logo
Hegseth: US will stand by Indo-Pacific allies against ‘imminent' China threat

Hegseth: US will stand by Indo-Pacific allies against ‘imminent' China threat

Glasgow Times5 days ago

He said Washington will bolster its defences overseas to counter what the Pentagon sees as rapidly developing threats by Beijing, particularly in its aggressive stance towards Taiwan.
China has conducted numerous exercises to test what a blockade would look like of the self-governing island, which Beijing claims as its own and the US has pledged to defend.
China's army 'is rehearsing for the real deal', Mr Hegseth said in a keynote speech at a security conference in Singapore.
'We are not going to sugarcoat it — the threat China poses is real. And it could be imminent.'
China has a stated goal of having its military have the capability to take Taiwan by force if necessary by 2027, a deadline that is seen by experts as more of an aspirational goal than a hard war deadline.
But China also has built sophisticated man-made islands in the South China Sea to support new military outposts and developed highly advanced hypersonic and space capabilities, which are driving the US to create its own space-based Golden Dome missile defences.
Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue, a global security conference hosted by the International Institute for Security Studies, Mr Hegseth said China is no longer just building up its military forces to take Taiwan, it's 'actively training for it, every day'.
Mr Hegseth repeated a pledge made by previous administrations to bolster US military capabilities in the Indo-Pacific (Anupam Nath/AP)
Mr Hegseth also called out China for its ambitions in Latin America, particularly its efforts to increase its influence over the Panama Canal.
He urged countries in the region to increase defence spending to levels similar to the 5% of their gross domestic product European nations are now pressed to contribute.
'We must all do our part,' Mr Hegseth said.
He also repeated a pledge made by previous administrations to bolster US military capabilities in the Indo-Pacific to provide a more robust deterrent.
While both the Obama and Biden administrations had also committed to pivoting to the Pacific and established new military agreements throughout the region, a full shift has never been realised.
Instead, US military resources from the Indo-Pacific have been regularly pulled to support military needs in the Middle East and Europe, especially since the wars in Ukraine and Gaza.
In the first few months of president Donald Trump's second term, that has also been the case.
In the last few months the Trump administration has taken a Patriot missile defence battalion out of the Indo-Pacific in order to send it to the Middle East, a massive logistical operation that required more than 73 military cargo aircraft flights, and sent Coast Guard ships back to the US to help defend the US-Mexico border.
Mr Hegseth was asked why the US pulled those resources if the Indo-Pacific is the priority theatre for the US.
He did not directly answer but said the shift of resources was necessary to defend against Houthi missile attacks launched from Yemen, and to bolster protections against illegal immigration into the US.
At the same time, he stressed the need for American allies and partners to step up their own defence spending and preparations, saying the US was not interested in going it alone.
'Ultimately a strong, resolute and capable network of allies and partners is our key strategic advantage,' he said.
'China envies what we have together, and it sees what we can collectively bring to bear on defence, but it's up to all of us to ensure that we live up to that potential by investing.'
The Indo-Pacific nations caught in between have tried to balance relations with both the US and China over the years.
Beijing is the primary trading partner for many, but is also feared as a regional bully, in part due to its increasingly aggressive claims on natural resources such as critical fisheries.
Mr Hegseth cautioned that playing both sides, seeking US military support and Chinese economic support, carries risk.
'Economic dependence on China only deepens their malign influence and complicates our defense decision space during times of tension,' Mr Hegseth said.
China usually sends its own defence minister to this conference, but Dong Jun did not attend this year in a snub to the US and the erratic tariff war Mr Trump has ignited with Beijing, something the US delegation said it intended to capitalise on.
'We are here this morning. And somebody else isn't,' Mr Hegseth said.
Mr Hegseth was asked by a member of the Chinese delegation, made up of lower level officers from the National Defence University, how committed it would be to regional alliances. In some, China has a more dominant influence.
Mr Hegseth said the US would be open to engaging with any countries willing to work with it.
'We are not going to look only inside the confines of how previous administrations looked at this region,' he said.
'We're opening our arms to countries across the spectrum — traditional allies, non-traditional allies.'
Mr Hegseth said committing US support for Indo-Pacific nations would not require local governments to align with the West on cultural or climate issues.
It is not clear if the US can or wants to supplant China as the region's primary economic driver. But Mr Hegseth's push follows Mr Trump's visit to the Middle East, which resulted in billions of dollars in new defence agreements.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says Putin told him Russia will respond to Ukrainian attack on airfields
Trump says Putin told him Russia will respond to Ukrainian attack on airfields

Western Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Western Telegraph

Trump says Putin told him Russia will respond to Ukrainian attack on airfields

The US president said in a social media post that 'it was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate peace.' The call that lasted for an hour and 15 minutes was Mr Trump's first known with Mr Putin since May 19. Satellite images show, from top, the Belaya Air Base before a Ukrainian drone attack in the Irkutsk region of eastern Siberia in Russia, and the damage afterwards (Maxar Technologies via AP) Mr Trump said he and Mr Putin also discussed Iran's nuclear programme. Ukraine's Security Service gave more details on Wednesday about its weekend drone strike on Russian air bases, which it claimed destroyed or damaged 41 Russian aircraft, including strategic bombers. The agency claimed the planes struck included A-50, Tu-95, Tu-22, Tu-160, An-12, and Il-78 aircraft, adding that artificial intelligence helped guide the drones thousands of kilometres from Ukraine. It also said it set off an explosion on Tuesday on the seabed beneath the Kerch Bridge, a vital transport link between Russia and illegally annexed Crimea, claiming it caused damage to the structure. But Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said on Wednesday that there was no damage. Russia's Defence Ministry said on Wednesday that its troops have taken control of another village in Ukraine's northern Sumy region, on the border with Russia. Mr Putin announced on May 22 that Russian troops aim to create a buffer zone that might help prevent Ukrainian cross-border attacks. Since then, Russia's Ministry of Defence claims its forces have taken control of nine Sumy villages.

England exodus exposes lack of Plan B, writes TARA ANSON-WALSH, as Sarina Wiegman faces mounting crisis ahead of Euros title defence
England exodus exposes lack of Plan B, writes TARA ANSON-WALSH, as Sarina Wiegman faces mounting crisis ahead of Euros title defence

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

England exodus exposes lack of Plan B, writes TARA ANSON-WALSH, as Sarina Wiegman faces mounting crisis ahead of Euros title defence

Three Lionesses have withdrawn their names from this summer's Euros hat, leaving Sarina Wiegman facing a mounting crisis. Less than 24 hours after Fran Kirby announced her retirement from international football following England 's 2-1 defeat to Spain, centre-back Millie Bright has also made herself unavailable for selection. Bright – who captained England during the 2023 World Cup campaign – said she was 'right now not able to give 100 per cent mentally or physically' for England's title defence in Switzerland. She follows Earps, who had fallen down Wiegman's pecking order and was likely to be starting from the bench, and Kirby, who had been told by the Dutch coach she wasn't going to make the Euros squad, out of the door. But this is not simply a crisis of who's left to start the games. Wiegman was clearly already heading in a different direction, prompting Kirby and Earps to call it a day. Bright will be more sorely missed in that respect, as she was destined to partner Leah Williamson at the heart of the Lionesses' defence this summer. However, there is a more-than-able deputy in Alex Greenwood, who can easily slot into the back three alongside Williamson and Jess Carter. What now threatens to shatter the nation's hopes of a second consecutive major European title is who is there to pick up the pieces if injury rules out another player. Wiegman refused to answer whether she asked Kirby to be on standby for the Euros, citing the question 'irrelevant', but surely having someone of the Brighton forward's stature around, with 77 caps to her name and four major tournament appearances, is relevant – and better than throwing an uncapped player in at the deep end? Over the years, Wiegman has become increasingly dependent on a small inner circle of trusted players – particularly veterans like Lucy Bronze, Keira Walsh and Georgia Stanway. Given they have 65 major trophies between them, that is understandable. And in Tuesday night's clash with Spain, Wiegman fielded a side that, with just four changes, closely resembled the one that contested the World Cup final in Sydney nearly two years ago. There is nothing inherently wrong with consistency. But what happens when that dependable core begins to fray? Right now, it appears there isn't a Plan B. Wiegman has been reluctant to refresh her ranks since taking charge, and that is proving increasingly worrying – not only for the short-term aims of England's title defence this summer, but also for the long-term health of the squad. Walsh's knee injury in the group stage of the World Cup and the subsequent panic should have been a warning sign. England rallied then, but it was a glimpse into a squad overly dependent on certain individuals. Yet since that final, Walsh has played more minutes than any other Lioness. And with the current set of players, there is no natural defensive midfielder ready to deputise should she fall again. There are further gaps in experience all over the pitch. In the goalkeeping department, Hannah Hampton is now the only capped shot-stopper in the squad. Lucy Bronze, meanwhile, is the only recognised right-back. Wiegman has suggested she sees Maya Le Tissier providing cover there, and yet the Manchester United captain has almost exclusively played as a centre-back since her top-flight debut six-and-a-half years ago. And the lack of experience behind Wiegman's trusted XI was laid bare against the world champions on Tuesday night when Bronze and Stanway were substituted to manage loads. Carter – out of position at right-back – and debutant Missy-Bo Kearns stepped in. England looked quickly devoid of control and conceded twice. Of course, against most teams a single gap will not necessarily be fatal. As it wasn't against Portugal, when Alessia Russo's injury forced Wiegman to start 21-year-old Aggie Beever-Jones – the Chelsea striker making the most of the opportunity to announce herself on the world stage with a hat-trick on her Wembley debut. Equally, when you're up against a better side when the stakes are at their highest, getting on the wrong end of these fine margins can ultimately send you home. Wiegman has taken this team to unprecedented heights, but the road ahead is demanding evolution. Get it wrong, and another major title could end up being just a pipe dream.

How slaughter and starvation of Gaza's children are creating a sinister new world order
How slaughter and starvation of Gaza's children are creating a sinister new world order

Scotsman

timean hour ago

  • Scotsman

How slaughter and starvation of Gaza's children are creating a sinister new world order

Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The war of words between European and Canadian political leaders and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu provides a timely reminder of how any semblance of a positive vision for global governance continues to die in a world of division, anger, fear, and hate. October 7, 2023 is a date that will live in infamy. Israel has the right to defend itself and deal with Hamas following its attacks on that day. But Israel as a country is unfortunately hurtling towards pariah status in a world tiring of Netanyahu's apparent hatred of Palestinians and his desire to obliterate Gaza, annex the West Bank and destroy any prospects of a two-state solution. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Two other factors are placing Netanyahu on the wrong side of history. His political survival now depends on extending court proceedings about corruption charges for as long as possible and the support of far-right, anti-Arab, ultranationalists in his government. A girl appears to be in distress after receiving food at Jabalia refugee camp, Gaza City, earlier this month (Picture: Abood Abusalama) | Middle East Images/AFP via Getty The real pariah To suggest that Keir Starmer, Canada's Mark Carney and France's Emmanuel Macron, who called for Israel to halt its latest offensive, are in any way responsible for the tragic and brutal murders of two Israeli embassy staff in Washington DC and accuse them of emboldening Hamas speaks volumes about this desperate Prime Minister. Netanyahu is the real pariah in this story. Israel is a democracy, a friend and an ally. But Netanyahu is using claims of antisemitism – a real and unacceptable problem – as a shield to defend his government's indefensible actions. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad People are angry and sickened by the images of destruction and death being shown nightly on TV screens worldwide, but downplayed in Israel. This is a moral issue. Netanyahu should feel emotionally challenged by emaciated children and babies being starved to death in Gaza, a young girl smashed to smithereens in her wheelchair, hospitals and medical staff bombed and denied vital medicines, humanitarian aid halted, innocents slaughtered, whole families wiped out and homes turned to rubble, while the West Bank is terrorised by Israeli settlers. And yet on Netanyahu's watch, it goes on and on. Deaths are dismissed by the Israel Defence Force as 'targeted strikes'. Within the dark recesses of Netanyahu's mind, moral bankruptcy is imperilling his impressive country – and it is spreading. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Starvation of children deemed 'desirable' In a remarkable and distressing meeting in the Israeli parliament, its Foreign Affairs and Defence Sub-committee discussed Gaza. Israeli's left-leaning Haaretz newspaper reported the proceedings in an article headlined, 'Knesset debate reveals not everyone thinks starving Gazan children is a bad thing'. Giving evidence, Dr Sharon Shaul, of Israeli humanitarian organisation Natan, said she thought that 'even everyone sitting around this table doesn't want a suffering child to be unable to receive painkillers or minimal medical treatment'. This sparked a barrage of protest from MPs. 'I'm not sure you're speaking for us when you say we want to treat every child and every woman,' said one. 'You are the sickest doctor I've ever seen,' said another. Haaretz journalist Nir Hasson wrote that 'many around the table indeed thought that the starvation and torment of Gazan children is not only legitimate but even desirable'. Even more alarming was the comment of Moshe Saada, a Likud party MP and ally of Netanyahu, who told Israel's Channel 14 he was "interested" in starving an entire nation. "Yes, I'll starve Gazans, yes, this is our obligation,' he said. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The failure of the League of Nations How should the world respond? History provides little in the way of hope. The League of Nations was established in 1920, following the First World War, to promote international cooperation, encourage disarmament, improve global living conditions and prevent wars. But it faced significant challenges. Europe remained unstable and, in Germany, resentment grew over the imposition of severe reparations by the war's victors. The weak League, which infamously failed to achieve its aims and stop another world war, was dissolved in 1946. We are now a few weeks away from the 80th anniversary of the signing of the 'Charter of the United Nations', the League's successor organisation, in San Francisco in June 1945. Comprising nearly 200 nations, the UN has, for decades, played an important role in peacekeeping, human rights, international law, refugee crises, health, education and climate change. United Nations' weakness But the return of a world of sovereign nations, powerful political alliances, an emphasis on national self-interest, growing military strength and populist leaders has made pursuing and enforcing international stability difficult and, at times, impossible. The world needs Abraham Lincoln's 'better angels of our nature' to show themselves if the UN is to find success. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The UN Security Council has 15 members but the five permanent members – China, France, Russia, the UK and the US – can veto any resolution. The International Criminal Court was designed to have global authority but has been hampered by the US, India, China, Türkiye, Russia and others not being signatories. Israel signed up but never ratified its membership, putting it outwith the court's jurisdiction. The crumbling of the international order into further chaos is likely to continue but let's hope the UN does not face the same fate as the League. And hopefully it will not take the threat or reality of a Third World War for countries to recognise again the need for order, and the benefits of peace, tolerance and respect. The prospects remain grim. Until a new way forward for international cooperation is found, we will have to depend on 'coalitions of the willing' forming in response to pressing issues in world affairs, like the statement issued by the UK, the EU and Canada on the situation in Gaza. This week US President Donald Trump has described Russia's Vladimir Putin as 'crazy' following a major attack on Ukraine, so what about Netanyahu? Does the systematic slaughter and the starvation of children in Gaza not meet the criteria for similar condemnation – or is it much worse? Welcome to the new international order.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store