Family-Truckster Showdown! 2025 Ram 1500 vs. Ford F-150
With both trucks carrying only mild levels of off-road equipment, our two test trucks are damn near anonymous in today's sea of cargo-bed-adorned rigs. Both trucks are set up for an ideal mix of work and leisure—most notably, their tires offer tons of sidewall, skipping the low-profile, big-wheel-tiny-tire aesthetic that plagues many modern vehicles (and tends to ruin ride quality in the process).
The Ram's front end is bulkier and more brutish, its chromed maw opening wide enough that you might mistake it for a heavy-duty Ram 2500 model. The Ford opts for a darker, chrome-free face, though the door handles and various trim garnishes make up for that lack of forward-facing shiny stuff. Even though these aren't the hardcore off-road trims, both trucks ride high and require a big step up to climb aboard. The F-150 XLT comes standard with side steps when outfitted with its optional hybrid powertrain (they're part of a $1585 package otherwise), whereas Ram wants at least $695 for 'em on the Big Horn no matter what's under the hood.
The cleverest bit of any pickup truck's exterior is the tailgate, where engineers have designed all sorts of new ways for a thing to open. Our Ram's $1095 multifunction tailgate has a 60/40 split that lets the tailgate open to the side, adding a bit of versatility. The $635 Bed Utility package on our F-150 XLT, however, only features a tailgate step and work surface; if you want the trick Pro Access tailgate, you must move to a more expensive trim. That's annoying.
Inside, the Ram's crew cab feels just a bit larger, but both cabins are sized to rival a big-city studio apartment. Ford's struck us as more user-friendly. Both test examples were equipped with their largest-available screens. The Ford's horizontal layout allows for a clean swath of physical controls beneath the display, while the Ram's vertical setup offers more onscreen flexibility with less (and more frustratingly arranged) switchgear. We prefer the Ford's column shifter to the Ram's shift... dial? Knob? The Ram's cluster also features real-deal gauges, whereas the Ford's is entirely digital.
If you need the ultimate in cabin flexibility, both the XLT and Bighorn can be had with a 40/20/40 split front bench seat. Our F-150, however, came with buckets. We like the Ram's seating for six. We wouldn't recommend adults occupy the front middle for long stints—unless you like controlling the touchscreen with your knees—but kids will love it. Plus, a quick pull of a vinyl strap drops down the middle seatback, converting it to a standard center console.
With both vehicles optioned as near-entry-level trucks, the Ram's interior fit and finish puts it ahead of the Ford. The Ram offers more variety and quality in its hard- and soft-touch materials.
Why stick with stock? Both trucks seen here come equipped with optional powertrains. For the Ram, that means moving from the standard Pentastar 3.6-liter V-6 to the Hurricane twin-turbo 3.0-liter inline-six, a $2695 upgrade that boosts output to 420 horsepower and 469 pound-feet of torque. An eight-speed automatic is the only transmission on offer.
The Ford, on the other hand, offers a wider variety of powertrain options. A twin-turbo 2.7-liter V-6 is standard, with a twin-turbo 3.5-liter V-6 and a naturally aspirated 5.0-liter V-8 as interstitial upgrades. But our test truck came wielding the range-topping PowerBoost hybrid setup, which pairs a twin-turbo 3.5-liter V-6 with an electric motor for a combined output of 430 horsepower and 570 pound-feet of torque, mated to a 10-speed automatic. It's pricey, though, at $3560, and it also mandates springing for at least the $1585 Equipment Group 301A.
Despite the hybrid hardware, the F-150's 5631-pound curb weight is slinkier than the Ram's 5765-pound weigh-in. But the two prove nearly evenly matched at the test track. The Ram starts out ahead of the Ford, snagging victory in the sprint to 30 mph (1.6 seconds versus 1.8) and 60 mph (4.8 seconds versus 5.0). But then the Ford pulls ahead, beating the Ram to 100 mph by 0.8 second and winning the quarter-mile by 0.1 second and 2 mph. The PowerBoost also bests the Ram in our 5-to-60, 30-to-50, and 50-to-70 acceleration tests.
HIGHS: Gutsy-thrifty hybrid powertrain, responsive steering, superior visibility.LOWS: No bench seat in the hybrid, more rear-end jostle than the Ram, interior feels a little chintzier.VERDICT: An around-town truck that's rewarding to drive in most every situation.
The Ford's lower curb weight also pays dividends in braking: At 185 feet, the F-150 required a shorter distance to stop from 70 mph than the Ram, which needed 196 feet despite having larger brake discs. The Ford also had more grip, maxing out at 0.76 g against the Ram's 0.72-g result. Though, to be fair, our Ram was wearing Falken WildPeak A/T all-terrain tires, while the Ford wore more street-friendly Michelin Primacy XC rubber.
Both trucks feature 30-plus-gallon fuel tanks, which means total range figures in excess of 500 miles, more than the average bladder can handle. During our evaluation, both trucks managed a not-so-great 16 mpg observed. But in our 75-mph highway fuel-economy test, the F-150's 20-mpg result bested the Ram's 18 mpg, with both falling short of their EPA estimates, the Ford by 4 mpg and the Ram by 6 mpg. Most of that delta largely comes down to tire and mirror choice.
This comparison wasn't about extracting every inch of usability from these trucks; instead, because they serve all parts of the work/play spectrum, we gave them a more holistic workout, paying attention to how these vehicles function more as daily drivers.
The Ram 1500 proved the cushier of the two, though Ram may have taken that softness a bit too far. Yes, its optional four-corner air-spring suspension ($1995) soaked up nearly every bad road condition Michigan threw at us, while Ford doesn't offer air springs at all. But the Ram driver also feels disconnected in a bad way: The steering is too light for our tastes, and the pedals feel mushier than the Ford's. We felt more body roll in the Ram too. The air springs' ability to alter the ride height could be helpful when towing or hauling with a full bed. But in ordinary driving, the Ram's chassis setup may come off as too aloof.
HIGHS: The king of shock absorption, great interior fit and finish, smooth straight-six.LOWS: Skip the towing package for pure daily driving, less user-friendly infotainment, too light on feel.VERDICT: A solid contender, especially when truck stuff happens often.
By comparison, the F-150 felt a little more truckish over the road, which we appreciated in this instance. Its front coil- and rear leaf-spring setup retains more feeling underfoot, giving us a better idea of what's happening closer to the road. Everything from entering corners to braking feels more natural and predictable, and Ford does a commendable job of retaining a good bit of shock absorption. Though not as overtly plush as the Ram's, the Ford's ride never devolves into an unladen jiggly mess. The F-150's steering is slightly heavier and more direct, helping the Ford feel smaller than it is, which is good for navigating tighter confines like parking lots.
Speaking of squeezing into tight spots, we'd recommend daily drivers skip the Ram's $1345 Trailer Tow Group package, which mandates massive manually folding tow mirrors that all but eliminate front-corner visibility, making this 1500 feel like a 3500 and turning everyday maneuvers into a major pain. Ford has similar tow packages, but you aren't forced to spec Dumbo-ears mirrors. A full-size pickup's high front end already makes for difficult forward visibility, and you don't want to make it any worse. Ford's tow-option solution is more versatile, and that little dip designed into the F-150's front windows also is a huge visibility helper.
Both trucks have a healthy smattering of options, but the Ford's $65,940 as-tested price managed to sneak in below the $68,320 Ram. The F-150, with its PowerBoost hybrid powertrain, proved better at top-end performance and delivered better mileage on the highway (where hybrids are at their least efficient) while somehow weighing less than the Ram. The Ford's coil- and leaf-spring suspension gave us better around-town driving confidence at the expense of some ride quality. The Ram's softer setup feels more luxurious when you're wafting down the road, but we didn't like how devoid of feel the end result was. Considering how often a family truck will be driven unladen, dynamics remain a pivotal part of the conversation.
This was a close one: These are both good trucks, and your money isn't going into a firepit no matter which way you go. In the end, our winner walked away from a knock-down, drag-out fight with a one-point margin of victory. In these specific testing conditions with these specific trims, we determined that the F-150 provided better daily-driving dynamics and a more cohesive package at its price point.
You Might Also Like
Car and Driver's 10 Best Cars through the Decades
How to Buy or Lease a New Car
Lightning Lap Legends: Chevrolet Camaro vs. Ford Mustang!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
5 hours ago
- USA Today
Want to buy an electric car or truck? What to know before tax credits expire Sept. 30
A brand new, out-of-the blue Sept. 30 deadline to buy an EV could be easy to miss, given all the quirky details packed into the nearly 900-page mega tax bill. But automakers aren't about to let that happen. An email sent by Telsa says: "Order soon to get your $7,500." "You can get $7,500 off a qualifying Tesla vehicle at delivery with the federal tax credit, which will now expire on September 30, 2025," the email stated. You must take delivery on or before Sept. 30 to be eligible. Sales of electric cars and trucks, including plug-in hybrids, could be scorching hot at the end of summer, according to industry analysts, as buyers hear more promotions about why they absolutely must lock in lucrative clean vehicle tax credits that expire under what has been called the 'one, big, beautiful bill.' A lucrative loophole on leasing EVs ends Sept. 30, too. A clean vehicle tax credit that's up to $4,000 for eligible used electric vehicles also expires Sept. 30. Don't kid yourself. Not every tax filer will qualify for the credit when buying a clean vehicle. The make and model and the MSRP matter. So does your income. The credits do not apply to every package offered on some electric car or truck or plug-in hybrid models. The availability of the credit for those who buy will depend on several factors, including the vehicle's MSRP, its final assembly location, the sourcing of the critical minerals and components in the battery, and your modified adjusted gross income. Included in the footnotes for the Tesla email: "Consult a tax professional. Not all buyers, vehicles or financing options will qualify. Terms and conditions apply." What vehicles qualify for the EV tax credit? Check out the details at to search for eligible vehicles. Independent websites, such as Edmunds, also list cars and trucks that are eligible for the federal EV tax credit. Some 2025 vehicles that could qualify for a $7,500 credit when you're buying the vehicle, according to the list, are: the Ford F-150 Lightning Flash Trim, as well as Lariat and XLT trims; the 2025 Jeep Wagoneer S; the 2025 Tesla Cybertruck dual motor, long range and single motor; various models of the 2025 Tesla Model 3, Model X and Model Y; the Cadillac Lyriq and Optic; the Chevy Blazer EV, the Chevy Equinox EV, and the Chevy Silverado EV. Among these models, though, you're limited to a vehicle with an MSRP of $80,000. Ask the dealer whether the specific car or truck you're buying qualifies. Not every version of a model listed on the website qualifies. For a consumer to qualify for a clean vehicle credit, the manufacturer suggested retail price can't exceed $80,000 for vans, sport utility vehicles and pickup trucks. It cannot exceed $55,000 for other vehicles. What are the income limits for an EV tax credit? Higher income households won't qualify for the credit when buying an EV. Your modified adjusted gross income may not exceed $300,000 for married couples filing jointly; $225,000 for heads of households; and $150,000 for all other filers. You can use your modified AGI from the year you take delivery of the vehicle or the year before, whichever is less, according to the Internal Revenue Service. If your modified AGI is below the threshold in one of the two years, you can claim the credit. The EV or plug-in hybrid must be bought for your own use, not for resale. You must use it primarily in the United States. More: Gamblers will pay more taxes in 2026 and beyond when Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' hits More: Taxes on Social Security benefits were not eliminated despite what you've heard Why many drivers are opting to lease EVs The bulk of EVs these days are leased — and for good reason when it comes to the complicated tax credit. A loophole in the tax credit, which was part of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, gave dealers an edge for promoting attractive leases for new EVs and plug-in hybrids, especially as many new clean vehicles were introduced. The driver cannot claim the clean vehicle tax credit in this case but can likely benefit from a better lease deal. It's one way many are finding lower monthly payments for higher priced vehicles, too. Leased electric vehicles are classified as "commercial vehicles," which means that they're eligible for the full federal clean vehicle credit without meeting strict battery and sourcing requirements. So, you might be able to lease an EV that wouldn't qualify for any credit at all if you bought it. In these cases, the tax credit belongs to the leasing company, often the automaker's captive finance arm. Some or all of that savings could be passed along to the buyer through a well-positioned lease deal. Stephanie Valdez Streaty, director of industry insights at Cox Automotive, told the Detroit Free Press that dealers are likely to feature attractive lease deals in the next two and a half months before the Sept. 30 deadline hits, which puts an end to the leasing loophole. She noted that only about 20 electric and plug-in hybrid models are eligible for the clean vehicle credit of up to $7,500 for consumers. Thanks to the EV leasing loophole, she explained, virtually any EV — regardless of price or country of origin — can qualify for the commercial clean vehicle tax credit, making it far more accessible than the consumer EV credit. The consumer who opts to lease the EV doesn't have to worry about any income limits affecting whether you qualify for the clean vehicle credit, she noted. And the leasing loophole gets around MSRP requirements or where batteries are produced or components are sourced. In April, 60% of all new EV transactions were lease deals, according to Cox Automotive data. Ivan Drury, director of insights at Edmunds, said almost all offers involving leasing are going to be the most favorable deals, given that they allow for more vehicles to benefit from tax breaks regardless of assembly location or battery sourcing requirements. Automakers and dealers already are having trouble moving EVs off the lot now, Drury said. "EVs went from some of the hottest products on the market back in 2022 to sitting on the lot for months on end, and it has been this way for nearly two years," Drury said. Selling EVs could get even tougher once the clean vehicle tax credit disappears. "Any reduction in incentives could lead to further issues once the tax credit deadline approaches, especially since many automakers have incentives stacked on top of the tax credit — with the tax credit doing most of the heavy lifting," Drury said. It is hard to say what happens beginning in October. Will automakers move so many EVs off lots by Sept. 30 that they no longer need to offer super-deep discounts? Or will brands with bloated EV inventories now still need to offer really good deals to unload metal in the fall? Drury said in some cases it might be possible to see current inventories reduced to a more manageable volume, especially as 2026 model year planning and forecasting will take into account reduced sales. "This could easily make the next few months one of the best and last times to score a deal on an EV," Drury said. Valdez Streaty, at Cox Automotive, expects solid growth in EV sales in the third quarter, as buyers act ahead of the Sept. 30 deadline for the expiring tax credit. Not surprisingly, she predicts that EV sales then will drop off in the fourth quarter, as the electric vehicle market adjusts to a new reality where buyers no longer receive federal tax breaks. Some states, like Colorado, currently offer tax breaks for EV purchases. But even Colorado's smaller tax break is set to be reduced as of Jan. 1, 2026. EV sales in the second quarter were down 6.3% year over year, according to a report issued July 14 by the Cox Automotive Kelley Blue Book team. Some of that decline is attributed to some buyers who rushed ahead to buy in the first quarter, as many anticipated that President Donald Trump would ultimately put end to EV tax credits for consumers. During the second quarter, consumers bought 310,839 new EVs in the United States, down from 331,853 in the same period in 2024, according to the well-known provider of information about the value of new and used cars. Total EV sales through the first half of 2025 set a record at 607,089, up 1.5% year-over-year, according to Cox Automotive Kelley Blue Book. Right now, buyers are looking at healthy inventories for EVs and strong sales incentives, according to experts. Ford Motor Co., for example, has extended a program called the "Ford Power Promise" that offers a free home charger and complimentary standard installation until Sept. 30. The offer applies to the purchase or lease of a new Ford F-150 Lightning, Mustang Mach-E or E-Transit Cargo Van. More: Ford's latest sale may be just the start in a summer of car-buying deals, experts say One doesn't have to look far to find some sort of deal on EVs. "Manufacturers and dealers are using this opportunity to create a sense of urgency to buy now while this (tax) incentive is still in place," Valdez Streaty said. Overall, sales incentives on EVs in the second quarter were more than 10% of the average transaction price. In June, average EV incentives from manufacturers reached an all-time high of 14.8% of average transaction prices, hitting nearly $8,500, according to Kelley Blue Book. These incentives are in addition to any available tax credit. In June, the average transaction price was $56,910 for a new EV, according to Kelley Blue Book. Todd Szott, whose family owns dealerships in Michigan, said more buyers are getting motivated to shop for EVs by the Sept. 30 deadline. The dealership is promoting several lease deals, including $329 a month for 24 months on a 2025 Dodge Charger R/T and $299 a month for 24 months for a 2024 Wrangler, 4-door Sport 4xe. The dealership is also promoting a $399 a month lease for 36 months on a 2025 Ford Mustang Mach-E. All lease deals are plus sales tax and state fees, and the first payment is due at signing. Almost all the dealership's customers lease electric vehicles or plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, Szott said. "The federal tax credit goes to the leasing company and is passed on to the customer in the form of a great lease deal," Szott said. He noted that more makes and models qualify for the federal tax credit through leasing because the qualifications to get the credit through leasing are less stringent. Many drivers also benefit from leasing, he said, because EV and PHEV technology will improve and change in three years, so leasing for about three years makes sense. He sells Ford, Chrysler, Jeep, Dodge, Ram and Toyota vehicles through Szott Auto Group in White Lake, Highland Township, Holly, Waterford and New Hudson. More: Ford's latest sale may be just the start in a summer of car-buying deals, experts say Some tips for car shopping now If you're tempted to buy or lease to beat the Sept. 30 deadline, experts say do your research and figure out your options now. If you plan to buy, talk to your bank or credit union and see what kind of interest rate on a car loan you'd qualify to get. Pushing anything to the last minute can cause processing errors, warns Mike Mader, Baker Tilly's dealership industry practice leader. And paperwork is key if you're buying an EV and expecting a tax credit. Remember, you cannot claim a federal income tax credit on your tax return if you lease the EV. Don't think things will just magically work out at tax time. Some taxpayers faced enormous headaches this year when dealing with the credit on their 2024 tax returns filed this year. The federal government notes that Clean Vehicle Tax Credits must be initiated and approved at the time of sale. Buyers should obtain a copy of the confirmation from the Internal Revenue Service that a 'time-of-sale' report was submitted successfully by the dealer. The IRS has an online portal for dealers to submit time of sale reports for EVs sold. Dealers must submit time-of-sale reports within a three-day period. The National Automobile Dealers Association told the Detroit Free Press that some earlier tax glitches have been worked out. 'NADA worked with the IRS to resolve the systemic issues with the portal earlier this year and those fixes have remained successful,' according to NADA spokesperson Amy Wright. 'Anecdotally, some dealers have reported an occasional, individual problem, but that should not deter consumers from purchasing an EV. There is no reason to believe there will be upcoming problems.' Many dealers, Wright said, offer the $7,500 credit at the time of purchase and that will remain unchanged until Sept. 30. The buyer can choose to take the credit upfront or claim it later on their tax return. You need the proper paperwork in either case. While a bit more than two months isn't a long lead time, the NADA said it was able to help secure a longer phaseout of the tax incentive through Sept. 30 instead of seeing the credit hit a dead stop even earlier. Contact personal finance columnist Susan Tompor: stompor@ Follow her on X @tompor.
Motor 1
6 hours ago
- Motor 1
Man Parks His Ram, Cracks Open His Window. He Says Having That Window Open Disables the Key Fob
Automakers love to tout 'smart' security features. But for one Ram driver, the system's smarts feel more like stubbornness by blocking his key fob from unlocking the truck just because he left the window open a little. The clip from truck enthusiast still-stockF150 (@still_stockf150) has captured the attention of more than 19,000 viewers. In it, the frustrated owner stands outside his pristine blue truck, mashing the buttons on his key fob and unable to unlock the vehicle. 'Got my windows cracked. My truck is locked,' he narrates. 'I go try to unlock it and I get a red notification on my key fob.' Separating Myth from Mechanism Despite the owner's frustration, there's no evidence that Ram intentionally disables the key fob when a window is cracked. No official owner's manual or technical bulletin mentions such behavior. What Ram enthusiasts and modders do discuss, however, are features that allow you to roll windows down (and sometimes up) using the key fob, but those hail from prior generations or rely on aftermarket toggles. For instance, older Rams around 2012 and earlier included functionality to lower the front windows by pressing the unlock button twice and holding it . It's a feature drivers likely found useful in sweltering heat. Many lament its disappearance, as it appears to have been discontinued around the 2013 model year due to liability concerns: A few owners accidentally left them cracked during storms, leading to interior damage and consumer complaints. Since then, tech-savvy owners have turned to tools like AlfaOBD or Tazer modules to reinstate these features, adding functionality through coding rather than from the factory. The comments section on the clip included several Stellantis owners pointing out they had no similar experiences with their own vehicles, which suggests the video creator had some kind of anomaly going on. What Could Actually Be Happening? There's no clearly documented 'window‑crack lockout' protocol in Ram trucks, but several technical explanations are worth exploring: Signal Interference or Dampening: Standing close to a cracked window may change the key fob's radio-frequency signal path , especially if there's moisture or metallic tinting near the breach. RF-sensitive systems can be finicky under such conditions, especially in newer vehicles using ultra-low-battery signals or more stringent proximity sensing. Key Fob Unpaired or Security Glitch: Anecdotes on Reddit detail random key‑fob unresponsiveness in 2024-25 Rams, sometimes resolved by opening and closing the driver's door or using the Ram app to re‑authenticate it. These may be minor bugs in the vehicle's security or convenience features. Aftermarket Mod Contamination: If the vehicle in question has ever had a Tazer, AlfaOBD, or similar module installed , even temporarily, it could be triggering unexpected behavior. The module may inject code or logic that overrides factory protocols. What Should Drivers Do Next? For these seemingly unexplained but persistent problems, there are some across-the-board steps to take to try to get some answers: Reach Out to Ram/Stellantis: Since no official documentation confirms that locking a Ram with a cracked window disables remote unlocking, your safest bet is to ask directly. Consult the 2025 Ram 1500 Owner's Manual for existing remote keyless behavior and follow up with Ram support for confirmation or clarification. Survey the Community: Several Ram owners report similar frustrations. One driver described how their 2025 Ram would randomly refuse to lock or unlock until they opened and closed the driver's door. Another worked around a 'key not detected' error by pressing the fob directly against the start button, triggering re-authentication. Scouring forums and comment threads can help you see if this is widespread or isolated. Run a Diagnostic Scan: In one case, a 2019 Ram owner encountered fob failures coinciding with the installation of an interlock device. Dealer advice included checking fuse F24, wiring integrity, and potential anti-theft 'lockdown,' then targeting Body Control Module (BCM) diagnostics. A professional scan may uncover electronic or software indicators that explain or fix the behavior. Motor1 reached out to the creator via direct message. Now Trending 'Is This Even Legal?:' Woman Takes 2023 Hyundai Palisade With Glitchy Touchscreen to Dealership. They Say She Needs a New Car 'That Can Happen?:' Woman Pumps Gas by Herself For the First Time. Then the Nozzle Breaks Off and It Spews Out Stay informed with our newsletter every weekday back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )
San Francisco Chronicle
7 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Ryan Preece earns 2nd career pole position in hunt for NASCAR playoff spot at Richmond
RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — Ryan Preece will start from the pole position Saturday night at Richmond Raceway while trying to lock in a spot for the NASCAR Cup Series playoffs. Preece earned his second career pole in 212 Cup starts with a lap at 121.381 mph around the 0.75-mile oval in his No. 60 Ford. 'What a great car,' said Preece, whose previous pole came at Martinsville Speedway in April 2023. With two races remaining in the regular season, Preece still can make the playoffs through the points standings, but a win would secure an automatic berth. Tyler Reddick, who can lock into the 16-driver playoff field on points with a strong result Saturday, qualified second. AJ Allmendinger will start third despite his No. 16 Chevrolet failing prerace inspection twice, which resulted in a loss of pit stall selection and the ejection of car chief Jaron Antley. Denny Hamlin and Chase Elliott rounded out the top five in qualifying. Sweeping the top three starting spots, Preece, Reddick and Allmendinger were joined by six other winless drivers qualifying in the top 15: Brad Keselowski (sixth), Alex Bowman (ninth), Michael McDowell (10th), Austin Dillon (11th), Chris Buescher (12th) and Carson Hocevar (15th). It'll be a tougher slog to get to the front for Ty Gibbs (22nd) and Kyle Busch (28th). Three-time Cup champion Joey Logano, a two-time winner at Richmond, will start last in the 38-car field after being unable to turn a lap in qualifying. Logano hit the Turn 4 wall in practice because of a right-front tire problem on his No. 22 Ford. Starting position is critical at Richmond, which tends to have long green-flag stretches when it's easy to fall a lap down. Last August's race had only three caution flags, which is tied for the fewest on a short track since the 2022 debut of the Next Gen car. ___
