
GOP's House map overhaul: Texas Democrats flee state to block Trump's redistricting; tensions escalate
The Republican governor's late-night missive came after more than 50 Democrats left the state Sunday afternoon to prevent a vote on a new congressional map favouring Republicans.
In a letter, Governor said, "These absences are not merely unintended and unavoidable interruptions in public service, like a sudden illness or a family emergency. Instead, these absences were premeditated for an illegitimate purpose— what one representative called 'breaking quorum.'
Another previously signaled that Democrats 'would have to go by an extreme measure' of a quorum break 'to stop these bills from happening.
' In other words, Democrats hatched a deliberate plan not to show up for work, for the specific purpose of abdicating the duties of their office and thwarting the chamber's business."
"That amounts to an abandonment or forfeiture of an elected state office. When the Governor calls a Special Session, our Constitution provides that the 'Legislature shall meet.'
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
How Much Does It Cost to Rent a Private Jet - The Prices May Surprise You!
Private Jet I Search Ads
Learn More
Undo
TEX. CONST. art. III, § 5 (emphasis added). It's not optional. It's a duty... This truancy ends now. The derelict Democrat House members must return to Texas and be in attendance when the House reconvenes at 3:00 PM on Monday, August 4, 2025.
For any member who fails to do so, I will invoke Texas Attorney General Opinion No. KP-0382 to remove the missing Democrats from membership in the Texas House," he added.
Why Democrats ran away?
Texas' Republican majority recently introduced redistricting plans, supported by President Donald Trump, which would establish five additional Republican-leaning seats in the US House of Representatives.
A vote requires two-thirds attendance of the 150-member Texas legislature. Fifty-one Democratic legislators have left, primarily to Illinois, preventing the required quorum, BBC reported.
They intend to remain absent for two weeks until the special legislative session, called by Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott, concludes.
The session aims to approve redistricting, provide disaster relief for recent Texas floods, and prohibit THC, marijuana's primary active component.
Each absent lawmaker faces potential daily fines of £380, whilst Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, has issued arrest threats.
On X, he advocated using "every tool at our disposal to hunt down those who think they are above the law".
"Democrats in the Texas House who try and run away like cowards should be found, arrested, and brought back to the Capitol immediately," he wrote.
Texas Democrats issue statement, defending their actions
"We're not walking out on our responsibilities," stated Gene Wu, state legislator and Democratic caucus chairman.
"We're walking out on a rigged system that refuses to listen to the people we represent."
Whilst Democrats nationwide have suggested reciprocal actions, their options appear limited.
In Democrat-controlled redistricting states like Illinois, New Mexico and Nevada, they have engaged in similar gerrymandering practices.
Illinois' latest map received an F grade from the Princeton Gerrymandering Project for political unfairness.
However, some Democrat-led states, including New York, California, Colorado and Washington, utilise non-partisan, independent commissions for redistricting rather than state legislatures.
Texas Republicans currently control 25 of 38 congressional seats. The new maps could increase their representation to 30 seats - all in districts Trump won by over 10 points last November.
Before next year's midterms, Texas' redistricting could strengthen the Republican majority in the US House, where they hold 219 seats to Democrats' 212.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Gold steady amid Trump's 100% tariff threat on chip imports and trade tensions
Gold held a moderate loss, as traders looked past uncertainty created by US President Donald Trump's latest trade moves, including threatening a 100% tariff on chip imports. Traders also watched for Trump's nomination within days of a temporary Federal Reserve governor who is expected to be more aligned with his agenda to ease monetary policy.(AFP File Photo) Bullion was steady around $3,370 an ounce after a 0.3% decline in the previous session. This came after Trump said he would impose a 100% levy on semiconductor imports in a bid to force companies to move production back to the US. Meanwhile, relations with key trade partners soured, with the US leader doubling the tariff on Indian goods to 50% over the South Asian country's continued purchases of energy from Russia. Japan may also face higher duties than agreed last month on some products, Kyodo reported. Traders also watched for Trump's nomination within days of a temporary Federal Reserve governor who is expected to be more aligned with his agenda to ease monetary policy. Lower rates benefit gold, which doesn't yield interest. The precious metal's recent rally has been driven by rising expectation of rate cuts. Central bank buying and a broad trend of diversifying away from US dollar-denominated assets have also offered support. It's climbed nearly 30% this year, though the bulk of its gains happened in the first four months, as geopolitical and trade tensions rattled the market. Gold was 0.1% higher at $3,373.45 an ounce as of 8:42 a.m. in Singapore. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index was steady. Silver, palladium and platinum all rose.


Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
UCLA says Trump administration froze $584 million of its federal funding
President Donald Trump's administration has frozen $584 million in federal funding for the University of California, Los Angeles, UCLA said on Wednesday after the government reprimanded the university over pro-Palestinian protests. The Trump administration has threatened to cut federal funds for universities over pro-Palestinian protests against US ally Israel's war in Gaza. The government alleges universities, including UCLA, allowed antisemitism during the protests. Large demonstrations took place at UCLA last year. Protesters, including some Jewish groups, say the government wrongly equates their criticism of Israel's military assault in Gaza and its occupation of Palestinian territories with antisemitism, and their advocacy for Palestinian rights with support for extremism. 'Currently, a total of approximately $584 million in extra-mural award funding is suspended and at risk,' UCLA Chancellor Julio Frenk said in an update on the university website. University of California President James Milliken separately said the institution agreed to have talks with the federal government to restore its funding. Milliken said funding 'cuts do nothing to address antisemitism.' The White House had no immediate comment. Last week, UCLA agreed to pay over $6 million to settle a lawsuit by some students and a professor who alleged antisemitism. It was also sued this year over a 2024 violent mob attack on pro-Palestinian protesters at the height of the campus protest movement. The government has in recent weeks settled its probes with Columbia University, which agreed to pay over $220 million, and Brown University, which said it will pay $50 million. Both institutions accepted certain government demands. Talks to settle with Harvard University are ongoing. Rights advocates have raised concerns about academic freedom and free speech. The government has also attempted to deport foreign student protesters but faced judicial roadblocks. Stanford University's student-run newspaper sued the Trump administration on Wednesday, saying student writers censored themselves and turned down assignments related to Gaza to avoid being targeted for deportation. Rights advocates have noted a rise in antisemitism, anti-Arab bias and Islamophobia due to the war. The Trump administration has not announced equivalent probes into Islamophobia.


India.com
29 minutes ago
- India.com
Rs 2580000000000: US's treasury overflowing with billions in tax revenue! Here's how Trump administration plans to use money..., Americans to get...
Escalating his tariff offensive against India, US President Donald Trump on Wednesday slapped an additional 25 per cent duty–doubling it to 50 per cent–on Indian goods over New Delhi's continued imports of Russian oil. The move that is likely to hit sectors such as textiles, marine and leather exports hard was slammed by India as 'unfair, unjustified, and unreasonable'. How much has the US government collected so far this year? The Treasury Department reported that in the last month, the US government collected almost $30 billion in tariff revenue in July, a 242% increase from July of last year, reported CNN. The government has earned $100 billion in revenue from tariffs since April, when the president instituted a 10% tariff on nearly all goods and many other even higher tariffs. This is three times more than was collected in the previous year in the same four months. So the question arises: what will the Trump administration do with all this money? As reported by CNN, Trump has offered two possible options for the tariff revenue: Either to reduce the government's multi-trillion-dollar debt or to send 'tariff rebate checks' back to the American people. 'The purpose of what I'm doing is primarily to pay down debt, which will happen in very large quantity,' Trump was quoted as saying by CNN. 'But I think there's also a possibility that we're taking in so much money that we may very well make a dividend to the people of America,' he added. How will tariff revenues affect the federal budget deficit? According to CNN reports, neither of those plans has come to fruition – at least not at this time. So, many Americans may feel that the billions of dollars coming in from tariffs, mostly paid upfront by U.S.-based businesses importing foreign goods, are sitting idle. There is a lot more going on behind the scenes. The government collects revenue from various sources, such as taxes and tariffs. The revenue is all sent into the general fund, which is managed by the Treasury Department. The Treasury calls this general fund 'America's checkbook.' The Treasury Department then spends that money on the government's obligations, including payments such as Social Security. When the money raised by the government does not equal the expenses it has, resulting in a budget deficit, it needs to borrow money to cover the expenses it cannot pay with tax revenue. The national debt is now exceeding $36 trillion, and the debt is increasing. Many economists are concerned about the increasing debt and think it could be impacting economic growth. This is because the government, like an individual, is also required to pay interest on the money borrowed. The more it borrows, the larger its interest obligations grow—adding another monetary impediment that forces money away from critical public investments, like upgrading roadways and infrastructure. While the tariff revenue isn't enough to plug the $1.4 trillion budget deficit the government is facing this fiscal year, it has helped close the gap somewhat. Therefore, the government is borrowing a bit less than it would in the absence of these tariff collections. If Congress agrees to Trump's proposal to use tariffs to send 'rebate checks' to Americans—an idea supported by a bill introduced last week by Republican senator Josh Hawley—it would probably create a budget hole, Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics for the Budget Lab at Yale, and a former economist in the Biden White House said, reported CNN.