logo
University of Minnesota men's hockey coach Bob Motzko to lead Team USA in world junior championship

University of Minnesota men's hockey coach Bob Motzko to lead Team USA in world junior championship

CBS News16-04-2025
Gophers men's hockey coach Bob Motzko will lead the 2026 U.S. National Junior Team, USA Hockey announced on Tuesday.
Motzko recently finished his seventh season as head coach of the men's ice hockey team at the University of Minnesota, where he led the team to the NCAA national tournament for five consecutive years. Before that, he was the head coach at St. Cloud State University for 13 seasons.
This will be Motzko's second time leading the national junior hockey team, coaching them to gold and bronze at the 2017 and 2018 IIHF World Junior Championships, respectively.
"We're fortunate to have someone with Bob's level of experience coaching our team on home soil," John Vanbiesbrouck, general manager of Team USA, said. "Having guided our teams to medals on two other occasions in the World Juniors, he knows what it takes to have success, and we're excited to have him leading our team."
Motzko, as a collegiate head coach, holds the all-time record of 437-274-70 with 13 trips to the NCAA tournament, including three NCAA Frozen Four appearances. He was named the top coach in all NCAA Division I men's ice hockey for the 2022-2023 season and has been named conference
coach of the year
seven times.
The 2026 U.S. National Junior Team will play in the IIHF World Junior Hockey Championship in St. Paul and Minneapolis. The tournament starts Dec. 26 and is expected to conclude Jan. 5, 2026.
The U.S. will go into the 2026 IIHF World Junior Championship as two-time defending gold medalists, competing against Germany, Slovakia, Sweden and Switzerland in the Group A preliminary round at
Xcel Energy Center
in St. Paul. The preliminary round for Group B, which includes Canada, Czechia, Denmark, Finland and Latvia, will be at the 3M Arena in Minneapolis.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A resilient Skye Blakely returns at Xfinity U.S. Gymnastics Championships
A resilient Skye Blakely returns at Xfinity U.S. Gymnastics Championships

NBC Sports

timean hour ago

  • NBC Sports

A resilient Skye Blakely returns at Xfinity U.S. Gymnastics Championships

There was a time last summer when Skye Blakely, toting crutches after surgery, reflected with her parents about how well she competed at the 2024 U.S. Gymnastics Championships a month or two earlier. Blakely finished runner-up to Simone Biles at those nationals, confirming she was a bona fide contender for the five-woman Paris Olympic team. Three weeks later, Blakely ruptured her right Achilles' tendon while training on floor exercise, two days before the Olympic Trials. She underwent season-ending surgery. 'Just talking about the feeling of how I competed at (2024 U.S.) Championships — I was very free, I was very relaxed, and I was having fun,' Blakely recalled. 'That was a newer kind of feeling for me. I don't always compete like that. 'They (mom Stephanie and dad Steven) were just like, 'You see how well you did, and you're still talking about how (much) more you have to give. Allow that to drive you for this next Olympics.'' Blakely returns to elite gymnastics competition for the first time in 14 months at this week's Xfinity U.S. Championships. Nick Zaccardi, She plans to do strictly balance beam and uneven bars, eschewing vault and floor for now. She is working toward returning to all-around competition in 2026. Even without doing all four events, she can still be chosen for this October's World Championships, which include individual events only. The four women for worlds will be decided at a selection competition in early autumn, though results at nationals will also play a role in committee picks. Blakely's young senior career — she is 20 years old, coming off her freshman year at Florida — has already been defined by perseverance. At the Tokyo Olympic Trials, she tore an elbow ligament warming up for vault, her first event. Blakely underwent Tommy John surgery, then came back to earn places on world championship-winning U.S. teams in 2022 and 2023. In 2024, Blakely could have been the first-timer on an Olympic team otherwise full of veterans (Simone Biles, Suni Lee, Jade Carey, Jordan Chiles). Instead, she could be the experienced rookie in 2028. A day after the Achilles tear, she posted, 'I'm devastated and heartbroken but I believe everything happens for a reason. I was so close to reaching my dream but this injury was unavoidable. I had an amazing season that I am extremely grateful for. the plans we have for ourselves aren't always the plans God has for us. I'm going to keep my chin high and be proud of the statement I have made for myself these past couple years. I'll be back.' Blakely, a Texan who started gymnastics at age 3, matriculated at Florida later last summer. She told coaches with determination that she planned to make it through physical rehab and be available for the first meet of the NCAA season in January 2025. 'There were some people who were like, 'I don't think you will compete. We're not sure if you will or be ready,'' she said. 'I was like, 'I'm going to be ready.'' On Jan. 10, Blakely mounted the bars minutes after older sister Sloane did in front of about 6,000 people at the O'Connell Center. She scored 9.725 in Florida's season-opening meet. #Gators freshman Skye Blakely's first collegiate routine … Not bad for where she was less than 200 days ago … Blakely's original plan was to make the 2024 Olympics and move on from elite gymnastics. But as she saw others go to college and then return to elite successfully — like Lee, Carey and Chiles — Blakely revised her thinking. 'Right after I got hurt, I was like, I'm going for 2028,' she said. Blakely began to feel like her old self in June. Through physical therapy, she had overcome weakness in her calf and discomfort in her heel after the NCAA season, which her surgeon had told her to expect. The next three years will be about progression, from getting her skills back to developing into a seasoned NCAA competitor. Come 2028, she can become the first U.S. female gymnast to make her first Olympic team off qualifying for her third Olympic Trials since Kelly Garrison in 1988. 'That kept me motivated, knowing how close I was to making the team, knowing how ready I was,' she said. 'The injury keeping me back from making that team just motivates me more.'

NCAA Tournament expansion was tabled, but we should still scrutinize how the field is picked
NCAA Tournament expansion was tabled, but we should still scrutinize how the field is picked

New York Times

time5 hours ago

  • New York Times

NCAA Tournament expansion was tabled, but we should still scrutinize how the field is picked

The main reason a majority of college basketball fans did not want the NCAA Tournament field expanded is that they did not see a need for more middling high-major teams getting additional at-large bids. They got their wish on Monday, at least for now. The tournament will remain at 68 teams in 2026; however, conversations about whether to expand to 72 or 76 in 2027 will continue. Currently, the tournament selection committee uses a collection of different data sets — both resume and metric-based — to select and seed the field. How they weigh each is subjective. Ken Pomeroy, a leading analytic voice who runs the popular rankings site believes there should be a more objective means of selecting the field and sees the Wins Above Bubble (WAB) metric as the fairest way to do so. Unlike his rankings and the NET, WAB does not factor in scoring margin. Advertisement Essentially, it's a team's record compared to the expected win total of a team on the bubble playing that team's schedule. Had the field been expanded to 76 last year, these would have been the eight teams added by WAB: West Virginia, Indiana, Wake Forest, San Francisco, Boise State, UC Irvine, Ohio State and George Mason. Four more places for power-conference teams, but four for mid-majors who did not win their conference tournaments as well. 'I don't know if that's perfect, but it's much closer to perfection than the current process,' said Pomeroy, who added that the current setup dings a mid-major team that 'racks up a bunch of wins that aren't Quad 1 wins or aren't Quad 2 wins.' 'They're playing (more) Quad 3 teams on the road, and if you win 30 of those games, it's actually pretty impressive,' he said. Even if the selection committee continues to choose teams using its current criteria, an expanded tournament would present opportunities for mid-majors. I looked at the last five tournaments, using Bart Torvik's sorting tool to pull the top eight non-tourney teams in the NET, the top eight with the highest average resume ranking and the top eight with the highest average quality rating. Every year, there were two to five teams outside of the power conferences that would have been in consideration. Most likely, one or two of those teams would have made an expanded field each season. One negative of expansion could be forcing more of these mid-major at-large teams to the play-in round (currently known as the First Four), which has lacked the fanfare of the Round of 64 since its creation in 2011. In the past, the committee has pushed most conference tourney winners — with the exception of four 16 seeds — into the field of 64. I'd propose they take that a step further to protect the mid-majors who earn their way in with great regular seasons: If you won your conference's regular-season title, you are also exempt from the play-in round. Advertisement Another argument against expansion is that it would devalue the regular season. Pomeroy argues it will have the opposite effect. With more teams on the bubble, more teams would play meaningful games down the stretch. In a 76-team tournament, only 52 teams would automatically make the field of 64, compared to 60 now. It makes it more difficult to get a bye to Thursday and Friday, so even some of the teams safely 'in' will have more at stake. The pro-expansion view is that it's necessary because of the growth of the sport. Since 1985, when the field grew from 53 to 64, the number of Division I teams has expanded by almost 100. The counterargument is that adding teams to Division I should not mean adding teams to the tournament, because those teams are low- or mid-majors who aren't competing for at-large spots. But there have been breakthroughs. Florida Atlantic joined DI in 1993-94 and has made a Final Four. UC San Diego, in its first year of tourney eligibility in 2025, was a top-40 team at KenPom. Had the Tritons not won the Big West tournament, they likely would have been excluded from a 68-team field, similar to Indiana State's snub in 2024. But with an expanded field, they likely would have made it. Those of us who love college basketball see Selection Sunday and the first two days of the tournament as holidays, and the tournament captures the attention of the casual fan because almost everyone fills out a bracket. The sanctity of the 64-team bracket, a model that feels like perfection, likely wouldn't actually go anywhere with expansion. Just like when the field expanded to 65 and then 68, 64 teams would likely still tip off Thursday and Friday. Adding more teams would make it slightly harder to immediately fill out a bracket because of an expanded play-in round. But is that really going to stop people from filling out brackets? Advertisement And it's the great games, moments and upsets that make the tournament so popular. It's Valparaiso and Bryce Drew hitting a miracle shot to beat Ole Miss. It's UMBC over Virginia. It's George Mason and Florida Atlantic to the Final Four. It's the parity! 'Teams that you've never heard of can beat really good teams on any given night, and that's what makes it great,' Pomeroy said. Now, if the presidents at the big schools and power-conference commissioners find a way to drive out those smaller schools altogether, then yes, they will be taking the soul of the NCAA Tournament. That's worth fighting against. But if it's nostalgia that makes you hate expansion, that fight was lost when the first play-in games were created. And if you don't like watching those games on Tuesday and Wednesday, then just ignore them and tune in on Thursday. The magic wouldn't go anywhere. A few more teams would just have a chance to make the field. The energy should be spent making sure the mid-majors have a fair crack at those spots.

NCAA Basketball Tournaments Will Remain At 68 Teams In 2026
NCAA Basketball Tournaments Will Remain At 68 Teams In 2026

Forbes

time18 hours ago

  • Forbes

NCAA Basketball Tournaments Will Remain At 68 Teams In 2026

After recently contemplating expanding the NCAA men's and women's basketball tournament fields starting in 2026, the events will continue to have 68 teams next year. However, Dave Gavitt, the NCAA's senior vice president of basketball, said in a statement on Monday that the organization's tournament committees will continue having conversations about increasing the events to 72 or 76 teams beginning in 2027. The men's tournament has had 68 teams since 2011 when the NCAA introduced the 'First Four' games where eight teams play each other on a Tuesday in March. The winners are slotted into the 64-team bracket, which begins two days later. The tournament previously had 65 teams since 2001. The women's tournament, meanwhile, had 64 teams from 1994 through 2021. It has featured 68 teams the past four seasons. Gavitt's announcement on Monday occurred less than a month after he said on July 10 that it was 'still viable' that the tournament could expand to 72 or 76 teams next year. He added at the time that the NCAA Division 1 men's basketball committee met that week in Savannah, Ga., while the women's basketball committee gathered in Philadelphia. While both groups discussed expansion, Gavitt said 'no decision or recommendation was made.' Charlie Baker, the NCAA's president and former Massachusetts governor, told reporters at a Big 12 Conference meeting in May that the NCAA was having 'good conversations' with CBS Sports and Turner Sports, which televise the men's tournament, and ESPN, which airs the women's tournament. Baker, though, said that there is 'a lot of logistical work' that goes into expanding the tournament. As it currently stands, the postseason champions of each of the 31 Division 1 men's and women's conferences earn a berth in the NCAA tournament, while the other 37 slots are chosen by a selection committee. Most of the at-large berths come from the so-called Power Four conferences of the Big 12, Big Ten Conference, Atlantic Coast Conference and Southeastern Conference, as well as the Big East Conference. For instance, only four men's teams (New Mexico, San Diego State, Utah State and Saint Mary's) and three women's teams (Richmond, Columbia and Princeton) outside of those five leagues received at-large berths in this year's tournament. None of those six teams made it past the second round. While the expansion could lead to more teams outside of the power conferences getting tournament bids, the committee could also continue to reward teams from the major leagues that finish in the middle or near the lower half of their conference standings. Those details will be ironed out over the coming months and years, but the fields will remain at 68 teams, at least for one more year. The 2026 NCAA men's tournament begins on March 17 and concludes with the national title game on April 6 in Indianapolis, while the women's tournament starts on March 18 and ends with the championship on April 5 in Phoenix. Florida is the reigning men's national champion, overcoming a 12-point second half deficit and defeating Houston, 65-63, in the national title game. The Gators return a few players, including forwards Alex Condon (10.6 points and 7.5 rebounds in 24.9 minutes per game last season) and Thomas Haugh (9.8 points and 6.1 rebounds in 24.4 minutes per game), and add several newcomers, including transfer guards Xaivian Lee (Princeton) and Boogie Fland (Arkansas). Lee averaged 16.9 points, 6.1 rebounds and 5.5 assists per game as a junior last season, while Fland averaged 13.5 points and 5.1 assists per game as a freshman last season even though he missed about two months after undergoing surgery on his right thumb. Meanwhile, the University of Connecticut won the women's national title in April, defeating South Carolina, 82-59, in the final. The Huskies return three starters in forward Sarah Strong (16.4 points and 8.9 rebounds per game last season), guard Azzi Fudd (13.6 points per game) and center Jana El Alfy (5.0 points and 5.1 rebounds per game). They also signed transfers Kayleigh Heckel, a guard who averaged 6.1 points per game as a USC freshman last season, and forward Serah Williams, an incoming senior who averaged 19.2 points and 9.8 rebounds per game last season at Wisconsin. Williams was a first team All-Big Ten selection the past two seasons.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store