Rising seas, shifting lives and a test of democratic values
In Odisha, once thriving coastal settlements such as Satabhaya have been swallowed by the sea, forcing villagers to relocate to government resettlement colonies that often fail to provide sustainable livelihoods. In Karnataka's Honnavar taluk, traditional fishing communities face dispossession as ports, tourism projects, and mangrove destruction accelerate coastal degradation. Similar patterns are unfolding in Tamil Nadu's Nagapattinam, Gujarat's Kutch region, and the flood-prone lowlands of Kerala.
Projects and environmental degradation
Industrial and infrastructural expansion along coastal zones — from port development under the Sagarmala programme to energy projects and commercial aquaculture — have compounded ecological degradation. Mangrove forests, sand dunes and wetlands that historically buffered coastal communities have been systematically cleared.
Environmental clearances for many projects have overlooked cumulative climate risks, leading to a development model that intensifies ecological and social vulnerabilities. The displaced populations are increasingly getting absorbed into the informal economy as construction workers, brick kiln labourers and domestic workers in urban centres such as Bhubaneswar, Chennai, Hyderabad and Mumbai.
These migration patterns often result in systemic labour exploitation, which include debt bondage (displaced families take wage advances to survive, tying them into exploitative labour conditions); lack of legal protections (informal workers have little or no access to rights under India's labour laws, such as the Building and Other Construction Workers' (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996) and gendered exploitation (displaced women entering domestic work face heightened risks of abuse, underpayment, and trafficking).
Legal lacunae on climate displacement
The absence of a coherent legal framework on climate-induced migration exacerbates this crisis. While Article 21 of the Constitution guarantees the right to life and dignity, there is no specific legislation that addresses the rights of those displaced by slow-onset climate disasters. Existing frameworks such as the Disaster Management Act, 2005, the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, and the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) Notifications, including the diluted CRZ 2019, are limited either to disaster response or environmental conservation, without adequately factoring in the socio-economic dimensions of displacement.
The National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC) and State Action Plans recognise vulnerability, but lack targeted strategies for the rehabilitation of displaced populations or integration into labour markets.
The CRZ Notification, 2019, intended to streamline clearances and promote sustainable coastal management, has often been critiqued for prioritising tourism and industrial development over the rights of coastal communities. Across States, the dilution of zoning regulations has led to a surge in commercial projects in fragile coastal belts, displacing traditional fishing communities without their informed consent — a principle enshrined in national law and international environmental standards. Even India's landmark Labour Codes are silent on extending specific protections to climate migrants.
Environmental justice jurisprudence from the Supreme Court of India — in M.C. Mehta vs Union of India (1987) and Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action vs Union of India (1996) — has recognised the intrinsic link between the environment and fundamental human rights. Yet, the translation of these principles into robust, community-centric legal frameworks on climate displacement remains lacking.
The story of displacement is also the story of resilience. Coastal communities, particularly fisherfolk unions and indigenous groups, have resisted ecologically destructive projects with remarkable tenacity. The protests against the Adani ports expansion at Ennore Creek, Tamil Nadu, the Pattuvam Mangrove Protection Movement in Kerala, and the Save Satabhaya campaign in Odisha underscore how grass-roots mobilisations have challenged mainstream development narratives.
However, environmental defenders face intimidation, surveillance and criminalisation which are antithetical to India's constitutional commitment to protect the rights to protest and association. New challenges also emerge as climate change is weaponised to justify 'managed retreat' without participatory planning or safeguards for the displaced.
Towards a rights-based framework
Recognition of climate migrants within national migration and urban planning policies is essential. There is a need for a rights-based approach that guarantees decent work, housing, education and health care. Labour codes must be revised to explicitly extend protections to climate migrants, especially in sectors such as construction and domestic work where informality is rampant. Similarly, coastal zone management must be revisited to prioritise ecological sustainability and community rights over commercial interests. India's commitment to achieving Sustainable Development Goal Target 8.7 — eliminating forced labour and ensuring decent work for all — is contingent upon addressing the new vulnerabilities created by climate displacement.
If climate change is the defining challenge of our era, responding to climate-induced displacement must be at the core of India's adaptation strategy. Protecting the rights, dignity, and livelihoods of those most impacted is not just an environmental necessity. It is a test of India's democratic and constitutional values.
Bhoomika Choudhury is an international lawyer and researcher specialising in business and human rights, corporate accountability, and labour rights
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
19 hours ago
- Indian Express
Indian Railways done well to incorporate Braille signage in coaches. But a lot more needs doing
Written by Praveen Kumar G During a recent journey in an A1 coach on the Karnataka Express train, I encountered a telling example of how accessibility for blind passengers is often treated as an afterthought. While there was some information provided in Braille — such as berth numbers and alarm details — the implementation was far from user-friendly. The Braille plates were positioned in such a way that they were partially obscured by fixed luggage racks, making them difficult to locate and read. This is not merely a matter of inconvenience; for many travellers with visual disabilities, it is the difference between being able to navigate independently and having to rely on others. What was even more concerning was the absence of vital information in Braille. Critical details such as emergency safety instructions, contact numbers of train attendants, cleaning service information, and procedures for seeking assistance were nowhere to be found in accessible formats. This approach — providing only partial and poorly positioned information — undermines the very purpose of accessibility. It is a piecemeal effort that signals compliance in appearance, but not in substance. The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (RPwD Act) is explicit: Persons with disabilities are entitled to equal access to information, facilities, and services without discrimination. Section 42 of the Act mandates that all service providers take steps to ensure that information is available in accessible formats, including Braille, audio, and electronic text. Indian Railways, as a public service provider, is legally and morally bound to implement these provisions fully. Partial compliance — such as offering only berth numbers in Braille — falls short of the law's intent. Inaccessible safety information can put blind passengers at direct risk during emergencies. Lack of contact details for attendants can leave passengers stranded without timely assistance. Accessibility is not a courtesy; it is a right that ensures dignity, independence, and safety. It is commendable that Indian Railways has begun incorporating Braille signage in coaches, but the execution must improve dramatically. Authorities should provide complete travel-related information in Braille — safety instructions, contact numbers, complaint procedures, and service information. They must ensure logical and accessible placement of Braille signage — away from obstructions like luggage racks. Use multiple accessible formats — including audio announcements and QR codes linked to screen-reader-friendly information. Accessibility should not be a box-ticking exercise. The RPwD Act provides a strong legal mandate — what is needed now is serious implementation with empathy, consultation with passengers with disabilities, and regular audits for compliance. For India's transport systems to truly serve all citizens, accessibility must move from being symbolic to being substantive, comprehensive, and rights-based. The writer is VSO international social accessibility advisor


Economic Times
a day ago
- Economic Times
Supreme Court urges overhaul of slow adoption process, warns delays push parents to illegal routes
The Supreme Court has pointed out issues in India's adoption process. It finds the system complex for parents. The court urges the government to simplify adoption rules. This encourages legal adoptions over unlawful methods. Many couples face long waits. Demand for children exceeds the number available. A recent case highlights the need for accessible adoption. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Long queues, few children Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Court restores custody The Supreme Court on Wednesday flagged serious flaws in India's adoption framework, describing it as 'overly cumbersome and frustrating' for prospective parents, according to a TOI. It urged the government to simplify and streamline procedures so that childless couples are encouraged to adopt legally rather than resorting to unlawful means.A bench of Justices B.V. Nagarathna and K.V. Viswanathan made the observations while hearing a matter related to child trafficking . The court noted that the current system is so time-consuming that many parents bypass legal channels altogether.'Not having children is still viewed as a social stigma. Many couples desperately want a child, but the process is complex and slow,' the bench the Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA), India recorded more than 4,500 adoptions in 2025–26, the highest figure in over a decade. Yet, demand far outweighs supply—over 36,600 prospective adoptive parents (PAPs) are currently registered, while only 2,756 children are legally available for court noted that the average wait for adopting infants or young children is now around 3.5 years. This gap between availability and demand, it said, is a driving factor behind unlawful adoptions . 'The present adoption process is taking too long. Parents want a child badly but the process is cumbersome and frustrating,' the bench the systemic issues, the court referred to a case decided just a day earlier involving four sets of adoptive parents from Telangana. They had taken custody of children—aged between a few months and three years—after learning that the biological parents could not care for they had not followed the legal procedure or informed the adoption authorities, the media outlet report police learned of the adoptions, the children were removed from the families and placed under the care of the Child Welfare Project Director and Integrated Child Protection Services. Invoking its extraordinary powers under Article 142 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court restored custody to the adoptive parents, noting that the children's welfare was bench said the case underscored why a more accessible and efficient adoption process is essential—not only to protect children but also to prevent well-intentioned parents from being caught in legal disputes.


News18
a day ago
- News18
Attention, Dog Owners: Why A Licence Is A Must, And What Happens If You Don't Have One
Unlike stray dogs, pet dogs in Delhi fall under a set of strict regulations, and failing to follow them could even lead to losing your furry friend. Here's a detailed breakdown of the pet ownership rules in Delhi, explained through ten key questions answered by an expert from the Veterinary Department of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD). 1. Do you need a licence to keep a pet dog at home? Yes. In many cities across India, including Delhi, a licence is required to keep a dog. According to Section 399 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, all pet dogs must be registered. Upon doing so, the MCD issues a registration certificate or dog licence to the pet owner. 2. Who issues the dog licence? Dog licences are typically issued by the Municipal Corporation or local municipality. In most urban areas, the registration process is now available online for convenience. 3. How long is the licence valid for? The licence remains valid for one year or for the duration of the dog's rabies vaccination, whichever is shorter. It must be renewed once expired. 4. What documents are needed for registration? To register your dog, you will need: The Aadhaar ID of the pet owner, a photo of the dog and owner together, the dog's vaccination certificate (with details of both dog and owner) and proof of rabies vaccination 5. Is there a registration fee? Yes. A fee of Rs 500 is charged for initial registration, with an additional fee applicable for annual renewals. 6. Where can I register my dog? The entire process is handled online. Simply visit the MCD website, complete the required form, and upload the necessary documents. 7. How long does it take to get the licence? If all details are correct and documentation is complete, the licence is usually issued immediately. 8. What happens if I don't get a licence? Keeping a dog without a valid licence is a legal offence. In such cases, owners may be fined. Typically, a warning is issued first, but if a pet is found roaming unattended, the MCD may take it into custody. In some cities like Lucknow, fines can go up to Rs 5,000 for unlicensed dogs. 9. What are the benefits of having a licence? If your dog goes missing or is picked up during an MCD stray dog drive, it will be far easier to reclaim your pet if you hold a valid registration certificate. Without one, you may face delays or complications. 10. What does the Constitution say about animal welfare? Article 51A (G) of the Indian Constitution encourages citizens to show compassion towards all living beings, including stray animals. This includes the right to feed and care for them responsibly.