logo
The £100m final Man Utd cannot afford to lose?

The £100m final Man Utd cannot afford to lose?

Yahoo20-05-2025

"It's a crossroads moment."
That is the verdict of former Manchester United first-team coach Rene Meulensteen on the club's Europa League final against Tottenham on Wednesday.
Like all United fans, the Dutchman is coming to terms with a bitterly disappointing domestic campaign, and dreading the consequences of failure in Bilbao.
"It would be a silver lining. A win in the Europa League isn't going to make up for the most disastrous season," Meulensteen told BBC Sport, with United languishing 16th in the Premier League, and now condemned to their lowest top-flight finish for more than half a century.
"But if they don't win it, why would we expect anything different next season? The trophy would free up some finances to get players in.
"If they don't win it, we won't be in Europe, and I really worry what the future is going to look like."
With qualification for the lucrative Champions League the prize for the Europa League winners, and set against the backdrop of United's long decline, it is easy to see why the match is being portrayed as such a defining moment at Old Trafford.
But just how significant is it really?
"Financially, it's the most important match in the club's history," says football finance expert Kieran Maguire.
"Champions League participation is crucial, because it could generate over £100m from tickets, broadcast money, and sponsor bonuses."
With four home games guaranteed, Maguire estimates that there could then be an additional £30m-£40m if United go deep into the competition.
While the benefits of being back in the expanded Champions League apply just as much to Spurs of course, United arguably need it more.
Spurs recorded an annual loss of £26m last year, while United's deficit was £113m over the same period. That took their total losses to £300m over the past three years.
The sense of underperformance is even more stark given United generated total revenue of £651m last year, the fourth highest by any club in world football.
But due largely to the leveraged takeover by majority owners the Glazer family in 2005, the club are also more than £1bn in debt, which costs tens of millions of pounds a year to service. And that burden is set to increase in the years ahead because of refinancing and higher interest rates.
Indeed, United have admitted they have been at risk of failing to comply with Premier League profit and sustainability rules (PSR) that limit clubs' losses.
Why more than £100m rests on Man Utd winning Europa League
Latest Manchester United news, analysis and fan views
Get Man Utd news notifications
In March, co-owner and petro-chemicals billionaire Sir Jim Ratcliffe told me the club would have gone bust by the end of the year if significant action had not been taken, bemoaning the financial burden of several players he had inherited who "were overpaid and not good enough".
Meanwhile, fans are clinging to reports linking the club with moves for potential targets such as Liam Delap, Antoine Semenyo and Matheus Cunha. But if United fail to sell loaned-out, high-earning players such as Marcus Rashford, Jadon Sancho and Antony, acquisitions could hinge on what happens in Bilbao.
Luring new players to Old Trafford is likely to be much easier if the club can offer European football. And United have admitted that if they are to improve their underperforming squad, they need to cut outgoings, hence the hundreds of staff redundancies, and ticket price increases imposed by Ratcliffe - that have sparked protests by fans.
"United still have one of the highest wage bills in the Premier League. They have a squad which has cost more than £1bn, and many of those deals have been on credit, so they have outstanding instalments of over £300m that need to be paid," says Maguire.
"So they need the cash from the Champions League to meet their ongoing financial obligations, and that's before they start recruiting the players the manager wants. The additional revenue will put the club in a far stronger position in terms of a reboot."
Such thoughts are echoed by former United defender Rio Ferdinand who told PA that victory could spark a "new era" for the club.
"With Manchester United, they need the money to recruit for this manager and it's a vital period for him in that sense," he said. "I do think it's a chance to press the restart button and it will be a new era if these are the guys who managed to win."
With each finishing position in the Premier League table worth around £3m, United have made around £30m less than the club's executives would have been planning for.
For the Ineos hierarchy, a trophy would also help compensate for the £14.5m spent on the sacking of former manager Erik ten Hag - who was retained and then backed in the transfer market last summer - and the hiring and firing of former sporting director Dan Ashworth.
Under mounting scrutiny over such decisions, club bosses are also yet to explain how they will afford to build a proposed new stadium estimated to be costing at least £2bn.
At a time when Ratcliffe is reducing his other sports investments, including an Ineos sponsorship agreement with Spurs, in a challenging economic landscape for the chemicals industry, a first European trophy since taking over at Old Trafford would be a very timely boost.
Winning in Bilbao would also come at a cost. With player contracts heavily incentivised, Maguire estimates that qualifying for the Champions League will also mean United could face having to pay out 25% extra on wages. But he maintains that the Champions League would still be "transformative".
Manager Ruben Amorim hinted as much when admitting that the Champions League was more important to him than winning the Europa League. "The best way to help us to get to the top in a few years is the Champions League, not the cup," he said.
When asked if being out of Europe next season might actually help by giving him more time to work on his squad, he was clear that losing the final against Spurs would be "really bad... the patience of the fans and you guys [the media] next year if we don't win it is going to be on the limit".
For Spurs, the prospect of a first trophy since 2008 is also a chance to salvage something from a desperate Premier League campaign that – just like United - has redefined what domestic failure looks like for a so-called 'Big Six' club.
Their season has also featured furious fan protests over a perceived lack of investment by the club's owner Enic and the approach of chairman Daniel Levy.
"Qualifying for the Champions League would be in the desirable category for Spurs, rather than essential," says Maguire.
"They are the best-run business in the Premier League. They have the most profits historically. They have an ability to generate money from non-football activities to a far greater extent than any other club, so they've always got this as a support mechanism."
At United, a second consecutive season out of the Champions League means the club will have to pay kit provider Adidas a £10m penalty under the terms of their deal.
Speaking on condition of anonymity, one former senior United figure predicts that the sponsorship revenue the club have prided themselves on over so many years could be at risk of "collapsing" if they are out of Europe for only the second time in 35 years, and that their brand value is now at a pivotal moment.
"Not being a European team creates more existential issues around the whole model" they told BBC Sport, pointing to the end of the Tezos sponsorship of the club's training kit this summer.
"It's not healthy, and people start to question whether you are still a 'big club'. But win, and it keeps the wheels spinning. The cash will be 'lifeblood' that allows them to keep trading. If not, they'll have to look at selling homegrown talent like Alejandro Garnacho and Kobbie Mainoo to give them the funds they want."
Some United fans travelling to Bilbao will hope the match evokes memories of the 1991 Cup Winners' Cup triumph - which helped spark the subsequent Sir Alex Ferguson glory years, and showed the club could perform again at a European level.
Others will look to 2017 as inspiration, when Jose Mourinho's team won the Europa League final to rescue Champions League qualification after finishing sixth in the Premier League. But given how much worse United's league performance has become, this feels much more significant.
Lose against Spurs, and many will feel that Ineos' already ambitious Mission 21 plan to turn United into Premier League champions by 2028 could start to look like Mission Impossible. However, senior United insiders dispute the suggestion that this is "win or bust", insisting that the cost-cutting programme the club are implementing is designed to give flexibility in the summer transfer window, and has been predicated on a 'no-Europe' scenario.
While they accept that winning the Europa League would provide a major boost, they say the key is fixing the club's structure.
Both Amorim and his counterpart, Spurs boss Ange Postecoglou, have played down suggestions that the Europa League offers some kind of panacea. Indeed, with Spurs also on course for their worst-ever Premier League season, victory may not be enough to keep Postecoglou in his job, while Amorim seems secure in his, even if his team loses.
And yet there is no denying that there will still be a huge amount at stake on Wednesday, making this one of the most eagerly anticipated matches of the season.
While the neutrals can enjoy the jeopardy, United and Spurs fans will long for a much-needed sense of hope at the end of a season to forget. Here in Bilbao, a city known for its regeneration, lies a chance to kickstart a revival.
Lose, however, and the road to recovery will feel much longer.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Inside Thomas Frank's Tottenham Hotspur appointment
Inside Thomas Frank's Tottenham Hotspur appointment

New York Times

time25 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Inside Thomas Frank's Tottenham Hotspur appointment

Thomas Frank is probably the greatest manager in Brentford's history. He spent nearly seven years in charge of the west London side and guided them from the Championship into the Premier League. Despite having one of the lowest wage bills in the division, they recorded two top-half finishes in four seasons under him. Supporters will never forget the memorable victories over Manchester City, Arsenal and Chelsea, while Frank helped Ivan Toney, David Raya and Bryan Mbeumo to become superstars. It is conceivable there will one day be a statue of him outside their stadium but he is walking away from Brentford, and 'leaving a big piece of (his) heart' behind, for a daunting new challenge. Advertisement On Thursday evening, Frank was announced as Tottenham Hotspur's new head coach on a three-year contract. The 51-year-old is the successor to Ange Postecoglou, who became the first Spurs manager to lift a trophy since 2008 when they won the Europa League final last month. Chairman Daniel Levy sacked Postecoglou 16 days after that famous victory over Manchester United in Bilbao, in large part because Spurs' Premier League performances under the Australian were woeful in 2024-25, losing 22 times and finishing 17th. Tottenham's fanbase are torn over the decision to sack Postecoglou and some members of the first-team squad are deeply upset. There is upheaval in the boardroom, with the arrival of new chief executive officer Vinai Venkatesham, along with the departures of chief football officer Scott Munn and long-serving executive Donna-Maria Cullen. Fabio Paratici — the former managing director of football — is lurking in the background. His 30-month ban from football activity for alleged financial malpractice during his time with Juventus expires on June 30. The conditions of Paratici's ban mean he has been able to act as a consultant for Spurs over the past two and a half years and he has been spotted at home games. It will be a tricky situation to navigate but Frank has patiently waited for his opportunity at a bigger club. This is the inside story of why he decided to join Spurs. Frank has never been shy about his long-term ambitions and there were multiple occasions where he nearly left Brentford. In October 2021, a few months into Brentford's first season in the Premier League, he was interviewed by Aston Villa after they sacked Dean Smith. If he had been successful, it would have been the second time in his career that he had replaced Smith. Frank spent just under two years as Smith's assistant at Brentford and was promoted when he joined Villa. Advertisement Johan Lange was Villa's sporting director at the time and he conducted the interviews with then-chief executive officer Christian Purslow. Lange left Villa in October 2023 to become Tottenham's sporting director. Frank and Lange have known each other for nearly two decades — they worked together at Danish top-flight side Lyngby in 2006 — and will be reunited in north London. Lange and Purslow were impressed by Steven Gerrard's presentation and interview so decided to appoint the former Liverpool captain as Smith's replacement. In January 2022, Frank and his then-assistant Brian Riemer signed new long-term contracts with an improved salary at Brentford. At the beginning of the 2022-23 campaign, Leicester City were interested in Frank but they decided to stick with Brendan Rodgers. When Graham Potter took over at Chelsea that September, Frank publicly praised the decision because it would have 'been easy' for them to appoint Mauricio Pochettino or Zinedine Zidane. There are lots of similarities between Frank and Potter. Neither of them had playing careers at the highest level and they coached in Europe before punching above their weight with Brentford and Brighton & Hove Albion respectively. Frank's comments made it feel as if he was becoming restless in west London and talking up his own credentials as much as Potter's. When Villa sacked Gerrard a month later, they considered Frank again but hired former Arsenal, Aston Villa and Paris Saint-Germain manager Unai Emery. In December 2022, with all of the interest swirling around Frank, Brentford rewarded him with a pay rise and a new contract until 2027. Potter lasted less than seven months at Chelsea before he was sacked and Frank's tone changed. He suddenly sounded wary of leaving Brentford. 'It was difficult for (Potter) to turn down and of course he believed in himself,' Frank said. 'He was aware he was going into a big club and it could potentially be difficult but I don't think he predicted the amount of injuries they had or the amount of players they bought. Advertisement 'You never know what's going to happen in the future. I'm very privileged to be working at Brentford. We need to constantly remind ourselves of what we have, even on a day when it's grey or we are losing or a day where I wake up with big ambitions, because it's not always better on the other side.' Frank's stock was at its highest by the end of that campaign as Brentford finished ninth and narrowly missed out on qualifying for the Europa League. They recorded memorable victories over Manchester United, Liverpool and his future employers Spurs. Antonio Conte was sacked by Tottenham in March but Frank was overlooked and they hired Postecoglou instead. In the 2023-24 season, Brentford struggled with injuries and Toney's eight-month suspension for betting offences, finishing 16th. Yet it did not damage Frank's reputation and he spoke with senior figures at Manchester United around the FA Cup final when they were considering sacking Erik ten Hag. Then he reached the final two for the vacancy at Chelsea but was overlooked for Enzo Maresca. In an interview with The Athletic in May 2024, he said he had 'close to the perfect football life at Brentford'. 'I can see myself being here for a long period,' Frank added. 'Can I stay here for seven more years? I don't know and that's not that I don't love Brentford, it's just: do I want to try something different? But I'm very aware the grass is not greener in the garden next door even if it looks like it. Then you get in there, take a closer look and see there are a lot of weeds in the grass.' Just over a year later and Frank has been convinced to sacrifice his near 'perfect football life'. There are lots of issues to solve at Spurs but he has not been deterred by the challenge. The Athletic reported in March that Postecoglou's long-term future was in serious doubt and that Frank, Fulham's Marco Silva and Bournemouth head coach Andoni Iraola were identified by Spurs as potential replacements. Iraola was their top target but he decided to stay at Bournemouth. There was a mixed reaction at Brentford. Some senior figures were not too concerned because they had become used to the constant interest in Frank. Others were worried as they thought Spurs would be the perfect fit. He would be reunited with Lange, inherit a young squad with vast potential and would not have to relocate from his family home in west London. Multiple club sources during conversations with The Athletic wondered if potential new investment — owner Matthew Benham has been open to selling a minority stake for the past few years — would tempt him into staying. Equipped with better resources, Brentford could then consistently challenge in the top half of the table. Advertisement Towards the end of the season, it became clear Spurs had made Frank their top choice and that he wanted the role. Frank's pre-existing relationship with Lange helped and Levy has been a big fan for some time. Lange was heavily involved but Levy drove the pursuit. Conversations were held about the finances it would take to prise Frank and his staff out of Brentford before the season had finished. Brentford never attempted to persuade him to stay. They accepted his ambition and are well aware their business model is all about developing and selling talent. They did not stand in Smith's way when he joined Villa and have recovered from losing star players including Ollie Watkins, Toney and Christian Eriksen. Brentford told Frank's representatives they did not want to be contacted by any interested club until after the season ended so they could focus on finishing as high as possible. Brentford were warned to expect a phone call in the evening after their final game on May 25 but it never came. Spurs winning the Europa League threatened to change everything. Nobody knew what was happening with Postecoglou. The Australian went on holiday to Greece while Levy took time off too. Brentford acted as if Frank was staying and he was even involved in the signing of Caoimhin Kelleher from Liverpool as their new first-choice goalkeeper. He then spent a couple of weeks in Denmark, with a short trip to Munich in between to watch Paris Saint-Germain's victory over Inter Milan in the Champions League final with his family. In a strange quirk, Frank's first competitive match with Spurs will be the UEFA Super Cup against PSG on August 13 in Italy. On June 6, just over two weeks after winning the Europa League, Spurs announced they had sacked Postecoglou. They sent an email to club staff shortly before the public announcement but lots of people, including first-team players, found out through social media. Spurs did not make direct contact with Brentford until June 9. Levy and Brentford's director of football Phil Giles spent the next few days discussing the specifics of the deal. Compensation was one element of that — Brentford sources say the fee reached was around £10million ($13.6m), while Tottenham sources say that figure is closer to £5m. Advertisement The other key component of the conversation centred around which members of Frank's backroom staff would follow him. Part of the reason why negotiations dragged on is because Brentford were reluctant to lose Justin Cochrane. The former England youth-team coach has spent the past three years as Frank's assistant and was viewed as his potential replacement. Cochrane considered his options and decided to return to Spurs, where he spent nearly a decade as a coach in their academy. Head of athletic performance Chris Haslam, who worked at Brentford for over a decade across two spells and is one of Frank's most trusted allies, has joined Spurs too, along with analyst Joe Newton. Brentford were reluctant to lose that many staff members and wanted to make sure they were properly compensated. Steven Pressley left his role as head of individual player development at the beginning of June to become Dundee's head coach, which means Brentford have a lot of vacancies to fill this summer. Ideally, they do not want to hire a new head coach with a large entourage. Frank would like to persuade Mbeumo to follow him too, but the forward favours a move to Manchester United. Another reason why it took a few days to resolve Frank's future is because Brentford had already started the process of replacing him. They have identified six potential candidates and will narrow that number down before conducting formal interviews. They are long-standing admirers of Ipswich Town's Kieran McKenna, while then-Reims head coach Will Still visited their training ground at the beginning of 2024 when he was studying for his coaching badges. Still spent the 2024-25 campaign in charge of Lens and joined Southampton last month. Riemer, Frank's assistant in west London between 2018 and 2022, is not expected to be considered for the role. The 46-year-old has been in charge of Denmark for under a year and the World Cup takes place next summer. Scott Parker, who beat Brentford in the 2020 Championship play-off final while in charge of rivals Fulham, is not thought to be in contention either. Once the negotiations around Frank's backroom staff were completed, Spurs officially announced his appointment on June 12. They described him as 'one of the most progressive and innovative head coaches' within football who 'consistently and significantly' outperformed expectations with Brentford. Frank was the second-longest-serving manager in the Premier League behind Pep Guardiola at Manchester City. He forged genuine friendships at Brentford with Benham, Giles, technical director Lee Dykes, chief executive officer Jon Varney and chairman Cliff Crown. This is a bittersweet moment for Brentford, who are grateful for what Frank has achieved but sad to see him leave. Advertisement Some members of the first-team squad are known to be happy for Frank as they believe he has been overlooked for other opportunities in the past. With two top-half finishes in four seasons, they think he has taken Brentford as far as he can unless they start spending more money on wages and transfers. One dressing-room source, who wished to remain anonymous to protect relationships, said: 'This is what Brentford do. We bring people in, help them do well and then sell.' Frank has not contacted the squad since the season finished but the time will come when he can give them a proper goodbye. Taking charge of Spurs is the biggest challenge of Frank's career. He has never managed in a European competition before and has to contend with the expanded version of the Champions League next season. There will be more games to manage, more scrutiny and more pressure. He overachieved across seven special years at Brentford and now he will try to repeat the trick with Spurs. (Top photos: Mike Hewitt,; design: Demetrius Robinson)

Everything to know on Soccer Aid 2025 including how to watch and the squads
Everything to know on Soccer Aid 2025 including how to watch and the squads

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Everything to know on Soccer Aid 2025 including how to watch and the squads

Soccer Aid is back for 2025 with the annual charity football match once again featuring a whole host of celebrities and former footballers. The event was created by singer Robbie Williams back in 2006 in order to raise money for the children's charity UNICEF. Every year, an England XI takes on a World XI and the 2024 match saw more than £15 million raised. England emerged victorious after a high-scoring 6-3 game last year, which ended a five-game winning streak from World XI. Soccer Aid for UNICEF is back! 🏆💙 🏟️ Old Trafford, Manchester 🗓️ Sunday 15th June 🎟️ Get your tickets today 🫡@ManUtd | #SoccerAid — Soccer Aid (@socceraid) March 11, 2025 You can donate to Soccer Aid on the website here. As always, the squads for Soccer Aid contain a mixture of celebrities and former professional players. Usual favourites such as Sir Mo Farah and Paddy McGuinness will be returning. The squad lists for Soccer Aid 2025 are as follows: Alex Brooker Jermain Defoe Steven Bartlett Toni Duggan Angry Ginge Tom Grennan Joe Hart Your England squad is nearly complete. Who else needs to be added? 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿✍️ — Soccer Aid (@socceraid) June 6, 2025 Steph Houghton Bella Ramsey Bear Grylls Dame Denise Lewis Aaron Lennon Sir Mo Farah Paddy McGuinness Gary Neville Sam Quek Wayne Rooney Jill Scott Paul Scholes Vicky McClure Louis Tomlinson Phil Jagielka Michael Carrick Roman Kemp Jack Wilshere James Nelson-Joyce Leonardo Bonucci Tobi Brown Tony Bellew Richard Gadd Dermot Kennedy Maisie Adam Kaylyn Kyle Bryan Habana Gorka Márquez Nadia Nadim Livi Sheldon (aka Diamond from Gladiators) David Trezeguet Edwin Van der Sar Nicky Byrne Nemanja Vidic Harry Kewell Carlos Tevez Big Zuu Noah Beck Billy Wingrove Robbie Keane Asim Chaudry John O'Shea Kheira Hamraoui Soccer Aid 2025 arrivals have begun 📸 🔥 — Soccer Aid (@socceraid) June 12, 2025 Harry Redknapp will be returning to manage England, while boxer Tyson Fury and Line of Duty actress Vicky McClure will also be part of the management team. Wayne Rooney will also be involved on the coaching side as well as being a listed player. TV personality Sam Thompson had initially been announced as a player for England, but will now be part of the management team following an injury. Meanwhile, former Manchester United goalkeeper Peter Schmeichel will be managing World XI, alongside actors Emmett J. Scanlan and Martin Compston. Soccer Aid 2024 will be hosted at Manchester United's Old Trafford stadium, with kick-off occurring at 7.30pm on Sunday, June 15. Recommended reading: Match Of The Day fans say it 'won't be the same' without Gary Lineker amid exit Pubs across the country to stay open longer this summer - but on one condition See the 10 stadiums in the UK and Ireland that will host Euro 2028 matches Old Trafford has hosted the match on eight previous occasions, with the most recent one being in 2023. Coverage for Soccer Aid 2025 will be available to watch from 6pm on ITV1 and ITX on Sunday, June 15. Dermot O'Leary and Alex Scott will be presenting the coverage, while Sam Matterface and Jason Manford will be providing commentary.

How can Liverpool afford Florian Wirtz?
How can Liverpool afford Florian Wirtz?

New York Times

time30 minutes ago

  • New York Times

How can Liverpool afford Florian Wirtz?

The signing of Florian Wirtz comprises a new club-record deal for Liverpool. Wirtz will join from Bayer Leverkusen on a five-year contract. In exchange, Liverpool have agreed to pay the German club £100million ($135.9m) in guaranteed fees, with a potential £16m due in add-ons. The deal, even without those add-ons, eclipses Liverpool's previous transfer record by a distance. That record is generally seen as having been in place since January 2018, when they parted with £75m to buy Virgil van Dijk from Southampton. Advertisement In fact, the Van Dijk fee may already have been topped prior to this agreement. Darwin Nunez was signed from Benfica in June 2022 for an initial £64m that could rise to £85m. To the end of last December, according to the Portuguese side's financial disclosures, Liverpool had paid a further €10m (around £8.5m) of a potential €25m in add-ons, so any more conditions being met in the last six months could mean Nunez's transfer fee went past Van Dijk's. Either way, Wirtz's signing tops both of them, and makes him one of only a dozen or so footballers in history to command a £100m-plus fee. How, then, can his new side afford him? Wirtz's club-record arrival comes at a time when Liverpool are enjoying record revenues. They cleared £600m for the first time in 2023-24, a year in which they had to make do with Europa League football and finishing third in the Premier League. Last season, with a return to the Champions League and a twentieth domestic title secured, alongside a full season of the extended Anfield Road End being open and continued commercial growth, Liverpool should have topped £700m in turnover, a feat only previously managed by Manchester City in England. A further record in 2025-26 looks likely. The Athletic estimates Liverpool earned £181.5m through winning the Premier League and, even if they don't retain the title in 2025-26, they will still benefit from an uptick in the league's overall income. A new TV rights cycle starts this season, with the Premier League expecting to earn £12.25bn over the next three years — a 17 per cent increase on the 2022-25 cycle. Liverpool's commercial growth is well-placed to continue. August will see them begin a new kit deal with Adidas. The agreement, while incentive-based, represents a significant potential increase on the club's already lucrative arrangement with Nike. The latter secured Liverpool a base payment of £30million a season, but garnered around double that in reality. Booming revenues are all well and good but of little use if your expenditure is through the roof. Liverpool lost £57.1million pre-tax in 2023-24, the worst financial result both of the Fenway Sports Group (FSG) era and in the club's history, so are costs are swallowing their income whole? Not really. That big loss a year ago was very much out of the ordinary for a club who, across FSG's near-15 years at the helm, have broken even. In fact they've most likely done better than that: as detailed in The Athletic's BookKeeper series, published in March, we expect Liverpool to have returned to profitability in 2024-25, and healthy profitability too. Even if the club's wage bill crept up to the £400m mark — not a guarantee by any stretch, but possible once league-winning bonuses were handed out — we project Liverpool could still have booked a £30m profit. Advertisement The club are big wage-payers, as evidenced by their 2023-24 wage bill only trailing Manchester City domestically. The Athletic understands Wirtz will earn around £200,000 per week at Anfield, before any bonuses which may accrue to him. From Liverpool's perspective, inclusive of employer-related costs on top of his basic salary, Wirtz will cost them at least £12m a year to employ. Liverpool have some world-class players and pay them accordingly, but they'll benefit from the departure of Trent Alexander-Arnold, who also cost them £12m a year in employment-related costs (again before bonuses). One of the reasons the signings of Van Dijk and goalkeeper Alisson are often pointed to as examples of Liverpool not skimping on fees is they were pretty much outliers; they did spend big on the pair, but their transfer spending has generally trailed domestic rivals. At the end of 2023-24 the cost of assembling Liverpool's squad, across transfer and agent fees, was £749.4m, the seventh most expensive squad in the world but well behind Chelsea (£1.4bn), Manchester City (£1.1bn), Manchester United (£943.9m) and Arsenal (£882.4m). Correspondingly, annual amortisation costs hitting the club's books were well below domestic peers; Liverpool's amortisation bill of £114.5m last year was over £20m behind Spurs and £75m less than Chelsea. After a quiet summer in 2024, amortisation won't have ticked up much, if at all. Assuming his signing completes on June 16, when the transfer window reopens, Wirtz's £100m fee, plus assumed agent fees on top of around 10 per cent, will add £20.9m to Liverpool's 2025-26 amortisation bill, with a further £21.8m per season following thereafter until 2029-30 (a small sliver, £1.8m, will fall into 2030-31 as a result of the club's 31 May accounting date). Alongside the recent signing of Jeremie Frimpong, they'll have added around £28m a season onto their amortisation costs, but they'll still trail all the rest of the 'Big Six' clubs, with the potential exception of Spurs. Advertisement No. We recently explained how Liverpool could have lost £75m last season without breaking any Premier League rules. Across wages and transfer fee amortisation, signing Wirtz will add an extra £34m or so in annual costs — but the club have the headroom to handle it. That's not to say that outgoings are not likely this summer. They aren't needed to satisfy Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR) — the profitability of 2024-25 and growing revenues will ensure no issues there — but they will help balance both the squad and the books. FSG has long sought to run Liverpool sustainably and, while they can splurge this summer without fear of bankruptcy or rule-breaking, and lose a chunk of money in 2025-26 if they wish to, that doesn't mean they'll do it for the sake of it. A big money departure, likely Nunez, would be no surprise. Cash worries are different from PSR ones, but Liverpool have little concern there either. Access to funds is no problem. Even if FSG was reluctant to loan money in (something they've generally preferred to do for infrastructure spend rather than operational costs), the ownership refinanced a revolving credit facility in September last year, lifting its limit from £200m to £350m. At the end of May 2024, it had only drawn down £116m of the original £200m, so there's plenty to be dipped into if the need arises. Liverpool may not need to increase borrowings anyway. Operating cash flow was positive at £83.7m in 2023-24 even without Champions League revenue, while cash spent on infrastructure has reduced following the completion of the revamped Anfield Road End. As well, their relatively low spending on transfers — and keenness to pay more of deals up front if they can — means Liverpool owe far less than peers in outstanding fee instalments. At the end of May 2024, they owed a net £69.9m, an amount which is expected to have dropped even lower in the past year. The previous figure was already lower than seven other Premier League clubs at the time and nowhere near the £308.9m Manchester United owed at the end of March 2025. Signing Wirtz is a significant undertaking for Liverpool. Combining the transfer fee, assumed agent fees and five years of his basic salary puts the total cost to Liverpool of signing and employing him at an estimated £170.5m. With potential add-ons and bonuses that sum could feasibly reach £200m. All parties concerned will hope it does — it will mean Wirtz and Liverpool have enjoyed plenty of success together. Those are big sums, but then Liverpool are a wealthy club. FSG's ownership has not been to every fan's taste, but it is precisely because of its frugality that Liverpool are able to make these deals when opportunities arise.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store