How much of your stuff was made in China? Here are the sobering numbers.
Amid the tariff tumult of recent weeks, perhaps you have found yourself pulling random plates and mugs from your shelves and turning them over to learn their country of origin.
Quite often, the answer is China.
China ranks as America's third-largest source of imported goods in 2025, according to Census data, with $103 billion in imports through March. In all of 2024, China ranked second, behind Mexico.
President Trump's campaign of import tariffs has consumers spooked about looming price hikes on imports from around the globe. Many of the biggest fears, however, center on China.
Trump enacted massive 145% import taxes on Chinese goods in April, then announced a trade deal on May 11 that slashed them to 30%, at least for now. But 30% is still a large number.
If you've already taken a 'tariff tour,' strolling around your home, upending lamps and couch cushions to discover their provenance, then you already know how much we depend on products from China.
'This might be a bit of a wakeup call to where all of our stuff actually comes from,' said Alex Jacquez, chief of policy and advocacy at the progressive Groundwork Collaborative.
If you haven't inventoried your household imports, then allow us to lead the tour.
A breathtaking share of our pots and pans, 90%, hail from China. A relatively small quotient of washers and dryers, 30%, originate there. But those figures understate the full scale of Chinese imports.
'Even products that seemingly have another country of origin embody significant content that originates from China,' said Adam Hersh, a senior economist at the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute.
Here is a list of 11 common household items, showing what percentage of all imports came from China in 2024. The numbers were compiled using the U.S. International Trade Commission's DataWeb from official U.S. merchandise trade statistics published by the Department of Commerce.
Dishes: 66% made in China. Next biggest source: Mexico.
Pots and pans: 90% made in China. Next biggest source: India.
Utensils: 87% made in China. Next biggest source: Vietnam.
Refrigerators: 87% made in China. Next biggest source: Vietnam.
Televisions: 48% made in China. Next biggest source: Mexico.
Couches: 43% made in China. Next biggest source: Vietnam.
Lamps: 48% made in China. Next biggest source: Mexico.
Dresses: 40% made in China. Next biggest source: Vietnam.
Toilets: 44% made in China. Leading source (47%): Mexico.
Vacuum cleaners: 35% made in China. Leading source (42%): Vietnam.
Washer-dryers: 30% made in China. Next biggest source: South Korea.
The current tariff deal between the United States and China is only good for 90 days, while the two nations negotiate. Where will tariff rates stand after that? Even some trade experts are reluctant to say.
"That's the million-dollar question, right there," said Colin Grabow, an associate director at the Cato Institute's Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies. "You get the sense that they're kind of making it up as they go."
This story has been updated with additional information.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: How much of your stuff was made in China? We have the numbers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senate Environment and Public Works panel releases ‘big beautiful bill' text
The Senate Environment and Public Works (EPW) Committee released text for its portion of the Trump legislative agenda policy bill that Republicans are trying to get across the finish line, becoming the first Senate panel to do so. The EPW bill appears similar to provisions passed by the House. It's not one of the committees that deals with thorny issues like Medicaid or energy tax credits that is likely to undergo changes in the upper chamber. Like the House version of the bill, the text released by Senate Republicans on Wednesday repeals numerous green programs passed by the Democrats in 2022. This includes a $20 billion program that seeks to provide financing for climate-friendly projects and a $3 billion program that provides grants for underserved communities that want to fight air pollution and climate change. It also repeals other grant programs related to air pollution monitoring and reducing air pollution at schools – as well as a program that seeks to charge oil and gas companies for their excess methane emissions. Like the House version, the Senate bill also includes a provision criticized by Democrats as 'pay-for-play' that allows companies to pay for expedited reviews of energy or other infrastructure projects. And it seeks to repeal a Biden-era regulation that's expected to push the auto market toward selling more electric vehicles. The ultimate text could still change as the parliamentarian has to decide which programs can actually be passed through reconciliation – a process by which the Senate can pass legislation with a simple majority instead of the 60 votes it usually needs. However, since the green programs it seeks to repeal were passed in a similar manner in 2022, those are likely to make it into the final version. 'This legislative text puts in motion plans that Senate Republicans pledged to take, like stopping Democrats' natural gas tax and rescinding unobligated dollars from the so-called Inflation Reduction Act,' said EPW Chair Shelley Moore Capito ( in a written statement. 'I look forward to working with my colleagues to move our legislative package forward to enact President Trump's agenda, which the American people overwhelmingly support,' she added.
CNN
13 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump administration returns migrant hastily deported to Mexico back to the US
A Guatemalan national who says he was wrongfully deported to Mexico last month is back in the United States, his legal team told CNN, in what appears to mark the first time the Trump administration has brought back a migrant after a judge ordered the administration to facilitate their return. OCG, a pseudonym the migrant is using in the case, landed in the United States on Wednesday and made contact with a member of the litigation team challenging the Trump administration's moves to send migrants to countries where they have no ties, according to Trina Realmuto, executive director of the National Immigration Litigation Alliance. The team expects he will be taken into the custody of the Department of Homeland Security, though it's unclear where he'll be detained, Realmuto told CNN. This is a developing story and will be updated.
USA Today
16 minutes ago
- USA Today
What fueled the Target DEI boycott? The answer may surprise you
What fueled the Target DEI boycott? The answer may surprise you Show Caption Hide Caption Consumer Boycotts target DEI retreats—are they working? What we know. Consumer boycotts are targeting companies like Amazon and Target, who've rolled back DEI initiatives, but are they working? Here's what we know. An orchestrated campaign to stoke tensions over Target's rollback of diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives deployed fake accounts to flood social media with manufactured outrage, a new report claims. Israeli tech firm Cyabra analyzed thousands of posts on social media platform X from Jan. 1 to April 21 as shoppers vented over Target's pullback and activists organized grassroots boycotts. It determined that 27% of the social media accounts it sampled were fake and 'contributed significantly to the viral backlash.' Inauthentic sentiment surged 764% after Target's announcement to roll back some diversity programs, Cyabra found. The accounts impersonating Black users actively promoted calls to boycott Target, using trending hashtags such as #EconomicBlackout. Some posts accused Target of 'bending the knee' to President Donald Trump, others pushed specific campaigns such as 'Target Fast' or '40-day boycott' to persuade people to stop shopping at Target. Cyabra analysts, who use artificial intelligence to identify fake accounts, also uncovered profiles posing as 'conservative' voices who mocked the Target boycott. These accounts claimed they already boycott Target over its 'woke' policies. While Cyabra said it did not find clear evidence that this was also a rigged campaign to dupe Target shoppers, exploiting political and cultural divisions is a common tactic by influence operations. Similar tactics have been used against other major brands including Nike, Costco and Starbucks, Cyabra spokeswoman Jill Burkes said. 'We've seen this kind of behavior in disinformation campaigns tied to elections, brands and social movements around the world,' Burkes said. 'When fake profiles move in sync, mimic real users and amplify both sides of a divisive issue, it's a clear sign of manipulation. That's what we saw here.' Cyabra said it examined the online discussions around the Target boycott after its system flagged multiple tell-tale signs of inauthentic behavior such as spikes in engagement, rapid viral backlash, synchronized messaging, high-volume posting and an unusually high number of fake accounts. Trump says he killed DEI: So why isn't it dead yet? Cracks emerge in war on 'woke' Target did not respond to a request for comment. The backlash against DEI gained momentum during the 2024 presidential campaign but hit a fever pitch when Trump took office and issued a series of executive orders aimed at eliminating 'illegal DEI' in the federal government and the private sector. Target was one of the corporations to make concessions in the rapidly changing political climate. In recent months, its customers have pulled back on discretionary purchases amid growing anxiety over the economy and inflation. The company also cited its decision to scrap some diversity policies as a contributor to the sharp pullback in consumer spending in the first quarter as church pastors and other community activists launched protests, spreading word of planned boycotts on social media. Target said the boycotts dented its first-quarter performance but could not estimate by how much. The Cyabra report raises the question if the coordinated campaign of fake accounts had real-world impact on Target. A follow-up analysis of X conversations from May 27 to June 3 found that the coordinated campaign against Target continued to resonate long after the boycotts began, according to Cyabra. Fake social media profiles made up 39% of the accounts, on some days outnumbering authentic profiles. Many of these accounts continued to call on shoppers to boycott Target and promoted the #EconomicBlackout's new campaign that began this week. Nekima Levy Armstrong, a Minneapolis activist who started a Target boycott on Feb. 1, said she could not comment on the Cyabra report. "I'm not on X and I know our people in Minneapolis have no involvement in this situation," she said. Contributing: Betty Lin-Fisher
