New charges accuse Bolsonaro of running spy ring from Brazil's presidential palace
Federal police have formally accused Brazil's former far-right president, Jair Bolsonaro, of presiding over an illegal spying network which allegedly snooped on political rivals, journalists and environmentalists during his administration.
Bolsonaro is already facing the prospect of jail time over his alleged role in masterminding a military coup plot designed to help him keep power after losing the 2022 election to the leftwing veteran Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. There is broad consensus among analysts that Bolsonaro's conviction is a foregone conclusion and the 70-year-old populist is expected to face arrest in the coming months once a supreme court trial concludes.
The latest accusations relate to a two-year federal police investigation into suspicions that a 'parallel' intelligence agency was set up during Bolsonaro's 2019-23 administration in order to monitor those considered government foes.
On Tuesday, police accused Bolsonaro's alleged former spy chief, Alexandre Ramagem – who ran Brazil's intelligence agency, Abin, from 2019 to 2022 – of running the clandestine operation and accused more than 30 others of being involved, including the president's politician son Carlos Bolsonaro.
The news website G1 said investigators had concluded that under Bolsonaro members of Abin 'formed a criminal organization in order to monitor people and public authorities, invading mobile phones and computers'.
Some of the information gathered was allegedly provided to a covert social media team that operated within the presidential palace and allegedly used illegally collected information as ammunition to launch online attacks.
The targets reportedly included four supreme court ministers and powerful politicians including the former president of Brazil's lower house, Arthur Lira, and the then governor of São Paulo, João Doria, a prominent rightwing rival to the president.
Journalists and public servants were also reportedly spied on, including Hugo Loss, a respected member of the environmental agency, Ibama, who was on the front line of efforts to protect the Amazon at a time when illegal loggers and miners were emboldened by Bolsonaro's anti-environment rhetoric and climate denial.
Loss had worked closely with Bruno Pereira, the Indigenous expert and former government employee who was murdered in the rainforest region three years ago this month with the British journalist Dom Phillips.
The newspaper O Globo said police believed the Bolsonarista spy network was created in order 'to make it possible for Bolsonaro to remain in the presidential chair'.
Bolsonaro and Ramagem made no immediate comment on the accusations but have previously denied such charges. Carlos Bolsonaro responded to the allegations on X, suggesting that they were the result of a political grudge against his father's political movement. 'Was anyone in any doubt that Lula's PF [federal police] would do this to me?' he tweeted.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
3 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
A Chinese Ph.D. student is sentenced to at least 24 years in prison for raping multiple women
LONDON — A British judge on Thursday sentenced a Chinese Ph.D. student to a minimum of 24 years in prison for drugging and raping 10 women in England and China. Zhenhao Zou, 28, was convicted of the attacks, which took place between 2019 and 2023, during a four-week trial earlier this year at Inner London Crown Court. Judge Rosina Cottage on Thursday described Zou as 'very bright young man' who used a manipulative 'charming mask' to hide that he is a 'sexual predator.' Zou was studying for a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering at University College London in 2023 when the first woman came forward to allege that he had raped her. As part of the investigation, police seized Zou's phone, on which they found videos of him raping unconscious women. A search of his apartment in south London turned up sedatives and recording equipment. The investigation into Zou's crimes continues, and at least 24 women have come forward with new allegations as a result of the publicity surrounding his trial, London's Metropolitan Police Service said. Taken together, the cases would make him one of the worst sex offenders in U.K. history. Zou, who also used the name Pakho online, befriended fellow students of Chinese heritage on dating apps and WeChat, before inviting them for drinks and drugging them at his apartments in London or an unknown location in China. Using hidden or handheld cameras, Zou filmed nine of the attacks as 'souvenirs,' and he kept a 'trophy box' of his victims' belongings, according to evidence presented at trial. Zou, who claimed the encounters were consensual, was also convicted of three counts of voyeurism, 10 of possessing an extreme pornographic image, one of false imprisonment and three of possessing a controlled drug with intent to commit a sexual offence. He was handed a life sentence and must serve a minimum of 24 years in prison. Prosecutor Saira Pike praised the victims who came forward to report Zou's 'horrific crimes.' 'They have been incredibly strong and brave,' Pike said. 'There is no doubt that their evidence helped us to secure his conviction, and the life sentence handed to him today.' Kirka writes for the Associated Press.
Time Business News
3 hours ago
- Time Business News
Exonerated but Still Wanted: Red Notices That Outlive Legal Cases
VANCOUVER – You win your case. The charges are dropped. A judge clears your name. But months—or even years—later, you find yourself arrested at a border, denied a visa, or blocked by a bank. Why? Because a Red Notice issued by INTERPOL continues to circulate globally, even after the legal grounds for it no longer exist. In a justice system increasingly dependent on digital alerts and automated databases, exoneration doesn't always mean freedom. Amicus International Consulting investigates how outdated or unresolved INTERPOL Red Notices continue to punish the legally innocent, raising urgent questions about due process, data synchronization, and international cooperation. When Innocence Isn't Enough A Red Notice, once issued, can outlive the legal case it was based on. Although it is meant to be temporary—pending extradition or resolution—INTERPOL notices are often not automatically removed even when: Charges are dropped A court rules in favour of the accused A statute of limitations expires A conviction is overturned on appeal This creates a legal phantom: a person who is no longer wanted by law, but still flagged globally as a fugitive. Case Study 1: British Banker Cleared, But Detained in Dubai In 2022, a British national previously accused of fraud in Southeast Asia was acquitted after evidence emerged that a business rival had fabricated the case. Despite the dismissal, he was arrested at Dubai International Airport during a layover, due to a Red Notice that had never been withdrawn. Although the arresting country had no jurisdiction and the extradition request was void, he was held for four days, missed a major business summit, and suffered reputational damage when local media reported on the story. His legal team, working with Amicus, later succeeded in having the Red Notice deleted by the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL Files (CCF). Still, the incident cost him professional contracts and exposed systemic failures in Red Notice management. Why Red Notices Outlast Legal Proceedings There are several reasons why Red Notices persist even after exoneration: Member States Must Notify INTERPOL INTERPOL does not actively monitor ongoing court cases. It relies on the issuing country to voluntarily request removal. Some countries delay or intentionally fail to update INTERPOL on dropped charges. INTERPOL's Bureaucratic Lag Even when removal is requested, data purging can take months . . The General Secretariat in Lyon handles the process and requires a formal internal review. Data Duplication in Third-Party Systems Many private firms (banks, airlines, visa services) mirror INTERPOL databases . . These may not update in real time—or at all—even when a Red Notice is deleted. Legal Limbo: The Digital Consequences Even after being cleared in court, an individual listed in INTERPOL's system may: Be detained at international borders Lose banking relationships due to KYC/AML compliance Have visa applications rejected or delayed Be barred from working in regulated industries Suffer reputational loss, especially if their Red Notice was publicly visible The human and economic cost of this 'residual criminality' can be devastating. Case Study 2: Journalist Exonerated, Still Flagged in Europe In 2021, a Middle Eastern journalist exiled in Europe won asylum and later had criminal defamation charges against her dismissed by the Supreme Court of her home country. Yet a Red Notice remained active, and she was detained during travel to Switzerland for a media conference. Authorities initially resisted her release, citing INTERPOL's alert. Only after Amicus submitted a dossier with court records and asylum documentation was she allowed to continue her journey. It took another seven months for the CCF to delete the outdated notice. Who Is Responsible for Removal? The responsibility to remove a Red Notice lies with: The Issuing Country : They must notify INTERPOL of legal developments. : They must notify INTERPOL of legal developments. The INTERPOL General Secretariat : Must process removals efficiently. : Must process removals efficiently. The CCF May act independently if a formal complaint is filed. May act independently if a formal complaint is filed. The Subject or their legal team must often initiate contact to push for deletion. This fragmented process creates a bottleneck, especially when legal representation is absent or under-resourced. The CCF: The Last Hope for the Wrongfully Listed The Commission for the Control of INTERPOL's Files (CCF) is the only body authorized to review and delete Red Notices. Its process is confidential, written, and can take 6–12 months. Grounds for deletion include: Case dismissal or acquittal Violation of due process in the origin country Political or discriminatory motive Expiry of the statute of limitations Contradiction with asylum or refugee status While the CCF plays a vital role, its slow pace and limited enforcement power often mean that individuals remain trapped in legal uncertainty. Case Study 3: Businesswoman Exonerated in U.S., Flagged Abroad A dual citizen of the U.S. and West Africa was exonerated in a high-profile corporate embezzlement case in 2020. A federal court found the charges unfounded and politically retaliatory. However, INTERPOL had already issued a Red Notice. Although the U.S. courts cleared her, she was denied entry to Canada, where the Red Notice still appeared in immigration systems. It took Amicus and a Canadian legal team three months to coordinate with authorities and have her travel clearance reinstated. The Red Notice was eventually deleted, but her ability to operate in global finance remained impaired. Amicus Intervention: Legal Strategy Against Old Alerts Amicus International Consulting works with clients whose legal cases are resolved but whose Red Notices remain active. Our services include: Petitioning the CCF for deletion Requesting post-resolution updates from issuing countries Coordinating with immigration and banking compliance units Advising on travel and visa risks during review periods Reputation and media management for high-profile individuals 'Red Notices don't die just because the case does,' said a legal advisor at Amicus. 'You need to bury them legally—or they'll bury your freedom.' Private Sector Fallout: When Banks, Airlines, and Visa Services Don't Get the Memo Even after a Red Notice is deleted, the ripple effects continue: Banks may keep compliance flags for years , fearing future liability. , fearing future liability. Airlines may block bookings from blocked names via API-PNR systems. from blocked names via API-PNR systems. Visa systems, such as ESTA, ETIAS, and eTA, may automatically reject applicants with past INTERPOL flags. may automatically reject applicants with past INTERPOL flags. Background check companies may cite old or archived Red Notices. Amicus offers digital hygiene audits and private-sector erasure campaigns to mitigate ongoing risk. Case Study 4: Interpol Notice Deleted, But Identity Still Tainted In 2023, Amicus represented a Balkan IT executive who had a Red Notice removed after being cleared of charges in Croatia. Yet, his LinkedIn, banking apps, and even air ticketing profiles continued to reject verification due to cached data from third-party vendors. A year-long campaign of legal requests and GDPR filings finally removed the last traces of the outdated notice, but not before he lost clients and had to close his consultancy firm. Policy Recommendations: Preventing Post-Exoneration Injustice To prevent future harm, Amicus and human rights partners advocate for: Automatic removal protocols triggered by issuing countries upon exoneration triggered by issuing countries upon exoneration Real-time data syncing between INTERPOL and third-party users between INTERPOL and third-party users Mandatory Red Notice expiration after legal closure, unless extended by judicial order Red Notice review board with faster appeal windows for cleared individuals Global standard for data privacy and reputation restoration Until then, legal vigilance remains the only defence against a system that exceeds its mandate. Case Study 5: Politician Cleared, Still Blocked from Travel A former Central Asian diplomat, acquitted of corruption charges by an international court in 2021, continued to face travel restrictions in the EU and Asia-Pacific because his Red Notice had not been removed. Despite repeated requests, the issuing country refused to notify INTERPOL. Amicus filed an independent appeal with the CCF, resulting in the deletion nearly a year later. The gap between legal reality and INTERPOL's records had cost him three years of international engagement and stalled the humanitarian work he led. 📞 Contact Information Phone: +1 (604) 200-5402 Email: info@ Website: Follow Us: 🔗 LinkedIn 🔗 Twitter/X 🔗 Facebook 🔗 Instagram TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Former UK Security Chief Says Bombing Iran 'Is Not Going To Make The World Safer'
A former UK security chief has called on the UK not to back Donald Trump if he decides to bomb Iran – because it will not make the world any safer. Lord Ricketts, who was the government's national security adviser between 2010 and 2012, said air strikes on the Tehran regime would only 'reinforce their determination' to get a nuclear bomb. His comments, on ITV's Peston programme, came as the US president mulls whether to send American planes to bomb Iranian nuclear sites, alongside Israeli jets. CBS News has reported that Trump approved the attack plans on Tuesday night, but has yet to decide whether to put them into action. Speaking at the White House on Wednesday, he said: 'Nobody knows what I'm going to do.' It has also emerged that the British government would have to give America permission if it wanted to use the joint UK-US air base at Diego Garcia in the Chagos Islands to launch its bombing missions. Robert Peston, ITV's political editor, asked Lord Ricketts: 'If he orders an American strike on Iran, what do you think the British prime minister should say? Do you think that we should use British planes to support him?' The crossbench peer said: 'My feeling is we should not, for the simple reason that I think the only way you're going to control Iran's nuclear ambitions in the long term is by having a deal with them. 'I think just coming back and bombing them every few years is not going to make the world safer. In fact it's going to reinforce their determination to keep working on a nuclear weapon when this round of fighting is over. 'Although it's difficult to take a distance from our American ally on this, I think history tells us that you have to be very careful before you get into war, and I would advise not doing so.' 'If Trump orders an American strike…should we use British assets to support him?' 'We should not' Former National Security Adviser @LordRickettsP says bombing Iran will 'only reinforce their determination' for a nuclear weapon and a deal is the only way forward# — Peston (@itvpeston) June 18, 2025 Could The UK Be Dragged Into War As Donald Trump Ponders Bombing Iran? Angela Rayner Hints UK Would Not Join US If Trump Decides To Attack Iran Trump Considers Bombing Iran'As He Demands The Country's 'Unconditional Surrender'
