Singapore opposition leader, found guilty of lying to parliament, could face electoral ban
Singapore's opposition leader has been convicted of lying to parliament while helping a fellow party member to cover up a false witness account, in a case that could disqualify him from running in upcoming national elections.
Pritam Singh, 48, secretary-general of the Workers' Party, was found guilty on Monday on two counts of lying to a parliamentary committee that was investigating a fellow MP.
The conviction is a blow to the south-east Asian nation's struggling political opposition, which is seeking to challenge the overwhelming dominance of the ruling People's Action Party (PAP) in elections expected within months.
The PAP has ruled the wealthy city-state since 1959.
Singh's sentence could have a devastating effect as it will determine whether the MP could stand in general elections to be held before November.
Singh had pleaded not guilty and his sentencing was due later on Monday.
Under the constitution, a person fined a minimum of Sg$10,000 ($7,400) or jailed for at least one year, is disqualified from running for election or holding a parliamentary seat for five years.
Singh faces a maximum sentence of three years' behind bars and a fine of up to Sg$7,000 on each charge.
The Attorney-General's Chambers had previously said the prosecution will seek a fine for each charge.
Raeesah Khan who resigned from the legislature following the scandal, had admitted to making up a story she told in parliament about a female rape victim she accompanied to make a police report.
The former MP confessed that she lied when telling parliament in 2021 that a police officer supposedly made 'insensitive comments' about the way the alleged victim was dressed and that she had drunk alcohol.
But home affairs minister K. Shanmugam had said there was no record in the police files of such an incident and Khan eventually admitted to lying about the story.
Singh was then accused of lying to the parliamentary committee investigating Khan.
He allegedly told the committee that he was not aware that Khan had made up the story about the rape victim, in an apparent attempt to downplay his own responsibility as party leader, court documents said.
In the 2020 general elections, the PAP won 83 of the 93 seats at stake to retain its dominance.
But the main opposition Workers' Party stole the show when it captured 10 seats, four more than previously held, in its strongest performance yet since independence in 1965.
Its leaders have said they hope to further increase the party's numbers in parliament in the upcoming elections which will be new premier Lawrence Wong's first major political test.
With Reuters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
a day ago
- South Wales Argus
Race Council Cymru on racial justice five years after Newport protest
Five years ago today, on the 11th of June 2020, more than a thousand people gathered in Newport to support the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement, joining the millions worldwide standing against racial inequality. At the time, the Black Lives Matter movement, whilst not a new movement, had gained a substantial amount of momentum internationally following the death of George Floyd in the US. Race Council Cymru (RCC), work with key organisations in Wales to combat racial inequality, recall that point in time as a turning point, not only around the world but within Wales. 'People took to the streets, to screens, to classrooms, and to their hearts to say: enough is enough,' they explained. In Newport, a city known for its cultural diversity, people came together in protest against racial inequality, raising placards, kneeling in silence, and pledging to be part of the change. At the time, the world was amid a global pandemic, and there were concerns surrounding public gatherings. Nevertheless, supporters of the movement left the safety of their homes anyway, sending a powerful message. Various protests took place throughout Wales, sparking important conversations about racism, about the systems we live under and about racial inequality in Wales. In the five years since, Wales has seen many significant changes which seek to ensure racial equality. In 2022, the Welsh Government launched an Anti-Racist Wales Action Plan, with the ambition of creating an anti-racist nation by the year 2030. Wales is also said to be the first UK nation to make the teaching of Black, Asian, and minority ethnic histories mandatory in schools, recognising that Black history is Welsh history. Nevertheless, Race Council Cymru highlights that positive progress has not erased racial inequality in Wales. 'There is progress. But there is also pain. While the conversation around race has evolved, racism has not disappeared,' they said. 'Hate crime in Wales remains a serious concern,' they added. Reminding the public to recognise the human being behind each crime statistic. As the years pass since the BLM protests, organisations such as Race Council Cymru continue to push for racial equality in Wales. 'We cannot and will not allow racism to go unchallenged. Not in our streets. Not in our institutions. Not in our silence,' they declared. Race Council Cymru invited everyone to take a stand, saying: 'Use your voice. Support our work. Speak up when you see injustice. Teach your children about the value of every human life.' 'Let's build a Wales where every person, regardless of race, background or belief, feels safe, respected, and heard,' they said.
Fashion United
2 days ago
- Fashion United
French Senate to vote on regulating fast fashion
The French Senate is due to vote Tuesday on a bill to regulate the fast fashion industry, by sanctioning companies and banning advertisements. The bill is targeted at Chinese-founded e-commerce giant Shein, which has a reputation for selling lower quality clothes at a very low price. Easy to order and replace, fast fashion items are exported to France on a large scale, causing pollution and saturating markets. Adopted by the lower house National Assembly in March 2024, the bill will be voted on by the Senate later on Tuesday and is expected to pass, with backing from the government and widespread support in the chamber. The vote is not the final legislative hurdle: a joint committee of senators and lower house deputies is expected to meet from September to produce a joint text, prior to the final adoption of the law. The text plans to "reduce the environmental impact of the textile industry", said Anne-Cecile Violland, the centre-right member of parliament who proposed the bill. Fast fashion is a growing market in France and between 2010 and 2023, the value of advertised products grew from 2.3 billion euros to 3.2 billion euros. Around 48 clothing items per person are released into the French market each year, and 35 are thrown away every second in the country, according to the state environmental agency Ademe. Fast fashion poses a "triple threat", said the minister for ecological transition, Agnes Pannier-Runacher. "It promotes overconsumption, causes ecological disaster and threatens our businesses," she said. Slamming an "invasion" of products that "do not last", the minister expressed hope it would help change things in Europe. Once adopted in France, the European Commission will be notified to ensure it complies with European law according to Pannier-Runacher. Targeting fast fashion The Senate, dominated by the right, modified the bill to target "ultra" fast fashion companies, such as Asian websites Shein ou Temu. The Senate's amendments plan to leave out French and European brands that may be affected by the bill, such as Zara, H&M and Kiabi. The fashion giants will still be obliged to notify their customers about the environmental impact of their products, according to the new bill. "I have no intention of making French brands that contribute to our country's economic vitality pay a single euro," said rapporteur Sylvie Valente Le Hir, member of the right-wing The Republicans party. The bill will impose stricter sanctions on fast fashion companies by scoring their "environmental communication". This "eco-score" will affect all fast fashion companies, Pannier-Runacher said. Those with the lowest scores will be taxed by the government up to 5 euros per product in 2025 and up to 10 euros by 2030. This tax cannot go beyond 50 percent of the price of the original product. Advertisement ban The bill would impose sanctions on influencers who promote such products and ban fast fashion advertisements. The regulation of the fast fashion industry will only succeed with a "collective effort", and not by targeting "a single actor," Shein spokesperson Quentin Ruffat told RTL radio on Monday. According to Ruffat, the law will add "a tax of 10 euros per sold item of clothing by 2030" and "impact the purchasing power" of French people. Environmental organisations are also worried that the law may be misinterpreted. Debates may amount to an interesting framework which still lacks substance, according to Green Senator Jacques Fernique. On Monday, the Textiles Industry Union (UIT) recognised the bill as "a first step" and hoped for its "rapid adoption ... even if the text does not entirely fit our expectations".(AFP)
Daily Mirror
2 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Terror attack hero who lost job after defending people wins 'substantial' payout
Gareth Watkins, 56, sued the MoJ and Fishmongers' Hall for £200,000 over the 2019 attack. The hero launched himself against a door to stop knifeman Usman Khan's deadly rampage A security guard who fought to protect victims of the London Bridge terror attack has won a "substantial" out-of-court payout from the Ministry of Justice. Gareth Watkins, 56, sued the MoJ and Fishmongers' Hall for £200,000 over the 2019 attack. The hero launched himself against a door to stop knifeman Usman Khan's deadly rampage. He lost his job and was left with PTSD from the atrocity, which killed Jack Merritt, 25 and Saskia Jones, 23. RAF veteran Mr Watkins shielded wounded Jack and then grabbed a fire extinguisher and followed Khan outside to save passers-by. The attack took place at a prisoner rehabilitation conference called Learning Together, part of a programme which works with the MoJ. Khan was a convicted terrorist and had served eight years of a 16-year sentence for plotting to bomb Parliament and the London Stock Exchange. Mr Watkins launched a civil claim against the MoJ and Fishmongers' Hall in 2023. He had spent 18 years working as a security guard at the venue. He was looking for more than £200,000 in damages and the Mirror can reveal that it has been settled out of court. The MoJ said it had settled this claim without an admission of liability. A source said: 'Gareth had his life hugely impacted by the attack. He felt taking legal action was the right option. The London Bridge attack raised a lot of questions for a lot of different organisations. "Things like prisoner reform, protection of the public and security were all placed in the spotlight and that's what this case did as well.' It is not known how much the claim was settled for and if Fishmongers' Hall also settled. In papers lodged at London's High Court papers, Mr Watkins' lawyers claimed Khan's trip to London was not properly risk-assessed. Khan had been jailed in 2012 for his role in a plot to bomb the London Stock Exchange. But 11 months after his release he travelled to an offender rehabilitation event in London in November 2019, carrying a bag of knives. Khan was not searched on arrival and went on to kill Jack and Saskia. Three others were wounded. Lawyers say the failures left Mr Watkins suffering 'pain, injury, loss and damage'. Mr Watkins gave evidence at the inquest into the attack and described the moments before the bloodbath and during it. He said: "A few minutes after coming back in he saw Merritt running towards me. I noticed he was bleeding through his white shirt. There appeared to be a bad injury in the centre of his chest. I thought this was very serious. Jack ran towards the reception office. I vividly remember a pleading look on his face. He then lay down. I looked out of the office and saw the attacker.' He described Khan as 5ft 6ins to 5ft 7ins tall with a beard and a baseball cap. He said: "It seemed as though he was chasing Jack and would go for anyone he saw. I remember the knives going up and down in his hands as he was running. They looked like large kitchen knives. The attacker ran towards the reception office so I immediately closed the door and held it closed with my shoulder. "As I was leaning against the door, I could still see outside. I could see the attacker was right against the door trying to get in. I looked through the door glass and saw the attacker moved three or four feet away. I saw bits of furniture flying through the air." He saw Khan point one of the knives at his colleague's chest and added: "The attacker said, 'Let me out.' I grabbed a fire extinguisher to protect myself and yelled a warning to everyone to get away. People looked bewildered as though they did not know what was going on." He went back in to find Izzie Rowbotham lying in a pool of blood in the foetal position with a man kneeling at her side. He said: "I took a table cloth. I could see deep wounds, I could see the flesh and fatty tissue. I apologised for pressing so hard. A woman came over said the woman's name and I heard her murmur back."
