South Korea to end private adoptions after landmark probe
South Korea, Asia's fourth-largest economy and a global cultural powerhouse, sent more than 140,000 children overseas between 1955 and 1999.
But an official enquiry concluded this year that the international adoption process had been riddled with irregularities, including "fraudulent orphan registrations, identity tampering, and inadequate vetting of adoptive parents".
The rights of South Korean children had been violated, the landmark investigation by a truth commission found.
The independent body established by the state called for an official apology and blamed the government for the issues, especially a failure to regulate adoption fees that effectively turned it into a profit-driven industry.
On Saturday, South Korea will introduce a "newly restructured public adoption system, under which the state and local governments take full responsibility for the entire adoption process," South Korea's Ministry of Health and Welfare said.
The change is a "significant step towards ensuring the safety and promoting the rights of adopted children," the ministry added.
- 'Shameful part' of history -
International adoption began after the Korean War as a way to remove mixed-race children, born to Korean mothers and American soldier fathers, from a country that emphasised ethnic homogeneity.
It became big business in the 1970s to 1980s, bringing international adoption agencies millions of dollars as South Korea overcame post-war poverty and faced rapid and aggressive economic development.
But the system failed children, the truth commission said in March, with a failure to follow "proper legal consent procedures" for South Korean birth parents resulting in highly-publicised reports of lost children being put up for overseas adoption.
The commission's chairperson Park Sun-young said at the time it was a "shameful part" of South Korea's history.
Under the new system, key procedures -- such as assessing prospective adoptive parents and matching them with children -- will be deliberated by a ministry committee, in accordance with the principle of the "best interests of the child".
Previously, this had been done by major adoption agencies, with minimal oversight from the state.
"With this restructuring of the public adoption system, the state now takes full responsibility for ensuring the safety and rights of all adopted children," said Kim Sang-hee, director of population and child policy at the Ministry of Health and Welfare.
Activists, however, say the measure should be merely a starting point and warn it is far from sufficient.
"While I think it's high time that Korea close down all private adoption agencies, I don't believe... having the state handle new adoptions is enough," said writer Lisa Wool-Rim Sjoblom, a Korean adoptee who grew up in Sweden.
The government should prioritise implementing the findings of the truth commission, issue an official apology, and work to help the tens of thousands of Koreans who were sent abroad for adoption, she told AFP.
"The government urgently needs to acknowledge all the human rights violations it enabled, encouraged, and systematically participated in, and, as soon as possible, begin reparations."
hs/ceb/rsc
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SBS Australia
2 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Childcare centres to lose funding if safety standards breached under Labor's new legislation
Childcare centres to lose funding if safety standards breached under Labor's new legislation Published 23 July 2025, 8:34 am Labor is expecting the Opposition to back its new legislation to crackdown on childcare centres in the wake of shocking sexual abuse allegations. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has promised to be constructive, as the first female leader of a major party to step up to the dispatch box since Julia Gillard twelve years ago.
West Australian
3 hours ago
- West Australian
Student debt cuts: Government talks as Opposition steps up attack on super tax plans
Anthony Albanese and Jim Chalmers have avoided ruling out ever taxing unrealised capital gains beyond existing plans for multimillion-dollar superannuation accounts, fuelling accusations Labor has secret plans to go after family homes and trusts. Legislation for the reduced tax breaks for superannuation balances above $3 million is yet to be re-introduced to Parliament but it was the key lines of attack from an Opposition regrouping after its election loss. The first question time of the 48th Parliament got off to a slow start as Mr Albanese and new Opposition Leader Sussan Ley took each other's measure. Coalition strategists had planned to focus on Treasury advice that flagged a need for higher taxes or spending cuts to tackle deficits but ultimately canvassed the superannuation tax plan that has been in Parliament for almost two years. Ms Ley misfired with a question that failed to mention the word 'superannuation.' 'The name of the tax would be helpful for future questions,' Speaker Milton Dick advised. It was Nationals leader David Littleproud – under fire internally from would-be rivals – who asked new Assistant Treasurer Daniel Mulin a specific question about how the changes would affect farmers in a failed season. The Prime Minister and Treasurer continued their reluctance to bind themselves to 'never ever' positions ahead of next month's economic roundtable discussions. 'The time to run a scare campaign is just before an election, not after one,' Mr Albanese said when shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien asked if Labor was considering going after capital gains on family trusts and family homes next. 'It's a bit early, on day one … to start the rule-in-rule-out game that they themselves said on Sunday said was juvenile and absurd.' Mr O'Brien claimed a win, suggesting the Government should be embarrassed about its performance. 'Both the Prime Minister and the Treasurer refused to rule out expanding Labor's tax on unrealised capital gains to include family homes and family trusts. This should send a chill down the spine of every Australian family,' he said. The super tax was a key revenue measure from the previous term, slated to raise $2.3 billion in its first year in effect from about 80,000 people but it was stalled in the Senate. Dr Chalmers is hopeful of winning support from the Greens. The minor party wants the threshold lowered to $2 million and indexed, paving the way for a possible compromise. 'This is not his Tinder profile, this is his dream ticket. He's not looking to swipe right, he's looking to swipe out (Mr Littleproud),' Mr Bowen said. The Government used the political theatre to highlight its almost-fulfilled promise to cut student debts by 20 per cent. Education Minister Jason Clare said it was 'a lot of help for a lot of people just out of uni, just getting started, help them to buy a home, thinking about starting a family'. He also put forward measures to strengthen childcare safety regulation in the wake of the allegations that a Melbourne childcare worker committed dozens of instances of child abuse. Under the bill, care providers could have childcare subsidies – which make up the bulk of their funding – blocked over a single breach of quality standards. Regulators would also have the power to conduct snap inspections of centres and there would be more transparency around breaches and sanctions. 'This is not about leaving parents stranded without care for their children because of fixable or minor shortcomings at their service. But this legislation is also not an idle threat to services,' Mr Clare said, adding the ultimate aim was to lift standards. The Coalition had signalled broad support for improving safety at childcare centres but raised concerns about whether the measures went far enough, while the Greens want the Government to bolster its plan by creating a national watchdog. 'I can't think of many issues in my time in this Parliament that have made me feel as physically sick as this one has,' Ms Ley said. 'This is an issue well and truly above politics. We will all work incredibly hard to get this right.' Late night sittings are already planned for next week to get the vital legislation through swiftly as Parliament gets down to business.
ABC News
7 hours ago
- ABC News
Far-right Sanseito party wins shock electoral gains in Japan on anti-foreigner platform
Japan's prime minister has launched an office focused on fostering "harmonious coexistence" with foreign nationals as an ultra-conservative party rode a wave of anti-immigration sentiment to unexpected electoral success. In a shock to the long-ruling Liberal Democratic Party, previously fringe Sanseito won 14 seats in the 248-seat upper house on Sunday — becoming the fourth largest opposition party in parliament with its calls for a crackdown on "excessive acceptance of foreigners". Sanseito had proposed "loyalty checks" for foreigners, as well as the suspension of social services to foreign residents and strict limits for hiring them. The party's leader, Sohei Kamiya, recently told a rally that "under globalism, multinational companies have changed Japan's policies for their own purposes". Analysts say Sanseito's rise has exposed long-simmering public anxiety about rising costs, over-tourism, and a stagnant economy — all of which the party blames on foreigners. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba last week announced the establishment of an office within Japan's cabinet to manage an influx of foreigners needed to prop up the economy, which is affected by a rapidly aging population. While Japan needed to accept some degree of foreign workers and invite spending by tourists, Mr Ishiba said the behaviour of some foreigners was causing Japanese people to feel "anxiety and unfairness", according to public broadcaster NHK. The appeal of far-right politics was primarily driven by economic factors said Simon Avenell, a Japan expert at the Australian National University. "First and foremost, it's about people's wallets," Professor Avenell said. Japan's booming tourism sector is one of the few parts of the economy tracking well. A record 36.9 million foreign visitors arrived in 2024 — a 47 per cent jump from the previous year and higher than pre-COVID levels. "Tourists can afford to pay for an increase in price for a bowl of ramen while locals are struggling to buy a dozen eggs," Professor Avenell said. "Buses are full. Trains are crowded. Locals feel pushed out of their own space," he said. In polling, 29 per cent of voters told NHK that social security and a declining birthrate were their biggest concerns. The price of rice, which remains a staple of the Japanese diet, has doubled over the past year. In the face of economic anxiety, Sanseito's populist message has resonated with many Japanese voters. Sanseito was created in 2019, emerging from an ultranationalist YouTube channel. The party's "Japanese First" pitch is that the country is under cultural and economic threat from outsiders. Foreigners, they claim, are driving up prices, overcrowding cities, committing crimes and buying up Japanese land. "The requirement for aspiring candidates and party members to submit nationality information, ensuring they're 'pure Japanese,' is appealing," one Sanseito supporter told Japanese newspaper The Mainichi Shimbun last week. Almost 3.8 million foreign residents lived in Japan as of late 2024, just under 3 per cent of its total population. This is in stark contrast to other wealthy nations. Almost one-third of Australia's population was born overseas. But numbers of foreign residents have steadily climbed as Japan cautiously relaxed its immigration laws in recent years, for example by creating special visa categories to address labour shortages in nursing and construction. At the same time, tourism has exploded. Japan had already seen the arrival of 18 million tourists by May this year — and cities like Kyoto and Tokyo are feeling the strain. "The majority of Japanese citizens are not xenophobic," said Ryosuke Hanada, a Japanese citizen and PhD student at Macquarie University. "What they want is an adjustment of the rules applied to temporary residents." Mr Hanada said right-wing populism was feeding on real economic stress, visible demographic shifts, and a government that had, until now, avoided serious discussion about what integration or coexistence with foreigners might look like. Sanseito has capitalised on resentment over foreign access to public resources and property. "There are no restrictions on foreign land ownership in Japan," Mr Hanada said. "This causes the increase of property prices in the Tokyo metropolitan area." There are no publicly available records of the nationality of buyers in Japan, but one survey of housing developers by Mitsubishi UFJ Trust & Banking Corp suggested that 20 per cent to 40 per cent of new apartments in central Tokyo were being purchased by foreigners. While some high-end properties in Tokyo or ski towns have seen foreign interest and inflated local prices, there's no widespread evidence that this is happening across the country. Foreign residents who stay over three months are automatically enrolled in Japan's national health insurance scheme and can apply for public housing, childcare and other social services. Nana Oishi, an associate professor in Japanese studies at the University of Melbourne, said many Japanese felt public resources should be "prioritised for struggling Japanese nationals". "These perceptions have contributed to the appeal of Sanseito's messaging," she said. And there's another layer: anxiety about global power shifts. With the Trump administration floating new US tariffs on Japanese exports, some voters feel the need to adopt a more self-protective stance. "There's this sense that, well, the Americans are looking after themselves … maybe we should too," said Professor Avenell. Sanseito's sharp rise has forced the Liberal Democratic Party, a centre-right party which has long dominated Japanese politics, to react. Professor Avenell said the government wasn't "prepared for the debate" yet moved quickly when anti-foreigner sentiment was reflected in the polls. "Whether the panel [to manage foreigners] does anything meaningful is still unclear, but the politics have shifted," he said. Some regions are already acting on over-tourism. Differential pricing — where foreigners pay more for attractions like temples or services — has been introduced in tourist hotspots. Other ideas, such as capping tourist numbers or restricting purchases in sensitive zones, have gained traction but face legal and economic hurdles. But Dr Oishi said despite over-tourism in cities like Kyoto, "most Japanese cities continue to welcome international tourists and foreign residents".
