ROSEN, A LEADING NATIONAL FIRM, Encourages Tungray Technologies Inc Investors to Inquire About Securities Class Action Investigation
SO WHAT: If you purchased Tungray Technologies securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action seeking recovery of investor losses.
WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the prospective class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=32968 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.
WHAT IS THIS ABOUT: On December 31, 2024, Tungray Technologies filed a current report with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 6-K. The current report stated that on 'December 30, 2024, the Board of Directors of Tungray Technologies Inc (the 'Company'), upon recommendation of the Audit Committee and following discussions with management, determined that the Company's financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2023, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 26, 2024 (the '20-F'), should no longer be relied upon. Similarly, related reports, press releases, earnings releases, and investor communications describing the Company's financial statements for these periods should no longer be relied upon.'
WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
-------------------------------
Contact Information:
Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Should You Choose a Traditional IRA Over a Roth for Retirement Savings?
Key Points You never escape income taxes, but IRAs can help you control when you pay them, possibly lowering your lifetime tax payments. Roth IRAs are exempt from required minimum distributions, a boon if it's your intent to leave some of your retirement account for an heir. Many investors choose to have both a workplace 401(k) account as well as a self-directed IRA held with a retail brokerage firm. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook › It's a question investors have been asking themselves since they were first given the choice back in 1998: Do I take my tax break now and pay taxes later, or do I pay my taxes now and enjoy tax-free IRA distributions later? A traditional IRA offers the former. A Roth IRA allows for the latter. That is to say, unlike traditional IRAs (sometimes called contributory IRAs), contributions to Roth retirement accounts aren't tax deductible. Also unlike traditional IRAs, though, distributions from Roth accounts aren't taxable. There's still no clear answer to the question. Or it might be more accurate to say that the answer changes from one investor to the next, since everyone's situation is unique. There is one common criterion every investor should consider, however, before choosing one or the other. An option for every scenario If you aren't familiar with the difference between a contributory IRA and a Roth IRA, here's a brief primer. Individual retirement accounts have been around since 1974, created by that year's Employee Retirement Income Security Act. That's when it was becoming clear that corporate pensions alone -- the source of most peoples' retirement incomes up to that point -- simply weren't up to the task any longer on their own. Workers embraced their new self-directed retirement savings vehicles too, using contributions to these accounts to lower their taxable income. Withdrawals from these ordinary IRAs, however, are treated as taxable income by the IRS. Congress took the idea a step further in 1978, introducing workplace 401(k) accounts to take more of the ever-growing pressure off of employers' still-struggling pension plans by allowing workers to tuck away much more of their income for retirement. Like the IRAs introduced just four years earlier, 401(k) accounts allow for pre-tax contributions. The IRS just collects what its due on the back end, when money is taken out of these accounts. Then in the late 1980s Delaware Senator William Roth and some of his colleagues introduced a different idea. Rather than allowing for tax-deductible contributions to IRAs now and taxing this money and its growth later, why not forego the tax break linked to contributions to retirement accounts and instead allow tax-free distributions from these IRA accounts as they are withdrawn in retirement? That idea became law in the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, leading to the creation of Roth IRAs in 1998. Three years later, Congress allowed these same taxability rules to apply to 401(k) accounts with much bigger contribution limits. It's (almost) all about minimizing taxes Assuming you're able to contribute to either and that you qualify to contribute to a Roth, which one makes the most sense for you? The answer is, you should aim to pay your retirement savings-related taxes when your taxable income is going to be at its lowest. For most people this will mean funding an ordinary or traditional IRA during your working years, and then paying income tax on IRA distributions in retirement when your income is likely to be lower. Exceptions are certainly possible, though. For example, if for some reason a traditional IRA has grown to an extraordinary sum and is going to generate more annual income than you ever earned in as an employee, a Roth is likely the right answer. On a net basis, you'll keep more of your income. There are some other important matters to consider. Chief among them is what you're going to do with any tax savings you'll achieve by making tax-deductible contributions to ordinary IRAs or 401(k) accounts while in your working years. If it's your intent to spend most or all of this savings rather than invest at least most of it for retirement outside of a qualified retirement account, you might be better served by funding a Roth account instead -- you may need all the retirement income you can get when the time comes. You should also know that while Roth accounts can be a bit inflexible in terms of withdrawals when you first open them, they become more flexible in time. Specifically, with some rare exceptions, not only do you need be at least 59 1/2 to make a penalty-free and tax-free withdrawal, but the Roth account must have been opened and funded for at least five years. Early withdrawals -- before you turn 59 1/2 -- from traditional IRAs and 401(k) accounts are also usually subject to taxes and penalties, but at least there's no five-year minimum rule. Then there's another important consideration: Do you actually need or even want the retirement income either type of IRA will provide? Most people do. But on the off-chance you don't, know that you're not required to take any distributions from a Roth account. That's not the case with a traditional or contributory IRA or 401(k). Once you reach 73 years of age, the IRS imposes required minimum distributions from ordinary retirement accounts, forcing you to make taxable withdrawals from them. So if it's your plan to leave all of your retirement savings to an inheritor or even multiple inheritors, this can matter. Leaving everything in a Roth account at least leaves all of your assets in one account that's relatively easy to retitle, with fairly flexible rules for your heirs to gain access following the account owner's passing. Just don't fall victim to analysis paralysis Still not sure? Here's the thing -- you don't necessarily need to choose only one or the other. If you've got the option of a Roth 401(k) at your place of work, you can also add to a contributory IRA outside of your employer's plan. Or vice versa. Remember that just because you fund one kind of account or the other in any given year doesn't mean you're limited to funding that kind of account forevermore -- you can own more than one kind of IRA. You're even allowed to fund ordinary and Roth IRAs in the same year. Just make sure you don't contribute more to a Roth than your income allows. Also be sure your total combined contribution to all of your retirement accounts doesn't exceed the sum-total limit the IRS imposes for any given tax year. And yes, the agency knows. Your broker reports these contributions. Most importantly, do something. The biggest mistake isn't choosing the wrong kind of IRA. Rather, it's worrying so much about it that you end up doing nothing. Both accounts are perfectly fine options when the alternative is funding neither. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Should You Choose a Traditional IRA Over a Roth for Retirement Savings? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Epoch Times
6 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
China Sets Steep Duties on Canadian Imports, Opens New Probe
China announced on Aug. 12 that it would impose tariffs on rapeseed and rubber products imported from Canada, escalating trade tensions between Beijing and Ottawa. China will implement a 26.2 percent duty on halogenated butyl rubber imported from Arlanxeo Canada, and a 40.5 percent duty will be levied on the same products from other Canadian companies, according to a statement from the Chinese Ministry of Commerce.
CNN
23 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump's major China gamble has paid off so far. But Xi still holds trump cards
President Donald Trump has placed a massive bet that the United States can take an historically aggressive stance against China, the world's second-largest economy, and emerge stronger because of it. Although it remains unclear if the gamble will pay off over the long term, Trump has been riding an incredible winning streak in recent months. The stock market is near record highs, the US economy rebounded in the second quarter and inflation has defied predictions of a surge after Trump put his tariffs in action. But Chinese leader Xi Jinping is on a winning streak of his own. On Monday, Trump opened the door to sending China faster AI chips after releasing previously blockaded mid-tier chips. And despite America's tariffs, China has successfully found other markets to sell to, flooding the world with its goods. That's because Xi holds a number of trump cards: China remains the world's biggest exporter of goods, wielding significant power across the world. It also maintains control of nearly the entire supply of the world's critical rare-earth minerals, necessary for manufacturing electronics and defense equipment crucial to America's national security and whose export Beijing has been slow-rolling their release, much to US consternation. And Xi has slow-walked a prize that Trump has long sought: a one-on-one meeting. Trump has played the role of the China bully this year, escalating the tariffs he placed on China in his first term – and continued by former President Joe Biden – to unprecedented levels. He set tariffs on Chinese goods at a minimum of 20% early in his second term, sending them to 145% in the middle of the spring and effectively blockading trade with America's second-largest trading partner. In May, negotiators between the two countries brought America's tariffs on Chinese goods imposed this year way down – to 30%. That felt better to US companies that rely on Chinese goods, even if it remains significantly higher than anything the United States has placed on a major trading partner in nearly a century. Over the course of the past few months, Trump's negotiators have secured several concessions from China, including purchases of US soybeans and a halt to antitrust investigations into some large American companies that threatened their ability to do business there. Those may not be major concessions, but as negotiations have continued, Trump has celebrated the tens of billions of dollars in tariff revenue that have flowed into the US Treasury each month, in large part because of the massive tariffs placed on China. Meanwhile, inflation has risen only slightly from four-year lows reached earlier this year. Last quarter's gross domestic product, the broadest measure of the US economy, showed a sharp rebound in growth, even though it was filled with warning signs. Jobs growth has slowed dramatically in recent months, but uncertainty about tariffs has largely eased, and some economists expect businesses to begin hiring again as a result in the coming months. And Trump's favorite indicator of success, the US stock market, has been booming, largely ignoring tariffs in favor of relatively strong earnings and a potential rate cut from the Federal Reserve in the next few months. So Trump has been able to come across as a strong foil to China, which he has labeled a national security threat and key economic competitor, while keeping the US economy from plunging into a recession – at least in the near term. That's no small feat. Despite Trump's bluster about China, America's president has treated Xi with relative leniency compared to the aggression he's shown toward US allies, including the European Union and Brazil, in recent months. That's because Xi is playing a very strong hand, too. China maintains an iron grip on rare-earth minerals used in ultra-strong magnets that are essential components in everything from cars to fighter jets. The United States deems them critical to the defense and industrial sectors, but China controls 90% of the global processing of rare earths. In various rounds of trade negotiations, the United States said it has won concessions that would give any US business that wants rare earths preferential treatment and access, but American companies continue to complain that China isn't issuing permits quickly enough to satisfy their needs. In exchange for doling out more rare earths, China has demanded a reduction in US export controls on critical goods – with a particular eye on advanced AI microchips. The Trump administration had drawn a line in the sand on AI chips, barring their delivery to China. But Monday, Trump reversed course, saying Nvidia's H20 chips that powered China's earth-shattering Deepseek AI model could flow somewhat freely into China. And he even said he would consider allowing Nvidia to ship a pared down version of its highest-end Blackwell chips, a concession that the White House had previously said was a nonstarter. Xi has also curried favor with Trump by agreeing to purchase US goods, including soybeans. Meanwhile, China's economy has kept pace by selling into new markets, including countries in South America and Africa, limiting disruption to its businesses. China's exports grew at 5.9% in the first half of 2025, the same pace as the first six months of 2024, according to ING. And China's trade surplus reached $586 billion in the first half, setting a new record for any six-month period. And Xi has power over something else that Trump truly covets: a meeting. Although Trump has claimed Xi promised to meet a date has not yet been set, and China has yet to confirm. So Xi is biding his time, leveraging his country's resources and export dominance. It's a strong hand to play against a president who has used tariffs to steamroll practically every other foreign leader in his path.
