
Man lost in wild for nine days survived by 'slurping unclean pond water'
A man 'slurped unclean pond water' to stay alive for nine days after his car broke down in a vast wilderness.
Andrew Barber had written the word 'help' into a massive rock and spelled out 'SOS' in mud in a desperate bid to be rescued in the Cariboo region of British Columbia, Canada. The 39-year-old, who went missing on July 31, survived by drinking pond water and he built a shelter made from wood and mud. He was eventually found on August 8 by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police after a helicopter saw his broken down vehicle which allowed them to hone in on the area.
And rescuers said that he had used survival tactics to stay alive but even so was severely dehydrated and he had an injured leg. It comes after a dead body is found in 'underground ancient cave' in popular UK beauty spot.
READ MORE: Schoolboy, 13, has both legs amputated after 'getting cramp' at sports camp
'I don't know that he would have made it another 24 hours without us recovering him,' said Bob Zimmerman, from Quesnel Search and Rescue. 'He was in poor health, he was having a hard time standing.'
An image from the rescue team shows a type of bivouac that Andrew had built from wood and mud which was next to rock that had the word help written on it.
Mr Barber went missing near McLeese Lake which is around 365 miles north of Vancouver after his vehicle broke down.
"He was literally slurping unclean pond water to stay hydrated," Staff Sgt. Brad McKinnon of the Williams Lake Royal Canadian Mounted Police McKinnon, told Canadian Press News. "The human body can go a long time without food, but water is a different situation.
"I'll put it this way — had we not found him when we did, I would have had graver concerns than I currently do. We had been at this for nine days, and it was essentially like looking for a needle in a haystack. The Cariboo region of British Columbia is beautiful, but it is immense, and there are tons of rural and wilderness areas."
After being found, Andrew was flown to Cariboo Memorial Hospital in Williams Lake for treatment. He has now been discharged and is doing 'quite well' considering his ordeal.
In a post on their Facebook page, Quesnel Search and Rescue wrote: 'After over a week in the wilderness, our subject has been located alive during today's search from the air.
'This outcome is the result of countless hours on the ground and in the air, using every resource and piece of technology available to us. Quesnel Search and Rescue is on call 24/7, 365 days a year — and our entire team is made up of dedicated volunteers who give their time, skills, and heart to help those in need.
'We want to extend our deepest thanks to our partners: RCMP, PEP Air, and BC Emergency Health Services for their outstanding support in bringing this search to a successful conclusion. Today's result is why we train, why we respond, and why we never give up.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Spectator
2 days ago
- Spectator
The case for Letby's innocence looks weaker than ever
The annual Panorama documentary on Lucy Letby appeared on BBC 1 this week, barely a week after a more one-sided pro-Letby documentary was shown on ITV. Channel 4 has a Letby show in the works and Channel 5 has already broadcast two. Fortunately, there is plenty of material for producers to get their teeth into. Not only did her trial last ten months but there was a retrial after that, plus two appeal attempts, and her supporters have been making new claims on any almost weekly basis ever since. The ITV documentary was Letbyism 1.0, mostly consisting of talking points about shift patterns, Post-it notes, door-swipe data etc. that have either been debunked or which are now understood to be irrelevant. The Panorama documentary – the third in what is sure to be an ongoing series – focused on the second phase of Letbyism that began with two press conferences, the second organised by Letby's PR firm (yes, she has a PR firm working for her), in December 2024 and February 2025. In the first press conference we were told that the insulin tests used to convict her of poisoning Baby F and Baby L were wrong, and that Baby O was accidentally killed by a doctor. In the second press conference we were told that no murders had taken place, that the insulin readings for Babies F and L were perfectly normal, and that Baby O died from a liver injury sustained during childbirth. Confused? So are they. Letby has a number of distinguished medics in her corner but they seem to be finding it difficult to put forward a consistent narrative. A panel of experts convened by the Canadian neonatologist and economist Dr Shoo Lee has offered innocent explanations for all of the 22 collapses and deaths on Letby's indictment (including the ones for which she was not convicted, which seems over-eager). Thanks to the unexpected appearance of credible physicians on Team Letby, her supporters have been playing a game of 'my expert is bigger than your expert' ever since, but the Court of Appeal is not interested in how 'eminent' or 'world leading' a witness is. It only wants to know if they have a point, and it is far from obvious that the 'international panel', which contains no pathologists, radiologists, endocrinologists or haematologists, have cracked the case by looking at some medical records a decade after the events took place. Dr Michael Hall, a neonatologist who was ready to give evidence for the defence in Letby's first trial but was never called, gave short shrift to the panel's theory that Baby A died from thrombosis. He pointed out that this suggestion had been raised in court and said 'I'm not sure that the expert witnesses have added anything to that conversation.' Nor was there any evidence that Baby A's mother had passed a rare blood-clotting disorder onto the child. On the contrary, blood tests had disproved this. Hall was also dismissive of the idea that Baby O suffered a liver injury during childbirth. Baby O's mother had plenty of complaints to air about the Countess of Chester Hospital at the Thirlwall Inquiry, but the standard of her planned Caesarean section was not one of them. In any case, Baby O's haemoglobin readings strongly suggested that he had not suffered a liver injury at birth and even Letby admitted that whatever happened to his liver had happened 'on my watch' the following day. Speaking anonymously – presumably to avoid the wrath of Letby's increasingly militant fanbase – a pathologist told Panorama that the theory about Baby O being killed by a doctor's misplaced needle was poppycock. Indeed, everyone on the show seemed to agree that this never happened, despite Dr Richard Taylor stating it as fact on live television eight months ago. With regards to the insulin poisonings, Shoo Lee relied on the expertise of the mechanical engineer Dr Geoff Chase and the chemical engineer Dr Helen Shannon, possibly because he couldn't get any paediatric endocrinologists to come out to bat for Britain's most prolific child-murderer. In their report, they claimed that the incredibly high insulin readings and extremely low C-peptide readings for Baby F and Baby L were 'within the expected range for preterm infants'. Professor John Gregory, a paediatric endocrinologist, told Panorama that such readings were 'exceedingly unlikely' to be natural; in other words, the babies were almost certainly given exogenous insulin. Interviewed by Panorama, Dr Chase said that 'within the expected range' was a poor choice of words, but insisted that such results were 'not uncommon'. He then downgraded this to 'unusual' and 'possible'. The only British member of Lee's panel is Professor Neena Modi. Asked about the claim that Baby O had suffered a liver injury during childbirth, her response was essentially that although there wasn't any evidence that such an injury had been sustained in this instance, a traumatic childbirth is the kind of thing that could cause a liver injury. It was at this moment that the penny dropped: from the outside, Lee's panel do not seem to have been looking for the theory with the most evidence to support it, nor even for the most likely explanation. They appear to have been looking for anything that sounds vaguely plausible so long as it doesn't involve Lucy Letby inflicting deliberate harm on defenceless infants. Dr Hall, who seems genuinely unsure whether Letby is guilty or innocent, said that he feared that the tenuous opinions of the international panel could 'rebound' on her. As this Panorama showed, many of them can be batted away with ease since they were either raised and rejected in court or have no evidence to support them. Letby can go to the Criminal Cases Review Commission as many times as she likes, and is likely to have plenty of time to do so, but every application takes years and the Court of Appeal does not appreciate having its time wasted with lengthy submissions of little merit. The eminence of the experts and the hard work of the PR company do not come into it. Meanwhile, the public may see distinguished doctors disagreeing and conclude that there must be reasonable doubt by definition, but that is not how it works. Only one side can be right and the medical evidence, though important, was only one part of the case. Hundreds of pieces of evidence could be cited, almost all of it circumstantial but almost all of it pointing an accusing finger at staff nurse Letby. It will take many more documentaries for it all to be broadcast to the viewing public, but at the current rate we should get there by the end of the decade.


Daily Mirror
2 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Prince Andrew 'caught in foul-mouthed tirade' in speed bumps row near Royal Lodge
A witness said Prince Andrew, Duke of York, was riding his horse through Windsor Great Park when he came across workmen installing speed bumps - then pulled up beside them and launched into a rant Prince Andrew reportedly launched into a foul-mouthed rant at workmen installing speed bumps near his Windsor residence. A witness said the Duke of York, 65, was riding his horse through Windsor Great Park when he came across the crew laying the new traffic-slowing humps. Pulling up alongside them, the prince is said to have snapped: "What the f*** are you doing now?" The bump in question has been positioned on his regular driving route out of Royal Lodge - his 31-room home within the 4,800-acre estate - meaning he will now have to slow down as he leaves. One source said: "Andrew likes to drive his car out of Royal Lodge quite fast and is obviously a bit peeved as one of the speed humps is right by the gate out of the park." "The worker was just going about his job when Andrew, on one of his regular rides round the estate, came along and looked down from up high and said, 'What the f*** are you doing now?'", the source told the Sun. Windsor Great Park is managed by his brother, King Charles, who is Ranger of the estate. It comes after King Charles' Balmoral Castle was forced to close with a warning issued in a statement. Andrew's temper has previously caused friction at his Windsor residence. In early 2022, he allegedly berated his gardener over the way she had trimmed trees, leaving her "shaken and upset"' She later transferred to another job elsewhere on the grounds. She also claimed he once summoned her to shut blinds four flights up while he sat nearby, then shouted: "Can't you f***ing do anything right?" when a small gap was left. Andrew denied all allegations and claimed he had never met the woman. In 2016, he made headlines again for reportedly ramming open locked park gates with his £80,000 Range Rover to avoid a one-mile detour to his front door. He was reported to police but no charges followed. The prince has remained at Royal Lodge for more than 20 years despite efforts to have him leave, following the loss of his royal duties over his friendship with US paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. He later paid millions to settle a civil sexual assault lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre, who was trafficked by Epstein as a teenager. Andrew has always denied the allegations and insisted he had never met her. Giuffre died in April this year at her home in Australia, aged 41, while Epstein died by suicide in a New York prison in 2019.


Daily Mail
3 days ago
- Daily Mail
Three young girls saw reckless driver kill dad in car crash...now their mother has stage four breast cancer
Three young sisters' lives have been left devastated after witnessing a reckless driver kill their father in a horror car crash - all while their mother battles breast cancer. Andrew Cristillo, 35, tragically died on August 3 after his car was allegedly hit head-on by Jaiwin Kirubananthan, 18, in Ontario, Canada. Andrew was driving back from a family gathering around 9.30pm with his wife Christina and their three daughters, Leah, seven, Chloe, six and Ella, four. The loving father and husband died instantly while Christina rushed to rescue their children, who were left crying in the back seat. As she did so, Kirubananthan fled the scene. He was located soon after and taken into custody, according to the Ontario Provincial Police. Kirubananthan has been charged with dangerous driving causing death, three counts of dangerous driving causing bodily harm, failing to remain at the scene of an accident resulting in death, and public mischief, according to court documents reviewed by City News Toronto. Christina, who has been fighting stage four cancer, is now the sole provider and caregiver for their daughters. Their family has banded together to be there for the now-single mother who is watching over their girls after they were left with injuries following the car wreck. 'This is something you read about and to have it happen to you is a nightmare. It doesn't even feel real,' Jordan Cristillo, Andrew's younger brother, told the outlet. 'The girls have been taking it day by day. One of the difficult parts of this is although my brother has been killed, we can't process that because we are so focused on making sure the girls are okay.' Along with her health battle, Christina was also left injured from the car accident. 'She is the strongest person I've ever met and can only imagine the complete selflessness to ensure those three girls are cared for,' Jordan said of his sister-in-law. The grieving brother is determined to get justice for Andrew while his wife and children recover from the unimaginable. 'How can you flee when you hear three little girls crying for help, crying for daddy who is not able to respond, crying for mommy who's kicking out the windshield to get out to pull her daughters out of this wreckage,' he said of Kirubananthan. 'This wasn't an accident. This was complete and utter negligence and recklessness. Justice means that this doesn't happen to other families, they don't need to experience this unbearable pain and loss.' Christina echoed Jordan's stance, as the widow called for justice for her heartbroken family. 'This tragedy was not just an accident — it's the result of someone else's reckless actions. The other driver fled the scene and is under criminal investigation,' she wrote on a GoFundMe page. 'While justice is being pursued, our focus now is survival physically, emotionally, and financially.' Andrew's wife and brother have remembered him as a loving person who was devoted to his family. 'My brother was the funniest person I ever met. He really pursued everything with 110 percent,' Jordan recalled. 'Various interest and he would always jump in with both feet and he loved to share his passion with others. He was always there for people too.' Christina called Andrew her 'best friend and the love of my life.' 'Andrew had a wicked sense of humor and a way of lighting up every room he walked into — the life of the party, the friend everyone wanted by their side, the one who could make you smile even on your worst day,' she said. 'His greatest wish was for his family to be safe, happy, and cared for, and he worked tirelessly to give our daughters the best life and future he possibly could.' As of Tuesday morning, more than $351,400 CAD ($255,090 USD), has been raised for the family during this difficult time. Andrew worked as a site supervisor at Pro Caissons Ltd., a drilling contractor in the area. Jordan said he believes his late brother 'is the reason why those three girls and Christina are able to live to see another day, it's because he saved them.' This was not the first time Kirubananthan was involved in a car crash, as he collided with a Ontario Provincial Police vehicle carrying Premier Doug Ford in January. Ford and other occupants in the vehicle were left unharmed. Kirubananthan was charged with dangerous operation of a motor vehicle in connection to that crash, per court records obtained by City News Toronto. He appeared at a bail hearing on Monday morning for the recent crash, CTV News reported.