logo
The US test fired its most power laser ever

The US test fired its most power laser ever

Yahoo19-05-2025
A laser named after the most powerful god in ancient Greece is living up to its name. According to the University of Michigan, the first official experiment from the Zettawatt-Equivalent Ultrashort pulse laser System (ZEUS) yielded 2 petawatts (2 quadrillion watts) of power. For reference, that's more than 100 times the electricity output across the entire planet—but you'll likely miss it if you blink.
The school gym-sized ZEUS is the successor to the university's HERCULES system, which topped out at 300 terawatts. ZEUS relied on a reconfigured target for its debut demonstration, which required firing a laser pulse at a cell containing helium. The subsequent interaction produced plasma as it tore electrons away from the helium atoms, resulting in a mixture of both positive ions and free electrons. The electrons started gaining speed behind the laser pulse in a phenomenon known as wakefield acceleration. Because light moves slower in plasma, the electrons can catch up to the laser beam. Those free electrons also get more time to speed up given the size of the target chamber and thereby hit higher speeds.
The recent demonstration is a prelude to the signature ZEUS experiment scheduled for later this year. In that test, the accelerating electrons will also smack into laser pulses coming from the opposite direction. This is where things get (even) more complicated—but to condense it down, the effect makes a 3-petawatt laser appear one million times more powerful, hence the 'zettawatt-equivalent' in ZEUS' name.
Accomplishing this and other experimental feats does require some safeguards. ZEUS includes optical devices known as diffraction gratings that stretch out the initial infrared pulse over time. This ensures the initial power doesn't get so intense that it begins tearing apart the air around it.
Another goal is to ultimately create beams of electrons with energies similar to those found in particle accelerators hundreds of feet longer than ZEUS at a fraction of both its size and operating costs. At only $16 million to construct, the University of Michigan previously described the machine as a 'bargain.'
Years of construction, calibration, and expertise is showcased in an astoundingly short amount of time. ZEUS' 2 petawatt firing lasted just 25 quintillionths of a second. But future experiments will make the most of these moments.
'The fundamental research done at the NSF ZEUS facility has many possible applications, including better imaging methods for soft tissues and advancing the technology used to treat cancer and other diseases,' explained Vyacheslav Lukin, program director in the National Science d Division of Physics, which is responsible for the ZEUS project.
Meanwhile, ZEUS experiments could also help researchers explore the dynamics of positron jets that shoot out of black holes, or how gamma ray bursts operate.
'One of the great things about ZEUS is it's not just one big laser hammer, but you can split the light into multiple beams,' said Franklin Dollar, a University of California professor of physics and astronomy who oversaw the 2 petawatt experiment. 'Having a national resource like this, which awards time to users whose experimental concepts are most promising for advancing scientific priorities, is really bringing high-intensity laser science back to the U.S.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S. Cuts Antarctica's Only Research Icebreaker Ship under Trump Budget Squeeze
U.S. Cuts Antarctica's Only Research Icebreaker Ship under Trump Budget Squeeze

Scientific American

timea day ago

  • Scientific American

U.S. Cuts Antarctica's Only Research Icebreaker Ship under Trump Budget Squeeze

Many ships have tried to reach the floating tongue of Thwaites Glacier —a 130-kilometer-wide conveyor belt of ice that slides off West Antarctica's coast and splinters into the sea. Thwaites is rapidly destabilizing, and precise mapping of the seafloor and ocean currents surrounding it are urgently needed to know how much damage the crumbling glacier and resulting sea-level rise could do to coasts worldwide. Only one vessel—the U.S. research icebreaker Nathaniel B. Palmer (NBP)—has successfully penetrated the area's phalanx of sea ice and billion-metric-ton icebergs to reach a critical location on Thwaites, widely considered the world's most dangerous glacier. The NBP has made about 200 research cruises to Antarctica in the past 30 years, in many cases reaching places never before visited. But if the Trump administration has its way, this will all come to an end in October. The NBP's expeditions along remote parts of the Antarctic coast have gathered voluminous data that are critical to U.S. interests. If the Thwaites glacier were to implode, it could raise the average global sea level by 65 centimeters, and it could potentially trigger wider Antarctic ice sheet collapse that could raise global sea level by more than three meters. Marine science shows that a disproportionate brunt of that rise would inundate the Gulf of Mexico and eastern U.S. coasts. Frequent measurements in Antarctica's remote locations are needed to project how quickly this might happen. Expeditions also monitor marine ecosystems that are rapidly shifting as a result of climate change and affecting the large commercial fisheries in surrounding waters. Yet Antarctic science experts and officials told me that the administration is imposing such severe budget cuts on the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) that the organization has no realistic option but to terminate its lease for the NBP after 30 years. The U.S. is 'losing the only research [icebreaker it has] in the Southern Hemisphere,' says Michael Jackson, the NSF's former section head for Antarctic sciences, who left in December. A replacement vessel —if one is even funded—'will probably take 10 years to build,' he says. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. This latest move caps what feels like a major U.S. retreat from Antarctica, says Theodore Scambos, a polar glaciologist at the University of Colorado Boulder. For 27 years, the U.S. had operated two research icebreakers in the region. But in 2024 NSF dropped its lease for the smaller of the two craft because of budget shortfalls. That and the impending loss of the NBP marks 'a general decline of America in the science and exploration fields,' Scambos says. 'And I hate that.' This loss will have widespread consequences, according to a wide range of scientists, logistics experts, former NSF officials and former diplomats interviewed for this story. It will hamstring U.S. influence in the Antarctic at a time when geopolitical competition and resource exploitation are intensifying in the region. It will also undermine scientists' ability to monitor rapid changes in Thwaites and other remote areas—at the very moment climate impacts on the continent are accelerating. Researchers first learned of the NBP 's situation on May 30, when the Trump administration released its full fiscal year 2026 budget request for NSF to Congress. The termination was buried in a single sentence on page 102 of the 222-page document. The budget request also stipulated a 70 percent funding cut for polar science research projects overall. 'None of us saw that coming,' says Patricia Yager, a polar marine biologist at the University of Georgia, who called the move 'shocking.' In response to a request for comment from Scientific American, an NSF spokesperson confirmed via e-mail that NSF had proposed terminating the lease of the NBP in Trump's 2026 fiscal year budget request but provided little additional information. Although the U.S. Coast Guard has three icebreakers— Polar Star, Healy and the newly commissioned Storis, a former commercial icebreaker—none can fill NBP 's role. Healy is continually committed to Arctic duties; sending it to Antarctica and back to do even a single day of scientific work would require 60 days of travel. Storis, which has a troubled history, will also be used in the Arctic. And Polar Star is simply not equipped for the kind of research the NBP does. 'The Palmer is the most amazing research tool that we have; there's nothing like it anywhere in the world,' Yager says. It can plow through meter-thick sea ice at three knots with little more than gentle side-to-side rocking. And it can remain at sea for 65 days, a vital capability given that a round trip to Thwaites takes nearly two weeks from the nearest port. Waiting for vast rafts of sea ice and icebergs to shift and open a passage can add many more days. When the NBP is in Antarctic waters, it continuously collects data. Multibeam sonar captures a three-dimensional map of the seafloor, revealing features such as undersea canyons that influence the stability of coastal glaciers. Another sonar system traces sediment layers below the seafloor, which can provide important records of past climate periods. Even in rough seas and high winds, the ship's dynamic positioning system allows it to hover within a few feet of its intended location while technicians do the delicate work of collecting sediment cores or piloting remote-operated submersibles on the seafloor. The NBP can carry and launch two helicopters, which proved decisive during a 2010 cruise, allowing researchers to leapfrog over impassable sea ice and install instruments for monitoring crustal movements and glacial retreat as far as 200 kilometers away. The impending loss of the NBP means five Antarctic missions, slated for October 2025 through April 2026, now hang in limbo. The NSF is scrambling for ways to salvage at least some of them. For example, the agency might send the University of Alaska Fairbanks's Arctic research vessel Sikuliaq all the way down to Antarctica in January to perform a major ecological survey that has been conducted annually since 1999. The survey covers 2,000 kilometers along the Antarctic Peninsula's coast and out past the lip of the continental shelf. It measures the abundance of krill and phytoplankton—which anchor the region's ecosystem—and monitors deep ocean currents. In recent decades this survey has revealed important changes in ocean mixing that have caused the winter sea ice season in this relatively temperate section of Antarctica to shorten by roughly 100 days a year. But the Sikuliaq is already in high demand in the Arctic, for up to a dozen expeditions per year. And compared with the NBP, it has fewer berths for scientists, can spend fewer days at sea and has more limited ice-breaking capabilities—effectively excluding it from Thwaites and other heavily iced sections of the Antarctic coastline. A few other countries have research icebreakers, including the U.K., Germany, Australia, South Korea and China. It is possible that a couple U.S. researchers could occasionally find ride-along spots. But that may not advance U.S. research priorities, Scambos says: 'You're not going to get somebody else's icebreaker to bring you and 20 of your colleagues and undertake a major mission that has U.S. research interest behind it.' The NSF spokesperson stated that the agency 'has started the process to identify vessels and partnerships to continue support of marine science.' A new icebreaker that would eventually replace the NBP is in early design stages, but it would take a decade to build. The work on this new Antarctic research vessel has been moving slowly for a variety of reasons, even prior to the start of the current Trump administration. The NSF spokesperson stated that the agency 'has paused source selection activities' for the next stage of development. Since the 1950s the U.S. has maintained a larger scientific presence on the Antarctic continent than any other nation, by way of research stations, ships, remote air transport and exploratory teams that drive vehicles in long traverses across the ice sheet. For now, NSF plans to try to keep operating the three U.S. land bases in Antarctica—the Palmer, McMurdo and Amundsen-Scott South Pole stations—because the harsh environment would cause them to rapidly deteriorate if they were not staffed. But spending an ensuing decade without a research icebreaker could have major geopolitical consequences. Antarctica is Earth's largest remaining territory not unilaterally controlled by any particular nation. The U.S. has long backed the Antarctic Treaty, under which nations set aside any territorial land claims they've made and reserve the continent for scientific research. If international commitment to the treaty ever faltered, however, nations might pursue territorial claims on the continent, and those claims would be bolstered by having maintained research stations, communications hubs, deep water ports and air transport and driving routes. 'Operations and logistics are 100 percent necessary for U.S. national security interests,' says William Muntean III, a former senior adviser for Antarctic affairs and a deputy representative for the U.S. State Department to the annual Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting. The scientific research conducted there is a fundamental part of that equation. 'In the Antarctic Treaty System,' Muntean says, 'knowledge is what equals power.' That's because the rules of play for Antarctica and its surrounding seas are constantly negotiated and monitored by more than two dozen countries with research stations there—and any negotiations become especially heated when it comes to resource extraction. For years commercial vessels have plied the coastal seas for Antarctic toothfish (sold in restaurants as 'sea bass') and krill. The U.S. and a handful of other countries have sought to establish several marine protected areas around the continent where fishing would be prohibited, but they have encountered resistance from Russia and China. Negotiations often hinge on data collected from research vessels, such as those that document changes in ecosystems. In this way, Muntean says, 'knowing what is actually happening in Antarctica gives a country the ability to then influence' what happens. Right now the NBP remains moored at the main pier in Punta Arenas in southern Chile—its standard departure point for Antarctica. The ship's fate is on hold until early September, when Congress returns from recess. 'The budget request is always just a policy document,' says Alexandra Isern, a former assistant director of the NSF. In the NSF's pending request, she says, the Trump administration is putting 'a line in the sand' for what it wants. Funding bills that were sitting in Congress before recess add confusion. Senate bill 2354, which passed out of the Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Agencies in mid-July, appears to restore full funding to the NSF. The corresponding House bill restores roughly two thirds of the proposed cuts. Isern says 'members [of Congress] are big supporters of the Antarctic program,' but neither of those bills mentions the NBP or the new icebreaker intended to replace it. Jackson fears that Congress will cave to pressure from the Trump administration and neither the NBP nor the other polar research funding will be saved. In the meantime, polar researchers across the U.S. continue to prepare for science missions that may or may not happen. Some have already shipped their scientific gear south to Chile in case their cruise happens after all. Others will have to do so in the coming weeks, before Congress returns. Amid the uncertainty, Oscar Schofield, a biological oceanographer at Rutgers University, sees a clear message. The administration is already stripping climate data from government websites, preparing to halt EPA regulation of carbon dioxide emissions and quietly discussing plans to scuttle a state-of-the-art NASA satellite that monitors carbon dioxide—allowing the spacecraft to burn up in the atmosphere. Canceling the NBP, he says, looks like 'a political decision of not wanting to support climate change research.' In this decision, Schofield sees an important lever of soft power being abandoned. 'Since World War II,' he says, 'there was always a strong belief that if the U.S. had the strongest scientists and the strongest engineers, it would serve national security.' Those generational investments, he says, are now being undone.

Milky Way and zodiacal light glow above telescopes in Chile
Milky Way and zodiacal light glow above telescopes in Chile

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Milky Way and zodiacal light glow above telescopes in Chile

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Recently, the Chilean night sky was illuminated by the glow of the Milky Way galaxy as it was seen above the domes of telescopes at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO), a facility of the National Science Foundation's (NSF) NOIRLab. What is it? A cone of zodiacal light intersects the iconic Milky Way, creating an x-shape in the night sky. NOIRLab highlighted this x-shape in a recent LinkedIn post, saying: " X marks the spot at Cerro Tololo!" Zodiacal light extends in a triangular shape from Earth's horizon along the ecliptic, the apparent annual path of the sun across the sky, serving as the baseline for positions of the planets and zodiac constellations. This special light is the reflection of sunlight off particles and dust in the solar system. Astronomers can study zodiacal light to map the distributions and possible origins of cosmic dust, revealing further insights about the processes happening in our solar system. Where is it? This image was taken at the CTIO facility, around 310 miles (500 km) north of Santiago, Chile at an elevation of 7,200 feet (2200 meters). Its location allows it to avoid light pollution from urban areas. Why is it amazing? As a major astronomical research facility, the CTIO hosts nearly 40 telescopes at it site, which offers exceptionally clear dark skies to peer deep into space. These telescopes are used for many different projects, from studying near-Earth asteroids to space debris to exoplanets. CTIO's mission is to provide world-class observing capabilities to the global astronomical community, supporting key discoveries while helping us to further understand more about our universe. Want to learn more? You can read more about telescopes based in Chile and night sky photography. Solve the daily Crossword

Nvidia, National Science Foundation Partner to Create Open AI Models for US Scientists
Nvidia, National Science Foundation Partner to Create Open AI Models for US Scientists

Yahoo

time5 days ago

  • Yahoo

Nvidia, National Science Foundation Partner to Create Open AI Models for US Scientists

The US National Science Foundation (NSF) has secured significant investments from the private and public sectors for its Open Multimodal AI Infrastructure (OMAI) project. The Allen Institute for AI, known as Ai2, is leading the project, which will provide cutting-edge AI models for scientists nationwide. Nvidia has already committed $77 million to the new project. The key to the OMAI project is that the large language models (LLMs) produced will be open source, freeing researchers from potential ties to private interests. At this stage of AI development, the hardware costs of training LLMs are outside the budgets of many research facilities. Those LLMs are generally not open source. (Even OpenAI isn't entirely open source, despite its name.) Ai2 plans to fill that gap with the OMAI project by producing LLMs geared towards literature and scientific data. 'These tools will enable America's researchers and developers to process and analyze research faster, generate code and visualizations, and connect new insights to past discoveries, accelerating breakthroughs across materials science, biology, energy, and more,' the NSF wrote in a statement. Ai2 was founded by the late Paul Allen, a Microsoft co-founder who donated considerable sums to further science research. The investment in Ai2's OMAI project gives Ai2 a massive boost in funding and hardware. Credit: Nvidia. Nvidia isn't the only organization contributing to the OMAI project. The NSF is providing $75 million, bringing the initial investment to $152 million. The Trump administration recently created an AI Action Plan, which prioritizes the US's 'global dominance in artificial intelligence.' 'Bringing AI into scientific research has been a game changer,' said Brian Stone of the NSF. 'NSF is proud to partner with Nvidia to equip America's scientists with the tools to accelerate breakthroughs. These investments are not just about enabling innovation; they are about securing US global leadership in science and technology and tackling challenges once thought impossible.' The $152 million will also help the OMAI project support universities in Hawai'i, New Hampshire, New Mexico, and Washington. The project already has partnerships with Cirrascale Cloud Services and SuperMicro. Cirrascale will handle hardware infrastructure management. As you'd expect from a hardware company, Nvidia is providing its HGX B300 systems, which are loaded with Nvidia Blackwell chips and designed for AI uses. According to Nvidia, the HGX B300 features 8 Blackwell Ultra SXM GPUs and up to 2.3TB of memory. The OMAI project hasn't indicated yet how many HGX B300 systems will be involved.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store