Entrepreneur UK's London 100: MEUM
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
You're reading Entrepreneur United Kingdom, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media.
Industry: Advisory
MEUM connects ultra-high net worth individuals with best-in-class trusted experts.
The company transforms the current fragmented journey of instructing silo experts requiring numerous identity verification processes into a simple, single ID verified platform where clients can access top vetted in-house expertise across law, finance, and luxury lifestyle.
MEUM is a game-changing start-up disrupting the traditional private client industry, which is embedded in conventional methods of working and delivery.
By providing integrated services through a single platform, they offer unprecedented efficiency and reliability alongside the requisite trust and integrity in this industry.
CEO of MEUM, Sofia Syed states, "MEUM is committed to revolutionising the private client experience. We believe in providing holistic and seamless advice that goes beyond traditional boundaries and sets a new standard in client service."
MEUM has grown from 4 to 50 experts in less than 2 years and is set to continue this growth trajectory, seeking overseas expansion.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Despite the downward trend in earnings at Bellway (LON:BWY) the stock swells 12%, bringing three-year gains to 58%
By buying an index fund, investors can approximate the average market return. But if you pick the right individual stocks, you could make more than that. Just take a look at Bellway p.l.c. (LON:BWY), which is up 38%, over three years, soundly beating the market return of 14% (not including dividends). However, more recent returns haven't been as impressive as that, with the stock returning just 16% in the last year, including dividends. After a strong gain in the past week, it's worth seeing if longer term returns have been driven by improving fundamentals. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. While the efficient markets hypothesis continues to be taught by some, it has been proven that markets are over-reactive dynamic systems, and investors are not always rational. By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time. During the three years of share price growth, Bellway actually saw its earnings per share (EPS) drop 28% per year. This means it's unlikely the market is judging the company based on earnings growth. Therefore, we think it's worth considering other metrics as well. The revenue drop of 12% is as underwhelming as some politicians. The only thing that's clear is there is low correlation between Bellway's share price and its historic fundamental data. Further research may be required! You can see how earnings and revenue have changed over time in the image below (click on the chart to see the exact values). Bellway is a well known stock, with plenty of analyst coverage, suggesting some visibility into future growth. If you are thinking of buying or selling Bellway stock, you should check out this free report showing analyst consensus estimates for future profits. As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. In the case of Bellway, it has a TSR of 58% for the last 3 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. This is largely a result of its dividend payments! We're pleased to report that Bellway shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 16% over one year. And that does include the dividend. That's better than the annualised return of 6% over half a decade, implying that the company is doing better recently. Given the share price momentum remains strong, it might be worth taking a closer look at the stock, lest you miss an opportunity. Most investors take the time to check the data on insider transactions. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling. If you would prefer to check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of companies that have proven they can grow earnings. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on British exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Five key points for London from Spending Review
It is no secret that the mayor of London was not pleased with what was - or rather, what was not - in the government's recent Spending Review. Sadiq Khan's wish list, including money for new transport infrastructure projects, was surrounded by tumbleweed. An increase in police funding - unlikely to fill the Met's budget black hole - offered cold comfort, and there were slim pickings for council finances. The government would disagree with his outlook, pointing to investment in affordable homes, free school meals and the NHS. So let's take a closer look at the offerings for the capital. Transport Transport for London (TfL) is getting a four-year spending settlement of £2.2bn. It's a big deal because in recent years, not knowing how much government funding it would be getting beyond the next year TfL has struggled to plan ahead. TfL commissioner Andy Lord said having four years of cash guaranteed meant TfL could now complete the introduction of new trains on the Piccadilly line and Docklands Light Railway (DLR), and new signalling on 40% of the Tube. He said it can now procure a new tram fleet, progress discussions on new Bakerloo line trains and can get to work on renewing some of London's critical roads, tunnels and flyovers. Infrastructure In bad news for City Hall, no cash was allocated for the new transport infrastructure projects Sir Sadiq had been pinning his hopes on. These included the DLR extension to Thamesmead, the Bakerloo line extension to Lewisham and the West London Orbital between Hendon and Hounslow. This spending review was about the government's priorities and it was clear new London-based transport projects were not on that priority list. Instead, it pointed at old infrastructure announcements we already knew about -Heathrow expansion and HS2 to Euston. I asked the mayor's team whether it was an anti-London spending review. The answer was unequivocal: "Yes it is". However, an olive branch to City Hall was offered in a Treasury document, which said "the potential growth and housing benefits" of the DLR extension was recognised, and that the government "is committed to working with TfL to explore options for delivery". Sir Sadiq, who spent the run-up to last year's General Election telling journalists a Labour government working with a Labour mayor would mean London would get what it needs, was clearly not pleased. In the statement, he said it was "disappointing" there was no commitment to invest in the new infrastructure. He warned that without such investment, it will be unable to build "the new affordable homes that Londoners need". Housing The good news on housing was the £39bn for affordable homes over 10 years, which has been welcomed by the G15 group of the capital's leading housing associations. Chair, Ian McDermott - who is also the chief executive of the Peabody housing association - said it was clear ministers understood the issues. "In London the challenge remains considerable, but this settlement offers a real opportunity to turn the tide." Antonia Jennings, chief executive at the Centre for London thinktank, agreed it will bring more certainty to home builders, although did specify "the devil is in the detail". That brings us to the not-so-pretty side of this £39bn funding - we do not yet know what proportion of the funding will actually come to London. Ms Jennings warned a 10-year plan does not help Londoners today who are struggling to find affordable homes. She added that it would have been "very helpful to see… an uplift to the Local Housing Allowance" to help private renters. The Spending Review did include £950m to help councils pay for what the government described as "good-quality temporary accommodation" instead of "costly bed-and-breakfasts and hotels". London's boroughs have welcomed that, but again, it is not clear how much will come to London. London's councils now collectively spend £4 million a day on temporary accommodation to house homeless Londoners, and it is unclear if this sum would make much of a dent in that. Policing Yes, the chancellor did announce an increase of 2.3% for policing, but - and it is a huge but - the Metropolitan Police is facing a black hole in its funding of £260m this year. Commissioner, Sir Mark Rowley, warned of potential cuts to officer numbers and said they might be forced to choose which crimes the Met can afford to focus on. So is a 2.3% increase enough? The mayor of London thinks not. The statement he issued to us read: "I remain concerned that this Spending Review could result in insufficient funding for the Met and fewer police officers." In response, the chancellor Rachel Reeves told the BBC: "I really don't accept that there need to be cuts when we're increasing the money the police force gets." Clearly all is not harmonious between London's Labour mayor and the Labour government on this issue. Local government Put simply, London boroughs wanted more. The Treasury did announced an increase of around 3.1% per year in local authority core spending power, but London Councils has been warning it expects a collective funding gap of £500m this year. Chair of the group, Claire Holland, who also leads Lambeth Council, said boroughs' finances remain "extremely difficult" and the funding "will remain very tight." She said the critical issue going forward would be whether the government includes the cost of housing in how it decides the funding formula that determines the proportion of money each council receives. Pointing to research from the Institute for Fiscal Studies that suggested London local government funding was 17% lower than its relative need, Holland said the distribution of funds "can be make or break for us in London". She added it was "vital" a new funding formula is implemented, that matches resource to need. Then there is council tax. Treasury documents for the spending review suggest council tax is expected to rise by 5% a year to pay for local services and that bills are also expected to rise further to pay for an increase in police funding. In London that has already been happening for years. Most councils here raised their council tax by the maximum 5% allowed this year and the mayor has, for several years, raised the council tax precept (the amount the Greater London Authority adds to your council tax bill) to provide more funding for the Met Police. Londoners can probably expect that trend to continue. From next year London will get an integrated settlement, bringing it in line with how funding works for combined authorities in some other parts of the country. So instead of the Greater London Authority getting different pots of cash from central government for, for example, housing or policing, which has to be spent on those areas, the mayor will get one budget pot and the GLA will decide how to spend it. Winners and losers: Who got what in the spending review? Why London councils want more Spending Review cash Could this be London's property hotspot in 2040? Leaks and crumbling ceilings: Met says half its buildings face closure
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mobile Tornado Group Full Year 2024 Earnings: UK£0.004 loss per share (vs UK£0.002 loss in FY 2023)
Revenue: UK£2.03m (down 10% from FY 2023). Net loss: UK£1.56m (loss widened by 58% from FY 2023). UK£0.004 loss per share (further deteriorated from UK£0.002 loss in FY 2023). AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period The primary driver behind last 12 months revenue was the South America segment contributing a total revenue of UK£1.20m (59% of total revenue). The largest operating expense was General & Administrative costs, amounting to UK£2.57m (73% of total expenses). Explore how MBT's revenue and expenses shape its earnings. Mobile Tornado Group shares are up 4.5% from a week ago. Before we wrap up, we've discovered 6 warning signs for Mobile Tornado Group (4 are a bit unpleasant!) that you should be aware of. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
