logo
Is Britain an ally or an enemy of Israel?

Is Britain an ally or an enemy of Israel?

Spectator11-07-2025
Even as the British parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) published its stark warning yesterday that the Islamic Republic of Iran's Quds Force orchestrates spy rings on British soil, the UK continues its public ostracisation of Israel, the very country on the frontline of seeing down that exact threat.
Britain must choose. Not between Israelis and Palestinians, but between honesty and hypocrisy
Earlier this week, an Afghan-Danish spy working for Iran was arrested for photographing Jewish and Israeli targets in Berlin. The intelligence trail ran through Israel, Denmark, Switzerland, Turkey and the UK. Israel's cooperation helped foil an operation with chilling echoes of the Iranian regime's 1980s and 90s terror campaigns in Europe, such as the assassination of Shapour Bakhtiar in France, the murder of Salman Rushdie's Japanese translator, and Hezbollah-linked attacks tied to Iranian agents. And yet we in Britain are punishing our ally, Israel, with symbolic slights, even as it helps protect European citizens.
Britain must choose. Not between Israelis and Palestinians, nor between compassion and realism, but between honesty and hypocrisy. For too long, successive UK governments have sought to conceal the depth and strength of their alliance with Israel behind a veil of diplomatic ambiguity and theatrical moralising. In doing so, they not only insult a vital ally but also betray the British public by failing to explain, with clarity and confidence, why our alliance with Israel is essential – economically, militarily, and morally.
In May, Foreign Secretary David Lammy declared with great theatrical indignation that he was suspending UK-Israel trade negotiations, condemning Israeli ministers in apocalyptic tones, while still quietly affirming continued security and intelligence cooperation. As he stood up in the Commons, all bluster and rage, I thought back to a moment less than two years before; I had been in Israel, travelling with then Trade Secretary Kemi Badenoch as she diligently worked towards that exact free trade agreement, paving the way to greater collaboration between the UK and Israel. As we toured the Teva pharmaceuticals factory, she told me how it represents just one example of the mutual benefits to both countries of our close ties: the Israeli company's generic medicines save the NHS around £2.7 billion every year, and it employs 1,200 people in the UK across four sites. But in 2025, Lammy declared the trade talks frozen.
Yet only today the British Embassy in Israel quietly released a glowing statement (aimed at the Israeli press), touting Britain's new Industrial Strategy and hailing Israel as a premier partner in eight high-growth sectors, from AI and clean energy to life sciences and digital innovation. One in eight medicines used in the UK originates from Israeli firms, it boasts. Over the last five years, more than 300 Israeli companies have expanded into the UK creating around 4,000 jobs and over £906 million in investment. Israeli investment in the UK last year alone created nearly 900 jobs and injected £173 million into our economy. Britain exports aircraft engines and automobiles to Israel. Israel delivers biotechnology, software, and cyber expertise to Britain.
The relationship is not just strategic, it is indispensable. But while Britain embraces it in practice, it condemns it in public. Israel is treated by British politicians not as a respected friend, but as a secret mistress, visited in the dark, denied in the daylight. This duplicity is neither moral nor mature. It is cowardice, dressed up as conscience.
Worse still, it empowers precisely the voices that seek to undermine both countries. By indulging and appeasing the anti-Israel theatrics of certain backbenchers and media ideologues –those who confuse Hamas propaganda with human rights advocacy – the UK government lends legitimacy to a worldview in which the Jewish state is uniquely villainised.
Nowhere is this split-personality approach more absurd than in the UK's recent decision to sanction Israel's Finance and National Security Ministers, at the very moment it is deepening trade ties and drawing on Israeli expertise in security. The Finance Minister is targeted while UK-Israel economic cooperation thrives. The National Security Minister is blacklisted even as, in the words of Col. Richard Kemp, former commander of British forces in Afghanistan and ex-head of international terrorism at the UK's Joint Intelligence Committee, the UK continues to rely on Israel's unmatched security know-how. Earlier this month as we sat together in a bomb shelter in Tel Aviv, Kemp told me just how much Britain still learns from Israel.
The ISC's report on Iran is categorical: Iran is executing or sponsoring kidnapping plots, assassination attempts, cyber-attacks, and propaganda operations within the UK. MI5 and counter-terror agencies have thwarted at least 15 credible plots since 2022. British-Iranian journalists have been targeted. Families of BBC Persian staff harassed in Tehran. British Jews are in danger. All this, while Britain dithers on whether to proscribe the IRGC, the military arm of a regime that openly boasts of its ambition to destroy both Israel and the West.
Meanwhile, Israel confronts these threats head-on. Not with bluster, but with courage, skill and competence. It has created a society that is both free and secure, pluralistic and resilient. It is a state where secularism coexists with vibrant religious life, where Arab citizens serve in the judiciary and military, and where corruption is prosecuted even at the highest levels – unlike in Britain where free spectacles, clothes, wallpaper, concert tickets, dresses and much more are no more than tabloid fodder. A nation of just ten million has produced more start-ups and lifesaving medical innovations per capita than nearly any other country on Earth, ranking among the top globally for Nobel laureates per capita. It has absorbed refugees from every continent, forged a national identity from extraordinary diversity, and shown that multiculturalism need not mean fragmentation.
Contrast this with Britain's own drift. Struggling with incoherent policing, demoralised armed forces, a fraying social contract, and a political class paralysed by its own post-colonial neuroses, the UK seems ever more inclined to lecture its allies instead of learning from them. We issue pious calls for ceasefires with no strategy, no plan, no understanding of the enemy. We demand de-escalation while offering no alternative to surrender. We condemn Israel for confronting jihadism while failing to contain it ourselves.
Enough. Britain cannot afford to berate the very partner that helps it survive in a perilous age. Nor can it outsource its moral compass to the loudest street protestor, the scariest religious fanatic, or most sanctimonious backbencher. It should stand up, speak clearly, and state the truth: Israel is our friend, a model, and an essential ally. The time for double-dealing is over. We must stop whispering our friendship and start declaring it with pride.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Are the Greens heading left?
Are the Greens heading left?

New Statesman​

time25 minutes ago

  • New Statesman​

Are the Greens heading left?

Photo byIn exactly a month's time, the Green Party will be in the first moments of a new, or renewed leadership. The battle to lead the party will be passed into the hands of members this afternoon as a month-long period of voting opens (the winner will be announced on 1 September). Since May, candidates to take on the role – the MPs Ellie Chowns and Adrian Ramsay (who is a current co-leader) and the London Assembly Member Zack Polanski – have been locked in a head-to-head. This race comes at a defining moment for the Green Party, and more widely for the left. After winning four MPs in last year's general election (a record performance), the party could have the chance to capitalise on its victories in this new era of five party politics. And, with the imminent founding of a new left-wing party led by Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana, the future of the left hangs in the balance. Whichever candidate (or candidates) is successful, their leadership will define the party's place in British politics going forwards. Polanski fired the starting gun on this race when he announced his surprise (although not so to most party insiders) decision to run shortly after this year's local elections. His platform of 'eco-populism' has, in some ways, defined the campaign and its place in the wider political moment. Polanski, who is the party's current deputy leader, said in his leadership pitch that the Greens should occupy a more progressive, populist space on the left in order to confront the infectious populism of Nigel Farage's Reform. He has called for a wealth tax, a better approach to net zero and a more robust left-wing position on immigration. In doing so, he has captured the imagination of the former Corbynite left, some of whom have ditched their former Labour allegiances and become paid-up members of the Greens. The commentator and former NS columnist Grace Blakeley announced her defection to the party in order to vote for Polanski in June. This, insiders in his campaign believe, is reflective of wider increases in membership of the party: people have signed up to Green Party membership in order to vote for Polanski. (This mirrors those who took advantage of Labour's £3 membership deal to vote for Corbyn's leadership in 2015). 'I'm delighted,' Polanski told me, 'there's been a lot of focus on all the new members that have joined to vote for me.' He added: 'I'm feeling confident, but not complacent. I will be campaigning until the very last day of voting for every single vote.' (When asked, the Green Party said they would not share membership data during the election campaign.) Though it was clearly obvious Polanski was on manoeuvres, he did not inform Ramsay of his decision to run. Nor was Chowns aware of her now-opponent's intentions. The pair stepped forward as candidates shortly after Polanski's announcement, with Chowns stepping in to run as a co-leader, replacing Carla Denyer, the MP for Bristol Central who has been leading the party alongside Ramsay since 2021. Their campaign has focused on their ability to win first-past-the-post elections, and the pair have made clear the damage they think having a leader sitting outside of parliament would do to the progress the Green party has made. 'People really want a professional party that can win elections,' Chowns told me when we spoke over the phone shortly before voting opened. 'That's what Adrian and I are standing for. Members can vote for a leadership who knows how to win elections.' This has been a perennial criticism thrown at Polanski throughout the campaign: that as a London Assembly Member and not an MP, his leadership would provide a stumbling block for the Green Party's enduring progress. Jenny Jones, a party grandee and former deputy mayor of London, who is backing Ramsay and Chowns told me: 'I get on well with Zack, he's an excellent campaigner.' But she added: 'The reason I am voting for [Ramsay and Chowns] is because they are good at getting not only themselves elected, but getting other people elected'. But this is a moment of flux in British politics. As Labour has moved rightward in order to face-up to the ongoing threat of Reform, it has become more exposed on its left flank. Analysis by Stack Data Strategy and shared with the New Statesman found that Labour is losing more votes to its left than to the right. The founding of Corbyn and Sultana's party, and the increasing anger and frustration from left-wing voters over Gaza, has provided an opportunity for the Green Party. James Schneider, Corbyn's former director of strategic communications, said in a recent interview with the New Left Review that Corbyn and Sultana's party should be open to some form of red-green cooperation. Chowns and Ramsay have all but turned their backs on this idea: 'We have a really distinct identity as Greens,' Chowns told me. On the eve of voting opening, they criticised Polanski's eco-populist platform as 'chasing the next headline, the next set of likes, rather than real substance'. This has been an unprecedented campaign for the Green Party, not least because of the volume of media attention it has courted. But the outcome also bears wider political significance. A party led by Ramsay and Chowns would likely mean business as usual for the Green Party (beefed up local campaigning, and a focus on winning more seats). A victory for Polanski, however, would mark a new era for the party and more widely, for the left. In partnership with a new left party led by Corbyn, the Greens could do some serious damage to Labour's left flank. In just over four weeks' time, the future of the Green Party may finally begin to take shape. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe This piece first appeared in the Morning Call newsletter; receive it every morning by subscribing on Substack here [See also: One year on, tensions still circle Britain's asylum-seeker hotels] Related

PM urged to review oil policy after Trump labels North Sea ‘a treasure chest'
PM urged to review oil policy after Trump labels North Sea ‘a treasure chest'

North Wales Chronicle

time29 minutes ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

PM urged to review oil policy after Trump labels North Sea ‘a treasure chest'

Andrew Bowie called for a review of policies affecting the oil and gas industry. The US president was in Scotland earlier this week and during his visit he described the North Sea as 'a treasure chest for the United Kingdom', and warned fossil fuel taxes make 'no sense'. He also took aim at 'some of the ugliest windmills you've ever seen', referring to wind turbines off the coast near Aberdeen. Mr Bowie has written to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer calling for a meeting in London to explore the effects of oil and gas policies. Following his flying visit to Aberdeenshire with President Trump earlier this week, I've written to the Prime Minister urging him to heed the calls of all those he met on the EPL, overturn ban on licenses, ensure a future for our region & secure Britain's energy 👇 — Andrew Bowie (@AndrewBowie_MP) August 1, 2025 He referred to the windfall tax on the profits made from extracting UK oil and gas, introduced by the previous Conservative government in 2022 and retained until 2030 by Labour Chancellor Rachel Reeves. In his letter to Sir Keir, Mr Bowie wrote: 'As president Trump has said, the UK's 'very high' tax on oil and gas companies is a deterrent to investment. 'The extension of the energy profits levy (EPL), coupled with uncertainty around future licensing and investment signals, has created a climate of instability that threatens jobs, innovation and the region's economic resilience. 'President Donald Trump's remarks during your visit – calling Aberdeen the 'oil capital of Europe' and urging the UK to 'bring it back' – reflect a sentiment shared by many in the region. 'May I urge you to consider the president's call to 'incentivise' domestic production of hydrocarbons? 'Oil and gas still have a vital role to play in our energy mix and economic future; British people would rather see the UK benefit from domestic exploration and drilling than import more from Norway and Qatar.' Mr Bowie, who is the Conservative MP for West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine, added: 'Will you urgently call a meeting in Downing Street to conduct the review in partnership with industry leaders, our world-leading supply chain business, and the local workforce to ensure a coherent and sustainable path forward?' During his visit with Sir Keir, Mr Trump posted on his Truth Social website: 'North Sea Oil is a treasure chest for the United Kingdom. 'The taxes are so high, however, that it makes no sense. 'They have essentially told drillers and oil companies that, 'we don't want you'. 'Incentivise the drillers, fast. A vast fortune to be made for the UK, and far lower energy costs for the people.' Speaking at his Turnberry golf resort in South Ayrshire, Mr Trump said: 'When we go to Aberdeen, you'll see some of the ugliest windmills you've ever seen, the height of a 50-storey building.' Gesturing with his hands, he added: 'You can take 1,000 times more energy out of a hole in the ground this big.' Sir Keir at the time said oil and gas are 'going to be with us for a very long time, and that'll be part of the mix, but also wind, solar, increasingly nuclear'. Aberdeen has been chosen by the Government to host the headquarters of GB Energy, a state-owned company set up to accelerate the rollout of renewables.

PM urged to review oil policy after Trump labels North Sea ‘a treasure chest'
PM urged to review oil policy after Trump labels North Sea ‘a treasure chest'

Glasgow Times

time36 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

PM urged to review oil policy after Trump labels North Sea ‘a treasure chest'

Andrew Bowie called for a review of policies affecting the oil and gas industry. The US president was in Scotland earlier this week and during his visit he described the North Sea as 'a treasure chest for the United Kingdom', and warned fossil fuel taxes make 'no sense'. He also took aim at 'some of the ugliest windmills you've ever seen', referring to wind turbines off the coast near Aberdeen. Mr Bowie has written to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer calling for a meeting in London to explore the effects of oil and gas policies. Following his flying visit to Aberdeenshire with President Trump earlier this week, I've written to the Prime Minister urging him to heed the calls of all those he met on the EPL, overturn ban on licenses, ensure a future for our region & secure Britain's energy 👇 — Andrew Bowie (@AndrewBowie_MP) August 1, 2025 He referred to the windfall tax on the profits made from extracting UK oil and gas, introduced by the previous Conservative government in 2022 and retained until 2030 by Labour Chancellor Rachel Reeves. In his letter to Sir Keir, Mr Bowie wrote: 'As president Trump has said, the UK's 'very high' tax on oil and gas companies is a deterrent to investment. 'The extension of the energy profits levy (EPL), coupled with uncertainty around future licensing and investment signals, has created a climate of instability that threatens jobs, innovation and the region's economic resilience. 'President Donald Trump's remarks during your visit – calling Aberdeen the 'oil capital of Europe' and urging the UK to 'bring it back' – reflect a sentiment shared by many in the region. 'May I urge you to consider the president's call to 'incentivise' domestic production of hydrocarbons? 'Oil and gas still have a vital role to play in our energy mix and economic future; British people would rather see the UK benefit from domestic exploration and drilling than import more from Norway and Qatar.' US President Donald Trump was in Scotland this week to open a new course at his Aberdeenshire golf resort (Jane Barlow/PA) Mr Bowie, who is the Conservative MP for West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine, added: 'Will you urgently call a meeting in Downing Street to conduct the review in partnership with industry leaders, our world-leading supply chain business, and the local workforce to ensure a coherent and sustainable path forward?' During his visit with Sir Keir, Mr Trump posted on his Truth Social website: 'North Sea Oil is a treasure chest for the United Kingdom. 'The taxes are so high, however, that it makes no sense. 'They have essentially told drillers and oil companies that, 'we don't want you'. 'Incentivise the drillers, fast. A vast fortune to be made for the UK, and far lower energy costs for the people.' Speaking at his Turnberry golf resort in South Ayrshire, Mr Trump said: 'When we go to Aberdeen, you'll see some of the ugliest windmills you've ever seen, the height of a 50-storey building.' Gesturing with his hands, he added: 'You can take 1,000 times more energy out of a hole in the ground this big.' Sir Keir at the time said oil and gas are 'going to be with us for a very long time, and that'll be part of the mix, but also wind, solar, increasingly nuclear'. Aberdeen has been chosen by the Government to host the headquarters of GB Energy, a state-owned company set up to accelerate the rollout of renewables.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store