The US Space Force needs a 'warfighting ethos' and increased funding to compete with China in space: report
The US Space Force needs a "warfighting ethos" to compete with China in space, a new report has said.
Failure to adapt could threaten the force's long-term chances of success in the space domain, it said.
The Space Force also lacks a clearly defined role and resources, the authors said.
The US Space Force needs a change in mindset and increased funding to compete with China in the space domain, two retired US colonels argued in a new report for the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies.
The report, which was released earlier this week, summarizes the findings and recommendations from a two-day workshop held in October at the Mitchell Institute's Spacepower Advantage Center of Excellence.
The event brought together 55 space experts to examine the Space Force Chief of Space Operations' theory of success — called "Competitive Endurance" — against a set of potential crises over the next 25 years, including the Russian deployment of a nuclear antisatellite weapon and an attempted Chinese space blockade.
The workshop found that the role of the Space Force was not well understood by many Americans and that it lacked resources and a "warfighting ethos," which the authors of the new report said threatened its long-term chances of success against China in the space domain.
"Systemic issues exist within the Space Force and Department of Defense that threaten the success of the Space Force in a long-term competition with China," Charles Galbreath, a retired US Space Force colonel, and Jennifer Reeves, a retired US Air Force colonel, wrote.
"Chief among these are: inadequate authorities and resources, a lack of clearly defined and understood roles and missions, and the need for increased warfighting ethos."
Drawing on the workshop's findings, the authors, both senior fellows at the Mitchell Institute, called on Congress to increase funding to the USSF and loosen policy restrictions to allow the deployment of offensive and defensive weapons, which they said would enable the force to "create a stronger posture, capable of deterring hostile actions and conflict."
They also urged the force to develop educational and training programs that aimed to "foster an assertive, warfighting culture," adding that Space Force members — known as Guardians — "must see themselves as warfighters and project a war-winning ethos."
While Galbreath and Reeves praised the "three tenets of Competitive Endurance" — avoiding operational surprise, denying first-mover advantage, and undertaking responsible counter-space campaigning — they said the theory did not "normalize space as a warfighting domain" or allow Guardians to "pursue victory and space superiority," which they said made it difficult for the public and Congress to grasp its military importance.
"If this loophole is not addressed, the Space Force and U.S. Space Command could find itself in a death spiral of waning support and funding, ultimately precluding the fielding of capabilities and conducting of operations necessary to secure U.S. interests in space," they added.
A Space Force spokesperson told Business Insider that "as China and Russia accelerate the development of counter-space capabilities, the need for a well-resourced Space Force has never been more critical."
"Our Guardians remain committed to ensuring space superiority while safeguarding the long-term stability and sustainability of the domain," they said.
Maj. Gen. Timothy Sejba, commander of Space Training and Readiness Command (STARCOM), said in 2023 that a warfighting mindset was vital to the USSF's work.
Speaking to attendees at the Air & Space Forces Association's 2023 Air, Space & Cyber Conference, Sejba, then Brigadier General, said that STARCOM's mission was to instill the warfighting mindset in every Space Force recruit.
"Even though the Space Force is only four years old, we've built the warfighting mindset for almost 40 years," he said, adding that he thought it was "critical" for the force to train "like we potentially have to fight in the future."
"I think that exists in other domains and other services, but it's one that we just haven't necessarily had to put into place for space in the past," he added.
Officials have long warned of growing international threats facing the US in the space domain.
In an interview with Politico in October, Gen. B. Chance Saltzman, the Chief of Space Operations, said China was developing counter-space capabilities at a "mind-boggling" pace and was of particular concern for the US.
John Plumb, a former assistant secretary of defense for space policy, also warned in 2023 of the increasing quantity and quality of global counter-space threats.
Plumb pointed to China fielding ground-based counter-space weapons and Russia developing its own systems designed at "degrading and denying US space-based services."
"Our competitors have watched us, they have learned from us, they've stolen from us, and they have developed capabilities to hold us at risk. But they are not ready for us. They're not ready for us today," he said.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
3 Ways Trump's Tariffs Affect Prices Even After Rollbacks
President Donald Trump recently reduced tariffs on 'de minimis' packages, shipments worth less than $800 from China, from 120% to 54%, giving American shoppers a little relief. Despite these rollbacks, consumers shouldn't expect immediate relief at the checkout counter. Read More: Find Out: According to experts, here are the different ways Trump's tariffs will affect product prices even after rollbacks. One of the reasons prices may remain high even after rollbacks lies in retailers' existing inventory. The products sitting on store shelves were likely imported under older, higher rates. That means retailers are still passing this cost to consumers. 'Trump rolling back tariffs at this time doesn't guarantee that things would no longer be expensive for millions of Americans,' said Aaron Razon, personal finance expert at Couponsnake. 'Retailers would continue to pass on the tariff cost from their previous inventory down to consumers in order to stay profitable, and this will keep prices up for consumers.' Retail companies, including Walmart, Best Buy, Adidas, and Stanley Black & Decker, among others, have issued warnings of raising prices due to Trump tariffs, according to a CNN report. The impact on pricing adjustments extends beyond retailers' existing inventory until negotiations with China reach a conclusive agreement. Try This: Not all products will face the same tariff pressure. The complexity of manufacturing and global supply chains means certain products face persistent price pressures even after tariff reductions. 'The more complex a product is and the more it depends on components from different countries, the more it is subject to price increases due to tariffs,' said Julia Khandoshko, CEO of Mind Money. 'For example, microelectronics, which is assembled from many parts imported from all over the world, will be at the greatest risk of rising prices.' This complexity will likely be an ongoing challenge for manufacturers who rely on multiple imported parts from different countries, which could lead to delays in deliveries and higher costs for consumers. The 120% to 54% tariff drop might seem like a huge relief for shoppers, but in reality, it's still extremely high for millions of Americans. For this reason, consumers may not notice much relief at the checkout line. 'The truth is that a 54% tariff is still a significant burden,' added Razon. 'This exposes them to the danger of a false sense of security that the rollback on tariffs is a significant relief when, in reality, it's not. Consumers would continue to feel the strain of higher prices.' More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 6 Big Shakeups Coming to Social Security in 2025 10 Cars That Outlast the Average Vehicle This article originally appeared on 3 Ways Trump's Tariffs Affect Prices Even After Rollbacks
Time Magazine
24 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Trump's Parade Can't Cover Up How He Made America Weaker
On June 14, a 'big beautiful' military parade will make its way through the streets of Washington. Officially, it commemorates the U.S. Army's 250th birthday, a milestone worthy of recognition. But it also happens to fall on President Trump's 79th birthday. The pageantry will not only honor Army history, it will serve as a made-for-television moment to reinforce the image of a president who claims to have restored American strength. Staged just days after he federalized National Guard troops and readied Marines for deployment to Los Angeles in response to immigration protests, the parade is meant to showcase ' lethality ' and to fulfill Trump's long-held vision of tanks moving down the capital's broad avenues. The estimated cost: $25 to 45 million, although that could increase significantly if the tanks cause damage to DC's roads. But real strength isn't measured by parades. It's measured by whether the United States is more secure, our alliances stronger, and our adversaries more constrained. On that front, the picture is far less celebratory. China's military expansion is accelerating. Its navy is now the world's largest. Its presence in cyberspace, space, and critical infrastructure continues to grow. U.S. rhetoric hasn't slowed Beijing—if anything, it has only deepened its resolve. The Commission on the National Defense Strategy, which I chaired, reached the unanimous bipartisan conclusion that America's defense industrial base is too slow and too fragile to keep pace with global demands. It is not keeping up with China's rapid military buildup and would struggle to support the demands of a sustained conflict—especially in multiple theaters. Defense Secretary Hegseth recently delivered a forceful speech on the Indo-Pacific in Singapore, but his focus at home has been on fighting culture wars, eliminating diversity initiatives, and now overseeing the deployment of federal troops in U.S. cities. The Trump Administration's stated goal is to refocus the Pentagon on lethality, but in practice, these efforts have become a distraction from that mission. Meanwhile, our trade policies are alienating the very allies we need to help push back on China. In Ukraine, President Trump once promised to end the war in a day. That promise feels farther away than ever. Despite the administration's efforts to work toward a cease-fire, Russia has stepped up both its aerial bombardment and ground offensives. This week alone, it launched nearly 500 drones and missiles in a single night—the largest such barrage since the war began. At the same time, Ukraine has launched its own deep strikes inside Russia, including recent drone attacks on military airfields. Meanwhile, the most recent peace talks yielded little more than a prisoner exchange and the administration continues to pull back from a conflict that once galvanized the West. A bipartisan Senate bill to impose secondary sanctions on Russia's enablers has more than 80 co-sponsors, but it's stalled. And Russian President Vladimir Putin is watching. In Gaza, cease-fire talks remain stuck, while hostages remain captive and the humanitarian situation teeters on the brink. Hamas demands a permanent truce; Israel insists on a temporary pause. Negotiators haven't bridged the divide. Trump's broader vision for the region, anchored in Saudi-Israel normalization, is now on ice. Riyadh isn't moving forward without a credible path for Palestinians. And Trump's relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, once central to his regional strategy, has frayed. Then there's Iran. Nearly a decade ago, the Trump Administration withdrew from the nuclear deal negotiated by President Barack Obama, promising to replace it with something tougher and more durable. That alternative never materialized. Now, the administration is advancing a new proposal that would allow Iran to continue enriching uranium at low levels in the short term, while negotiations proceed on a broader agreement to eventually halt all enrichment on Iranian soil. But Iran insists it will never give up that right. This week, the International Atomic Energy Agency formally censured Iran for failing to disclose nuclear activities—its first such resolution in 20 years. Tehran has condemned the move and vowed to expand enrichment. Trump has said he is 'less confident' a deal is within reach. Meanwhile, Iran's stockpile of near-weapons-grade uranium continues to grow, Israeli officials are openly weighing military options, and the United States is evacuating diplomats and military families from Iraq due to rising tensions. It's hard to see what's been gained. For all the noise and bluster coming out of Washington, the United States today feels anything but strong. Instead, we are alienating allies, retreating from international commitments, and projecting uncertainty. Trump's attempts to convey otherwise ring hollow. Which brings us back to the parade. The Army's 250 years of service deserve deep respect. Its soldiers have defended not just our territory, but the democratic values we aspire to uphold. But if this administration truly wants to project American strength, it should focus less on optics and more on outcomes. From Eastern Europe to the South China Sea, our adversaries are asserting themselves. Our alliances are under pressure. And we are stepping back from the principles of freedom and liberty we once championed. So it's a bit strange, then, to stage a parade. At a time when American power feels diminished and uncertain, the spectacle may land differently than intended. The world may see it as a performance—and the birthday boy may not like the reviews.
Axios
24 minutes ago
- Axios
No Kings protest expected to draw 2,000 people
Protesters are gathering at the Iowa State Capitol on Saturday for what is expected to be the largest single-day anti-Trump demonstration since the beginning of his second administration. The big picture: The widespread No Kings movement will run counter to President Trump's multimillion-dollar military parade in Washington. Interest in the nationwide protests has risen since the Trump administration's crackdown on protesters in Los Angeles. Driving the news: Around 2,000 people are expected to attend the Des Moines event, based on registrations as of Wednesday, per Des Moines organizer Lori Hunt. Indivisible Iowa is supporting over 20 No Kings protests across the state. Zoom in: Hunt said she expects nonviolent protests. Volunteers are being trained for situational awareness and deescalation. Des Moines Police Sgt. Paul Parizek told Axios the department has a team in place to respond Saturday if needed. Hunt said event organizers are not coordinating with DMPD. State of play: Speakers include Charlie Wishman from Federation of Labor, Joe Henry with LULAC, Sue Dinsdale with ICAN and Iowa Rep. Rob Johnson (D–Des Moines). Hunt said the plan is to gather at the west terrace, and people can park in surrounding free lots, like the Capitol Complex parking garage. The event runs from 12pm to 2pm. Zoom out: Trump's military parade will be on June 14, the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary and his 79th birthday, achieving his long-held desire to march a parade of soldiers through the capital. The other side: "President Trump earned the support of 77 million Americans and won Iowa by a commanding margin, that's democracy in action," Iowa Republican Party spokesperson Jade Cichy shared in an email. "The protests we're seeing aren't organic. They're funded by dark money groups and designed to distract from the Democrats' sinking poll numbers and lack of a serious agenda." What they're saying: Hunt said she and other organizers are not receiving dark money.
