logo
Born Into the Business

Born Into the Business

New York Times31-03-2025

David Meylan didn't grow up aspiring to be a watchmaker, but even as a child he knew there was horological history in his DNA.
His relatives, starting with a paternal great-grandmother, include many members of the Audemars and Piguet families, the names behind the venerable watch brand. There are LeCoultres in his family tree, too. And Alfred Meylan, his paternal grandfather, was a watchmaker who worked at LeCoultre and later Smiths, a respected British company.
Five years ago, David Meylan, 40, added his own watch company, Olivier Meylan, to that legacy. As he put it, 'By launching this brand, it keeps the heritage alive and brings it all back to life.'
Mr. Meylan was speaking recently by phone from his office in Exeter, England, about 180 miles southwest of London. Although he spent part of his childhood in Switzerland, where his father owned and ran hotels, Mr. Meylan was born in Watford, a short drive from the center of the English capital, long after his Swiss watchmaker grandfather moved to England in the early 1930s.
Olivier Meylan watches range from a sleek 40-millimeter quartz-powered timepiece priced at 269 British pounds, or $347, to a 42-millimeter automatic moonphase chronograph movement for £2,295, or $2,958, both with Swiss movements. The brand's watches are stainless steel; many are covered in black, blanketed with a coating known as P.V.D., or covered in materials like yellow or rose gold.
The designs are quite classic (the black versions of one style, the Players Edition, look noticeably Royal Oak-esque with a similar screw design around the dial). The overall pricing is strategic, intended to fill what Mr. Meylan called 'a gap in the market for a brand with genuine heritage that is accessible.'
The combination has been noticed by the British watch community.
'They hit that sweet spot that everyone wants in a microbrand of accessibility and value at the same time, so not just a low price tag but getting some decent stuff for that, like the Swiss movements,' Sam Kessler, the editor of the print edition of the British horological publication Oracle Time, said by phone.
In March, Olivier Meylan introduced a special edition of its Players Edition watch for British Watchmakers' Day, a gathering in London of British-owned horological brands. Available in a limited edition of five pieces, the £1,349 watch features a Union Jack image on its dial.
In February, the brand introduced a watch that was designed with an Exeter-based artist, Emma Gibbons. It's the latest of several collaborations with people with local connections: On earlier timepieces, the brand partnered with the local artists Laura Wall and LP Edits and Jack Nowell, a rugby player who once carried the ball for the Exeter Chiefs, the city's team.
The company's connection with its hometown is an inherent part of its identity. As Mr. Meylan put it, 'We've got a Swiss name and heritage, but we are very much based in Exeter and launched in Exeter and designed down in Exeter.'
'It's a bit like me really,' he said. 'I'm half Swiss, half English. I have dual nationality, and the brand is in my eyes the same.'
Olivier Meylan is sold mostly online but it has vitrines in two hotels that reflect that identity: Lympstone Manor, a short drive from the brand's headquarters, and the Gstaad Palace, near Mr. Meylan's Swiss childhood home. Although Mr. Meylan won't share the brand's revenue, he said sales had risen nearly 30 percent in 2024 compared with 2023.
Before introducing his watch brand, Mr. Meylan worked in marketing and nightclub promotion, including projects for an Exeter-based club called, appropriately enough, Timepiece. In 2014, through FridayFlava, the events company he founded, he began working with entertainers to help book appearances and endorsements. (He's still involved with that company.) But he began to think about starting a watch brand, and within a year he was sketching timepieces and researching production.
The first Olivier Meylan watch, produced with a personal investment of £20,000, was introduced in 2020. The model, which is still available in various iterations, is called the Richemont — named not for the company that owns labels like Jaeger-LeCoultre, Mr. Meylan said, but for a Swiss hotel his father once owned.
The name of the brand itself is a nod to Mr. Meylan's elder of two sons Oliver. Other models recognize family, too, like the GM19 and G0811 — in honor of Mr. Meylan's younger son George, who was born Nov. 8, 2019 — and the A-07, a style that's planned to be released later this year, in honor of Alfred Meylan, who was born in 1907.
Although Mr. Meylan is clearly proud of his family, his watches are marketed more for their merits than their inherited provenance. 'The heritage is a huge factor, and I want to bring more of it into the brand as we grow,' he said, 'but I didn't want to hang the whole brand on that.'
Such positioning has impressed watch industry insiders.
'Watch first, story second is absolutely the right focus for him,' said Alistair Audsley, chief executive of the Alliance of British Watch and Clock Makers, which runs British Watchmakers' Day. (Mr. Meylan has been a member of the organization since January 2024.)
'It's a wise approach,' Mr. Audsley said, 'because ultimately you're judged by the quality of your watches.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

North missed £140bn of transport investment over last government, research finds
North missed £140bn of transport investment over last government, research finds

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

North missed £140bn of transport investment over last government, research finds

The North of England would have received an extra £140 billion in transport investment under the previous government if funding levels had been the same as in London, research has claimed. Independent analysis by think tank the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) looked at Treasury figures between 2009/10 and 2022/23, during which time the Conservatives were in power. It reached the figure, which it said was enough to build seven Elizabeth Lines, by considering the amount of spending per person across the different English regions over that period. While England as a whole saw £592 spent per person each year, London received double that amount with £1,183 spent per person, the IPPR said. The entire North region saw £486 spent per person, with the North East and North West seeing £430 and £540 spent per person respectively. This amounted to £140 billion of missed investment for the North, more than the entire £83 billion estimate of capital spending on transport in the region since 1999/2000, according to the analysis. The region with the lowest amount of investment over the period was the East Midlands with just £355 spent per person. Among the most divisive transport investment projects for the previous government was the HS2 rail project, which was axed north of Birmingham in October 2023. Then-prime minister Rishi Sunak pledged to 'reinvest every single penny, £36 billion, in hundreds of new transport projects in the North and the Midlands', including improvements to road, rail and bus schemes. Earlier this week, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced a £15.6 billion package for mayoral authorities to use on public transport projects across the North and Midlands ahead of the spending review. It is expected to include funding to extend the metros in Tyne and Wear, Greater Manchester and the West Midlands, along with a renewed tram network in South Yorkshire and a new mass transit system in West Yorkshire. Marcus Johns, senior research fellow at IPPR North, said: 'Today's figures are concrete proof that promises made to the North over the last decade were hollow. It was a decade of deceit. 'We are 124 years on from the end of Queen Victoria's reign, yet the North is still running on infrastructure built during her rein – while our transport chasm widens. 'This isn't London bashing – Londoners absolutely deserve investment. But £1,182 per person for London and £486 for northerners? The numbers don't lie – this isn't right. 'This Government have begun to restore fairness with their big bet on transport cash for city leaders. 'They should continue on this journey to close this investment gap in the upcoming spending review and decades ahead.' Former Treasury minister Lord Jim O'Neill said: 'Good governance requires the guts to take a long-term approach, not just quick fixes. So the Chancellor is right in her focus on the UK's long-standing supply-side weaknesses – namely our woeful productivity and weak private and public investment. 'Backing major infrastructure is the right call, and this spending review is the right time for the Chancellor to place a big bet on northern growth and begin to close this investment chasm. 'But it's going to take more than commitments alone – she'll need to set out a transparent framework for delivery.'

‘Significant challenges' in use of AI within UK screen sector
‘Significant challenges' in use of AI within UK screen sector

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

‘Significant challenges' in use of AI within UK screen sector

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) within the UK screen sector raises 'significant legal, ethical, and practical challenges' such as the use of copyrighted material being used without the permission of the rights holders, a report has warned. Other issues highlighted by the British Film Institute (BFI) report include the safeguarding of human creative control, the fear of jobs being lost as positions are replaced through the use of AI, and investment in training in new skills. High energy consumption and carbon emissions, and the risks to creative content around biased data, are also described as being of concern. The report, which has been carried out in partnership with CoSTAR universities Goldsmiths, Loughborough and Edinburgh, analyses how the screen sector is using and experimenting with rapidly evolving generative AI technologies. It warned that the 'primary issue' was the use of copyrighted material – such as hundreds of thousands of film and TV scripts – in the training of generative AI models, without payment or the permission of rights-holders. 'This practice threatens the fundamental economics of the screen sector if it devalues intellectual property creation and squeezes out original creators,' the report said. But it added that the UK's strong foundation in creative technology – as it is home to more than 13,000 creative technology companies – means that the UK screen sector is well positioned to adapt to the technological shift. The report – titled AI in the Screen Sector: Perspectives and Paths Forward – said generative AI promises to democratise and revolutionise the industry, with the BBC, for example, piloting AI initiatives. Meanwhile, projects such as the Charismatic consortium, which is backed by Channel 4 and Aardman Animations, aim to make AI tools accessible to creators regardless of their budget or experience. It said this could empower a new wave of British creators to produce high-quality content with modest resources, though concerns about copyright and ethical use remain significant barriers to full adoption. The report sets out nine key recommendations it suggests should be addressed within the next three years to enable the UK screen sector to thrive in using AI. These include establishing the UK as a world-leading market of IP licensing for AI training, and embedding sustainability standards to reduce AI's carbon footprint. It also calls for structures and interventions to pool knowledge, develop workforce skills and target investments in the UK's creative technology sector, while it urges support for independent creators through accessible tools, funding and ethical AI products. The BFI's director of research and innovation, Rishi Coupland, said: 'AI has long been an established part of the screen sector's creative toolkit, most recently seen in the post-production of the Oscar-winning The Brutalist, and its rapid advancement is attracting multimillion investments in technology innovator applications. 'However, our report comes at a critical time and shows how generative AI presents an inflection point for the sector and, as a sector, we need to act quickly on a number of key strategic fronts. 'Whilst it offers significant opportunities for the screen sector such as speeding up production workflows, democratising content creation and empowering new voices, it could also erode traditional business models, displace skilled workers, and undermine public trust in screen content. 'The report's recommendations provide a roadmap to how we can ensure that the UK's world-leading film, TV, video games and VFX industries continue to thrive by making best use of AI technologies to bring their creativity, innovations and storytelling to screens around the globe.' Professor Jonny Freeman, director of CoSTAR Foresight Lab, said: 'This latest CoSTAR Foresight Lab report, prepared by the BFI, navigates the complex landscape of AI in the screen sector by carefully weighing both its transformative opportunities and the significant challenges it presents. 'The report acknowledges that while AI offers powerful tools to enhance creativity, efficiency, and competitiveness across every stage of the production workflow – from script development and pre-production planning, through on-set production, to post-production and distribution – it also raises urgent questions around skills, workforce adaptation, ethics, and sector sustainability.' CoSTAR is a £75.6 million national network of laboratories that are developing new technology to maintain the UK's world-leading position in gaming, TV, film, performance, and digital entertainment. Last month stars including Sir Elton John, Sir Paul McCartney and Sir Ian McKellen, wrote a joint letter to Sir Keir Starmer, urging the Prime Minister to introduce safeguards against work being plundered for free. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Gerry Adams's lawyer to pursue chatbots for libel
Gerry Adams's lawyer to pursue chatbots for libel

Yahoo

time10 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Gerry Adams's lawyer to pursue chatbots for libel

The high-profile media lawyer who represented Gerry Adams in his libel trial against the BBC is now preparing to sue the world's most powerful AI chatbots for defamation. As one of the most prominent libel lawyers in the UK, Paul Tweed said that artificial intelligence was the 'new battleground' in trying to prevent misinformation about his clients from being spread online. Mr Tweed is turning his attention to tech after he recently helped the former Sinn Fein leader secure a €100,000 (£84,000) payout over a BBC documentary that falsely claimed he sanctioned the murder of a British spy. The Belfast-based solicitor said he was already building a test case against Meta that could trigger a flurry of similar lawsuits, as he claims to have exposed falsehoods shared by chatbots on Facebook and Instagram. It is not the first time tech giants have been sued for defamation over questionable responses spewed out by their chatbots. Robby Starbuck, the US activist known for targeting diversity schemes at major companies, has sued Meta for defamation alleging that its AI chatbot spread a number of false claims about him, including that he took part in the Capitol riots. A Norwegian man also filed a complaint against OpenAI after its ChatGPT software incorrectly stated that he had killed two of his sons and been jailed for 21 years. Mr Tweed, who has represented celebrities such as Johnny Depp, Harrison Ford and Jennifer Lopez, said: 'My pet subject is generative AI and the consequences of them repeating or regurgitating disinformation and misinformation.' He believes statements put out by AI chatbots fall outside the protections afforded to social media companies, which have traditionally seen them avoid liability for libel. If successful, Mr Tweed will expose social media companies that have previously argued they should not be responsible for claims made on their platforms because they are technology companies rather than traditional publishers. Mr Tweed said: 'I've been liaising with a number of well-known legal professors on both sides of the Atlantic and they agree that there's a very strong argument that generative AI will fall outside the legislative protections.' The lawyer said that chatbots are actually creating new content, meaning they should be considered publishers. He said that the decision by many tech giants to move their headquarters to Ireland for lower tax rates had also opened them up to being sued in Dublin's high courts, where libel cases are typically decided by a jury. This setup is often seen as more favourable to claimants, which Mr Tweed himself says has fuelled a wave of 'libel tourism' in Ireland. He also said Dublin's high courts are attractive as a lower price option compared to London, where he said the costs of filing libel claims are 'eye-watering'. He said: 'I think it's absurd now, the level of costs that are being claimed. The libel courts in London are becoming very, very expensive and highly risky now. The moment you issue your claim form, the costs go into the stratosphere. 'It's not in anyone's interest for people to be deprived of access to justice. It will get to the point where nobody sues for libel unless you're a billionaire.' Meta was contacted for comment. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store