Pleas on land acquisition for RRR to be heard on August 11 in Telangana
The petitions, filed nearly two months ago, had earlier come up for hearing but were adjourned after the Advocate General sought time to submit a detailed counter.
The landowners alleged that the acquisition process violates mandatory provisions of The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act.
They contended that authorities, under the pretext of complying with Sections 16 to 18 of the Act, issued notices for Grama Sabhas and public hearings in May and June without first conducting the required census and household survey of affected families.
In its counter, the government maintained that Grama Sabhas were duly conducted and that objections raised by the petitioners were examined and addressed in accordance with the provisions of the law.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
5 hours ago
- Indian Express
Nirmiti Kendras fall under RTI Act ambit, rules Karnataka HC
The Karnataka High Court ruled last week that Nirmiti Kendras, which were set up to develop construction skills and carry out state civil contracts, are subject to the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The order was passed by a single-judge bench of Justice Suraj Govindaraj on August 6. The bench also imposed an additional cost of Rs 50,000 on the Nirmiti Kendra in Chitradurga district, which had approached the high court against a State Information Commission order directing it to pay a cost of Rs 25,000 and submit certain documents sought by an RTI applicant in 2017. The petition argued that a Nirmiti Kendra is a private society, and this being the case, does not count as a 'public authority' under the RTI Act. Unless a body is a public authority, they are not bound to provide such information, the petition claimed. The opposing counsel argued that the Nirmiti Kendra was established to carry out the activities of the state, and the state government had substantial control and financed it, making it subject to the RTI Act. He also argued that even if it was an NGO, this would still apply as it was financed by the government. The bench observed that Nirmiti Kendras were established on the recommendation of the Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, and government officers, including IAS and Karnataka Administrative Service officers, ran their daily operations. It also pointed out that the source of funding was the Housing and Urban Development Corporation, a public sector entity. This being the case, the court ruled, the Kendras were subject to the RTI Act. 'It is not expected of a governmental authority and the officers of the Nirmathi Kendra, who are government officers, to have taken such a stand that a Nirmathi Kendra would not come within the purview of the RTI Act,' the bench said. 'The attempt made by the officers of Nirmathi Kendra to suppress such transparency leaves much to be desired and does not inspire confidence. By way of such conduct, the petitioner Nirmathi Kendra has successfully avoided disclosure of information and details,' it added.
New Indian Express
6 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Will not publish or circulate commission report: Karnataka government tells HC
BENGALURU: The State Government on Wednesday gave an undertaking before the Karnataka High Court that it will not publish or circulate the report submitted by the Commission of Inquiry headed by Justice John Michael D'Cunha into the stampede that claimed 11 lives outside M Chinnaswamy Stadium during the RCB victory celebrations on June 4. Recording the submission made by Advocate General K Shashikiran Shetty that the report will not be published or circulated till September 4, the next date of hearing, the division bench of Justice Jayant Banerji and Justice Umesh M Adiga adjourned the hearing of the petition filed by DNA Entertainment Networks Private Limited to September 4 to enable the State Government to file its objections. Accusing the commission of not following the procedure laid down in the Commission of Inquiry Act by not giving sufficient opportunity of hearing and also to cross-examination, DNA alleged that its reputation has been affected adversely because of the report. DNA contended that the commission contended that it is a company that falls under the category 'person' appearing in Section 8(b) of the Act, and therefore, the reputation and goodwill have been affected adversely because of the report, which was leaked to the media. The commission has finalised the report without recording the statements of the witnesses, DNA alleged. Raising preliminary objections about the maintainability of the petition, Advocate General submitted that the commission is empowered to set up its own procedure and the commission is not against any individual but into the incident, and therefore, the question affecting the individual's reputation does not arise. 'Some observations shocking' When the counsel for the petitioner submitted that the report of the commission has been given to the Criminal Investigation Department, which is investigating the crimes registered over the incidents, the court orally observed that some observations recorded in the report are shocking... 'but we are not making any observations at this stage,' the court said.
Hans India
6 hours ago
- Hans India
RTI awareness programme held
Tirupati: An awareness programme on the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005, was organised at the office of the Divisional Cooperative Officer, here on Wednesday. District Cooperative Officer SV Nagavardhana highlighted the importance of the Act, while District Cooperative Audit Officer Brahmananda Reddy stressed strict implementation of its provisions. Divisional Cooperative Officer J Suresh Kumar emphasised providing requested information within stipulated timeframes, as per the rules. A PowerPoint presentation explained the Act in detail. Officials, cooperative society staff, CEOs, and others attended. The event concluded with a rally through Tirupati streets to raise public awareness on RTI.
