How to see Mars visit a bright star and the moon this June
This has been a most interesting year to follow Mars. If you've been monitoring the Red Planet since the start of 2025, you have no doubt noted the dramatic change in its brightness as well as the occasional interactions it has had with the moon, bright stars and other celestial objects.
Mars travels a little more than half of its orbit each Earth year, and thus has oppositions (that point in the sky where it appears directly opposite to the sun in the sky) every two years plus about 50 days (its "synodic period," which is also the longest for any known planet). Prior to 2025, the last opposition of Mars was on Dec. 8, 2022; after 2025, the next will come on Feb. 19, 2027. It reached opposition this year on Jan. 16 and two nights earlier, on Jan. 14, a nearly full moon passed directly in front of Mars as seen from much of North America.
Mars is the most Earth-like planet of all known beyond our own, and it passed closest to Earth during the American morning of Jan. 12, just 3.5 days before opposition.
But the 2025 apparition of Mars has been one of the poorer and more distant ones in the planet's 15-to-17-year cycle of oppositions near and far. Just three months after opposition, Mars arrived at aphelion (farthest from the sun) in its eccentric orbit, so we came no closer than 59.7 million miles (96.1 million kilometers) to it last winter — some 5.3 light minutes away. Shining with a yellow-orange hue, it attained its peak brightness, gleaming at magnitude -1.3. That's just a trifle fainter than Sirius, the brightest star in the sky.
Ever since Jan. 12, however, it has been receding from Earth, and consequently it has gradually been getting dimmer. So, we're leaving it behind, and ever since Feb. 24, Mars has been traveling in prograde (eastward) motion — a long, straight line around the sky, becoming steadily farther away and smaller. Still, in spite of its fade-down, it continued to put on an eye-catching show during February and March with the "twin stars" of Gemini, Pollux and Castor as the brightest member of a prominent, albeit temporary, triangle.
And then, on the evening of May 4, Mars made a very close pass near the Beehive Star Cluster (M44), a very pretty sight as viewed through binoculars or a low-power, wide-field telescope.
And during the latter part of June, Mars will again make for a couple of eye-catching shows, teaming up first with a bright star and then, late this month, with Earth's nearest neighbor in space.
TOP TELESCOPE PICK:
Want to see Alcor and the other stars of the Big Dipper? The Celestron NexStar 4SE is ideal for beginners wanting quality, reliable and quick views of celestial objects. For a more in-depth look at our Celestron NexStar 4SE review.
Mars now appears as nothing more than a featureless dot in most telescopes. But on Tuesday evening (June 17), it forms a wonderful naked-eye pairing with the thin, only slightly brighter star Regulus in the constellation of Leo the Lion. Observers in the Americas will see the planet and star 2 degrees apart or less from June 13 through June 20, and one degree or less apart June 15 through June 18.
For viewers, around 40 degrees north latitude, Regulus and Mars are side by side, only 1.5 degrees apart on June 14, and Mars is 45 arc minutes (three quarters of one degree) almost straight above Regulus on June 17. That will be the evening when they are closest together. Neither one is exceptionally bright; Regulus shines at magnitude +1.34 and Mars is at magnitude +1.41. But the fact that they will appear so near to each other and are so closely matched in brightness will make them appear to stand out in the early evening sky.
Look for them around 10 p.m. local daylight time, roughly one-quarter up in the western sky. In addition to their closeness to each other, look for the orange-gold of Mars and blue-white of Regulus to appear intensified by contrast to each other when they are so close together (as seen with the naked eye or binoculars).
On Sunday evening, June 29, a waxing crescent moon, 24% illuminated by the sun, will pass very close to Mars and make for a rather attractive sight, low in the western sky at dusk. The moon, moving around Earth in an easterly direction at roughly its own diameter each hour, will appear to pass just below the orange-gold planet. Even though North America will miss out on seeing the moon pass directly in front of Mars (called an "occultation"), Mars will attract attention as it slowly appears to glide above the moon.
The view of the moon occulting Mars will be restricted to parts of Ecuador and Peru.
After closest approach, the moon will move slowly away from Mars. Locations to the east (or to the right) of a line running roughly from central Texas through central Ontario will be in various stages of twilight at the moment that the moon and planet are closest together (called a "conjunction").
To the west (or to the right) of that line, the sun will be above the horizon when the two are in conjunction, but will still appear relatively close as darkness falls. For places where the two are closest together within an hour or less after sunset, you'll probably initially need binoculars to pick Mars out against the bright twilight sky.
Once the sky has sufficiently darkened, however, Mars will be relatively easy to see. For most locations, the upper limb of the moon will skim to within about 20 arc minutes (one-third of a degree) of Mars. For places across the northern U.S. and Canada, the gap between the two will be a bit larger, while across the southern U.S. and the Caribbean, the gap will be a bit smaller.
The table below (calculated exclusively for Space.com by Joe Rao) provides the specific details for 15 selected cities in the U.S. and Canada.
The table gives civil times (all p.m.) of Mars' closest approach to the edge of the moon's upper limb. Separation between Mars and the moon's upper edge is given in terms of minutes of arc (the apparent width of the moon on June 29 is 31 arc minutes), and the percentage of the apparent width of the moon. A value of 0.48, for example, is equal to 48% of the moon's width (or fractionally, slightly less than one-half).
Examples: from Miami, closest approach between Mars and the moon is at 10:13 p.m. EDT. Separation is 15 arc minutes or 0.48, which is just under one-half of a moon's width from Mars to the upper edge of the moon. From New York, closest approach is at 9:48 p.m. EDT, the separation is listed at 23 arc minutes or 0.74, which means that 74% of the moon's width will separate Mars from the moon's upper edge.
Related Stories:
— How to see the 'Horse and Rider' in the Big Dipper's handle this summer
— Mars: Everything you need to know about the Red Planet
— June's Strawberry Moon treats skywatchers to a rare low-riding show (photos)
After its rendezvous with the moon, Mars will continue to press on to the east. In the weeks and months that follow, Mars will continue to be a fixture in the evening sky, but will continue to recede from Earth and consequently will get fainter, diminishing to the rank of second magnitude.
Passing north of Spica on Sept. 13 and Mercury on Oct. 19, Mars will be getting progressively lower in the sky — more southerly and nearer to the sunset. When it finally fades into the evening twilight glow of early November, it will be on the far side of the sun, some 225 million miles (362 million km) from Earth and just 1/13 as bright as it was in mid-January. It will finally end its run as an evening object when it will be at conjunction with the sun next year, on Jan. 9.
Joe Rao serves as an instructor and guest lecturer at New York's Hayden Planetarium. He writes about astronomy for Natural History magazine, Sky and Telescope and other publications.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
NASA Curiosity rover discovers coral-like flower-shaped rocks on Mars
NASA's Curiosity Rover has taken images of coral-like and flower-shaped rocks on Mars, which have been estimated to be billions of years old. On July 24, the rover sent images of a wind-eroded rock about one inch wide, resembling a piece of a coral reef. NASA has said that the rover has taken many images of rocks of this type. The space agency noted that when liquid water still existed on the planet, it carried dissolved minerals into the cracks of rocks. When the liquid dried, it deposited hardened minerals. 'This common process, seen extensively on Earth, has produced fantastic shapes on Mars, including a flower-shaped rock,' the agency said in a statement. NASA noted that the 'unique shapes' seen today came to be after billions of years of sandblasting. A uniquely shaped rock nicknamed 'Paposo' was also found on July 24. Similarly, another rock shaped like a flower was discovered in 2022. According to NASA, the flower rock is believed to have formed as mineralizing liquids went through conduits in the rock. The Jet Propulsion Laboratory built the rover, which is leading its Mars mission. After travelling for eight months and 352 million miles, the rover landed on Mars in 2012. NASA noted that it was the largest and most capable rover ever sent to Mars at the time. The rover has explored as much as 22 miles of the planet and previously found chemical and mineral evidence of previous habitable environments. According to NASA, the rover is continuing to gather samples and data from a time when Mars may have hosted microbial life. The one-inch rock was found in the Gale Crater, an impact basin. In June, Curiosity took images of a geological structure called 'spiderwebs' because of its pattern of ridges, also indicating that Mars previously had water that has since hardened. 'The images and data being collected are already raising new questions about how the Martian surface was changing billions of years ago,' NASA said in a June statement. 'The Red Planet once had rivers, lakes, and possibly an ocean. Although scientists aren't sure why, its water eventually dried up and the planet transformed into the chilly desert it is today,' the agency added. 'Remarkably, the boxwork patterns show that even in the midst of this drying, water was still present underground, creating changes seen today.' 'Eons of sandblasting by Martian wind wore away the rock but not the minerals, revealing networks of resistant ridges within,' said the agency. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
NASA Curiosity rover discovers coral-like flower-shaped rocks on Mars
NASA's Curiosity Rover has taken images of coral-like and flower-shaped rocks on Mars, which have been estimated to be billions of years old. On July 24, the rover sent images of a wind-eroded rock about one inch wide, resembling a piece of a coral reef. NASA has said that the rover has taken many images of rocks of this type. The space agency noted that when liquid water still existed on the planet, it carried dissolved minerals into the cracks of rocks. When the liquid dried, it deposited hardened minerals. 'This common process, seen extensively on Earth, has produced fantastic shapes on Mars, including a flower-shaped rock,' the agency said in a statement. NASA noted that the 'unique shapes' seen today came to be after billions of years of sandblasting. A uniquely shaped rock nicknamed 'Paposo' was also found on July 24. Similarly, another rock shaped like a flower was discovered in 2022. According to NASA, the flower rock is believed to have formed as mineralizing liquids went through conduits in the rock. The Jet Propulsion Laboratory built the rover, which is leading its Mars mission. After travelling for eight months and 352 million miles, the rover landed on Mars in 2012. NASA noted that it was the largest and most capable rover ever sent to Mars at the time. The rover has explored as much as 22 miles of the planet and previously found chemical and mineral evidence of previous habitable environments. According to NASA, the rover is continuing to gather samples and data from a time when Mars may have hosted microbial life. The one-inch rock was found in the Gale Crater, an impact basin. In June, Curiosity took images of a geological structure called 'spiderwebs' because of its pattern of ridges, also indicating that Mars previously had water that has since hardened. 'The images and data being collected are already raising new questions about how the Martian surface was changing billions of years ago,' NASA said in a June statement. 'The Red Planet once had rivers, lakes, and possibly an ocean. Although scientists aren't sure why, its water eventually dried up and the planet transformed into the chilly desert it is today,' the agency added. 'Remarkably, the boxwork patterns show that even in the midst of this drying, water was still present underground, creating changes seen today.' 'Eons of sandblasting by Martian wind wore away the rock but not the minerals, revealing networks of resistant ridges within,' said the agency.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Astronauts and scientists explain why living in space is almost impossible
Billionaires make it seem that we have all the tech we need to settle on the moon and Mars. But the hard part of living in space is adapting the human body to extraterrestrial conditions. Business Insider talked to astronauts and engineers about the complexities of space habitation. Pop stars are floating in zero-G while billionaires speak of building cities in space and on Mars. This is the wild reality we live in that's supposed to help pave the way for long-term space exploration and habitation. The hardest part of living in space, however, isn't rockets and robots — it's the squishy human body. Until we can fix that or find a feasible workaround, life beyond Earth remains impossible. To understand just how much of a long shot life in space is, Business Insider spoke with astronauts, scientists, and medical professionals, and one guy who paid $30 million to join Russia's space program. Here's what they said. Only 757 people have made it to space — and even fewer have stayed for very long. One of the biggest problems of living in space or on another world is the unknown. We simply aren't certain of what it will do to the human body because no one has lived in space for longer than 14 months at a time, and only 757 people have ever entered space. What we do know, so far, is that it's not the healthiest way to live. Common side effects of long-duration stays in microgravity include muscle and bone loss, decreased blood pressure, and blurred vision. While most of these return to normal once an astronaut is back on Earth, some effects of space radiation — like an increased risk of cancer, cataracts, and damage to the central nervous system — can be permanent. In all probability, the longer a person remains in space, the worse their health becomes. Even brief trips to other worlds like a return trip to Mars, would take two to three years, and "we just don't have a large enough data sample to understand how that would impact human biology," NASA astronaut Frank Rubio, who spent a US record of 371 consecutive days on the International Space Station, told BI. He said it took him six months to return to normal after experiencing "puffy head bird legs" syndrome — astronaut slang to describe how the face puffs up and the legs grow thin as your bodily fluids react to microgravity in space. Another issue is location: There are only three feasible destinations — and all of them suck. Low Earth orbit, or "LEO," is convenient, but it's getting crowded with over 9,000 metric tons of space junk, which raises the risk of a devastating collision that could kill everyone on board an orbital craft. The moon is close but has no breathable air, hardly any atmosphere to protect against deadly space radiation, and nights there can last up to two Earth weeks. Mars has a thicker atmosphere than the moon, but it also lacks breathable air and has toxic dirt and harmful dust storms. "The single thing that differentiates the Earth from every other place in the solar system is that there is free oxygen in the atmosphere," said Mike Shara, astrophysicist at the American Museum of Natural History. "So we can go take a nice breath, and if you were to do that on essentially any other planet, you would die, almost instantly," he said. There may be other planets outside our solar system more similar to Earth, but they're just too far away for current technology. "We're talking decades or at least a decade to get to the outer solar system. And 1,000, 2,000, or 10,000 years to get to the nearest star. Not practical," Shara told BI. Therefore, to survive anywhere beyond Earth, we need to build protective structures to live inside, which comes with its own challenges. Many companies worldwide are exploring how to build livable complexes in space, and on the moon and Mars. Blue Origin and NASA, for example, want to 3D print structures and extract oxygen from lunar soil on the moon. Meanwhile, SpaceX plans to transform Martian air into methane fuel to power colonies and rockets for return journeys to Earth. Space engineers call this ISRU: in-situ resource utilization. However, no one has proven ISRU works at scale in real life. "These are not unsolvable problems. The reason they haven't been solved yet is because it hasn't been tried," said Miguel Gurrea, a graduate student who published a paper in 2022 for the Mars Society outlining the weak points of SpaceX's proposed mission to Mars. Some space visionaries, including Jeff Bezos, say building on another, pre-existing world isn't the best idea. We should just build our own. Some space enthusiasts, including Jeff Bezos, believe the best option isn't the moon or Mars, but a massive rotating habitat built in free space — an idea fleshed out in the '70s by particle physicist Gerard K. O'Neill. Such a structure could generate artificial gravity through centrifugal force, but it would be the most ambitious — and expensive — construction project in human history, possibly taking centuries to realize. "Dr. O'Neill's idea was maybe the moon people will do their thing, and the Mars people will do their thing. But if you want to be able to freely go back and forth to the Earth, you need to be able to grow up in a simulated gravity field," said Rick Tumlinson, space activist and former student of O'Neill. Regardless of location, there's the serious problem that once you leave Earth's shield, space becomes a human flesh barbecue. Astronauts on board the International Space Station absorb about 100x more radiation than people on Earth. Moreover, a person on a 3.5-year round trip to Mars would be exposed to the equivalent of about 16,500 chest X-rays — enough to cause cancer and other long-term health problems. And if you're in the wrong place at the wrong time, a single solar flare could kill your entire crew within hours. Astronauts should prepare to burrow underground and stay there to avoid deadly radiation on the surface of the moon or Mars. The ground provides a natural barrier against radiation. Hence why many fallout shelters are underground. Similarly, astronauts on the moon or Mars should prepare to live underground like "moles or earthworms" to avoid radiation damage, said Dr. James Logan, a former NASA medical officer. Meanwhile, our spacecraft to get between worlds may need to look more like meatballs. Logan says protecting astronauts from radiation might mean ditching long, slim ship designs. Instead? Dense, spherical craft that surround the crew with as much mass as possible. For example, some proposals place the crew's living quarters in the center of a sphere of liquid water that would absorb much of the space radiation, thus protecting the crew within. Then, there's the matter of food. Even if we could build our own structures to safely live off-world, growing food to survive is another challenge entirely. Astronauts grow plants on the ISS under LED lights, but it's not enough to survive on and they rely on food they bring with them from Earth, a luxury that would likely be impossible on Mars. While the moon and Mars have soil, it's nothing like Earth's. Martian soil, for example, contains many toxic compounds. So, you can't simply grow red planet potatoes like Matt Damon. You'd have to process the soil first, likely by flushing it with precious water to wash out the toxic compounds, using energy to bake it at high temperatures, or harnessing engineered bacteria to break the toxins down — all before planting a single seed. There's also no 911 in space. In space, blood doesn't run; it pools in floating blobs. You can't use aerosol anesthetics because in microgravity, leaked gases don't rise or settle — they just linger and spread throughout the cabin. So even a small leak could circulate through the air supply and accidentally sedate or impair the entire crew. Even anesthesia delivered via spinal injection may not flow right without gravity. And on Mars, an emergency signal could take 20 minutes to reach mission control on Earth. That makes surgery in space risky and deeply under-researched. "Most of that research is happening on parabolic flights on pigs," said Kelly Weinersmith, co-author of "A City On Mars," referring to planes that dive bomb to simulate zero-G. "So the answer to when we'll understand this problem better is — when pigs fly." We once built a closed ecosystem on Earth — and it nearly fell apart. In the early 90s, Biosphere 2 tested whether humans could live in a self-contained bubble. Built in the middle of the Arizona desert, it had sun, gravity, backup air — and it still went haywire. Fast-growing microbes in the soil unexpectedly caused oxygen levels to dip and carbon dioxide levels to rise. Crops failed, and the crew split into factions. They made it the full two years inside the sealed ecosystem, but barely. And that was only eight people. Imagine thousands or millions of settlers on Mars. To be fair, NASA has run many self-contained experiments since the 90s — including its HI-SEAS and CHAPEA Mars simulation missions — that did not have the same issues as Biosphere 2. Nobody's had sex in space… we think. Despite a few rodent experiments aboard the ISS, there's never been a successful mammal pregnancy in orbit. And no humans have "done the deed" up there yet, at least not officially. Moreover, trying to start a family off-planet could be unethical because we're unsure how space radiation would affect a growing fetus. It would be as unethical as if people had tried (they didn't) experimenting with human pregnancy in Chernobyl after the nuclear meltdown "just to see what happens," said Zach Weinersmith, co-author of "A City On Mars." Meanwhile, celebrities are already floating in space, albeit very temporarily, for fun. Katy Perry, Star Trek actor William Shatner, and other ultra-wealthy passengers are already taking joyrides to space. Entrepreneur Nik Halik took a similar ride to suborbital space and spent $30 million of his own money to join Russia's space program. "I would gladly walk away, leave Earth, leave everything, and yeah, just be a colonist," said Halik, adding that his life goal is to walk on the moon or Mars. However, riding in a capsule for about 10 minutes, or becoming a backup cosmonaut, isn't the same as building a new civilization. For that, we need a lot more than flower selfies. This story was adapted from Business Insider's video series "The Limit." Watch the full video to see what it might really take to live in space. Read the original article on Business Insider
