Students full of questions about cellphone ban in North Dakota schools
North Dakota student leaders say they have a lot of unanswered questions after lawmakers passed a law requiring schools to be cellphone-free.
Members of the Superintendent of Public Instruction's Student Cabinet met Wednesday in Bismarck to discuss new legislation that will affect students.
Senate Bill 2354, which takes effect Aug. 1, prohibits public school students from having access to cellphones and other electronic devices in school from 'bell to bell.'
But the students raised a lot of questions lawmakers may not have considered. Some students said laptops provided by schools are 'horrible' and wondered if they could continue using personal laptops to do school work.
Another student said she views digital versions of her textbooks on a tablet so she doesn't have to carry heavy textbooks all day.
Yet another student said she'll miss using her phone to access the digital calendar she uses to keep track of homework, after-school practices and appointments.
'I see a lot of uncertainties with a lot of the exceptions the students were bringing up,' said Bridger Rivinius, a junior at Gackle-Streeter Public School. 'I feel like it might be a slight overreach for the state government to have to be involved with that.'
Gov. Kelly Armstrong was among the supporters of the bill. He has said it will help the next generation of students emotionally and academically.
Gov. Armstrong advocates for eliminating student cellphone use in public schools
The law requires cellphones to be silenced and stowed away in an inaccessible location during the school day. It gives school boards flexibility to craft their own policies around school-related noninstructional time, such as dances and sporting events.
It also mandates that school districts collect data to measure the impact of the new policy on student behavior, mental health, disciplinary incidents, school attendance and academic performance.
Gwyn Marback, a facilitator for the student Cabinet, said she expects there will be some 'fumbles' as school boards try to address issues with their new policies.
'They (state lawmakers) didn't think of everything,' Marback said. 'Hopefully, there's common sense when things arise.'
Sophia Johnson, a sophomore at Bismarck Legacy High School, said her school has an open campus policy that allows students to leave school during lunch or a free period, which could be an issue in implementing the policy at her school.
'It might be a bit of a disaster,' Johnson said. 'We have the open campus and we really want to focus on the 21st Century learning and that involves using our phones.'
She said some courses, such as media class, require students to use their phones to participate.
'All of that stuff is going to be really inhibited by this,' Johnson said. 'It really should be up to the teachers because they know their students the best. They know what's happening in their classrooms and they know how to work their students.'
Aidan Pelton, a senior at Watford City High School, said his school already implemented a zero tolerance cellphone policy. He said kids still have their phones in school, but fewer than before the policy was implemented.
'I like the bill. I just think there's going to be a lot of problems with it,' Pelton said. 'I don't really love the less control at the school level. But, I think it is overall a good thing to have no phones in schools.'
Addyson Rademacher-Nyame, an eighth grader at Mandan Middle School, testified in favor of the legislation at the Capitol. She said she finds it encouraging that each school board will be able to craft its own policy.
'It's going to be very interesting, especially this first try. It's going to be good to see the positive and negative results of it right away,' Rademacher-Nyame said.
She said legislative fixes might be needed during the 2027 session to address problems that arise from implementing the bill.
'Every school in North Dakota is different,' she said. 'I want to see every angle about how every school developed and adapted to this bill and we'll go from there.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Speaker Johnson vows to fight California Democrats' ‘illegal power grab'
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) slammed California Democrats' proposed House map on Monday, saying he's taking measures to stop the new congressional lines from advancing. 'Democrats across the nation have played politics with redistricting for decades, and this is just the latest example. Republicans who are following state and federal laws will not be lectured by people who abused the system,' Johnson wrote in a statement on the social platform X. 'I have instructed the NRCC to use every measure and resource possible to fight the California Democrats' illegal power grab,' he continued, referring to the House Republicans' campaign arm. 'I will continue to lead efforts to defend our House Republican incumbents and grow our majority so that we can continue to deliver on our commonsense, America First agenda.' California Democrats proposed a new set of congressional lines on Friday, which aim to neutralize the gains Texas is expected to make with their new proposed House map. Because the Golden State uses an independent redistricting commission to draw its House map, Democrats are looking to place the map before voters in a special election this November to get around the redistricting commission and do a mid-decade redrawing of their House maps. The moves in California came in response to Texas, as the White House has pushed the Lone Star State and other GOP states to redraw their House maps ahead of 2026. Republicans are bracing for a challenging midterm environment and are looking to offset potential losses next year. Unlike California, Texas only needs to pass new maps through the state legislature before it heads to Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) for his signature. Democrats have argued they need to do redistricting in response to Texas, saying their party has to fight fire with fire. Both parties have been criticized for taking the opportunity to redraw their House maps and both have been guilty of gerrymandering. Johnson is not the only Republican who's signaled he's against California's move. Former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R), who championed redistricting reform when he was in office, also indicated on X he was gearing up to fight the Golden State's proposed map. The Hill has reached out to a spokesperson for Newsom for comment. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Speaker Johnson vows to fight California Democrats' ‘illegal power grab'
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) slammed California Democrats' proposed House map on Monday, saying he's taking measures to stop the new congressional lines from advancing. 'Democrats across the nation have played politics with redistricting for decades, and this is just the latest example. Republicans who are following state and federal laws will not be lectured by people who abused the system,' Johnson wrote in a statement on X. 'I have instructed the NRCC to use every measure and resource possible to fight the California Democrats' illegal power grab,' he continued, referring to the House Republicans' campaign arm. 'I will continue to lead efforts to defend our House Republican incumbents and grow our majority so that we can continue to deliver on our commonsense, America First agenda.' California Democrats proposed a new set of congressional lines on Friday, which aim to neutralize the gains Texas is expected to make with their new proposed House map. Because the Golden State uses an independent redistricting commission to draw its House map, Democrats are looking to place the map before voters in a special election this November to get around the redistricting commission and do a mid-decade redrawing of their House maps. The moves in California came in response to Texas, as the White House has pushed the Lone Star State and other GOP states to redraw their House maps ahead of 2026. Republicans are bracing for a challenging midterm environment and are looking to offset potential losses next year. Unlike California, Texas only needs to pass new maps through the state legislature before it heads to Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) for his signature. Democrats have argued they need to do redistricting in response to Texas, saying their party has fight fire with fire. Both parties have been criticized for taking the opportunity to redraw their House maps and both have been guilty of gerrymandering. Johnson is not the only Republican who's signaled he's against California's move. Former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R), who championed redistricting reform when he was in office, also indicated on X he was gearing up to fight the Golden State's proposed map.
News24
4 hours ago
- News24
South Korea President Lee Jae Myung hints at restart of North Korea relations
South Korean President Lee Jae Myung ordered his cabinet to prepare to implement existing agreements with North Korea. Lee intends to restore a 2018 agreement that has since fallen apart to suspend some military activity. Lee has pledged to pursue dialogue with the nuclear-armed North without preconditions. South Korean President Lee Jae Myung, who has been seeking to improve strained relations with Pyongyang, ordered his cabinet on Monday to prepare a partial step-by-step implementation of existing agreements with North Korea. Lee did not specify which agreements he was referring to, but the president said on Friday that Seoul intends to restore a 2018 agreement that has since fallen apart to suspend some military activity along the border with North Korea. 'Relations between South and North Korea are crucial in order to protect the national interests of South Korea and expand the space to operate diplomatically in the face of rapidly changing external conditions,' Lee said during a cabinet meeting on Monday. 'Relevant ministries, please prepare for phased implementation of existing inter-Korean agreements starting from wherever possible.' Since entering office in June, Lee's government has sought to improve relations between neighbours still technically at war, though so far top North Korean officials have dismissed in state media overtures taken by the liberal president. AFP reported that on Friday, Lee vowed to 'respect' North Korea's political system and build 'military trust', a day after Pyongyang said it had no interest in improving relations with Seoul. Ahn Young-joon/Pool/AFP Lee has pledged to pursue dialogue with the nuclear-armed North without preconditions since his election in June, a reversal from his hawkish predecessor. He said the South Korean government 'will take consistent measures to substantially reduce tensions and restore trust' with the North. 'We affirm our respect for the North's current system,' he said at an event marking the anniversary of liberation from Japanese rule, adding that Seoul had 'no intention of engaging in hostile acts'. 'I hope that North Korea will reciprocate our efforts to restore trust and revive dialogue,' Lee said. 'North and South are not enemies.' North Korean leader Kim Jong Un's sister, Kim Yo Jong, said the North has 'no will to improve relations' with the South. She also denied reports that North Korea was removing propaganda loudspeakers.
