Is the Eversource pipeline extension project in Springfield dead?
SPRINGFIELD — Nearly two years after state Energy Secretary Rebecca L. Tepper told Eversource it needs to provide more information on a proposed gas pipeline project, that supplement has not been filed.
Since then, scant news has emerged about a controversial project to construct a new 5.3-mile, 16-inch diameter gas pipeline from Longmeadow into Springfield.
Though it has been quiet publicly, Eversource says it's still moving forward on the proposal. The company is working on the supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Report Tepper asked for and is planning more community outreach later this year, said Tricia Taskey Modifica, an Eversource spokesperson.
The utility company has said the additional pipeline is needed for reliability. The current line is more than 70 years old and issues with it could have 'dire' impacts on customers numbering in the hundreds of thousands.
Opponents have raised concerns like health impacts on Springfield — considered an environmental justice community — and not wanting to build fossil fuel infrastructure when the state is trying to dramatically reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
In 2023, Tepper reviewed Eversource's draft environmental impact statement and said it didn't comply with the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act, or MEPA.
'The (draft environmental impact report) has not fully justified the purpose and need for the project,' Tepper's 2023 report said, 'and does not explain why the risk of outage was determined to be unacceptably high at this location so as to warrant immediate action.'
She decided Eversource needed to file a supplement that addresses more questions.
There's no specific deadline by which the company needs to file its supplement, according to a spokesperson with the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs.
The Eversource project would need additional approvals, including from the Energy Facilities Siting Board. In December 2022, that board held a public hearing, but it's waiting on the MEPA process to move forward, according to Alanna Kelly, a Department of Public Utilities spokesperson.
The Department of Public Utilities has not yet determined whether project is needed for reliability, Kelly said. Once more information is presented, it will resume looking at the project, she said. A presiding officer hasn't been named to the siting board and DPU case, according to the state website.
Eversource said it will do more public outreach this year, which Tepper's 2023 report requires.
'We'll have more on the community outreach and the filing later this year, likely in the latter half of 2025,' Modifica said in a statement. 'Community outreach will take several forms, including direct customer communication, door to door visits, coordination with municipalities and community organizations, stakeholder outreach, and public meetings.'
Rusty Polsgrove, associate director and environmental justice organizer at Arise For Social Justice, has been underwhelmed by Eversource's advertising of outreach sessions in the past — and hopes for stronger community engagement.
Polsgrove said Arise is pursuing possible legislative options to halt the project. 'We came out pretty strong against it,' Polsgrove said of the pipeline proposal. Eversource has to submit supplementary information, but 'that is just buying time to get our lawmakers' attention,' Polsgrove said.
Gary Levine, chair of the Longmeadow Pipeline Awareness Group, which opposes the project, said he calls the state regularly to ask for updates. 'It's just lying there," he said.
Some think the project is no longer happening and will say to Levine, 'Didn't it go away? Didn't it get settled?' he said. 'No,' he tells them, 'it's still there.'
Springfield's City Council voted against the project in a 2022 resolution. The Longmeadow Select Board has also expressed opposition. The board is not actively working on the issue and is waiting on movement in the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act process, said Select Board Chair Vineeth Hemavathi.
'There's no informal or formal discussions with the town about this at this point,' said Richard Kanoff, an attorney who has represented Longmeadow in the matter.
At this point, everyone but Eversource is waiting, he said. 'We're in a reactive state.'
Springfield Partners for Community Action to Honor Legacy of Executive Director Paul Bailey
Federal grant cuts will end WMass hands-on science program for third-graders
With billions of dollars to be cut by feds, WMass elder care centers brace for the squeeze
Amid annual crackdown on urban dirt bikes, Springfield mayor says city will push to make them illegal
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
WEC Energy (WEC) Down 3.6% Since Last Earnings Report: Can It Rebound?
It has been about a month since the last earnings report for WEC Energy Group (WEC). Shares have lost about 3.6% in that time frame, underperforming the S&P 500. Will the recent negative trend continue leading up to its next earnings release, or is WEC Energy due for a breakout? Before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a quick look at the most recent earnings report in order to get a better handle on the important drivers. It turns out, fresh estimates have trended downward during the past month. The consensus estimate has shifted -7.11% due to these changes. At this time, WEC Energy has a nice Growth Score of B, though it is lagging a lot on the Momentum Score front with a D. Following the exact same course, the stock was allocated a grade of D on the value side, putting it in the bottom 40% for this investment strategy. Overall, the stock has an aggregate VGM Score of C. If you aren't focused on one strategy, this score is the one you should be interested in. Estimates have been broadly trending downward for the stock, and the magnitude of these revisions indicates a downward shift. Notably, WEC Energy has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). We expect an in-line return from the stock in the next few months. WEC Energy is part of the Zacks Utility - Electric Power industry. Over the past month, Eversource Energy (ES), a stock from the same industry, has gained 3.9%. The company reported its results for the quarter ended March 2025 more than a month ago. Eversource reported revenues of $4.12 billion in the last reported quarter, representing a year-over-year change of +23.6%. EPS of $1.50 for the same period compares with $1.49 a year ago. Eversource is expected to post earnings of $0.99 per share for the current quarter, representing a year-over-year change of +4.2%. Over the last 30 days, the Zacks Consensus Estimate has changed +0.3%. Eversource has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) based on the overall direction and magnitude of estimate revisions. Additionally, the stock has a VGM Score of B. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report WEC Energy Group, Inc. (WEC) : Free Stock Analysis Report Eversource Energy (ES) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
This AI Giant Is Among the Top 5 Holdings of Billionaires David Tepper, Philippe Laffont, and Stephen Mandel Jr. -- and It's Not Nvidia
Billionaires are betting on the AI revolution, and this particular company already is winning in the field. This tech player also has built a solid earnings track record over time. 10 stocks we like better than Amazon › Investors, including billionaires, have generated enormous returns by investing in Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) in recent years. The artificial intelligence (AI) chip giant climbed more than 800% from the start of 2023 through the end of last year as demand for its products and services soared. And with the AI market forecast to reach beyond $2 trillion a few years down the road, it's likely Nvidia will continue to benefit. But it's important to remember that Nvidia isn't the only attractive AI bet to be found. In fact, right now, some of the world's top investors are favoring another AI giant over Nvidia. This particular player is among the top five holdings of billionaires David Tepper of Appaloosa Management, Philippe Laffont of Coatue Management, and Stephen Mandel Jr. of Lone Pine Capital. This company, like Nvidia, already has brought in billions of dollars in revenue thanks to AI -- and could win as the AI boom continues. Let's find out more. First, it's important to note that these three billionaires have significant positions in technology stocks, with other such players among their top 10 holdings. So they clearly believe in the AI revolution and are setting themselves up to potentially gain as AI becomes more and more a part of our daily lives and the operations at businesses of every size. For example, Tepper and Mandel each have three Magnificent Seven stocks among their 10 most heavily weighted holdings, and Laffont has four. So, which company has caught the eye of these technology-focused investors? None other than AI powerhouse Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN). As of the first quarter of the year, Amazon is the third biggest stock position in Tepper's $8.3 billion portfolio, the second-biggest in Laffont's $22 billion portfolio, and the third- largest in Mandel's $11 billion fund. Here are the details: Tepper holds 2,510,000 Amazon shares, and the stock represents 5.7% of the portfolio. Laffont holds 10,753,808 Amazon shares, and the stock represents 9.02% of his portfolio. Mandel holds 4,352,740 Amazon shares, and they represent 7.15% of his portfolio. This is according to the billionaires' 13Fs, filings that managers of $100 million or more must submit to the Securities and Exchange Commission on a quarterly basis. Now the question is: These billionaires clearly see Amazon as a fantastic AI investment, but is it right for you too? After all, though billionaires have demonstrated their investment expertise, some of their moves may not suit your investment strategy or comfort with risk. It's important to take these elements into consideration before diving in. You probably are most familiar with Amazon thanks to its e-commerce business. It's built an empire in the area, and one that extends around the globe. The operation helps the company generate billions of dollars in revenue year after year, and its extensive fulfillment network and popular subscription program Prime offer it a significant competitive advantage, or moat. But Amazon also is becoming a leader in AI, using the technology to streamline those e-commerce operations and even developing and selling AI products and services to customers through its Amazon Web Services (AWS) unit. In fact, due to Amazon's aggressive push into the AI space, AWS recently delivered a $117 billion annual revenue run rate. So Amazon already is generating significant growth from this hot technology. And since AWS is the world's leading cloud services provider, it's in the perfect spot to capture more and more business. As AWS customers develop AI projects, they have all that they need right at their fingertips on AWS -- from access to top chips like Nvidia's to a fully managed service that tailors popular large language models to a customer's needs. The AI buildout continues, and AWS is set to gain from this and from the next stages of AI, as customers apply AI to their businesses more and more. Meanwhile, Amazon offers a solid track record of earnings growth and has demonstrated its ability to manage turbulent times and go on to grow. For example, the company revamped its cost structure when higher inflation hurt earnings a few years ago and returned to growth within a year. All of this shows that Amazon is well positioned to benefit from the AI boom, but the stock also offers you security thanks to its well-established and profitable e-commerce and cloud businesses. And this means that, whether you're a cautious or aggressive investor, you may, like the billionaires, want to make Amazon one of your key AI bets. Before you buy stock in Amazon, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Amazon wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Adria Cimino has positions in Amazon. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This AI Giant Is Among the Top 5 Holdings of Billionaires David Tepper, Philippe Laffont, and Stephen Mandel Jr. -- and It's Not Nvidia was originally published by The Motley Fool

Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
CT energy bill snarled by debate on consumer savings and regulatory power. What that means for you.
Energy legislation intended to cut consumer electric bills was stalled again Monday by ongoing disagreement over how much power the state's chief utility regulator would be allowed to wield. And as the debate over regulatory power dragged through another day, the savings consumers were promised they could find in their electric bills continued to shrink. Agreement on both power and savings remained elusive Monday evening as legislators continued to debate both questions while racing toward the General Assembly's Wednesday adjournment deadline. But it appeared legislative proposals that just weeks ago would have sliced as much as $800 million from the public benefits portion of consumer electric bills had been reduced to $180 million each for customers of Eversource and United Illuminating. The numbers are likely to change before the state Senate and House vote. For an average Eversource customer, a drop from $800 million to $180 million in public benefit costs means a monthly drop in the average customer bill from about $20 to about $5 a month, a company spokesman said. The savings could be greater for the far fewer United Illuminating customers. Customers of both utilities pay about $1 billion a year in public benefit costs, which are state mandated programs to develop carbon free electric generation, promote conservation and help pay the electric bills of customers unable to do so. Defeat of proposals to move a higher proportion of public benefit costs off electric bills by bonding them or paying for them with general taxation is seen as a victory for environmental and conservation advocates. 'It amounts to a less significant reduction,' House Republican Leader Vincent Candelora of North Branford said. 'It is something but it is not as much as I would like to have seen. The political fight over how much control Public Utility Regulatory Authority Chairman Marissa Gillett has over electric regulation has been simmering for more than a year. But it has flared up as lawmakers struggle to deliver on comprehensive energy legislation they promised when record heart and market forces conspired to send rates soaring last summer. Under Gillett, PURA has been in an extended fight with state utilities. Eversource and United Illuminating assert in lawsuits and regulatory filings that PURA has shown an anti-utility bias under Gillett and has issued legally questionable regulatory decisions resulting in repeated reductions in their credit ratings. The two electric utilities have sued PURA, claiming that Gillett has squeezed fellow commissioners out of the decision making process and is effectively breaking the law by making unilateral decisions. Candelora, backed by House Speaker Matt Ritter, D-Hartford, inserted language in the energy bill that would require all commissioners to vote to appoint hearing officers, to vote on all questions before the authority and to make all votes available for public inspection. Gillett advocates in PURA, the legislature and elsewhere have tried — but so far failed — to change Candelora's language in ways that some lawyers have said would not only preserve her power to direct decisions, but retroactively neutralize the utility suit. On Monday, language had been inserted in the latest legislative draft that appeared to be another effort to undermine Candelora's proposals. 'There is a sentence in there that is appointing her as the administrator and the way that language is written it would de facto make her the presiding officer on all the cases,' Candelora said. 'So I have had to push back on that. I am waiting to hear back.I don't believe PURA was ever intended to have one person presiding over it.' 'This bill is not going to run in the house if it is not fixed,' Candelora said. Ritter has agreed, saying the legislation would not be sent to the House without Candlora's support.