logo
$880 billion in Medicaid cuts would be ‘devastating' for nursing homes and their residents

$880 billion in Medicaid cuts would be ‘devastating' for nursing homes and their residents

Yahoo02-05-2025

The nursing-home industry finds itself in the crosshairs of a congressional budget debate.
The House Budget Committee voted in February to seek at least $880 billion in mandatory spending cuts to programs overseen by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. That committee oversees Medicaid, which is funded through a federal and state partnership.
Warren Buffett proves, once again, why he's the best
'We are the most privileged': My husband and I are tired of paying for our friends. How do we get them to pay their way?
'Retirement is within my grasp': I'm 57, my 401(k) is dropping and I'm feeling anxious about a recession. What can I do?
My eldest son refused to share his father's $500K inheritance with his siblings. Should I cut him off?
My father is giving me $250K to buy a home, but told me not to tell my two siblings. Am I morally obligated to tell them?
The potential $880 billion in Medicaid cuts could hurt the finances of nursing homes and lead to reduced services or outright closures, cutting care for the most vulnerable older populations.
The deep reductions are needed to allow Republicans to achieve their topline budgetary goals, including tax cuts. The Congressional Budget Office said the only way to meet the cost-cutting goals is through massive cuts to Medicaid overall. Medicaid accounts for about 8.6% of the federal budget, according to health-policy research nonprofit KFF.
The final budget details have not yet been hashed out. In April, the Senate passed an amended budget resolution, but the two chambers still must agree to a joint budget resolution.
'Any cuts to Medicaid would be devastating,' said Clif Porter, president and chief executive of American Health Care Association and National Center for Assisted Living, the trade group for nursing homes and assisted-living centers. 'Not only do we have a large portion of seniors on Medicaid, but the program already underfunds [nursing homes] by 18%.'
Nationally, 63% of nursing-home residents and 20% of assisted-living residents rely on Medicaid to pay for their care. There are about 1.3 million people living in nursing homes and more than 800,000 people in assisted living in the U.S., according to AHCA/NCAL.
'The fear of closures is real. Medicaid cuts could bring many homes to the brink and lead to closures,' Porter said.
Any new closures would come on top of the 774 nursing homes that shut their doors between February 2020 and July 2024, according to AHCA/NCAL, amid financial pressures, staffing shortages and the COVID-19 pandemic. That wave of closures displaced nearly 30,000 residents.
All this is putting access to long-term care at risk. Within the United States, 42 counties have no nursing homes as of April 2025, according to AHCA/NCAL. The vast majority — 85% — of these nursing-home deserts are in rural areas, and 20% of all seniors live in rural communities.
'Medicaid covers a lot of community-based, home-based services. If you stop checking on the elderly to see if they're eating right and take away community-based services, people are going to be sicker, sicker and sicker. You'll then have sick people flood the hospitals. Hospitals will be burdened with a lot more sickly patients,' said Dwayne Clark, the chair, chief executive and founder of Aegis Living, an assisted-living company that has 38 facilities with 3,000 residents.
The industry recently won a court battle against a Biden-era staffing mandate that would have required more caregivers in facilities. The rule could have provided a boost to patient care, but the industry sued to halt the requirement. In addition to the pressure on nursing homes' bottom lines, the industry argued it would have been 'impossible' to implement, in part due to a shortage of healthcare workers. According to AHCA/NCAL, the Biden administration staffing mandate would have led to facility closures or reduced bed counts and to the possible displacement of more than 290,600 seniors.
With the federal staffing mandate off the table, nursing homes are now bracing for Medicaid cuts that would be disruptive to the industry and to older people, a population that is projected to grow significantly in the coming years. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the number of people over the age of 80 will increase from 14.7 million today to 18.8 million by 2030.
'We're dealing with an exploding population. Cutting Medicaid is not a rational approach,' Porter said. 'One danger of potential closures is an increase in nursing-home deserts.'
When nursing homes close, patients are often transported to facilities farther away. In some cases, patients return home.
'Given the age and fragility of the patients, when facilities close, they may be sent to a facility 50 miles away. The senior may still get care, but their loved ones have to travel farther to see them. It can result in an increase in loneliness because of a lack of family nearby,' Porter said. 'People underestimate the impact of loneliness as we age. So when homes close, it absolutely affects the care and spirits of the patient.'
He added: 'Without question, there will be more demand in America. We should be thinking about expanding existing resources. Existing capacity is not enough. We have to do everything we can to have resources for the exploding population.'
Sam Brooks, public policy director for the National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term Care, said any cuts to Medicaid would ripple across the healthcare system and lead to higher overall healthcare spending nationally.
'With Medicaid cuts, you'll see less staffing, and that's the key component to quality care. Staffing is the No. 1 cost for nursing homes,' Brooks said. 'Residents won't get out of bed, because there's not enough staff to help them or transport them. Call bells won't get answered. Patients will suffer from pressure ulcers because there's not enough staff to reposition them.'
Brooks noted that pressure ulcers, or bedsores, can be deadly, because they can lead to sepsis. Staff cuts will 'lead to greater illness and increased hospitalizations. It will have a tremendous deleterious effect, because people struggle right now to get quality care, and it would only get worse if there are cuts,' he said.
'With cuts, care quality would inevitably decline,' he added. 'The proposed cuts are an existential threat to nursing homes and to all long-term care services in the United States. It will affect veterans, older Americans and people with significant disabilities.'
If federal Medicaid dollars are cut, states won't have the resources to offset those lost dollars, said Edward Miller, chair of the gerontology department at the University of Massachusetts Boston.
'Most states can't offset those cuts. With even less reimbursement, [nursing homes] will have even less resources, lower staff [levels] and worse quality,' Miller said. 'What happens is that families will have fewer resource options to fund robust long-term-care resources. What is your choice then? Most care is already provided by unpaid caregivers, and that will increase — which will impact their lives, their jobs, their retirement and the economy.'
The proposed $880 billion in cuts to Medicaid could have a domino effect within the U.S. healthcare system, Aegis Living's Clark said.
'There will be this big bubble of sick people. There will be a massive amount of elderly, and we can't fix it right away,' he said. 'This big bubble of sick people will affect everyone.'
Trump's tariffs are America's Brexit, says this strategist. These are the trades to make.
'She's kept him afloat': I'm 78 and leaving my daughter, 41, my life savings, but her partner is a mooch. How can I protect her?
What investors are overlooking at Nvidia, Apple and a cruise-line operator, according to this fund manager
'Money means nothing to my wealthy clients': My coworkers step on each other to get ahead. How do I create a nontoxic culture at work?
My sister has a learning disability and her husband squandered $100,000. How do I protect her after I'm gone?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk Just Backed Warren Buffett's 3-Word Fix for the Deficit. Would It Work?
Elon Musk Just Backed Warren Buffett's 3-Word Fix for the Deficit. Would It Work?

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk Just Backed Warren Buffett's 3-Word Fix for the Deficit. Would It Work?

The U.S. deficit topped $1.8 trillion in 2024, but a bold idea from Warren Buffett is making the rounds again, and this time, Elon Musk is getting behind it. In a 2011 CNBC interview, Buffett said he could end the deficit "in five minutes" by passing a law that disqualifies all sitting members of Congress from re-election if the deficit exceeds 3% of GDP. That clip recently resurfaced on social media, reigniting debate over government accountability—and catching the attention of Musk. He responded to Lee: "100%. This is the way." Moneywise reported that the proposal got a push from Utah Senator Mike Lee, who's now drafting a constitutional amendment inspired by Buffett's logic. Lee's version adds another twist: members of Congress would be ousted whenever inflation climbs above 3%. Buffett's plan might sound extreme, but based on recent numbers, it would be career-ending for nearly every lawmaker on Capitol Hill. The 2024 deficit hit 6.3% of GDP, which is double the threshold. Of course, critics were quick to point out the obvious flaw in the setup. Congress would need to vote to fire itself, making the law politically toxic. Even so, the idea is tapping into deep frustration with government spending. Nobel Prize-winning economist Milton Friedman once said, "Only Washington can create money," and warned that unchecked spending leads to inflation. Musk's endorsement, paired with Lee's amendment effort, has amplified the conversation online. Some supporters argue that even if the proposal never passes, it forces lawmakers to confront the consequences of fiscal irresponsibility. Others see it as more political theater than policy. While the odds of Congress passing a law that threatens its own job security are slim to none, the Buffett-Musk-Lee alignment has given the concept a second wind. For now, the public can only vote the traditional way. But the viral resurgence of this three-word fix—'fire the incumbents'—shows Americans are still searching for accountability where it matters Musk Just Backed Warren Buffett's 3-Word Fix for the Deficit. Would It Work? first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 12, 2025

David Hogg Takes Multiple Swipes at Democrats: 'Asleep at the Wheel'
David Hogg Takes Multiple Swipes at Democrats: 'Asleep at the Wheel'

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

David Hogg Takes Multiple Swipes at Democrats: 'Asleep at the Wheel'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. David Hogg took multiple swipes at Democrats as he announced that he will not fight to hold onto his leadership role in the Democratic National Committee. Hogg decried "a serious lack of vision from Democratic leaders, too many of them asleep at the wheel" in a lengthy thread on X on Wednesday night, adding that three Democratic House members have died this year after being reelected in November, giving Republicans an expanded majority. The Democratic National Committee (DNC) had voted to nullify the February 2025 elections that appointed Hogg as vice chair, citing procedural violations. In his Wednesday posts he also criticized the "crisis of competence and culture" that protects complacency and rewards seniority. It "has already cost us an election and millions of Americans their rights. Let's not let it cost us the country," he said. "We must change the culture of our party that has brought us here and if there is anything activism or history teaches us it's that comfortable people, especially comfortable people with power, do not change. In this moment of crisis, comfort is not an option." David Hogg attends the Fast Company Innovation Festival 2024 at BMCC Tribeca PAC on September 17, 2024 in New York City. David Hogg attends the Fast Company Innovation Festival 2024 at BMCC Tribeca PAC on September 17, 2024 in New York City. Eugene Gologursky//Getty Images for Fast Company This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

Live Updates: Police Clear Protesters in Seattle, Las Vegas and L.A.
Live Updates: Police Clear Protesters in Seattle, Las Vegas and L.A.

New York Times

time2 hours ago

  • New York Times

Live Updates: Police Clear Protesters in Seattle, Las Vegas and L.A.

California liberals welcomed Gov. Gavin Newsom's speech condemning President Trump, but some remained skeptical of the governor. Republicans, meanwhile, saw his address as opportunistic and blamed him for the state's turmoil. For months, Californians weren't sure what to make of Gov. Gavin Newsom. There was the new podcast on which he interviewed right-wing influencers and said he felt trans athletes shouldn't participate in women's sports. There was the meeting in February with President Trump in the White House. And there were occasional snipes at Republicans, but nothing like those Mr. Newsom had dished out in years past. Then came a blistering nine-minute speech on Tuesday in which Mr. Newsom warned Americans that Mr. Trump was destroying democracy and acting as an authoritarian who would eventually send the military to states across the country. Many liberals in California cheered Mr. Newsom, finally seeing in him the leader of the resistance that they had been missing. Those feeling confused and fearful since Mr. Trump started his second term were looking for someone to stick up for them and said they appreciated Mr. Newsom's forcefulness. 'In a time of rising fear and growing threats to democracy, he spoke not just as a governor, but as a moral leader,' said Representative Lateefah Simon, Democrat of California. 'He named the danger plainly.' But others, while supportive of his message, were not entirely convinced. They said testing the political climate ahead of a potential run for president. 'Even if you're late to the party, you know, welcome to the fight,' said Hugo Soto-Martinez, a progressive City Council member in Los Angeles, who appreciated what Mr. Newsom said but wished the governor had stood up to the president sooner. Adrian Tirtanadi, executive director of Open Door Legal, a nonprofit which provides free legal representation for immigrants and others, said he liked all of the words in Mr. Newsom's speech. But, he said, he wondered why the governor was not backing up the rhetoric with more financial support for immigration lawyers who could fight deportation. Big talk without much action, Mr. Tirtanadi said, is often the California way. Still, others appreciated that Mr. Newsom had demanded that Mr. Trump stop workplace raids and filed lawsuits seeking to block the deployment of National Guard troops and Marines in Southern California. That has given some hope to immigrants who have felt powerless. When David Campos was 14, he and his family traveled by foot and by bus, across deserts and over mountains, to California from their home in Guatemala. They scurried under a border fence and settled in South Central Los Angeles without legal papers. The family eventually obtained citizenship through his father's carpentry job. Mr. Campos went on to Stanford University and Harvard Law School, served on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and is now the vice chairman of the California Democratic Party. Mr. Campos said he was glad that Mr. Newsom, the former San Francisco mayor with whom he sometimes clashed, took a defiant stance toward Mr. Trump. 'I'm glad he's rising to this moment,' Mr. Campos, 54, said in an interview. 'The governor reminded us that if the president can do this in California, he can do it anywhere in this country. That's how a democracy can die.' Republicans in California, many of whom have aligned with President Trump, said they were decidedly unimpressed with the governor's speech. Senator Brian Jones, the State Senate minority leader, said that the governor seemed to have been filming an early campaign commercial with his speech, from the way the flags were set in his backdrop to the suit he was wearing. 'It doesn't do anything to lower tensions in L.A.,' Mr. Jones said. 'When he says we all need to stand up, is he encouraging more people to show up to the riots and participate?' James Gallagher, the Republican leader of the California State Assembly, called the governor's address 'self-righteous political posturing.' Mr. Gallagher said California's policy of preventing local law enforcement from working with federal immigration officials created the current tension. He said he found it funny that Mr. Newsom was accusing Mr. Trump of being authoritarian when the governor ordered Californians to close their businesses, stay home from church, attend school on Zoom, wear masks and get vaccinated during the Covid-19 pandemic. 'He was a total tyrant, and he has no business talking about authoritarianism because he is exhibit A,' Mr. Gallagher said. Mr. Newsom's speech, as well as his sharp-tongued retorts to Republicans on social media this week, won some plaudits from younger influencers. Dwayne Murphy, Jr., a 34-year-old content creator who lives in Downey, Calif., and said he votes Democrat, said he appreciated that the governor 'seems to be hyper-focused on standing up for this state at a time like this, and I feel like that's what people are very encouraged by.' Inkiad Kabir, 20, a pop culture content creator who lives in the Inland Empire region of California, said that Mr. Newsom was the rare Democrat willing to go on the attack, calling him 'basically liberal Trump, in a way.' Mr. Kabir created a popular TikTok video this week in which he called the governor 'Daddy Newsom' and likened the governor to a 'toxic ex that you promise you're not going to go back to, but you always go back to.' For now, it seems, Mr. Kabir has gone back.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store