Iskcon flyover case: Tathya Patel denied bail once again
Ahmedabad: A sessions court once again rejected the regular bail application of 22-year-old Tathya Patel, who is accused of running his car into a crowd and killing nine persons on the Iskcon flyover in July 2023.
In denying bail to Patel, principal district judge K M Sojitra discarded the argument that the trial in this case might take a long time. The court said that the accused himself is seeking adjournment during the trial for quite some time on the grounds that his revision application seeking discharge from section 304 of IPC (culpable homicide not amounting to murder) was pending before the Gujarat high court.
The court also took into consideration that Patel's pleas for regular bail were rejected twice by the trial court earlier, and that Patel has twice withdrawn his bail pleas from the Gujarat high court and once from the Supreme Court.
Regarding the arguments for bail, the court stated, "The contentions raised in this application were already raised in the earlier application and the same were already dealt with. No material changed circumstances have tilted in favour of applicant – accused.
"
The court also considered gravity of the case in denying bail, and said, "Having regards to the seriousness of the incident in which nine people have lost their lives and 12 people are injured and bail plea of the applicant-accused is not considered by the higher courts, the case of applicant - accused cannot be considered for grant of bail."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
When Sledging Turns Deadly: Cricket Spat Ends in Murder, Nine Get Life
Chennai: Sledging during a village cricket match in rural Tamil Nadu triggered a cycle of revenge that ended in bloodshed and life sentences. Seventeen years after a 20-year-old was hacked to death with sickles and killed using country bombs in full public view, a trial court sentenced nine men to life imprisonment, holding the murder as premeditated and executed with deadly precision. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The incident traces back to late 2007, when a match at Koothankuli Polytechnic Ground turned ugly. During the match, Siluvai Anthony Reagan (the deceased) and his friend Elton were assaulted with a cycle chain by Ganesan (alias Ganesh), son of Gandhi, and another player, whose name is also Raegan. Though elders mediated a truce, Ganesan's subsequent jibes at a hotel reignited tensions. The deceased, along with Elton and another youth, retaliated. A police case was filed against them, and they began reporting daily to Kudankulam station as per bail conditions. It was after one such routine police visit on January 22, 2008, that Reagan, Elton, and the complainant boarded a truck back to their village. Around 6.15 pm near Vijayapathi Rice Mill, their vehicle was intercepted by Ganesh's group—armed and waiting. Two motorcycles blocked the front and rear, and others emerged from thorn bushes with sickles. Gandhi (father of Ganesh) hurled a country bomb that hit Elton's right ankle, seriously injuring him. Ganesh followed with another bomb that exploded on the road. Siluvai Anthony Reagan was dragged out of the truck and attacked by multiple assailants. The court noted in forensic detail how each of the accused, including Simbu, John Paul, and others, inflicted targeted cuts using sickles—on his neck, shoulder, and torso—causing instant death. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Based on confessions, police later recovered 48 country bombs—38 from Gandhi and 10 from Simbu. Convicting nine accused—Gandhi, Ganesh, Simbu, John Paul, Vinod, Sanjay, Anran (son of Aeronimus), James, and Michael (son of Aeronimus)—the Tirunelveli Sessions Court sentenced them to life imprisonment under IPC Sections 302, 148, and 3(a) of the Explosive Substances Act. Gandhi and Ganesh received additional sentences under Sections 326 and 5(a), with all terms to run concurrently. Others were acquitted due to lack of evidence.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Inquiry committee submits report on VS illegal trials to Ahmedabad municipal commissioner
Ahmedabad: A five-member AMC committee completed its investigation into the alleged illegal clinical trials at VS Hospital and submitted a report, implicating top doctors in a multi-crore scam. Between 2021 and 2025, 58 unauthorized trials were conducted on over 500 patients in complete violation of rules, with payments from pharmaceutical companies routed to the accounts of senior doctors, instead of the hospital, said sources citing the report. The panel, led by the head of the AMC vigilance department, has reportedly recommended disciplinary action against all responsible parties. The municipal commissioner is now reviewing the report to decide whether a police complaint should be filed. Sources citing the inquiry report, which includes a 30-page summary and 500 pages of annexures, said that the key accused include then superintendent Dr Manish Patel, clinical head Dr Devang Rana, and contract doctor Dhaivat Shukla. "The trio allegedly siphoned off between Rs 17 crore to Rs 20 crore from pharmaceutical companies into their personal and family accounts. In some cases, money was also deposited into the accounts of unrelated individuals," revealed a source close to the development. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Memperdagangkan CFD Emas dengan salah satu spread terendah? IC Markets Mendaftar Undo The scam came to light after Rajshree Kesari, a Congress councillor from Chandkheda, filed a complaint, alleging that doctors were conducting illegal trials and depositing the money into private bank accounts. After conducting a preliminary investigation, the municipal commissioner then formed a special five-member inquiry panel on April 19. However, after questions were raised about one panel member's credibility, AMC's in-charge health officer Dr Bhavin Solanki was included in the committee. The probe was overseen by Hina Bhathawala, AMC's vigilance department chief. Earlier, eight doctors, including Dr Rana, were suspended, and a notice was served to the retired hospital superintendent. The committee also recorded statements from Dr Patel, Dr Rana, and other implicated personnel. A source, citing the inquiry report, said, "Over four years, 58 pharmaceutical companies conducted various unregulated vaccine and drug clinical research on more than 500 patients. The companies legally paid Rs 17 to 20 crore, none of which reached the hospital's official accounts. Instead, they were deposited into accounts belonging to Dr Patel, Dr Rana, Dr Shukla, their spouses, and even family HUF accounts. Some payments were allegedly made in cash. "The clinical trials were allegedly conducted using the approval of a private ethical committee instead of seeking clearance from the AMC, the hospital's management board, or the Medical Education Trust." Documents pertaining to these trials were either poorly maintained or deliberately concealed, said sources, drawing from the report. Despite a claim from Dr Patel that Rs 6 crore was deposited into the hospital account, the committee found no supporting documentation.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Man hides past divorces, loses current plea in HC
Kolkata: Calcutta High Court has set aside the divorce decree granted to a man 5 years ago on the basis of cruelty and desertion, as he hid his prior two divorces from the wife. The couple married in in Jan 2010 but it did not last more than six months. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now A child was born to them in Sept 2010. The couple have been living separately for nearly 15 years now. In 2019, the trial court granted the divorce, upholding the allegations of cruelty and desertion posed by the husband against the wife. While the husband claimed to have disclosed that he was a divorcee, the wife claimed that he did not disclose his two divorces prior to marrying her. The husband claimed that the wife left him after six months of marriage and kept complaining to everyone, including his employer, which led to him being fired. A part of his claim rested on the wife's purported neglect of household duties, her prioritisation of her legal profession as a practising advocate, and repeated threats to file false cases, which, according to him, resulted in a case under Section 498A of IPC. The wife's version was that she was driven out of the house while she was pregnant, and when she tried re-entering after giving birth, she was not allowed. She claimed that the husband questioned her "moral character". To support her claims, the wife submitted documents of the husband's two prior marriages and her approaching the protection officer in Howrah, showing her efforts to seek reconciliation and resume cohabitation. She approached the High Court, stating that the trial court "egregiously erred by equating her legitimate pursuit of legal redress" with cruelty, without any proof of it being false or with malicious intent. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now On June 11, The division bench of Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya and Justice Uday Kumar held: "We conclude that a divorce decree cannot be granted to a party (petitioner) who perpetrated foundational cruelty (eg, deliberate marital deception) of greater magnitude than any alleged misconduct by the other spouse, even if the marriage is irretrievably broken down, as it would constitute a miscarriage of justice and violate the principle of 'clean hands'. " On the fact that the wife resorted to legal means for genuine grievance, the bench held that it cannot be automatically branded as "having committed cruelty" unless there is malicious intent shown.
