Casualties, Targets, Threats: Developments From The Israel-Iran Conflict
Tehran / Jerusalem:
Israel and Iran traded deadly fire for a fourth consecutive day on Monday in their most intense confrontation in history, fuelling fears of a drawn-out conflict that could engulf the Middle East.
The longtime foes have fought a prolonged shadow war through proxies and covert operations, with Israel battling several Iran-backed groups in the region including Hamas in the Gaza Strip since October 2023.
Here are the latest developments:
Mounting Casualties
In a major campaign launched early Friday, Israeli fighter jets and drones have struck nuclear and military sites in Iran, also hitting residential areas and fuel depots.
Iran's health ministry says at least 224 people have been killed and more than 1,200 wounded.
Tehran has responded with barrages of missiles and drones that hit Israeli cities and towns, killing at least 24 people and injuring 592 others, according to the prime minister's office.
Israel has also killed many top military commanders and atomic scientists in Iran, part of the offensive that officials say seeks to thwart nuclear and missile threats from the Islamic republic.
Military Targets
The Israeli military said that after a wave of strikes on Monday, its forces had destroyed one third of Iran's surface-to-surface missile launchers.
According to military spokesman Effie Defrin, "we have now achieved full air superiority over Tehran."
It followed a wave of intense air raids across Iran, from the western border with Iraq to the capital Tehran and as far east as Mashhad, where the airport was hit.
In Tehran early Monday, Israel said it hit command centres belonging to the Quds Force, the foreign operations arm of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
Reza Sayyad, spokesman for the Iranian armed forces, said their targets in Israel included "sensitive and important" security sites as well as "the residences of military commanders and scientists".
Escalating Threats
Mr Sayyad, in a televised address, vowed a "devastating response" to the Israeli attacks, while the Revolutionary Guards in a statement warned they would hit more "vital targets" in Israel "until its complete destruction".
Residential areas in both countries have suffered, with Israel accusing Iran of deliberately targeting civilians.
After deadly overnight missile fire, Defence Minister Israel Katz warned that "the residents of Tehran will pay the price -- and soon".
Diplomacy
The conflict has rapidly escalated despite calls from world leaders to halt the attacks.
China urged Iran and Israel to "immediately" take steps to reduce tensions and "prevent the region from falling into greater turmoil".
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan told his Iranian counterpart in a phone call on Monday that Ankara is ready to play a "facilitating role" to end the conflict.
US President Donald Trump has urged the foes to "make a deal", but told reporters Sunday that "sometimes they have to fight it out" first.
Nuclear sites
Mr Netanyahu has said the Israeli offensive aims to thwart an "existential" nuclear and missile threat from Iran.
The fierce bombardment campaign began as Tehran and Washington were engaged in nuclear talks -- which have since been cancelled -- and after warnings from the UN nuclear watchdog over Iran's atomic activities.
Rafael Grossi, head of the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency, said on Monday there was "no indication of a physical attack" on an underground section of Iran's Natanz uranium enrichment facility, and that radiation levels outside the plant "remained... at normal levels".
"For the second time in three years, we are witnessing a dramatic conflict between two IAEA member states in which nuclear installations are coming under fire and nuclear safety is being compromised," Grossi told an extraordinary board meeting of the UN agency.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
9 minutes ago
- Hans India
Iranian missiles hit US Embassy in Israel
Tel Aviv: The Embassy of the United States in Tel Aviv was temporarily closed after the building suffered massive damage following an Iranian missile strike on Sunday night, US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee confirmed on Monday. Even as no injuries or casualties were reported among US diplomatic staff, latest videos on social media showed the consulate building was damaged by the explosions. Mike Huckabee took to X and said, 'Our US Embassy in Israel and Consulate will officially remain closed today as shelter in place still in effect. Some minor damage from concussions of Iranian missile hits near Embassy Branch in Tel Aviv but no injuries to US personnel.' The fresh videos from the damaged buildings in Tel Aviv showed glass and windowpanes broken by the missile attack near the building. The staff of the embassy were asked to take shelter in safe places, adhering to emergency protocols. It should be noted that the missile attack near the American embassy marks the first direct threat to US diplomatic missions in the region as hostilities between Israel and Iran escalated. Iran fired a new wave of missile attacks on Israel early Monday, triggering air raid sirens across the country as emergency services reported at least five killed and dozens more wounded in the fourth day of open warfare between the regional foes that showed no sign of slowing. Iran announced it had launched some 100 missiles and vowed further retaliation for Israel's sweeping attacks on its military and nuclear infrastructure, which have killed at least 224 people in the country since last Friday. Iran fired a new wave of missile attacks on Israel early Monday, triggering air raid sirens across the country as emergency services reported at least five killed and dozens more wounded in the fourth day of open warfare between the regional foes that showed no sign of slowing. Iran announced it had launched some 100 missiles and vowed further retaliation for Israel's sweeping attacks on its military and nuclear infrastructure, which have killed at least 224 people in the country since last Friday. Israel said so far 24 people have been killed and more than 500 injured as Iran launched more than 370 missiles and hundreds of drones. In response the Israeli military said fighter jets had struck 10 command centres in Tehran belonging to Iran's Quds Force, an elite arm of its Revolutionary Guard that conducts military and intelligence operations outside Iran.
News18
13 minutes ago
- News18
'As Long As US Does Not Join Attack': Iran Signals End To Hostilities With Israel, Says Report
Last Updated: Iran has signaled a willingness to end hostilities with Israel and resume nuclear talks, and is sending messages via Arab intermediaries, a report has claimed. Amid its escalating conflict with Israel, Iran has reportedly been signalling that it seeks an end to hostilities and resumption of talks over its nuclear programs. Quoting Middle Eastern and European officials, The Wall Street Journal claimed that Iran has been sending messages to Israel and the United States via Arab intermediaries. Tehran also told Arab officials it would be open to returning to the negotiating table as long as the United States does not join the attack, the report quoted officials as saying. Iran also passed messages to Israel saying it is in the interest of both sides to keep the violence contained, according to the report. Meanwhile, European foreign ministers told their Iranian counterpart in a call on Monday to return to nuclear negotiations with the United States and refrain from escalating conflict with Israel, to which Iran's foreign minister said Tehran's priority was to confront Israel for now, Reuters quoted a French diplomatic source. Israel launched what it called 'Operation Rising Lion' against Iran's nuclear facilities in the early hours of June 13, just two days before US and Iranian negotiators were due to resume talks to forge a new deal on Iran's nuclear programme. Israel called it a preemptive strike designed to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Iran has denied plans to develop such weapons and retaliated by launching counterstrikes on Israel. France, Britain and Germany, known as the E3, are party to the 2015 nuclear accord with Iran, which aimed to curb Iran's nuclear programme in return for sanctions lifting. Last week, they put forward a resolution that was approved by the board of governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency, a UN watchdog, which declared Iran in breach of its nuclear non-proliferation obligations. About the Author Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! First Published: June 17, 2025, 08:14 IST
Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's Iran choice: Last-chance diplomacy or a bunker-busting bomb
Netanyahu has pressed for the United States to make its bunker busters available since the Bush administration, so far to no avail. But people who have spoken to Trump in recent months say the topic has come up repeatedly in his conversations with the prime minister. When Trump has been asked about it, he usually avoids a direct answer. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump is weighing a critical decision in the days-old war between Israel and Iran : whether to enter the fray by helping Israel destroy the deeply buried nuclear enrichment facility at Fordo , which only America's biggest "bunker buster," dropped by U.S. B-2 bombers , can he decides to go ahead, the United States will become a direct participant in a new conflict in the Middle East , taking on Iran in exactly the kind of war Trump has sworn, in two campaigns, he would avoid. Iranian officials have warned that U.S. participation in an attack on its facilities will imperil any remaining chance of the nuclear disarmament deal that Trump insists he is still interested in has encouraged Vice President JD Vance and his Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, to offer to meet the Iranians this week, according to a U.S. official. The offer may be well received, and Trump said Monday that "I think Iran basically is at the negotiating table, they want to make a deal."The urgency appeared to be rising. The White House announced late Monday that Trump was leaving the Group of 7 summit early because of the situation in the Middle East."As soon as I leave here, we're going to be doing something," Trump said. "But I have to leave here."What he intended to do remained Vance and Witkoff did meet with the Iranians, officials say, the likely Iranian interlocutor would be the country's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, who played a key role in the 2015 nuclear deal with the Obama administration and knows every element of Iran's sprawling nuclear complex. Araghchi, who has been Witkoff's counterpart in recent negotiations, signaled his openness to a deal Monday, saying in a statement, "If President Trump is genuine about diplomacy and interested in stopping this war, next steps are consequential.""It takes one phone call from Washington to muzzle someone like Netanyahu," he said, referring to the Israeli prime minister. "That may pave the way for a return to diplomacy."But if that diplomatic effort fizzles, or the Iranians remain unwilling to give in to Trump's central demand that they must ultimately end all uranium enrichment on Iranian soil, the president will still have the option of ordering that Fordo and other nuclear facilities be is only one weapon for the job, experts contend. It is called the Massive Ordnance Penetrator, or the GBU-57, and it weighs so much -- 30,000 pounds -- that it can be lifted only by a B-2 bomber. Israel does not own either the weapon or the bomber needed to get it aloft and over a Trump holds back, it could well mean that Israel's main objective in the war is never completed."Fordo has always been the crux of this thing," said Brett McGurk, who worked on Middle East issues for four successive U.S. presidents, from George W. Bush to Joe Biden. "If this ends with Fordo still enriching, then it's not a strategic gain."That has been true for a long time, and over the past two years the U.S. military has refined the operation, under close White House scrutiny. The exercises led to the conclusion that one bomb would not solve the problem; any attack on Fordo would have to come in waves, with B-2s releasing one bomb after another down the same hole. And the operation would have to be executed by an American pilot and was all in the world of war planning until the opening salvos Friday morning in Tehran, Iran's capital, when Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ordered the strikes, declaring that Israel had discovered an "imminent" threat that required "preemptive action." New intelligence, he suggested without describing the details, indicated that Iran was on the cusp of turning its fuel stockpile into weapons.U.S. intelligence officials who have followed the Iranian program for years agree that Iranian scientists and nuclear specialists have been working to shorten the time it would take to manufacture a nuclear bomb, but they saw no huge they agree with McGurk and other experts on one point: If the Fordo facility survives the conflict, Iran will retain the key equipment it needs to stay on a pathway to the bomb, even if it would first have to rebuild much of the nuclear infrastructure that Israel has left in ruins over four days of precision bombing.(BEGIN OPTIONAL TRIM.)There may be other alternatives to bombing it, though they are hardly a sure thing. If the power to Fordo gets cut, by saboteurs or bombing, it could damage or destroy the centrifuges that spin at supersonic speeds. Rafael Grossi, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said Monday that this might have happened at the country's other major uranium enrichment center, Natanz. Israel took out the power supplies to the plant Friday, and Grossi said that the disruption probably sent them spinning out of rarely talks about Fordo by name, but he has occasionally alluded to the GBU-57, sometimes telling aides that he ordered its development. That is not correct: The United States began designing the weapon in 2004, during the Bush administration, specifically to collapse the mountains protecting some of the deepest nuclear facilities in Iran and North Korea. It was, however, tested during Trump's first term, and added to the has pressed for the United States to make its bunker busters available since the Bush administration, so far to no avail. But people who have spoken to Trump in recent months say the topic has come up repeatedly in his conversations with the prime minister. When Trump has been asked about it, he usually avoids a direct the pressure is on. Former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, who resigned in a split with Netanyahu, told CNN's Bianna Golodryga on Monday that "the job has to be done, by Israel, by the United States," an apparent reference to the fact that the bomb would have to be dropped by an American pilot in a U.S. airplane. He said that Trump had "the option to change the Middle East and influence the world."And Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., who often speaks for the traditional, hawkish members of his party, said on CBS on Sunday that "if diplomacy is not successful" he will "urge President Trump to go all in to make sure that, when this operation is over, there's nothing left standing in Iran regarding their nuclear program.""If that means providing bombs, provide bombs," he said, adding, in a clear reference to the Massive Ordinance Penetrator, "whatever bombs. If it means flying with Israel, fly with Israel."But Republicans are hardly united in that view. And the split in the party over the decision of whether to make use of one of the Pentagon's most powerful conventional weapons to help one of America's closest allies has highlighted a far deeper divide. It is not only about crippling the centrifuges of Fordo; it is also about MAGA's view of what kinds of wars the United States should avoid at all anti-interventionist wing of the party, given its most prominent voice by influential podcaster Tucker Carlson, has argued that the lesson of Iraq and Afghanistan is that there is nothing but downside risk in getting deeply into another Middle East war. On Friday, Carlson wrote that the United States should "drop Israel" and "let them fight their own wars.""If Israel wants to wage this war, it has every right to do so," he continued. "It is a sovereign country, and it can do as it pleases. But not with America's backing."At the Pentagon, opinion is divided for other reasons. Elbridge A. Colby, the undersecretary of defense for policy, the Pentagon's No. 3 post, has long argued that every military asset devoted to the wars of the Middle East is one diverted from the Pacific and the containment of China. (Colby had to amend his views on Iran somewhat to get confirmed.)For now, Trump can afford to keep one foot in both camps. By making one more run at coercive diplomacy, he can make the case to the MAGA faithful that he is using the threat of the Massive Ordnance Penetrator to bring the conflict to a peaceful end. And he can tell the Iranians that they are going to cease enriching uranium one way or the other, either by diplomatic agreement or because a GBU-57 imploded the if the combination of persuasion and coercion fails, he will have to decide whether this is Israel's war or America's.
