spend their money to defuse some threat that they say comes from our country, but it is nothing but an ephemeral threat," said Peskov.


The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Nato chief warns of Russian threat and calls for ‘quantum leap' in collective defence
Russia will remain an imminent threat to Nato even if there is peace in Ukraine and the western alliance has to dramatically increase its air defences and tank and weapon numbers as a result, the head of the organisation will say on Monday. Mark Rutte, who is visiting the UK and meeting the prime minister, Keir Starmer, is expected to outline why it is necessary for allies to agree a dramatic increase in military spending to 5% of GDP at a summit in The Hague later this month. At a speech at the Chatham House thinktank in London on Monday afternoon, the Nato secretary general will argue the alliance needs 'a quantum leap in our collective defence' and 'more forces and capabilities to implement our defence plans in full'. Critically, Rutte is expected to say 'the fact is, danger will not disappear even when the war in Ukraine ends', reflecting a belief that the Kremlin will not demilitarise even it agrees to a ceasefire and eventually a peace with Kyiv. Military planners believe that Russia will seek to retain an active and experienced army in excess of 600,000-strong and maintain elevated levels of defence spending of about 6.5% of the country's GDP, so threatening Nato's eastern flank. Rutte will first visit Sheffield Forgemasters, a nationalised steelmaker owned by the Ministry of Defence which makes complex components for nuclear submarines, before meeting Starmer and then giving his speech. The secretary general, a former Dutch prime minister, has been pushing a proposal for Nato members to agree to lift core defence spending to 3.5% of GDP by about 2035, with a further 1.5% on cyber and other related military infrastructure. Britain is expected to sign up to the plan, to be formally confirmed at the summit, as part of an effort to maintain the support of the US president, Donald Trump, who pressed for the new 5% target once he was elected president for the second time. Justifying the need for extra spending, Rutte is expected to say that Nato needs 'a 400% increase in air and missile defence' as part of a wider rearmament to maintain credible deterrence and defence. 'We see in Ukraine how Russia delivers terror from above, so we will strengthen the shield that protects our skies,' Rutte is expected to say, according to remarks trailed by Nato ahead of the speech, due to begin at 3.45pm London time (1645 GMT). There will also have to be wider restocking of weapons, run down initially during the long period of post-old ar peace and second, because so much has been donated to Ukraine to help it fend off the full-scale Russian invasion over the past three years. 'Our militaries also need thousands more armoured vehicles and tanks, millions more artillery shells, and we must double our enabling capabilities, such as logistics, supply, transportation, and medical support,' Rutte will add. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Britain has promised to increase defence spending from the current 2.33% of GDP to 2.5% by 2027 and to 3% in the early 2030s. But a week ago, Starmer acknowledged that discussions about Nato's future military needs were also taking place. 'There are discussions about what the contribution should be going into the Nato conference in two or three weeks' time,' the prime minister said as he unveiled the UK's strategic defence review, as part of a wider conversation about 'what sort of Nato will be capable of being as effective in the future'. Rutte is expected to welcome the UK's strategic defence review which he will say will 'enhance Nato's collective defence'. The document said Britain faced 'a new era of threat' and that in order to deter Russia the UK had to become, in the words of Starmer, 'battle-ready'. Last week, one of the three members of the defence review team, the foreign policy expert Fiona Hill, said the UK needed to recognise that Russia considered itself at war with Britain and that the US under Trump was no longer a reliable ally. 'We're in pretty big trouble,' Hill said in an interview with the Guardian.


BBC News
25 minutes ago
- BBC News
Wales not given fair funding for rail, says Lee Waters
Wales does not get its "fair share of rail funding" and the system must be "fixed", said a former Labour minister responsible for for a £6.6bn Oxford-Cambridge rail line were previously classified as an England-only project, which means Wales could have been entitled to more the Treasury announced there was a "publishing error" in a 2020 document and it should have been classified as an England and Wales Waters, the Labour MS for Llanelli said the "cock-up" highlights the broader issue of how "unclear" and in need of reform the funding system is. Rail in Wales is not devolved, which means funding is determined through the UK government using the Barnett formula. Speaking to BBC Radio Wales Breakfast on Monday, Waters said: "Is it cockup, is it a conspiracy? Who knows - almost always a cockup in my experience."But he said "it speaks to the broader truth" that "the system needs fixing".He said: "We have not had our fair share of funding, the formula does not work to our advantage. "It is not clear how the formula works and therefore we don't trust when things like this pop up."Waters said only a few weeks ago the Welsh government "had to dip into our own coffers" to pay for the national insurance costs, which should be covered by the UK government as per a Treasury agreement."We need to reform the Barnett formula," Waters said. "We need to have the UK treasury acting as a UK treasury for the whole of the UK, not just for whoever happens to be in government in England at the time."He added that this is not "a party issue" because "this happened under the last government, it's happening under this government".He said it is "the government machine" which must be "changed and fixed".He said he is "confident" his London colleagues are ensuring Wales gets more funding, but is "less confident" they are trying to reform the Barnett said part of the issue is there "is not a Wales pot of money for rail, we have to fight our corner in the England and Wales pot."Waters said: "There's a UK Labour manifesto commitment to create a Wales fund for schemes so there can be transparency."But he said he is "nervous" about "wholesale devolution of rail without the extra funding", because it comes with the responsibility of repair work. He said: "You can argue we should get the extra funding, but it's back to 'do we trust the UK funding arrangements to do that?'"The UK government previously said the "error" over the Oxford-Cambridge line classification "will be amended when an update is published at the spending review".The HM Treasury has been approached for comment.