RFK Jr. may stop government scientists from publishing in top journals
Kennedy made the statement on a podcast called The Ultimate Human, on which he called the journals "corrupt" and said they were controlled by drug companies.
"We're probably going to stop publishing in The Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA and those other journals," Kennedy said.
All three journals are known for publishing peer-reviewed studies and are widely read by health professionals around the world.
JAMA and The Lancet each get more than 30 million visits to their websites every year. The New England Journal of Medicine reaches more than 1 million readers weekly, in print and online, The Washington Post reported.
None of the journals responded right away to Kennedy's comments.
Kennedy said he wants HHS to create its own journals instead. They would "become the preeminent journals, because if you get [NIH] funding, it is anointing you as a good, legitimate scientist."
But some public health experts strongly disagreed.
"Banning NIH-funded researchers from publishing in leading medical journals and requiring them to publish only in journals that carry the RFK Jr. seal of approval would delegitimize taxpayer-funded research," Dr. Adam Gaffney, an assistant professor at Harvard Medical School, told The Post.
Gaffney also warned that drug approvals rely on science. While saying it's important to guard against commercial interests, he warned that Kennedy's plans - along with funding cuts and anti-vaccine views - could hurt public health.
On the podcast, Kennedy also criticized government agencies under HHS, including the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, National Institutes of Health and Medicare and Medicaid offices. He described them as "sock puppets" for the pharmaceutical industry.
The podcast came out shortly after Kennedy announced his department would stop recommending the COVID-19 vaccine for healthy children and pregnant women, bypassing CDC guidance.
Last week, the administration also released a new "Make America Health Again" report that challenged common views in medicine, including on vaccines.
The Post said the report included misleading information and claims not backed by strong evidence.
In April, a U.S. attorney sent a rare letter to the journal Chest, questioning its editorial policies. Critics said the move threatened freedom of speech, The Post reported.
Meanwhile, NIH funding has dropped by more than $3 billion since January, and many top universities are losing out on funding for research.
Kennedy has also led a major staff reduction at HHS, with about 20,000 federal workers cut - affecting almost every part of the agency, The Post said.
The cuts and funding freezes have led some U.S. scientists to consider leaving the country for jobs elsewhere. Countries like France, Germany, Spain and China are now actively recruiting American researchers.
More information
The Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England has more about the role of journals.
Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
6 minutes ago
- New York Post
Are mRNA vaccines safe and effective? What to know as RFK Jr. halts funding
Vaccines using mRNA technology weren't immune to the latest round of federal research cuts. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said this week that he's pulling the plug on nearly $500 million in funding for the development of mRNA vaccines. The 22 projects are managed by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA). 'The data show these vaccines fail to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like COVID and flu,' Kennedy, a longtime vaccine critic, said in a statement. 'We're shifting that funding toward safer, broader vaccine platforms that remain effective even as viruses mutate.' 4 Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said this week that he's pulling the plug on nearly $500 million in funding for the development of mRNA vaccines. AP Several studies have demonstrated that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were over 90% effective at preventing severe illness and death. Vaccine researchers immediately took issue with the fiscal gutting, calling it a major setback for science. 'I don't think I've seen a more dangerous decision in public health in my 50 years in the business,' said Mike Osterholm, a University of Minnesota expert on infectious diseases and pandemic preparations. Here's a closer look at how mRNA vaccines work. What is mRNA? All living cells have ribonucleic acid, an essential biological molecule known as RNA. RNA's primary role in the body is to make proteins, which are needed for virtually every cellular process, from building and repairing tissues to defending the body from bacteria and viruses and transporting nutrients and oxygen. 4 The COVID-19 vaccine manufactured by Pfizer and Biontec is administered during a clinical trial. EPA/Biontech SE/Handout Proteins are synthesized using three main types of RNA — messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA) and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). MRNA's job is to carry information for protein making from DNA to the cell's ribosomes, where it's translated into proteins. How do mRNA vaccines work? MRNA can be created in a laboratory and injected into the body to instruct cells to make a protein associated with a specific virus. The body recognizes the protein as foreign and produces antibodies to combat it. When the actual virus or pathogen invades the body, the immune system is ready to neutralize it, preventing or reducing the severity of illness. Though mRNA was discovered in the early 1960s, the first mRNA vaccine wasn't approved for human use until 2020. 4 German firm BioNTech, Pfizer's partner on its Covid vaccine, is developing mRNA-based vaccines for cancers at a rapid pace. Photothek via Getty Images The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use in December 2020 and later granted full approval. The vaccine uses mRNA to tell cells to make a harmless piece of the coronavirus's spike protein. Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine was also granted full approval by the FDA. MRNA vaccines are being explored for the treatment of cancer, food allergies and infectious diseases. Researchers say that mRNA vaccines can be developed faster than traditional vaccines because they do not require the time-consuming process of growing live virus cultures in a lab. 'The theoretical advantage of mRNA-based vaccines lies in their rapid adaptability,' Grant Hansman, senior research fellow at the Institute for Biomedicine and Glycomics at Griffith University in Australia, wrote this week in The Conversation. 'They will potentially allow annual updates to match circulating strains.' 4 University College London Hospital (UCLH) in London is testing novel cancer immunotherapy that aims to prevent skin cancer from recurring. The mRNA-based technology is for people who have already had high-risk melanomas removed. PA Images via Getty Images The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention notes that mRNA vaccines do not contain any live viruses or pathogens and do not alter a person's DNA. The mRNA molecule eventually breaks down in the body. The Cleveland Clinic reports that the risks of mRNA vaccines include pain or swelling at the injection site, fever, fatigue, headaches, muscle aches and allergic reactions. In his statement, Kennedy said that mRNA vaccines will be phased out in favor of whole killed virus vaccines, a traditional approach that uses entire pathogens that have been inactivated through heat, radiation or chemicals. Though it's a tried-and-true method of immunization, critics have raised concerns that these vaccines produce a weaker immune response than mRNA vaccines and pose manufacturing and logistical challenges. With Post wires
7 minutes ago
RFK Jr. cancels $550 million in funding for MRNA vaccine development
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced that the Department of Health and Human Services will cancel $500 million in funding for MRNA vaccines for viruses like COVID-19 and the flu. August 6, 2025
Washington Post
7 minutes ago
- Washington Post
RFK Jr.'s slander of mRNA technology will harm Americans
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s decision to cancel almost $500 million in contracts for projects to develop vaccines using mRNA technology underscores perhaps the greatest harm that he might inflict on the nation with his anti-vaccine ideology. The disparagement of existing immunizations by the health and human services secretary is dangerous on its own, in that it might persuade people to forego recommended shots and reduce herd immunity against diseases. But potentially even worse are the impacts that will be harder to see: the diseases that public health officials won't be able to fight because of the lifesaving innovations he is cutting short. Kennedy's resistance against mRNA vaccines is without evidence. In fact, the technology — which instructs the body's cells to produce a harmless bit of virus that is then used to train the immune system, as opposed to using weakened or dead versions of a virus — delivered arguably the most important achievement of President Donald Trump's first term: the production of effective vaccines against the novel coronavirus within the span of a few months. Such speed was practically unheard-of in biomedical research. Thanks to the urgency created by Operation Warp Speed, the federal government was able to mount an impressive vaccination rollout that boosted the population's immunity to the coronavirus just when it was needed. As with any medical treatment, these vaccines were not perfect. In very rare instances among adolescents, they resulted in a serious side effect known as myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart muscle. Their effectiveness also waned over time as the coronavirus mutated, as is the case with vaccines for other respiratory diseases. But there can be no doubt: These vaccines saved millions of lives. Kennedy absurdly claimed in a video statement that 'mRNA vaccines don't perform well against viruses that infect the upper respiratory tract.' He further claimed that a single mutation in a virus can render vaccines 'ineffective.' He even went so far as to argue that this effect 'encourages' mutations and could 'prolong' a pandemic. This is just plain wrong, as the covid pandemic demonstrated. The effectiveness of mRNA coronavirus vaccines might have diminished over time, but they continued to protect people against severe illness over the course of multiple strains. In fact, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention continued to recommend the shots for vulnerable populations for that reason, and manufacturers updated boosters to combat new strains. Giving up on this game-changing technology will slow down scientific innovation, leaving Americans more vulnerable to diseases. Kennedy just canceled or altered 22 mRNA projects that were supported by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority. On the chopping block are vaccine developments for several respiratory illnesses. That includes a project to defend the country against the H5N1 bird flu virus, which scientists warn could spiral into a deadly pandemic if someone contracts it while also infected with the seasonal flu virus. And that's just the beginning. Researchers are eager to deploy mRNA technology against a slew of other hard-to-tackle pathogens, from hepatitis C to HIV to malaria. There are even efforts to use this approach to activate the immune system to attack cancer cells and to treat other genetic diseases. Some scientists have suggested this research could also be essential for national security, as it might help defend against attacks from biological weapons. Calling Kennedy's latest actions shortsighted understates the gravity of his slander. Americans will bear the cost of his rejection of science.
