Democratic senator Alex Padilla forcibly removed from homeland security press conference
Alex Padilla, a
Democratic
California
senator and vocal critic of the
Trump
administration's immigration polices, was forcibly removed and handcuffed as he attempted to ask a question at a press conference held by
Kristi Noem
, the homeland security secretary, in
Los Angeles
on Thursday.
In video taken of the incident that has since gone viral on social media, Padilla is seen being restrained and removed from the room by Secret Service agents.
'I'm Senator Alex Padilla. I have questions for the secretary,' Padilla shouts, as he struggles to move past against the men pushing him back toward the exit.
'Hands off!' Padilla says at least three times. Outside the room, he is pinned to the floor and placed in handcuffs.
READ MORE
What just happened to
He is a sitting United States Senator.
This administration's violent attacks on our city must end.
— Mayor Karen Bass (@MayorOfLA)
Emerging afterward, Padilla, the ranking member of the judiciary subcommittee on immigration, citizenship and border safety, said he and his colleagues had repeatedly asked the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for more information on its 'increasingly extreme immigration enforcement actions' but had not received a response to his inquiries.
'If this is how this administration responds to a senator with a question, if this is how the DHS responds to a senator with a question, you can only imagine what they're doing to farm workers, to cooks, to day labourers, throughout the LA community and throughout California and throughout the country,' Padilla, the son of immigrants from Mexico, told reporters. 'We will hold this administration accountable.'
The extraordinary scene stunned his Democratic colleagues from Capitol Hill to California, though his actions drew criticism from Republicans, including the House speaker, Mike Johnson, who called for Padilla's censure. It comes amid escalating tensions between California and the federal government, after Donald Trump deployed national guard troops and US Marines to LA to quell protests prompted by immigration raids, over the objections of the state's governor and the city's mayor.
'I am shocked by how far we have descended in the first 140 days of this administration,' Adam Schiff, the junior senator from California said in a speech from the Senate floor shortly after viewing the video of the incident. 'What is becoming of our democracy? Are there no limits to what this administration will do? Is there no line they will not cross?'
In a statement, the DHS said the senator 'chose disrespectful political theatre' and disrupted a live news conference. They falsely claimed that Padilla had failed to identify himself and believed he was an attacker when he 'lunged toward' Noem as she delivered remarks.
'Mr Padilla was told repeatedly to back away and did not comply with officers' repeated commands,' the department said in a statement posted on X, adding that officers responded and 'acted appropriately'.
The deputy FBI director Dan Bongino accused Padilla of 'not wearing a security pin' and said he 'physically resisted law enforcement when confronted'.
'Our FBI personnel acted completely appropriately while assisting Secret Service and we are grateful for their professionalism and service,' Bongino added.
Noem was in Los Angeles to accompany federal agents on immigration operations in the area.
Noem said Padilla's approach 'wasn't appropriate' and that she wished he had reached out to her office before interrupting the event. Following the incident, she and the senator met for 15 minutes, according to DHS. Noem told reporters that they had a 'great' and 'productive' conversation and exchanged phone numbers.
Democratic officials said they were stunned by what the House minority leader, Hakeem Jeffries, described as the 'manhandling' of a sitting US senator.
The California governor, Gavin Newsom, called Padilla 'one of the most decent people I know', before adding: 'This is outrageous, dictatorial, and shameful. Trump and his shock troops are out of control. This must end now.'
Chuck Schumer, the Senate Democratic leader, wrote on X that 'watching this video sickened my stomach, the manhandling of a United States Senator, Senator Padilla. We need immediate answers to what the hell went on.'
Jimmy Gomez, a California representative, wrote on X: 'This isn't just shocking, it's a threat to the rule of law and democratic accountability. Sen Padilla is conducting oversight over the lawlessness of the Trump and the violations of the #RuleOfLaw. If this can happen to immigrant communities, it can happen to anyone.'
Tina Smith, a Minnesota senator, said: 'This is disgusting. If this is how they treat Alex Padilla, a United States Senator, how do you think they'll treat you?'
Norma Torres, a California representative, lambasted the treatment of Padilla in an impassioned video, writing: 'Let's call it what it is: a disgraceful abuse of power. Senator Alex Padilla was dragged and handcuffed out for daring to question Secretary Noem. This wasn't a threat – it was dissent. They're not keeping us safe – they're silencing us.'
The clash with Padilla comes just days after the Democratic representative LaMonica McIver of New Jersey was indicted on federal charges alleging she assaulted and interfered with immigration officers after a clash with law enforcement at a May protest outside a detention facility in Newark. Democrats have cast the charges as a politically motivated attempt by the Trump administration to intimidate the opposition.
As he exited the floor of the House of Representatives, Johnson said the senator had been at fault, accusing him of 'charging a cabinet secretary at a press conference' and calling his actions 'wildly inappropriate'.
'A sitting member of Congress should not act like that,' he said. 'It is beneath a member of the Congress, it is beneath a US senator.'
Johnson said he believes Padilla's behaviour 'merits immediate attention' by Congress and 'at a minimum, it rises to the level of a censure'. -The Guardian
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
PSNI given emergency Stormont cash to tackle anti-immigration riots
The Police Service of Northern Ireland is to get emergency Stormont funding to cope with anti-immigration riots across Northern Ireland, First Minister Michelle O'Neill has said. Saying that a proposal for a £5 million payment will be brought quickly to the Northern Ireland Executive, Ms O'Neill said the heavily-understaffed police service was 'really under pressure and really under financial strain'. 'Keeping the public safe is an absolute priority, not just for the PSNI but for us,' she said, speaking after a meeting of the British-Irish Council in Newcastle, Co Down, that included Taoiseach Micheál Martin and Northern Ireland Secretary of State Hilary Benn. However, the First Minister and her Democratic Unionist Party counterpart, Deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly insisted that divisions over Communities Minister Gordon Lyons would not threaten the existence, or the operation of the Executive. READ MORE Mr Lyons has been heavily criticised for a social media message about the use of Larne Leisure Centre to house Roma who were forced to flee their Ballymena homes after riots erupted this week. [ The DUP couldn't have chosen a worse moment to get tough on immigration Opens in new window ] Saying that the Executive's parties are 'all on the same page', Ms O'Neill said: 'This violent racism that we have seen on our streets has to be called out for what it is. It's absolutely wrong and it must stop.' 'What we've seen over the course of the last few days has been devastation and has been horrific for those people that have been targeted,' said Ms O'Neill, who said on Wednesday that Mr Lyons should resign. 'This is about women and children; this is about families. They have been at the front of racist, violent attacks and it is wrong on every level. I think the whole of the Executive is united on that front,' she went on. Defending Mr Lyons, Ms Little-Pengelly said her DUP colleague had been 'unambiguous' in trying to prevent violence, adding that the controversy about his remarks had been 'a distraction throughout' Thursday 'from our very clear and unified message'. Violence for four nights in a row is 'totally unacceptable', she said, adding that Mr Lyons's intention had been 'to defuse tensions' locally due to a significant amount of rumour' that had been circulating in Larne in the hours before. The calls for Mr Lyons's resignation shared by Sinn Féin, Alliance and by Stormont's only opposition party, the SDLP, hold little weight under Stormont rules, since each party controls the choice of their own ministers at the Executive table. Rioting in Larne and Portadown was 'a source of great shame for Northern Ireland', Church of Ireland Primate and Archbishop of Armagh John McDowell said. Portadown is in his diocese. 'Hiding behind the figment of `legitimate concerns' but in fact motivated by crude racism, groups of young men (and the shadowy and unaccountable people who control them) planned and carried out attacks on civil society and on democracy,' he said. With Drumcree Sunday looming on July 6th, rioting in nearby Portadown over recent nights is of particular concern. A total 22 officers were injured with two arrests made there following violence on Thursday night. The annual Orange march from Portadown to the Church of Ireland's Church of the Ascension at Drumcree became a focus for violence, particularly in the years from 1995 to 2000, when it was prevented from going through the nationalist Garvaghy Road area en route back to Portadown. The last Orange march allowed back to Portadown by that route was in 1997.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Kilmar Abrego Garcia pleads not guilty to migrant smuggling charges after wrongful deportation
Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the migrant returned to the US last week after being wrongfully deported to his native El Salvador, pleaded not guilty on Friday to criminal charges of taking part in a conspiracy to smuggle migrants into the United States . Mr Abrego Garcia's lawyer, William Allensworth, entered the not guilty plea on his behalf at a hearing in Nashville, Tennessee, before US magistrate judge Barbara Holmes. At the hearing, Mr Abrego Garcia (29) is also expected to contest a bid by federal prosecutors to have him detained pending trial. US president Donald Trump's administration has portrayed the indictment of Mr Abrego Garcia as vindication of its aggressive crackdown on illegal immigration. Before Mr Abrego Garcia's indictment was unsealed on June 5th, officials alleged he was a member of the MS-13 gang and said they would not bring him back. The justice department's decision to return him to the US to face criminal charges is a potential off-ramp for the Trump administration from its escalating confrontation with the judiciary over whether it complied with a court order to facilitate Mr Abrego Garcia's return. READ MORE The Republican president's critics say his swift removal without a hearing showed the administration prioritised increased deportations over due process – the bedrock principle that people in the US, whether citizens or not, can contest governmental actions against them in the courts. 'You are presumed innocent, and it is the government's burden to prove at trial that you are guilty beyond a reasonable doubt,' Ms Holmes said, addressing Mr Abrego Garcia. The criminal proceeding will provide Mr Abrego Garcia with due process by giving him the right to contest the charges contained in a grand jury indictment returned in secret on May 21st. Still, his lawyers say his return to face criminal charges does not absolve the Trump administration of responsibility for wrongfully deporting him. In the indictment, Mr Abrego Garcia was charged with working with at least five co-conspirators as part of a smuggling ring to bring immigrants to the US illegally, then transport them from the US-Mexico border to destinations across the country. The indictment alleges that Mr Abrego Garcia often picked up migrants in Houston, making more than 100 trips between Texas and Maryland between 2016 and 2025. Mr Abrego Garcia is also accused of transporting firearms and drugs. Jennifer Vasquez Sura, wife of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, speaks to the media before a hearing for Mr Abrego Garcia in Nashville, Tennessee, on Friday. Photograph: EPA Prosecutors say Mr Abrego Garcia, a Maryland resident whose wife and young child are US citizens, could face 10 years in prison for each migrant he smuggled. That means he could spend the rest of his life in jail if convicted, according to prosecutors. They are urging he be detained, saying the potentially hefty sentence means he may try to flee. They also say detention is warranted because he allegedly murdered a rival gang member's mother in El Salvador and solicited child pornography, though those accusations are not part of his indictment. Mr Abrego Garcia's lawyers have called the charges 'fantastical' and deny he is a flight risk. —Reuters (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025
Irish Times
12 hours ago
- Irish Times
Appeals court allows Trump to keep National Guard in Los Angeles
A US appeals court on Thursday allowed president Donald Trump to maintain his deployment of National Guard troops in Los Angeles amid protests over stepped-up immigration enforcement, temporarily pausing a lower court ruling that blocked the mobilisation. The Ninth US circuit court of appeals' decision does not mean that the court will ultimately agree with Mr Trump, but it does leave command of the National Guard with the president for now. Earlier on Thursday, San Francisco-based US district judge Charles Breyer found that Mr Trump's deployment of the National Guard was unlawful. Mr Breyer's 36-page ruling had ordered the National Guard to return to the control of California governor Gavin Newsom, who had brought the case. It was a short-lived victory for Mr Newsom, as judge Breyer's order was paused about two and a half hours later. READ MORE Asked for a comment, Mr Newsom's press office referred to the governor's statement after the initial ruling, and noted that the appeals court put a temporary pause on the ruling but did not reverse it. 'I'm confident, on the basis of the review of the 36 pages – absolutely it will stand,' Mr Newsom said of the district judge's order. The three-judge appeals court panel consisted of two judges appointed by Mr Trump in his first term and one judge who was appointed by Democratic president Joe Biden. The panel said it would hold a hearing on Tuesday to consider the merits of judge Breyer's order. The court's action, called an administrative stay, gives the appeals judges additional time to consider the Trump administration's request to block judge Breyer's order while litigation in the case continues. Mr Trump summoned the National Guard on Saturday in response to protests that had broken out over immigration raids, then on Monday ordered the US Marines to support the National Guard. A battalion of 700 US Marines is expected to arrive on Friday, marking an extraordinary use of military forces to support civilian police operations within the United States. The troops have stood guard at a federal detention centre in downtown Los Angeles where many of the protests have taken place in a show of solidarity for immigrants detained inside. The protests so far have been mostly peaceful, punctuated by incidents of violence, and restricted to a few city blocks. The National Guard had also accompanied Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) agents on operations to detain immigrants. In his ruling, judge Breyer wrote that the presence of the troops in the city was itself inflaming tensions with protesters – a contention made by Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, among others – and depriving the state of the ability to use the National Guard for other purposes. Ms Bass on Thursday called on Ice officers to stand down from the intensified series of raids that led to the protests, saying the local economy could be harmed as immigrants stayed home from work and school for fear of being snatched off the streets. 'The peace that we need to have happen needs to begin in Washington, and we need to stop the raids,' Ms Bass told a press conference as supporters flanking her broke out in a chant of 'Stop the raids'. 'Peace begins with Ice leaving Los Angeles,' said Bass, who has imposed a night-time curfew more than 2.5 sq km of downtown Los Angeles. Ms Bass spoke after department of homeland securitysSecretary Kristi Noem said she would 'liberate' Los Angeles at a press conference that was dramatically interrupted when federal agents dragged Democratic US senator Alex Padilla out of the room, forced him to the ground and handcuffed him. The court battle and press conference scuffle underscored the political polarisation generated by Mr Trump's hardline approach to immigration enforcement and expansive use of presidential power. Mr Trump is carrying out a campaign promise to deport immigrants, employing forceful tactics consistent with the norm-breaking political style that got him elected twice. Democrats have said the use of military force was unnecessary and an example of Mr Trump's authoritarianism. Americans are divided over Mr Trump's decision to activate the military. A Reuters/Ipsos poll showed 48 per cent of respondents agreed with a statement that the president should 'deploy the military to bring order to the streets' when protests turned violent, while 41 per cent disagreed. Between the rulings, Mr Newsom said the National Guard would be redeployed to its previous tasks, including border security, preparing for wildfires and countering drug smuggling. But the Trump administration immediately appealed the judge's order, calling judge Breyer's ruling 'an extraordinary intrusion on the President's constitutional authority as Commander in Chief.' Mr Trump justified the deployment of troops by characterising the protests in Los Angeles as a 'rebellion,' but judge Breyer said in his temporary restraining order that the protests fell far short of that legal standard. 'The Court is troubled by the implication inherent in Defendants' argument that protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the First Amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion,' judge Breyer wrote. Mr Trump has said if he had not ordered in the National Guard the city would be in flames. – Reuters
